The body is the visible mind. The body is the form of eternity.

Topics include: | mental psychology | theistic psychology | scientific dualism | Emanuel Swedenborg | immortality | God | eternal marriage | heaven and hell | reductionism in neuroscience | theistic science | dreams | consciousness | regeneration | spiritual development | rationality | love and truth | body-mind correspondences | virtual intersubjectivity | vertical community | dying/resuscitation process |

Avatar Psychology
and

Mental Anatomy

Exploring the Mental World of Eternity

 

Dr. Leon James (leon@hawaii.edu)

Professor, Psychology Department, University of Hawaii

With the collaboration of Dr. Diane Nahl (nahl@hawaii.edu)

Professor, Information and Computer Sciences, University of Hawaii

 

April 2009, Version 67, Electronic book in progress

For a background and context to this book, please see this previous online book: 
The Organic Mind: Discovering the Mental World of Eternity (2008) by Leon James:
http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/mental-psychology-p1.htm

Table of Contents

Introduction. 1

What is Mental Anatomy. 2

Table of Correspondences between Physical Space and Mental Space. 4

What is Avatar Psychology. 6

The Mental Sun of Eternity. 14

Affective and Circulatory Systems. 18

Cognitive and Respiratory Systems. 20

Neuro-Muscular and Sensorimotor Systems. 20

Synergy between the Physical Body and the Mental Body. 21

Explanation of Diagram 9. 22

Discovering the Mental World of Eternity. 23

Managing Our Eternity. 26

God’s Management Techniques: 29

The Laws of Providence and Permissions. 29

Regeneration and the Divine Psychologist. 35

Why This Is a Perfect World Despite Evil 40

The Vertical Community. 45

Where Do Thoughts Come From?. 50

Our Anatomical Roots in the Vertical Community. 55

Propositions of Mental Psychology. 57

Anatomical Diagrams. 78

Diagram 1: Schematic Representation of a Human Being. 79

Diagram 2: Schematic Representation of Male and Female Anatomy. 80

Diagram 3: Two Stages of Male-Female Unity. 81

Diagram 4: Formation of Man and Woman as Reciprocal Units. 82

Diagram 5: Male and Female Anatomy, Part 2. 83

Diagram, 6: The Vertical Community. 84

Diagram 7: Anatomy of the Mental Body (celestial, rational, material). 85

Diagram 8 – Table Listing the Mental Bodies. 86

Diagram 9: Synergy between the Physical Body and Mental Body. 87

Diagram 10: Immediate and Mediate Influx. 88

Diagram 11: Consciousness Prior and After Regeneraiton. 89

Diagram 12: Mental Layers in Sequential and Simultaneous Order. 90

Diagram 13: Layers. 91

Diagram 14: Mental anatomy of Husband and Wife. 92

Diagram 15: Ascending and Descending Development. 93

Diagram 16: The 12 Anatomical Layers of Creation, Existence, and Reality. 94

Diagram 17: Three Phases of Marriage. 95

Diagram 18: Dual Citizenship. 96

Diagram 19: Birth, Death, and Eternity. 97

Diagram 20: Correspondences Between Physical and Mental Body Systems. 98

Diagram 21: Maturation and Development. 100

Diagram 22: Developmental Stages Before and After Death. 101

Diagram 23: Maturation and Regeneration of Consciousness. 102

Overall Explanations of the Diagrams. 103

Material Loves. 106

Rational Loves. 109

Material Thinking and Rational Thinking. 111

Metanoid Self-Witnessing and the Discovery of Sudden Memory. 113

The 12 Anatomical Layers of Existence and Reality. 118

Mental Content in Eternity. 121

Research Methodology in Mental Psychology. 123

Rational Psychology vs. Empirical Psychology. 127

In Summary. 134

Dualist Empiricism.. 137

Rational Psychology and Rational Methodology. 142

Celestial Loves and Consciousness. 147

Consciousness and Conscience. 149

Selfism vs. Altruism.. 151

Avatar Psychology and Neuroscience. 153

The Body as Mind or the Mind as Body. 153

Definition of Avatar. 158

The Seven Avatar Bodies. 160

I. Physical Body or Avatar. 164

II. Conscious Material Mental Body or Avatar. 166

III. The Dream Body or Avatar. 166

IV. Imagination-Fantasy Body or Avatar. 167

V. The Digital Body or Avatar. 169

VI. Rational Mental Body or Avatar. 171

VII. Celestial Mental Body or Avatar. 173

Anatomical Components of the Mental Body. 174

Diagram 8 – Table Listing the Mental Bodies. 178

Body-Mind Correspondences. 179

Readings in Body-Mind Correspondences – Reductionist. 180

Readings in Body-Mind Correspondences – Dualist. 180

The Virtual and the Actual 181

Discovering the Vertical Community. 183

What Dreams Are Made Of. 188

Consciousness and Intersubjectivity. 192

Social Forces and Group Dynamic Theory in the Virtual World. 200

The Classification of Interpersonal Attitudes. 201

Behavior Influence and Personality. 205

Neurosemantics. 205

Conflict: A Field Dynamic Concept. 211

Conflict: A Field-Dynamic Concept. 218

The Group as a Social Milieu. 218

Clique Structure in Groups. 222

Field Dynamic Theory. 224

Topological Features of Group Space. 226

Boundaries in Field Theory. 229

Multiple Membership in Groups. 233

Field Dynamic Theory. 236

Social Organization. 237

Role Behaviors. 239

Status: Role Position and Role Setting. 243

Communication Networks. 246

Social Organization. 248

Research Methodology in Avatar Psychology. 249

Virtual Intersubjectivity. 249

Second Life Affordances for Social Practices by Residents. 253

Observing Stages of Acculturation  in Becoming a Resident of Second Life. 255

Stage 1: Discovering the Noticing Practices. 257

Stage 2: Discovering the Appraising Practices. 259

Stage 3: Discovering the Value-Attaching Practices. 259

Stage 4: Discovering the Intentionality Practices. 260

Stage 5: Discovering the Planning Practices. 260

Stage 6: Discovering the Executing Practices. 260

Data Gathering Form Using the Model of Social-Biological Technology. 262

Avatar Psychology Self-Witnessing Report. 262

Social-Biological Features of Second Life Technology. 264

Organic Correspondences between Mental World and Virtual World. 270

Illustrative Research Project in Second Life. 272

Research Hypothesis 1. 272

Observations on Social Presence. 272

Observations on Mental Co-presence or Intersubjectivity. 273

Readings for Research Hypothesis 1. 273

Visual Observation of Typical Avatar Behavior. 274

Inventory of Avatar’s Abilities. 274

Sample Profile Statements. 274

Second Life Groups (sample). 285

Discourse Analysis of Chat. 287

Experimental Set Ups for Avatar Behavior Studies. 287

(End of Avatar Psychology text). 289

 

Please Note: You can use Control-click (instead of click) for all the Web links in this document. Using this option will cause the new document to open in a new window, and you won’t lose your place in this document when you resume. This is especially useful when you want to look at a diagram or chart while reading the text.

 

Introduction

 

On a clear day you can see forever
1970 Barbara Streisand movie and song

 

Avatar Psychology describes the relationship between the virtual world and the mental world.

Mental Anatomy describes the organic components of the immortal mental body that we each possess since birth.

 

What is Mental Anatomy

 

There is only one physical world. Space is everywhere in the physical world – between galaxies, between grains of sand, and between electrons inside neurons in the brain. It is the same space since space is unitary. All space forms one unit, one whole. Space cannot be divided. For instance, the objects around you are in space. They do not displace space as objects do when immersed in water. The space around you is the same space around anyone on this planet, or on any other planet in the physical world. The above facts or properties of physical space correspond exactly to the properties of mental space. There is only one mental world.

 

Your mental world and the mental world of the people around you is the same mental world. A person on another continent half way around the globe from you may not know that the physical space around them is the same space around you here. You may not have realized that your mental world is the same as other people’s mental world. We don’t realize this because our daily material thinking and consciousness is immersed in sensorimotor input and its physical sociotemporal limitations. We are most conscious of what is immediately around us, whether physical objects, or mental sensations, thoughts, and loves.

 

We can all elevate our consciousness to the rational plane of thinking which is independent of physical limits. Rational thinking and ideas allow us to become conscious of how the world as unit whole is organized into parts and layers that correspond and interact. These concepts are not available to our consciousness when we restrict our thinking to the material organization of the physical world.

 

In our daily life we tend to oscillate across the two layers of consciousness – material and rational. You can observe this alternation by consciously monitoring and keeping track of your thoughts as you carry out various habitual activities. When your thoughts are operating within the lower material limits, your consciousness is limited in scope, and often presents puzzles and contradictions that weaken our control over some situation. For instance, you just got a phone call indicating you didn’t get the job you applied for. Your affective system suddenly feels in turmoil. You feel that intense loves and emotions are activated in you and they engender a fury of thoughts that produce cognitive overload, confusion, and distorted thinking. You keep formulating the sentence, “How can this be?” You had such a good job interview. The man said you were on top of his list. You are conscious of a series of anxious feelings and negative moods. Now you feel depressed. Your stomach feels unpleasant. You hate that feeling. It makes you weak, like a victim and a loser, instead of a winner. You begin to swear. You throw things. You punch the wall. Someone walks in, says something, and you jump on the person, verbally attacking them, as if the situation is their fault, and they deserve punishment. That’s all you can think of doing. Your material consciousness is limited to the situation at hand.

 

Now a friend shows up. He understands. His consciousness is in a rational state and he can interact with you from there. He finds ways of reassuring you. He argues convincingly that being turned down for the job may have nothing to do with you. There are circumstances that are unknown to you. They dictate the choice for the job. He reminds you that the interviewer found you more than just adequate and gave you a high evaluation. He suggests that you might go back to see him for any openings that he might know of. You might even end up with a better job. Besides, nothing is random, he points out. For our lives to work at all, events must be completely lawful and rational, completely controlled by an omnipotent omnipresent God. So you begin to understand that being turned down for the job at this time is your destiny, your biography. Your task is to elevate your consciousness to a rational level so that you can get the bigger picture on yourself and life, and your future in eternity. Now you begin to feel hopeful. You begin to take up a rational view on your situation. Your consciousness is elevated when you switch to a rational mode of thinking.

 

If you cultivate this rational consciousness you will gradually minimize bad moods and feelings of inadequacy, and the deeply disturbing sense of a lack of control over your life.

 

Your thinking will be more rational. You will be able to see rationally that there is only one mental world, just as there is only one physical world, because the two correspond perfectly. Whatever is true of the one is also true of the other, but only in correspondence, not in direct terms. Consider the following table of correspondences between physical and mental space:

Table of Correspondences between Physical Space and Mental Space

PHYSICAL SPACE

MENTAL SPACE

Physical space provides a medium or space that contains physical objects like planets, plants, animals.

Mental space provides a medium or expanse that contains mental objects or states like loves, meanings, and sensations.

Physical space unifies all physical objects by containing them in itself. There exists only one physical world.

Mental space unifies all mental states or objects of all people by containing them in itself. There exists only one mental world.

Physical space provides physical contact or closeness between all objects by propinquity or propensity in interior structure or components.

Mental space provides mental contact or closeness with anyone and anywhere, present and past, by means of similarity of loves, ideas, and sensorimotor operations.

Physical space allows a physical geography within which displacement and travel is possible, allowing exploration of new grounds and areas. This allows access to new resources that are indigenous to each locale, and their use for construction of living structures, artifacts, and cities.

Mental space allows a mental geography within which our consciousness can navigate, and thus experience new sensations, new thoughts, and new loves that are proper to each mental zone. This allows the construction of mental communities with people who have similar and compatible loves, and consequently ideas.

Physical space allows an indefinite variety of objects, arrangements, structures, and properties of physical objects, their properties and uses.

Mental space allows an indefinite variety of experiences, meanings, principles, and values, consequently unique lives and personalities.

Gravity is the principal force in physical space. It pulls particles together to form objects, planets, and galaxies.

Love is the principal force in mental space. It binds people together to form couples, groups, and societies.

 

The above comparison list allows you to recognize the correspondences between physical and mental space. The idea of distance in mental space has to do with similarity of sensations, thoughts, and loves, and especially loves because thoughts and sensations are produced and determined by loves. Similar loves can be co-present within the same geographic space of consciousness in the mental world. Opposing loves cannot be co-present because they repel each other, like positive and negative electronic charges. Love for winning by cheating cannot be together with love for playing fairly.

 

Every feature of the physical body is matched by a corresponding feature in the mental body. This body-mind correspondence in all particulars provides mental psychology with a grounded empiricism and objectivity.

 

This anatomical methodology was lacking in the proposals of the influential cognitivists of the nineteenth and twentieth century, like Freud, Jung, Chomsky, or Lakoff. But it was present in the unique work of eighteenth century theistic scientist Swedenborg, as for instance in his book Rational Psychology (1742) and related works on brain anatomy.

 

The body-mind correspondences are a sub-part of the universal physical-mental correspondences that fix the dualist world into discrete layers in concentric circles around the mental sun of eternity. We can measure the physical world with various simple and complex physical instruments. Science in the negative bias mode of monism has succeeded over many centuries in constructing basic charts of the physical world at various levels of magnitude from neutrinos to galaxies, and from anatomy to biochemistry. These operations are objectively discovered correlations of events within the same discrete degree, namely the natural or physical world. This is the outermost layer or degree around the mental sun. The laws of correspondences between the natural and mental degrees provide a methodology for all theistic science (see the work dualist and theistic physicist, Dr. Ian Thompson, e.g., http://www.beginningtheisticscience.com/ || http://www.theisticscience.org/papers/smn3b.html || http://theisticscience.blogspot.com/ ).

 

Mental psychology, theistic psychology, and theistic science are among the new theistic dualist disciplines that are now being evolved by the founding generation. This new evolution of science makes room for rational methodologies based on correspondences. The modern literature on consciousness and neuroscience has not provided a fully successful proposal because of the bias of reductionism. This self-imposed limitation has resulted in charts and taxonomies of the neuro-muscular and bio-genetic systems of the physical body and its correlated operations. With theistic science and mental psychology it is possible to upgrade the research methodology from correlation to cause-effect relations. This new possibility has come to light through the unique work of Swedenborg.

 

 

What is Avatar Psychology

 

Avatar psychology describes how people in different physical locations have real interactions online with each other (see “distributed computing”) through an information produced digital avatar that sees and moves around in a virtual world populated with the avatars of other owners (sometimes called “players” or “users”). Each person uses and controls their own avatar in a “virtual” world that is displayed on the computer screen of each owner. Avatars can be made to look like any person, object or animal. In the virtual world of Second Life most avatars are humanoid and are made to look young, attractive, and well dressed. Avatars interact with each other in dyadic or group activities such as attending a lecture, visiting a museum or exhibit, shopping for avatar clothes in elegant malls, or dancing, skating, exploring grottos, etc. “Inworld” relationships in Second Life are formed on the basis of wanting to share interests, whether personal, recreational, professional, educational, artistic, or commercial. To communicate with each other through the avatar interface, owners type to each other in the local chat window or in instant messaging. There is also a voice chat facility that is used less often.

 

Avatar psychology examines various theoretical and practical issues of interest, as for instance:

Do features of one’s avatar transfer to the owner?

This has been reported by some owners regarding how they stand or walk with the physical body in “real” life. With the digital avatar body on screen, the manner of standing and walking can be controlled (or “customized”) by the “AO” or scripted “animations” and movements that owners can install, “wear,” or “attach” to their avatar in order to “override” the built in script that comes with all newly born avatars. Owners can also manage the avatar’s primary body shape and facial appearance, called the avatar’s “shape” and “skin.” Besides the primary facial features there are also animated facial expressions that can be managed through customized animation devices called HUDs that can be invisibly worn by the avatar. The older an avatar is the more it tends to be endowed with customized appearance and behavior. Through this process of customization every avatar acquires a quasi-unique appearance and behavior style that represents the human owner in some way. Others inworld can also notice the projected persona of each avatar in terms of behavioral interactions on screen as well as verbal interactions in local chat or voice chat.

 

It is possible that we are influenced in some way by how our avatar looks and the personality it projects inworld. The avatar’s personality is not fully in control of the owner because its behavior is partially a response to situations inworld. The owner’s performance of managing the avatar’s social presence is adaptive and spontaneous. Unexpected things happen around the avatar, and the owner reacts by engaging the affordances with the keyboard and mouse, such as moving the avatar towards or away some object, camera zooming in on an object, clicking on an object or avatar, typing in the local chat, or IMing an avatar (“instant messaging”). These behavioral actions are adaptive, and respond to practices of owners inworld, also called “Residents” of Second Life.

 

Due to this unpredictable and adaptive feature of avatar behavior, owners can be impressed by their own avatar. This applies to both appearance, movement, and personality or behavior style. For instance some avatars boldly approach another while others stay at some distance. When watching their own avatar owners can spontaneously take on features of their avatar’s walking, standing, and sitting style. They may not be fully aware that they are doing this, but once in a while they suddenly become conscious while their physical body is modeling their digital avatar.

 

It is also possible that our personality development can be enhanced in various ways by the virtual intersubjectivity we possess with our avatar. Our avatar becomes a second consciousness that is created by virtual loves and virtual ideas. There can be a seepage effect whereby the virtual reality and the physical reality become somewhat mixed up with each other.  

 

How are virtual loves and ideas different from real life loves and ideas?

An example of a virtual idea we can have is the idea of “buying a virtual luxury house,” which costs around five U.S. dollars in 2009, and inviting 20 friends from around the world to a party in your new house – and all this within a few hours (or less). Another virtual idea is to make the avatar look like a child and join a virtual family that has avatar parents and siblings, who are living together in a residence to which other avatars can “teleport” and visit. Romantic relationships and real life marriages can result from avatar relationships.

 

In what way is virtual consciousness different from real life consciousness?

Virtual consciousness is produced by virtual intersubjectivity, which can be defined as the mental co-presence that we can create with other human beings through our avatar bodies inworld. In face-to-face interactions with our physical body we establish mental co-presence by jointly defining the situation and what is going on. When several avatars are present in one inworld location they can establish a virtual group intersubjectivity that is embodied in the coordinated interactions, both visual and verbal (in chat). For example, if they are attending a lecture or class, the avatars collaborate in co-constructing that virtual event. One avatar (usually the host of the event) rezzes a platform with seating conveniences while the arriving avatars take turn arranging themselves on the chairs, which possess a script that makes the avatar sit in various positions and attitudes while being there.

 

All social events inworld are co-constructed by a group of avatar owners. Each avatar performs the action of turn-taking exchanges in such a way as to validate the shared meaning that is embodied in the details of the exchanges. These details can be uncovered and described by participants. For instance, as individual avatars arrive upon the scene of a gathering place, they are each inducted or incorporated into the group by greeting rituals in local chat. The avatars already present take turns greeting the arriving avatar, who returns the greetings or offers a comment. The initial greeting exchange requires the collaborative effort of those present. It is the overt interpersonal performance of these collaborative actions that constitutes the existence of the objective event in the virtual world.

 

This coordinated interplay serves as reassurance to all present that what is going on is indeed what each claims is going on, and what they as a group, jointly claim to each other that it is going on. For instance, an avatar can say, “Hi everyone. I can’t stay long.” Or, “Couldn’t be here last week. Missed you all.” This detail in the exchange validates the shared claim that this is a type of virtual social gathering that has occurred before with those present, and that members notice and keep track of when an avatar is present or absent. The same may be noticed with leave-taking rituals as avatars begin to leave or “teleport” out of the venue. The host avatar is usually the last to leave.

 

(REMINDER: if you use Control-click, instead of just a click, the page and diagram will open in a new window, and this is more convenient as you continue reading the text.)

Avatar psychology is closely related to mental psychology whose topics include:

 

The study of avatar psychology provides mental tools for more effective daily self-management.

 

Nearly everyone finds it difficult or seemingly impossible to avoid being immersed in negative emotions, anxiety, and depressed morale or lack of enthusiasm. We experience the “highs” or high points of our life as rare events, islands of “full potential” and self-confidence in an ocean of problems, weaknesses, and disturbing challenges. Acquiring a rational understanding of our mental life is enlightening and liberating. Mental anatomy puts a bright spotlight on our immortality, giving rational proof and anatomical confirmation of its reality.

 

The Mental Sun of Eternity

 

Nothing can be more familiar to human beings than the mental world of eternity. The moment we are born and take our first breath, our conscious life begins. We become “aware” as a human being, that we are a human being. Our mental apparatus is all set to function and to provide us with our developing consciousness as a living immortal individual. Our physical and mental apparatus function together through the laws of correspondence. Every operation in our mental apparatus or body corresponds to an operation in our physical apparatus or body. The physical body and the mental body are exact copies of each other and correspond with each other point by point, in general and in particular. But they are constructed out of different substances.

 

The physical body and all things physical on the planet are constructed out of particles from the physical sun and other stars in the physical universe (e.g., the original “Big Bang” clump of matter and particles). This formation history of the physical world corresponds to the formation history of the mental world. The “Big Bang” clump of physical matter in deep space corresponds to the mental sun of eternity. Both are the source or origin of all matter or substance existing in the two worlds. In the physical world the particles that make up the elements and molecules of the physical body are originally in the form of “heat,” that is, in the form of particles at very high temperatures travelling at the speed of light. These particles can be called “cosmic dust” and permeate all space. They have an inherent propensity to “clump” together into larger and larger conglomerations, until they reach the size of a planet. After some time this hot clump of matter cools down, and earth as we know it is formed.

 

In the mental world the corresponding events take place. Issuing from the mental sun of eternity are the particles of heat and light that create a mental expanse around the mental sun (see Diagram 4). This mental world is filled with the “mental dust” particles of heat and light issuing endlessly and continuously from the mental sun into the mental world of eternity. These mental particles have a built in propensity to clump together into either of two arrangements. One is the [light/heat] arrangement, or “light particle within which is a heat particle.” This is the masculine arrangement. The other or reciprocal arrangement is feminine: [heat/light] or “heat particle within which is a light particle.”

 

Mental objects, or organs, that are formed by further compounding of mental particles, are always pure, not mixed. All mental organs formed by masculine clumps or mental genes [light/heat] are male. They form the male mental body that corresponds to the male physical body. The female physical body corresponds in its formation to the feminine mental body, which contains the feminine mental organs that are constructed out of the feminine mental genes [heat/light]. Hence it is that the consciousness of men and women are distinct from each other. Man’s consciousness is the result of male mental genes [light/heat], while woman’s consciousness is the result of female mental genes [heat/light]. Mental light in men create masculine intelligence, while in women it creates feminine intelligence. Mental heat in women creates feminine loves, while mental heat in men creates masculine loves. Men’s consciousness is the result of masculine loves and intelligence. Women’s consciousness is the result of feminine loves and intelligence.

A woman’s consciousness is born in the neuro-skeletal sensorimotor system of her mental body. This conscious subjective operation is the result of the marriage of mental heat entering her affective circulatory system with mental light entering her cognitive respiratory system. With a man, mental light enters his cognitive system on the outside and bonds with mental heat entering the affective system on the inside. This bonding or synergy produces the operation in the sensorimotor system that we call masculine consciousness. (See Diagram 2).

 

The mental body corresponds to the planet and its planetary objects, most completely and particularly to the physical body. The masculine mental body and its consciousness correspond to the external parts of physical objects that tend to be relatively tougher and colder than the inside. The feminine mental body corresponds to the internal parts of planetary objects that tend to be relatively softer and warmer than the outside. For example, the outer tougher skin of a fruit corresponds to masculine consciousness, while the fruit’s soft interior corresponds to feminine consciousness. In daily married life, men tend to have their focus on external components of the marriage, such as working away from home, while women have their focus on the internal components of the marriage, such as managing the home and taking care of the relationships and needs of the family. The larger, stronger, tougher physical body of men in general corresponds to their mental body which is constructed out of [light/heat] units, that is, cognitive on the outside and affective on the inside.

 

Today in our modern world, and even more so in the super-modern future of sociobiological technology, the contrast in masculine and feminine consciousness may express itself differently than the traditional and historical dictate: women are domestic while men are forensic. Today you can observe men and women doing the same jobs up and down the echelons in private industry, in the armed forces, in public office, and in the home. Equal pay for equal work has not yet fully caught up to societal practices everywhere, and the male dominated world continues as before, but in a more civilized tone. Much physical and mental abuse is heaped upon women by men throughout society, and within the family by fathers and brothers. I believe that in the future true equality between men and women will be established through the unity model of marriage, which argues that when a man changes from being self-centered and becomes wife-centered, his masculine intelligence is greatly enhanced by and enriched by the reciprocal adaptation to feminine intelligence.

 

The enhancement comes from the anatomical fact that men’s intelligence is exterior to their love, as shown above, while women’s intelligence is interior to their love. In mental anatomy components that are more interior are superior in consciousness, that is, closer to the celestial-rational degree. The more interior intelligence of women enhances and enriches the more external intelligence of men. (See Diagrams). (REMINDER: if you use Control-click, instead of just a click, the page and diagram will open in a new window, and this is more convenient as you continue reading the text.) The higher intelligence of women comes from the superior reception of mental light with anatomical receptors that are more interior.

 

Similarly, men receive mental heat in more interior components than women (see Diagrams). A man’s love is higher and deeper than a woman’s love because the affective circulatory system of the man’s mental body has more interior components for the reception of mental heat. Hence it is that a woman’s love is enhanced and enriched by a man’s love when it is adjacent to hers.

 

But most importantly, the man and the woman enhance and enrich each other through reciprocal interdependence of their corresponding anatomical systems in their mental bodies. A woman’s external feminine love attaches itself to a man’s external masculine intelligence, and after that, a man’s interior masculine love attaches itself to a woman’s interior feminine intelligence. Through this entwisted anatomy the man and the woman soulmates achieve an anatomical unity. She cannot breathe without his lungs, and his blood doesn’t circulate without her heart. She cannot love anything without his thoughts about it, and he cannot think anything without her loves for it. In this way they become the conjoint self, also called the conjugial couple.”

 

Mental light from the mental sun of eternity corresponds to physical light from earth’s sun in the physical world. Mental heat corresponds to physical heat. Sunlight issues from the natural sun and travels millions of miles across space to reach earth in a few minutes. In winter the sun comes to us at a more indirect angle so that earth receives sunlight that is relative cold, deprived of its usual direct heat. In summer, when earth angles more directly and closer to the sun, sunlight is hot. Light within which is heat (spring, summer) in the physical world corresponds in the mental world to the masculine mind when it has been regenerated and is in an order that corresponds to the celestial arrangement. In winter the correspondence changes to light in which there is less heat or no heat (fall, winter), which corresponds to the unregenerate masculine mind in which there is intelligence but less altruism.

 

Heat within which is light, which is the feminine arrangement, corresponds to the regenerated mind of an adult woman. Prior to this phase of her development, a woman is in an unregenerate phase of growth in which she has not yet fully attained her feminine consciousness. Women’s consciousness prior to regeneration in adult life, is feminine heat within which is masculine light. A woman’s cognitive organ within her affective organ, operates in the arrangement of masculine intelligence and masculine thinking. There is an inherent anatomical disarrangement that originates with inheritance and is stamped in through socialization practices in a “man’s world,” which is a “male dominance” social and mental environment. A woman’s consciousness experiences this inner conflict or disarrangement, and gradually begins to construct a feminine interior in her cognitive organ. At last she develops a feminine intelligence. Now all her feminine loves are able to be consummated and fulfilled through her feminine way of thinking. This restoration of inner balance allows the woman to be prepared for conjugial union with her soulmate. Now it is her husband who attaches his interior higher love to her interior higher feminine wisdom, intelligence, and intuitive perception. (See phase 2 in the unity diagram (3).

 

Affective and Circulatory Systems

 

In particular, the circulatory system in the physical body acts in correspondence with the affective system of the mental body. Physical blood corresponds to mental love. Blood supplies nutrition to the physical cells, just as loves supply consciousness to produce our individual mental life, or existence as a self. Blood pressure corresponds to the constancy of loves functioning as motives. A rise in blood pressure corresponds to an intensification of motivation in the form of mental stress, or distress such as fear, pain, or obsession. Physical states always correspond to mental states in every detail. The system of blood vessels extends throughout the physical body, reaching every cell through its minute capillaries. This corresponds to the affective system of distribution of loves to the entire mental body, our entire self. Everything in our personality must be supplied with one of the loves by the affective system.

 

Think of the things you do, such as your work, your studies, your friendships, your hobbies and activities. Each one of them requires some love to keep it going. You would stop listening to music if the “love for music” would suddenly cease to flow in your affective system. You would be able to hear the music but not to love it, and you would not experience emotions that you enjoy having. All mental states of enjoyment are caused by loves. The sensation and consciousness of enjoyment is produced by the love being present and activated. Love nourishes our conscious life, which is the life of awareness as a human being. When you move your eyes while talking, walking, or watching something, their physical movements correspond to the loves that are activated in your consciousness. Every interest is a love being fulfilled. You focus your physical eyes on objects or places that are selected by your interests, or loves. Hence the eye movements in the physical body are activated by the affective system in the mental body. This is true of your other body parts.

 

The biochemistry of the circulatory system in the physical body corresponds to the biochemistry by which consciousness is produced in the mental body. Neuropeptides are chemicals secreted by various organs throughout the body and they are carried by the circulatory system to the organic receptors situated on the outside surface of the cells. These hormonal productions of the physical body, supplying the cells with energy and vitality, correspond to the operations of our affective system in the mental body, where the texture and content of consciousness, is produced by the variety of loves that feed the personality and character of the person. Every individual has access to an unlimited variety of loves that are available for reception in the affective system of the mental body.

 

For instance, think of the variety of loves that activated you today, so far. In order to get your physical body moving out of bed, you had to wait until it was activated by your love for getting up and starting the day. If this love in your mental body were blocked from reception in your affective system, you would not be able to move your physical body out of bed. Think of how you got dressed. You had some choices and you chose what you wore when you left your place. Every choice you made in the physical world had to correspond to a love in your mental world. You liked this one but you didn’t want that one today. To want something or to reject something is the operation of love within our consciousness. When we walk we make constant adjustments to the physical environment, avoiding collisions with objects and people. Each correction or adaptation movement of the physical body is produced by the corresponding love, such as, the love to get where you want to go, the love to avoid colliding, the love to appear like a normal person in public, the love to respect others, or else, the love to tease others, or to act aggressively as a pedestrian.

 

To understand people’s behavior in the physical world we need to know their hierarchy of loves in the affective system. For instance, if you ask “Why are you not coming?” the answer you might get is, “I don’t feel like it.” We avoid doing things in the physical world that correspond to what we want to avoid in the mental world. This is acting according to our feeling, according to our motivation, thus, according to our desire or love. If you know someone’s loves, you have the power to influence their behavior by arranging things that they love to do or to participate in.

 

Where do loves come from? Love is a mental substance available in infinite variety in the mental world. In the physical world the body has access to a nearly unlimited quantity and variety of substances that nourish the circulatory system through digestion and inhalation. The mental world contains all the loves that human beings are capable of having or becoming conscious of. The affective system in our mental body is composed of multiple organic receptors capable of receiving the mental substances that flow into the mental body. Each individual is unique and has a unique arrangement of loves that characterize that unique individual. Two individuals may be in the same mental region and yet receive a different variety of loves from it. For example, when walking people are conscious of different physical things around them, paying attention to some things, ignoring other things. Each object or scenery corresponds to a different love or appreciation, or perhaps dislike and aversion.

 

Our thinking and language reflects the correspondences between the physical body and mental body, or physical states and mental states. For instance, we say that something is “the heart of the matter,” when we mean that it is the central part of the argument or explanation. Something physical “the heart” is used to refer to something mental, “the most important part of the explanation.” Sometimes we say that there is “bad blood” between them, by which we mean that they had a fight and never made up and they resent each other. “Blood” corresponds to “love” and therefore “bad blood” between them corresponds to “bad feelings” for each other. We use the physical shape or symbol of the “heart” to indicate our “love” for someone because the two correspond. We say that “he’s out for blood” (physical) when we mean that he is filled with the feeling or love for revenge (mental). He is “cold blooded” means that his emotions or loves are hostile. “She is hot” refers to the “blood boiling” (physical), by which we mean strong emotions of attraction (mental).

 

Cognitive and Respiratory Systems

 

The lungs and the rest of the respiratory system include the diaphragm, ribs, throat, mouth, nose, and lips. These organs work together to allow us to speak, which is closely related to breathing and the diaphragm action on the lungs. Respiration supplies oxygen to the used (blue) blood by which it is cleaned (red) and made ready to circulate again without stop. The action of the respiratory system in the physical body corresponds to the action of the cognitive system in the mental body. We stop thinking consciously when our breathing is paralyzed. The cognitive and respiratory systems correspond to each other in all actions. Faster breathing corresponds to more agitated thinking. Uneven breathing corresponds to cognitive operations. These include uneven flow of thoughts that fail to cumulate to a solution for the moment. Shallow breaths correspond to hesitations or uncertainties. Fast breathing corresponds to mental excitement and cognitive overload.

 

The physical substances we breathe in correspond to the mental substances that operate our cognitive operations of thinking, reasoning, imagining, visualizing, dreaming. Speaking (physical) and thinking (mental) are correspondences of each other. We speak in words of sound (physical) and we think in words of meaning (mental). The tone of voice and other prosodic features of every day speech involve complex control mechanisms by the respiratory system and organs acting in synergy.

 

Neuro-Muscular and Sensorimotor Systems

 

The neuro-muscular system in the physical body includes the bones, spinal cord, nerves, neurons, and the entire brain. This physical system corresponds to the sensorimotor system in the mental body, which includes sensations, sensory perception, stimulus receptivity, motor readiness, reflexes, automated habits, and spontaneous reactions. Consciousness is the awareness of the sensorimotor system in the mental body. The physical system involves only chemical operations, while the sensorimotor system involves only mental operations. For instance, hearing someone say “Hi” involves both the physical body and the mental body. The neuro-muscular system in the physical body carries the chemical and electrical information of the sound to the brain, while the sensorimotor system in the mental body reacts to it by correspondence producing the experience of hearing a meaningful word. The meaning is produced by the cognitive system in the mental body. The sensorimotor “hearing” and the cognitive “making meaning of it” also correspond to each other. And there is also a reaction by correspondence in the affective system, which involves the experience of loving it or not loving it, that is, feeling attracted to the person, or wanting to avoid the person.

 

Consciousness is the awareness of sensorimotor correspondences in the mental body. We are conscious of our environment, which means that we are aware of our sensations (sensorimotor), and the thoughts (cognitive) and feelings (affective) that correspond to them. The three mental systems in the mental body work in synergy with each other, and with the three systems in the physical body.

Summary and Recapitulation at: (control-click)

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy28/409b-g28-lecture-notes-p1b.htm#threefold-self

Please read, and then come back here.

 

Synergy between the Physical Body and the Mental Body

 

 

Explanation of Diagram 9

  1. The neuro-skeletal system detects the electro-chemical signal in the physical environment
  2. The respiratory system reacts to signal detection
  3. The circulatory system reacts to signal detection and respiratory change
  4. The receptive sensorimotor system in the mental body reacts by correspondence to the activity in the neuro-skeletal system of the physical body (double arrow=correspondence). This involves the activity of noticing and maintaining vigilance.
  5. The receptive cognitive system in the mental body reacts to the noticing. This involves meaning construction and appraisal (categorizing and contextualizing).
  6. The receptive affective system in the mental body reacts to the cognitive and sensorimotor activities. This involves value-attaching or evaluating, and consummatory activities.
  7. The optimizing affective system reacts to the evaluative affective system. This involves becoming motivated to an intention of engaging the environment, or modifying it.
  8. The optimizing cognitive system in the mental body reacts to the optimizing affective system. This involves planning and problem solving as directed by the goals of one’s intention or motivation.
  9. The optimizing sensorimotor system reacts to the optimizing cognitive system. This involves staying ready for specific action and determining to engage the environment.
  10. The neuro-skeletal system of the physical body reacts by correspondence to the optimizing sensorimotor system. This involves moving the muscles in correspondence to the sensorimotor determination to engage the physical environment.
  11. The action of the neuro-skeletal system modifies the physical environment. This returns to arrow 1.
  12. At the same time, the respiratory system reacts to the activity of the neuro-skeletal system. This involves breathing more rapidly to supply the circulatory system with more oxygen to purify the blood.
  13. And the circulatory system reacts to the respiratory system. This involves the heart pumping blood supply to the organs and muscles.

Note the correspondence relations in Diagram 9:                            

1 and 4: sensorimotor and neuro-skeletal systems (receiving modality)

2 and 5: cognitive and respiratory systems (receiving modality)

3 and 6, 7: affective and circulatory systems (receiving and optimizing modalities)

8 and 12: cognitive and respiratory systems (optimizing modality)

9 and 10, 13: sensorimotor and neuro-skeletal systems (optimizing modality)

 

Discovering the Mental World of Eternity

 

The mental world is organic, human, and living. It is an expanse of mental space created by mental substance. Mental objects can be constructed in this mental space and they are permanently alive or immortal. Mental substance does not break down like physical matter which composes physical objects. These break down over time and are not permanent. But mental objects like loves, thoughts, and sensations are permanent since they made of immortal organic substances that don’t break down. If you love something or someone, that love is unique to you, uniquely adapted to you. It remains part of your personality or character forever. Once you love something or someone you are forever tied together. We can change our loves, or exchange one love for another. This occurs in our consciousness. We are aware of loves we had but we no longer feel. Loves we no longer feel are not active in our consciousness but they still are attached to our personality. We can never get rid of them permanently.

 

The mental world is organically organized from center outward, which is the same as saying, from top down. This is because what is at the center, or “central,” is also what is at the top, or “primary.” These two correspond to each other. At the very center (or top) of the mental world is the Mental Sun of Eternity. We can “see,” or become conscious of, this Sun of eternity when we raise our consciousness to the top level (or move within, to the center of it). Every human being is born with two bodies, one physical and temporary, the other mental and permanent. The physical body is structured and composed with material elements that originate in the natural sun or star that is familiar to us visually. The mental body is structured and composed of substances that originate in the mental sun of eternity. These substances stream out of the mental sun and into the three organic layers there. Our mental organs overlap with this organic structure. Every human being is born with an immortal or permanent mental body that is “strewn out” throughout the three organic layers. In other words, we are able to experience the consciousness of sensations, thoughts, and loves when we “navigate” the three organic layers around the mental sun.

 

It is called the mental sun “of eternity” because it is not in the world of time. The physical world is in time and in physical space, while the mental world is not in time and not in physical space. That which is not in time and space is called eternity. Our sensations, thoughts, and loves are mental objects, not physical. These mental objects cannot exist in physical space or time, just as physical objects cannot exist outside time and space. As you are reading this text you are having thoughts (I hope so). Where are those thoughts? They have to be somewhere. There are two opposing answers – monism versus dualism.

 

The negative bias monism perspective in science simply assumes or asserts (without proof) that thoughts are not real, or else, that thoughts are nothing else than the brain’s pattern of electro-chemical activity. In contrast, the positive bias perspective in science, which accepts dualism as a premise (without proof), assumes that thoughts are real, but not physical. This means that the physical world is not the only portion of reality. There is a second portion called the mental world. Both worlds are equally real. Thoughts are real, but they are not physical, and they are not in time or physical space. Hence thoughts can’t be made of chemical elements called matter and made of atoms and electrons whirling in space. Instead, thoughts are made of mental substances, and these do not exist in physical space but in mental space. We are all very familiar with mental space because that is where our thoughts are. This non-physical space is called the mental world of eternity. Our thoughts exist in the mental world of eternity and they are constructed out of substances that exist in that world of eternity. This is substantive dualism in science, and it contrasts with material monism.

 

What is true of thoughts is also true of sensations and loves. These are the three categories of mental objects that exist in the mental world of eternity. Our mental body operates through three systems called the affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor (as reviewed above). These mental organs or systems are constructed out of the mental substances that fill the mental spaces around the mental sun of eternity. An endless and infinite stream of these mental substances come forth from this divine source. This is good news for the human race. As immortal individuals each of us, we do not want to enter the endless days of eternity contemplating being bored there, or worrying that we’ll eventually run out of inventiveness or newness of experiencing. Such a thought is depressing, and therefore it cannot be part of true reality in eternity, which is called heaven, or goodness and joy. There is an endless supply of an infinite variety of mental substances that feed our consciousness and experiencing in eternity.

 

The three systems of the mental body are each organically structured to function as receptor organs for these mental substances. The affective system is a receptor for love substance while the cognitive organ is a receptor for truth substance. These are the two primary categories of mental substances. They are the building blocks for our loves, thoughts, and sensations that make up our consciousness, our life as mental beings. Love substance streams into our affective organ producing organic operations that we subjectively experience as loves, feelings, desires, motives, intentions, attractions. When we experience a love or feeling we are conscious of its state of fulfillment as a love. Love substance has mental properties that we experience when we ingest that substance through our affective organ.

 

Our cognitive organ is a receptor for the other category of mental substance called truth substance. When truth substance enters the cognitive system it produces organic operations that we experience as thoughts or thinking. Consider your own thinking in the course of the day. This is going on in your cognitive system in the mental body. Your thinking consists of a coherent sequence. When you are planning to go to the kitchen at the next commercial break, your thinking sequence is adapted to the requirements of physical spaces and objects. You can plan the sequence of steps that will get you to the refrigerator and back with a cold soda can in your hand. Taking a popcorn break requires somewhat more complex planning, and traveling by air to a friend’s wedding requires even more complex flow of coherence, meaning, and intelligence. What is it that allows your cognitive organ to sequence thoughts and ideas in an adaptive rational arrangement called a plan or a project?

 

The ability to understand meaning and to operate logically comes from the substance of truth that our cognitive organ receives from the mental sun of eternity. The ability to feel, love, and become attached to comes from the substance of love that our affective organ receives from the mental sun of eternity. The affective and cognitive systems can conjoin together to operate with perfect synergy. When this occurs a resultant effect is induced in the sensorimotor system of our mental body. This sensorimotor reaction is experienced as human consciousness. It is what we are. We are our consciousness. The words “I” and “me” refer to this unique coherent consciousness that is born at the birth of our mental body and continues forever. We are born into eternity. That which is born into eternity is necessarily immortal and permanent. This eternal permanence of the consciousness of self is due to the eternal permanence of thoughts and loves constructed out of truth and love substance. This substance in and from the mental sun of eternity is a divine substance that is in God from eternity and from God in creation and in time.

 

The mental world of eternity is created to be finite and outside God in Essence which is the only infinite eternity of no beginning and no end. The mental world of eternity had a historical or evolutionary beginning called “creation.” But since it is created outside time the mental world is also called eternity. The physical world in time is created in correspondence to the mental world in eternity. The two worlds correspond and one cannot evolve without the other. Even though planets in the physical world have a limited existence, there are innumerable planets being born constantly in the vast expanse of the physical universe. Planets are managed by God’s laws of correspondence to evolve into a physical environment adapted to supporting the physical bodies of humans. The mental world of eternity is managed by God’s laws of correspondence to allow the endless evolution of individual human beings contained in an immortal and permanent mental body which we have since our birth into eternity.

 

Managing Our Eternity

 

The mental world is constructed in organic top down layers (represented vertically), or in concentric layers (represented horizontally). The first layer below, or around, the mental sun of eternity is called the celestial layer. When our consciousness operates from this layer we are called quasi-omniscient angels. The expression “quasi-omniscient” refers to the ability to know and understand anything we think about or wonder about. Our celestial consciousness has the capability to access instantly any information in the universe that we want or need under any situation. We cannot access our celestial consciousness with full awareness until after resuscitation when we are no longer connected to the physical body and world. Prior to this we oscillate between the rational and the material consciousness.

 

The lowest or most external layer of consciousness is called material consciousness, which involves loves and ideas that are adapted exclusively to the material or physical world of time, space, matter, politics, culture, economics. These are “earthly” issues because they concern our welfare while we are attached to the physical body. All our motives and thoughts are adapted to earthly and temporary considerations. Above the material consciousness, and below the celestial consciousness, there is the rational consciousness. It is intermediate between the order of things in the physical world (material consciousness) and the order of things in the celestial layer of the mental world (celestial consciousness after resuscitation). This intermediate position gives rational consciousness the unique human ability to perceive higher mental objects that exist in the celestial layer of eternity.

 

The mental sun of eternity issues from the Divine consciousness in God. Since God is infinite and indivisible the Divine substances that issue from God’s consciousness remain God’s. God cannot give away particles of Divine consciousness. This means that everything that is created out of these particles of Divine consciousness retain the presence of the Divine consciousness. This is the meaning of Divine “omnipresence” since God is present everywhere within all objects constructed out of the Divine substances. Hence it is also that our mental body is immortal since it is constructed out of the mental dust particles that issue from the mental sun of eternity.

 

The Divine consciousness is produced by God’s Divine Love and the Divine Truth conjoining in God as in a Divine marriage. The result of this marriage is the Divine consciousness, which is omnipresent and infinite. Divine Love and Divine Truth are the two Divine substances, each being infinite, and each flowing out of the mental sun as an aura of heat and light. The Divine Love comes out as mental heat, while the Divine Truth comes out as mental light.

 

Mental heat is received by the affective system of the mental body. Mental light is received by the cognitive system. This corresponds to the physical body which receives physical heat and light from the physical sun entering our atmosphere. Plants receive nutrients from the minerals in the ground. These minerals are particles of heat from the sun that have cooled off over time. The physical sun spews out heat and dust particles into the surrounding space. These heat particles cool off and coalesce together until they form a large object called a planet. Every object on the planet is therefore constructed of this original heat dust that issues from the physical sun.

 

This corresponds to what happens in the mental world of eternity. The mental objects that make up our mental body and its systems are constructed out of the heat dust from the mental sun that “cool off” to form the affective, cognitive and sensorimotor systems that give us consciousness. Our mental organs are constructed out of the particles of mental heat and light. Mental heat particles are captured and received by the affective circulatory system. These provide the mental nutrients for the three systems, just as the blood provides the natural nutrients for the physical body. Mental nutrients are loves that exist in an endless variety in the mental world of eternity.

 

The quality of ‘nourishing’ loves that we obtain from mental heat is specific to the three consciousness zones. Celestial loves are arranged in a hierarchy of loves that is governed by Ruling Loves.

The celestial ruling love is the love of conjunction and community.

The rational ruling love is the love of understanding truth.

The material ruling love is the love of survival, dominance, and power.

Everything in our life and in our eternal future is determined by our ruling love. After resuscitation there is a brief period of self-exploration in which our ruling love rises to the surface of our personality and consciousness. Prior to resuscitation people cannot show their actual ruling love since it is often egotistical, and therefore harmful and dangerous to others. This motivates people to hide their ruling love until it is safe to express it and live it. This happens after resuscitation when we realize that we are no longer attached to a vulnerable physical body. That vulnerability and fear keeps people from expressing their ruling love.

 

But once the fear of retaliation and physical punishment vanishes at death, we can allow our ruling love to emerge and show itself. Now this ruling love is in the center of our consciousness and we pursue it with passion and intensity. This ruling love now does the work of rearranging the affective hierarchy of loves. Every sub-love that is not compatible with the ruling love is laid aside, suffocated, and rendered unable to function. From then to endless eternity, that ruling love determines everything in our consciousness, and consequently in our environment – that is, who we associate with in eternity and what kind of environment we live in.

 

When the ruling love is heavenly, we associate with others who are also heavenly in their loves. People in the celestial consciousness arrange themselves in collectivities or mental societies according to the similarity of their ruling loves and sub-loves. There are two such collectivities, one called the Grand Human, and the other called the Grand Monster. These terms are chosen to reflect the quality of the ruling love in each mental society. Since everything produced by mental heat and light is human in quality or form, it follows that the mental body of each person has the human form. Also, the mental society formed by many individuals constructs itself in the shape of the human body. Finally the entire collection of all mental societies arrange themselves into the human form, hence the names Grand Human and Grand Monster (see Diagrams).

 

When the ruling love is hellish all those we associate with are clinging to hellish loves. The similarity and compatibility of these hellish loves arrange themselves into the form of a deformed human being, hence the name Grand Monster.

 

We determine our eternal ruling love by our cumulative daily life choices. Acting from inherited and acquired egotistical loves and their enjoyments, creates a permanent hellish ruling love. Fighting these character weaknesses through conscience and moral behavior involves us in a mental process of character regeneration. This is a lifelong process of changing our hellish loves by clinging to heavenly ones. After resuscitation we are left with the ruling love we practiced since birth.

 

God’s Management Techniques:

The Laws of Providence and Permissions

 

The anatomical origin of human life has been traced to the mental sun of eternity. To the ocular view of the celestial mental body it appears as a brilliant sun of heat and light, inundating and immersing the entire expanse around itself, which is called the mental world of eternity. This expanse is not “nothing” or “empty” or the absence of something. It is a space and sphere constructed out of the mental heat substance and mental light substance that stream out of the mental sun in continuous and endless variety. This flow never stops and maintains the expanse of eternity in a living organic and evolving progression. This expanse may be called rational ether because it has substance (“ether”) that is living, organic, human and rational. These properties are Divine-Human.

 

It makes no sense to attribute these properties to the mental sun as something inert. All things in the mental world of eternity are living because whatever exists there must start with the building blocks in mental ether. There is nothing else to build with. In the physical world all things are constructed out of matter, chemical elements, energy. There are no other building materials. These things are called “temporary” with a limited “lifespan” because they are constructed out of physical matter in time and space. But in the mental world all things are constructed out of mental heat and mental light substance, and these are living and immortal.

 

Everything that is living must be immortal.

 

Living or aliveness is a Divine-Human property. All Divine properties are immortal and eternal. The mental sun of eternity is the entry point or exchange point, between God and creation. God is uncreate, and all properties in God are uncreate. Life or living is a property of God, hence life must be immortal. People often think that even if God is the origin of life, once God activates a being into living existence, that being or individual now carries life within itself. We feel that we are alive in ourselves from ourselves. We feel complete as an individual, living and thinking, and doing, and reacting. This is my life. Even if it originates from God, now it is my life. God has given me this life.

 

However we need to realize by rational thinking that this feeling of “my life is mine” is an appearance that God wills to have us feel this appearance as real. God imposes that appearance on us. God hides from our view or knowledge that whatever property is bestowed on us from God remains God’s property. This includes: life, intelligence, rationality, humanity, love, truth, compassion, inventiveness, curiosity, desire for knowledge, artistic perceptions, talent, aptitude, the ability to have consciousness of sensations, etc. What is left as our own if all these things are God’s? The answer is that nothing is left as our own, except the will to cling to any and all of these Divine properties, and the consciousness we experience as a result.

 

Once we examine the rational implications of God’s omnipotence, we begin to understand that the operations in our seven bodies could not integrate into a unit, and could not progress and evolve without direct and immediate determinism over every detail of these immense operations. God must be a Divine-Human Operating System in the mind of every person, causing every little detail to progress and integrate with every other little detail regarding what we notice around us and what we ignore, regarding what comes into our consciousness and thinking and what gets left out, or regarding what kind of loves and emotions are allowed to move us moment by moment, and situation by situation. God controls the environment of the seven bodies as well as the operations within each body. And this is done for every human being from birth to endless eternity, and since the beginning of the human race to endless increase and multiplication. Even the concept of “infinity” seems too small to imagine what Divine Rational computing power it takes to keep all this going in a pre-selected direction and for a Divine purpose and goal. This goal is to increase the happiness and intelligence of the human race to endless eternity and evolution.

 

God maintains the unity of the entire human race through its continuous expansion, immortality, and eternity. Every newborn human being on any planet in the expanding universe, is an organic unit that is inducted into the human race through the vertical community. The networking and interconnectedness is total. Every feeling operation in the affective circulatory system of the mental body, every thinking operation in the cognitive respiratory system, and every sensory operation in the neuro-muscular sensorimotor system, that is going on in individual, reverberates and spreads like an expanding circular wave, to the individuals who are nearby, then to more distal areas, and finally to adjacent communities.

 

The entire Grand Human contains the synchronized breathing of each society, and of each individual in that society. The individual mental operations and emotions of all get transmitted in some varying form to each. Everything about human beings is coordinated to work synergistically. Every part enters into the whole and the whole into every part. This kind of organic functioning unity that is increasing forever in complexity and evolution must be kept on track by God’s omnipotent management techniques and procedures.

 

God’s omnipotence implies direct and immediate control of all things. How this is actually accomplished may be made clearer to our understanding when we consider there cannot be two infinites, or else neither would be infinite. There is only infinite because it includes everything. If God gives life and intelligence to a human being, does not God lose some of this infinity? Hence when God gives us life and intelligence it is only an appearance that this life and intelligence is ours. The life and intelligence in us is God’s, not ours. Instead of “our intelligence” it may be more accurate to say “God’s intelligence in us,” or “God’s life in me” but not “my life” literally (only so in appearance).

 

The mental heat from the mental sun is also called God’s infinite love substance, and the mental light is also called God’s infinite truth substance, which is the same as rationality substance since rationality comes from truth. Love substance is received by the affective circulatory system of the mental body, while truth substance is received by the cognitive respiratory system. When love and truth are reunited in our willing and thinking, they produce consciousness in the neuro-skeletal sensorimotor system of the mental body. The love and truth substance are from God and therefore remain God’s love and truth, but they are now outside God and in creation. This means that God is present in creation through love and truth substance in our mental body. Hence it is said that God is omnipresent and omniscient. These two properties of God are effected through love and truth in creation everywhere.

 

Once we understand that God manages the events in our mind and the events in our environment, we can realize to what extent each of us is intimately involved with God, regardless of whether we acknowledge it or know about it. God manages the events and the mental states of every person from birth to endless eternity. This idea is taught in all the major religions, which probably comprise the vast majority of worshippers. Children learn that God knows and sees everything, including their thoughts and intentions. They also learn that God requires us to live our life in a certain way, and if we don’t, we will suffer negative consequences both in this life and in the afterlife. Besides religious worship we also need to inquire scientifically and rationally into God’s management techniques and requirements. Specifically, how does God lead us to a heavenly life in eternity?

 

In order to understand this rationally we need to realize that God manages the life of human beings in two ways—direct (or immediate) and indirect (or mediate). Both are necessary to achieve God’s purpose in creation. God’s immediate control is made possible by the love and truth substance out of which all things are created and activated in the mind. Love and truth are God’s Own in our mind, hence, God in our mind. Whatever is God’s Own is God’s, and therefore God. The indirect or mediate control is exercised by God through the organized anatomical layers of the mental world of eternity that surrounds the mental sun.

 

The first entry point of love and truth in human consciousness is through the celestial mental body (VII, layers 4, 5, 6). From there they influence by correspondence the layer below called the rational mental body (VI). God’s mediate influence over the rational mental body is through the celestial mental body. Following this, God influences the material mental body through the rational mental body from the celestial mental body, thus connecting all the regions of the mind through mediate control. The result of this system of control is that the mental layers are united into one functioning unit. Ultimately all of humanity is controlled by God through both immediate and mediate control mechanisms.

 

An additional idea to understand is that God exercises immediate control through two distinct principles of engagement called the Laws of Providence and the Laws of Permissions. One is for the management of disorderly mental states called “evil,” while the other is for the management of orderly mental states called “good.” Without knowing this distinction it is not possible to answer rationally the question everyone has been asking for centuries without having an adequate and fully rational answer: “If God is omnipotent and perfect in love, why does He allow evil and suffering in human beings?” All the answers I have heard given all end up more or less in the idea that God alone knows, or that we cannot understand God’s ways, or that it has to do with giving us freedom, etc.

 

By considering God’s omnipotence and love in the context of these two Divine management laws, we can understand that our humanity (or humanness) lies in the ability to cling to God and through truth from God. Our ability to love God makes us immortal and capable of conjugial love in heavenly eternity. God cannot bring us to this eternal heavenly mental state because only the clinging to it can get us there. To force us there without our clinging to it would not make that mental state available to our consciousness. It would be no different from a state of mental torture and suffering, thus the opposite of heaven. Clinging to God is an ability we have from birth but it is not actualized, or made functional, until we practice that innate ability by clinging to God, or if we don’t know God, then clinging to God’s orderliness and truth that every person has access to from conscience and rational reflection.

 

Some people choose to practice this clinging to orderliness and truth, others do not. For our modern generations everyone is born with an inherited attraction to disorderly mental states, those that harm us in the long run unless we manage them rationally. God has allowed these “evil” mental states in human beings by means of the Law of Permissions. Only those disorderly mental states are allowed that God uses to bring about a good result for the benefit of all concerned or involved in that evil. Other evils are not allowed to come into existence. This is the Law of Permissions. It is for the management of disorderly mental states.

 

The law of Providence is for the management of orderly states called “good.” Think about some of the good that has happened to you today. You were able to open your eyes and use the ability to see around you. This is good. You are able to read these lines right now because God is managing your eye movements, your thinking about the meaning, and your motivation to get through it or to memorize it. These events are orderly events managed by God through the Law of Providence. The word “Providence” comes from “to provide,” to indicate that God provides all the good we need moment by moment, to continue living and progressing to a heavenly goal in eternity.

 

When you reflect on your day you will notice that you typically oscillate between orderly and disorderly mental states. For example, you are brushing your teeth – an orderly heavenly thing, and suddenly you remember that your friend didn’t return your call yesterday. You start swearing and feeling anxious in the stomach – a disorderly hellish mental state. As another example, think about your snacks. One moment you are eating and staying within your diet – an orderly heavenly thing, but minutes later you are ingesting an extra candy bar and feeling guilty that you are not sticking to your diet resolution – a disorderly hellish thing to do.

 

All day long we thus oscillate between orderly mental states and disorderly mental states. God must manage both of these or else chaos would be the result instead of a rational goal. The two laws of Providence and Permissions allow God to do this continuous management. Now you can think about the question of why an omnipotent God perfect in love allows a baby to die, or a child to be molested, or a father to be killed in war, or a terrorist to blow up innocent people, or a natural disaster that destroys towns and brings on famine and sickness. These are the disorderly states that God manages by the Laws of Permissions. God allows only those evil events to take place that meet three rational and loving criteria:

 

The Laws of Permissions account for the existence of the societies of the Grand Monster or “hell.” God manages evil with evil, and good with good. After the dying/resuscitation process everyone experiences an organic development by which the orderly and disorderly mental states are physiologically separated. All our traits are rearranged and placed under the command of the ruling love we have been clinging to in our mental and personality development since birth. There are two categories of ruling loves – orderly and disorderly, that is, heavenly and hellish. Once our traits are so organized into a duality of opposed ruling loves, we experience the necessity to cling to one or the other ruling love. It is not possible to resist this process and every human being undergoes it soon after the dying/resuscitation process.

 

What determines which choice we make? Clearly, few other questions can be of greater importance to us since this choice is permanent and forever. Do we choose a life in heaven or in hell? In order to understand how we can prepare for that choice and manage our eternal future we need to consider the process of regeneration.

 

Regeneration and the Divine Psychologist

 

It is clear from self-observation that we oscillate between heavenly and hellish mental states in the course of a normal day, or even hour. In one moment we resolve to stick to our diet plan and therefore not eat desert with everybody else around the table (a heavenly trait or motive), and a minute or two later we are eating the desert with everybody else, thus giving in to a temptation we were trying to fight (a hellish trait). One moment we’re in a good mood and humming a song (a heavenly emotion), and a minute later we realize we forgot an important appointment, and we feel rage and disgust against ourselves (a hellish emotion).

 

An employer treats his employees fairly (heavenly trait), for the most part, but sometimes he allows himself to be discriminatory for personal preference (a hellish trait). We may be honest most of the time (a heavenly trait), but sometimes we cheat to gain an unmerited advantage (a hellish trait). We can forgive and make peace from a sense of compassion (a heavenly trait), or we can carry a grudge and try to hurt someone’s reputation. We can be cruel and selfish, but also kind and generous. All day long we add to the cumulative heap of good and evil impulses, altruistic and selfish motives, kind and hurtful acts, wise and stupid words. Our life is an accumulation of heaven and hell within us.

 

If this process were left to continue unmanaged all the heavenly traits would be destroyed or converted by the hellish traits and we would become evil caricatures of ourselves and an image of the Grand Monster or eternal societies of hell in the human mind. The good and the evil, or the heavenly and the hellish, destroy each other, leaving what is destroyed, hence bad and evil. Evil wins when good is not protected. It is absolutely necessary therefore for God to manage this heap so that the heavenly is not destroyed.

 

Regeneration refers to a Divine therapy to which every human being must submit in order to have heaven and hell anatomically separated in the mind. This is accomplished by allowing the opposing traits to be adjacent to each other, or to lie on top of one another as in a heap of vines in the backyard composed of both pretty flowers and tasty fruit berries, mixed with prickly and poisonous bushes. For awhile they can be left to grow together because their roots don’t mix with each other. God intervenes in our mental procedures to make sure that heavenly and hellish impulses remain separated as to their roots. This process of separation is effected by God but it proceeds in proportion to the individual’s cooperation. God allows the individual to resist regeneration, in which case the good and bad roots gradually interpenetrate each other.

 

God’s role in the activity of our regeneration is called the Divine Psychologist.

 

In order to understand the process of regeneration we need to consider two additional ideas, namely, temptations and remains. Experiencing a temptation refers to a mental state of conflict brought about by the Divine Psychologist through having to face some threat by an outside event, or through interior reflection accompanied by disturbing emotions. For example, while you’re watching TV you realize that the volume is on pretty high, which is what you like when you watch sports. But now you remember that your roommate and your neighbors next door have complained that your TV is too loud. You feel a conflict. You feel like turning it down for their sake, but you also feel like enjoying it the way it is. This is a temptation state.

 

The Divine Psychologist is now intervening in such a way as to maximize your conflict. For example, the phone rings and the next door neighbor yells at you because of the TV and calls you disrespectful names. You feel mad like hell now. Your temptation doubles in intensity. You have the impulse to make the volume even louder, to teach your neighbor a lesson. But you resist. You don’t like the idea of being an obnoxious person that gives others trouble. You now turn the TV volume down a little. You remember your big brother who was always nice to everyone. Maybe you can be like him. Etc. Etc.

 

You can see from this type of reflection that we experience alternating impulses moment by moment, some heavenly and kind, some hellish and selfish. The Divine Psychologist keeps these two types of impulses separated in your affective circulatory system. Just like the blue blood containing cell waste is not allowed to mix with the red blood containing clean oxygen. As long as the two don’t mix, the body can be nourished and survives.

 

The Divine Psychologist works with every person to effect this separation. Conscience is a mental organ that responds directly to input from the Divine Psychologist. It’s like a Divine signaling system. Conscience delivers a good emotion when we accept its judgment or prompting, and a disturbing emotion when we reject it. People have to work hard to kill the voice of conscience in their mind, but many do so anyway. Eventually they don’t feel it at all so that they lose all ability to distinguish between good and evil, and between rational and irrational. At that point, whatever feels good is defined as good, appears good, and is seen as good. And whatever thoughts or ideas agree with this good, is defined and seen as rational truth. There is no objective evaluation possible within this framework. We are locked within our own opinion, whether it is false or true.

 

The word remains refers to the collection of orderly impulses we experience in the course of our daily lives. For example, we see a banana peel on the floor and pick it up to avoid someone from slipping on it. What made you do this altruistic act? It had to be preceded by an altruistic impulse prompted by your conscience or your desire to be a person of integrity. All day we may have such good impulses and they would merely be part of our history were it not for the happy fact that the Divine Psychologist collects these good impulses and keeps them safe for our immortal life after we undergo the dying/resuscitation process. Almost every moment of living contains some remains of innocence, altruism, sociality, goodness. All those heavenly impulses and affections cumulate and begin to fill out our heavenly personality in the celestial mental body. Without remains we would not have a coherent integration of the good impulses and affections into a Grand Human personality.

 

The Divine Psychologist also collects our evil or disorderly impulses that we have on a daily basis. Our evil remains make up our Grand Monster personality while our good remains make up our Grand Human personality. Following our resuscitation we undergo an intense period of self-discovery through various experiences and events that the Divine Psychologist arranges for each person to undergo. During this period we each face ourselves. We see the Grand Human personality in us, and we see the Grand Monster personality also in us. One personality is ruled by a heavenly ruling love, while the other is ruled by a hellish ruling love. Now we have a clear choice. Which one are we willing to let go for the sake of keeping the other one. That choice determines our eternal future, whether we join one of the societies of the Grand Human and their heavenly life, or whether we join one of the societies of the Grand Monster and their hellish life.

 

This kind of orderly choice making has to be engineered by the Divine Psychologist or else it would never work out.

 

For instance, what would happen if the Divine Psychologist stacks the odds in favor of a happy life in heaven by filling up our Grand Human personality with all sorts of heavenly impulses which we never actually had, but could provide us with a happy eternal life. Such an approach does not work out. For as soon as our consciousness enters our Grand Human personality, now aggrandized by these additional loves, we would not recognize those mental states as our own. It would be like visiting a neighbor’s house for the week end and pretending that it is our home. Sooner or later the pretense must stop. We don’t want to spend our lives in a home that we only pretend is our home. And so the Grand Human personality would feel like a mental trap or prison, and we would feel like we are in hell, not in heaven.

 

Hence you can see the importance of the work of the Divine Psychologist in each of us. Without our remains of good impulses we would not have an integrated heavenly personality in which our consciousness can spend the rest of eternity. The Divine Psychologist works with us by the second, by the minute, by the hour, by the day and night, to provide us with experiences and events to which we can react with positive impulses. If you examine your train of thoughts in various situations during the day you will discover that some of these thoughts are negative and hostile or judgmental and condemnatory, punishing and retaliatory. These kinds of thoughts are evoked by negative and hostile feelings and reactions.

 

These negative ant-social feelings are ruled by a ruling love that might be selfism, the enjoyment of revenge, the desire for power and popularity for the sake of manipulation and domination,  proneness to irrational judgment, etc. These are evil loves because they connect the person to the societies of the Grand Monster. The more cumulative connections we establish, maintain, and cultivate with the societies of the Grand Monster, the stronger the tie and bond grows, producing an organic root tying your material mental body to the material mental bodies of those who already live in the Grand Monster.

 

When we resuscitate we feel an irresistible attraction and bond with those societies, and upon our second death, we let go of all heavenly traits, and happily enter the company of those with whom we have been connected all along. Unfortunately the honeymoon does not last long when we discover that everyone here desires domination, and enjoys revenge, and thinks irrationally, without morality, without restraints. Then our life becomes an endless series of evil mental states such as rage, insanity, fantasy, fear, and suffering, and totally devoid of human feelings such as sociality, compassion, love of truth, love of children and and innocence, enjoyment of beauty and intelligence, etc. We can avoid this fate by undergoing the process of character regeneration prior to the dying/resuscitation process.

 

Regeneration proceeds through new temptations and progresses through cumulative remains.

 

The Divine Psychologist arranges events so that we can face spiritual combat against our disorderly impulses. Only those temptations are given us that we are able to overcome by means of our conscience. The Divine Psychologist does not expose us to temptations that we can’t resist since this would be tantamount to causing us to fail, to give in, and thus to strengthen the connection to that negative impulse. During a temptation it appears to us that we are alone, that we are fighting the mental battle on our own, and that we are putting up the effort and power to resist the temptation through our own power and determination. This is the appearance, not the reality.

 

The reality is that the Divine Psychologist has all the power through omnipotence, which rationally means that we have zero power on our own. To think therefore that we are fighting alone through our own power is therefore delusional and irrational, thus disorderly and hellish. Instead, we want to stay rational in our thinking, so we can understand that it is the Divine Psychologist who wills it that we experience the appearance that we are acting from ourselves and alone. This appearance is willed by the Divine Psychologist for our sake, so that we may accept our life as free and independent, so that we don’t feel like a robot that is merely activated by God’s will.

 

Heavenly impulses lead to pro-social behavior, altruism, community building, collective productivity, and organic evolution to ever higher human potentials. Hellish impulses lead to anti-social behavior, selfism, community breakdown, irrationality, destructiveness, and organic devolution to lower forms of consciousness and life. The distinction between “heavenly” and “hellish” traits is therefore organic, biological, and intrinsic. The distinction is not arbitrary, moralistic, cultural, or idealistic.

 

What about people who don’t know God, or who don’t believe that there is such a thing as God? Or who believe that there may be a God but that things in the world run on their own through the laws of nature that God created.

 

God is running everything in a person’s life through omnipotence, and not by permission of the individual. God must manage the mind of all individuals regardless of their beliefs and theories. Living is an organic process. God manages the growth of plants without any cooperation from the plants. God manages the wind, the rain, the random curve, and the animal distribution in an area. God manages every possible detail in people’s lives through omnipotence. People who do not relate to God, and people who deny God’s existence, are just as dependent on their conscience as those who relate to God. Conscience tells everyone between right and wrong, good and bad, and sometimes between true and false. God maintains the conscience in every person. God also allows every individual to reject conscience, and even to silence or kill conscience in themselves.

 

Conscience is formed by God within a cultural framework. People from different cultures and historical epochs have had each their own community conscience, and yet if you examine the content of people’s conscience from diverse cultures, they agree in all the basics. This is because the one and only God activates and maintains the conscience of all individuals, making sure that it contains only such loves and character traits that are compatible with heaven. The result is that the Grand Human societies are diverse but still compatible with good and truth. There is only one source of good and truth, namely, the mental heat and light from the mental sun, and this is God’s good substance and truth substance.

 

Why This Is a Perfect World Despite Evil

 

Now what happens when we give in to temptations, throw in the towel in the inner spiritual fight of good vs. evil, declare ourselves free from God's commandments, religious rules, or the dictates of our conscience? Note that this non-theistic or negative bias attitude could be temporary or permanent in any one individual. Note also that people who practice a religion may do so spiritually or naturally. To practice religion naturally means that you only let it affect your outward behavior and not what you are thinking to yourself and what you are feeling. In other words, we play an outward role of respectability and sincerity, but inwardly within our own private consciousness, we maintain ideas that would not be considered respectable, and emotions that would not be considered peaceful or sincere. We thus lead a double life to ourselves.

 

It is common and normal to lead a double life at times. As children we learn to survive and avoid punishment by being deceitful. As adolescents we learn to hide our emotions so that we stay out of trouble. We learn to feign sincerity, to hide our intentions, to carry secrets. All along the Divine Psychologist has been managing and controlling what each individual sees, hears, thinks, and feels. This total management control insures that the person grows up with an integrated personality that is made up of both healthy and unhealthy organic traits. The Divine Psychologist also saves the innocent remains of every moment and organically grows the celestial mental body that will serve the person in the Grand Human of eternity.

 

When we become young and mature adults we are given a radically new power and responsibility about our future. It is the power of rational thinking that is not based on material ideas. The Divine Psychologist gives conscious life to the rational mental body that is based on correspondence with the celestial mental body (see diagrams). This is layer 7i or the interior of layer 7, which is the rational mind (VI). This may be called the interior rational layer of the material mental body. It is the highest form of consciousness available to us anatomically prior to the dying/resuscitation process. This consciousness is based on rational loves and rational thoughts that correspond to the celestial order that forms our celestial mental body and consciousness.

 

With the functional operation of the rational mind we are able to form ideas and principles that are not sourced in the material ideas of our spatiotemporal life in the physical body. Now for the first time the Divine Psychologist can appear to us rationally. In other words, we are now able to understand the notion of rational proof as opposed to empirical proof. God’s existence is now a rational reality. Our rational mental body can see God’s rational mental body. Prior to this new celestial-rational mental state we had a material consciousness of God and God’s existence. In that state we spoke of our “faith” and “intuition” or “inner feeling” etc. These feelings are still there in the material consciousness of our daily life, but in moments of reflection or calm, we can raise our consciousness to the rational mental body, and we can then see God’s rational mental body.

 

But before we are activated in our celestial-rational mind, our idea of God is material, not celestial. We can then believe that what matters to God is how we act on the outside, whether or not we treat people decently and meet our expected responsibilities to family, career, and community. Certainly this is necessary to God, and we must all achieve this kind of life. But it is not sufficient. Following the dying/resuscitation process we are no longer in our outward personality (layer 9 or external part of the material mental body), which was tied by correspondence to our physical body. These personality features that lay in our outward personality include our culture, language, knowledge, appearance, and habitual interaction patterns with others. What is left of you now is the inner portion of the material mental body and the rational mental body (both exterior or materialized, and interior or celestial-rational).

 

You can see from this that if you continued to lead a double life in adulthood, when your outward personality is removed, your consciousness falls into the mentality you maintained privately within your mind. This inward personality may not be sane! What a shock! Does this mean that we are collectively sane on the outside but crazy individually on the inside? Yes.

 

All you need to do is to confirm this through your own direct empirical observations on yourself in daily life. No one has this data available on you. No brain scan or ethnographic interview can reveal it or measure it. You are the only source of objective data on your mind because you are the only observer available for that task. So if you want to test the hypothesis given here, you can.

 

Observe what your thoughts are made of when someone angers you or puts you in danger. Or when someone discriminates against you. Or when you discover someone has been spreading malicious rumors about you, or has obtained through deceit something that belongs to you. These are mental states in which your inward personality becomes self-righteous and operates at a more intense level so that you are able to monitor your thoughts, emotions, fantasies, words, intentions, wishes, etc. Think now what would happen if this irate, self-centered, irrational inward personality becomes your outward personality without any check or restraint exercised by your rational mind. This is what happens after the dying/resuscitation process. The crazy unchecked inward personality becomes the crazy unchecked outward personality.

 

The process of regeneration is an organic function that is activated through our conscious intervention. The first step is called entering the state of reformation. We review everything we believe, our principles and attitudes, our lifestyle habits, our relationship interactions, all in the light of the new celestial-rational understanding (layer 7i or VI) that our conscience receives from the Divine Psychologist. Through this mental activity we rearrange everything in our material mind to make each thing in correspondence and compatible with the celestial order. When this task is completed sufficiently we begin our regeneration. We are now armed with new knowledge about our eternal future and our task at hand. In the light of this celestial-rational knowledge and understanding we are able to fashion spiritual truths for ourselves to serve in combat against our temptations. Every temptation must be defeated with these celestial-rational truths. Without them we cannot win all the battles. The Divine Psychologist is limited by the truths we know or are willing to love sincerely.

 

If we remain in our material ideas of God and what God wants of us, we make it impossible for the Divine Psychologist in our rational mind to bring spiritual temptations to us because we would not resist them -- which would harm our spiritual future in eternity. The only way we can change our inherited selfish traits is to reject them freely and consciously, because they are contrary to our life in the Grand Human. No other motivation can succeed in altering how we think and feel inwardly, but only how we act and talk outwardly. This is because we are in inward mental states after resuscitation.

 

For almost three decades Swedenborg observed thousands of people who were recently resuscitated after the death of their physical body. He interviewed many of them concerning their knowledge and beliefs about God. They all were still able to recall clearly their memories from earth, which we can do for awhile after resuscitation, and before settling into our inward personality, which is who we really are underneath our veneer. Swedenborg discovered that people after resuscitation, thus in their immortal eternity body, cannot hold on to their rules of conscience and their religious beliefs when these were merely outward norms of conduct that they followed by habit and lifestyle. In their inward personality they were of the opposite disposition.

 

Because they now rejected all rules of religion, conscience, morality, and respectability they felt completely free to feel, think, and do whatever they felt like spontaneously, uncritically (See also: Section 7.0.4.1). And because they had not undergone temptations and character reformation, their inherited tendencies and loves for evil and cruel things now took over completely, and they turned into an immortal life of hellish pursuits, delights, and sufferings.

 

On the other hand, Swedenborg observed some people after their resuscitation that had no religion of any kind, but had had a strong sense of conscience and natural morality and respect for others, for animals, and for nature. After their resuscitation, when they were told and taught about God, they were instantly able to accept it and to understand it rationally, and were able to enter the life of conjugial heaven to eternity. In other words, the Divine Psychologist works with all individuals regardless of their culture or belief, through their conscience and through the activation of their celestial-rational understanding that is independent of culture, history, or the physical world.

 

This mental state allows the individual to love truth for its own sake and to love goodness as superior to loving evil. As a result people in this mental state can progress and evolve in regeneration by meeting the temptations of life and handling them through their conscience and inner rational understanding. After resuscitation their love of truth and goodness allows them to accept the new knowledge they acquire about God, and thereby they can enter the Grand Human society with which they have bonded during their life of love for the good and for the truth. Anyone who leads a life of love for the good and the truth is organically bonded to the Grand Human. Anyone who does not have an inward love for goodness and truth is bonded to the Grand Monster.

 

People look at crime, social disorder, human unhappiness everywhere, and they conclude that either there is no God, or that God is not omnipotent, or that God is both good and evil. These are all false conclusions. In fact, society is perfect for its spiritual purpose or goal, and God is maintaining it in perfect order for that purpose, since God is omnipotent to carry out what He wants and plans. The difficulty has been for people to see rationally that society and life on earth has a higher purpose related to our immortality. Crime and disasters cannot reduce or take away from this purpose. Crime and human selfishness do make our experience on earth more ghastly, but this experience does not interfere with why we are here. God will not allow anything to interfere with this purpose.

 

The perfection of the world and of society which is maintained and controlled by God, is that it gives people a life in which at any moment they can begin their character reformation and preparation for eternal happiness in heaven. No one is excluded. Everyone has an equal opportunity.

 

God maintains our ability to do and to think evil things just as he maintains our ability to think and do good things. If God took away our ability to think and do evil things, this would not be a perfect world because we could not regenerate our inherited character and we would be compelled to a life of eternal hell.

 

At any moment of our daily willing and thinking, the Divine Psychologist puts us up to a choice between choosing evil or good. The cumulative moment by moment choices we make every hour, day by day, over the decades of our life on earth – many millions of choices -- constitute our character. This is the vehicle of our immortality. After our resuscitation we are immersed by the Divine Psychologist into an intense life of recapitulation and self-discovery. All societal shackles are cast off in absolute liberty when we fully realize that we are now immortal, in a world where we are free to exercise our desires and loves whatever they are. Now at last, without social pressure, responsibility, expectations, and rules of conscience, we can be whatever our feelings and thinking prompt us to be -- purely selfish, totally egocentric, wild and mad, cruel and obsessive, prompt to extremes and excesses of any kind whatsoever. These feelings and imaginings now create a hellish environment around us, where we continue our life with others who are similar to us.

 

When we think about it now, it is clear that we should avoid at all cost from ending our life on earth with a hellish personality on the inside, even if we have a civilized personality on the outside.

 

God's purpose in providing revelation of spiritual truths in the form of Sacred Scripture allows us to see rationally that we must undergo regeneration of character in order to have a heavenly life in eternity. And as well, to teach us the techniques that are effective in this regeneration effort -- how we are to cooperate with the Divine Psychologist to reciprocate. By acknowledging the co-presence of the Divine Psychologist in our mind, by studying Sacred Scripture through a celestial-rational understanding, and by reflecting deeply on our conscience, we become spiritually enlightened so that we can acquire celestial-rational truths with which to resist spiritual temptations and consequently to be conjoined with God through willing what is good and thinking in accordance with our rational understanding of truth.

 

The Vertical Community

 

See Diagrams 6, 11, 13, 15, 19, 21, 22, 23.

(Reminder: shift-Click to get a new page for the diagrams so you can look at them while reading the text below, after adjusting the two windows. Or, you can print the diagrams.)

We are members of two communities, one in time and one in eternity. The vertical community contrasts with the horizontal community. Our physical socio-legal identity and social presence in community is located in the context of our horizontal community, that is, the surrounding locales, cities, countries, and world. Our location in the horizontal community is marked by place and time of birth, hence culture and language. Our vertical community is not in time and place, not in culture and language, but in loves and thoughts, consequently in consciousness. Those who are similar in loves have compatible thoughts, which localizes them close to each other in the vertical community.

 

An analogy to the vertical community is a word thesaurus. If you look at the classification outline of Roget’s Thesaurus you will find certain concepts or ideas to be near each other, being semantic neighbors in their vertical classification area, as for example:

These five expressions or ideas are close neighbors as indicated by their classification outline number. Contrast this semantic neighborhood with a more distant zone:

 

Another every day system that reflects mental geography are the subject headings classification systems that organize book collections in libraries, and allow people to find the needle in the haystack. When you “browse” the catalog, or the shelves of books in the library stacks, you will find that books that are located close to each other share a specific subject matter, and there are thousands of such categories in a large library system. Physical location of books indicates their topical relationship to neighboring books. In effect, you can inspect a shelf of books and see different titles, content, and perspectives on the one topic or subject that you are interested in. Thanks to the rational system of subject matter classification, physical geography corresponds to semantic geography. Or we can say “mental geography” instead of “semantic geography” because what is semantic is always mental.

 

The world of meanings is the world of consciousness. Meanings are discretely arranged in each mental zone (see diagram 16). (Reminder: you can shift-Click to have it opened in another window.) Divine Truth can also be called Divine Meaning. Hence mental light from the mental sun is the source of all meanings that we can experience through the cognitive respiratory system of the mental body.  The celestial mental body gives us a consciousness of God’s meanings or truths, that is least distorted in the human mind. This is called a celestial-rational understanding of Divine Truth or Rationality. It is based on being able to discern celestial-rational or interior-rational correspondences of Sacred Scripture. An appropriate form of Sacred Scripture exists in each mental zone (see this volume: http://www.theisticpsychology.org/books/theistic/ch12.htm )

 

God provides Sacred Scriptures in each mental zone as a source of celestial-rational ideas that are not in any way related to physical things. We are informed by God that there is an afterlife in eternity and that we have an immortal body with which we live our life in either heaven or hell, depending on how we live our lives and what loves we cling to after death. This is perfect rationality because it corresponds to God’s rationality as expressed in Divine Speech written down in Sacred Scripture. What God speaks always has a literal exterior in each mental zone, as well as a hidden interior that contains infinite wisdom arranged in perfect rationality.

 

There is a hidden rational science in Sacred Scripture and it can be reconstructed through the language of correspondences. When we read Sacred Scripture in the meanings of its literal-historical sense, our consciousness is formed in our material mental body (V) (or layers 9 and 8) (see Diagrams). Even if we “universalize” or “idealize” the literal sense into a principle or doctrine, it will remain an abstracted expression of the literal. In other words, in all such doctrine, the literal meanings are at their center.

 

In order to read Sacred Scripture at the celestial- rational level (rather than the material-rational level), we need to use our knowledge of correspondences to extract the rational-level meanings that are hidden within the literal. Divine Speech expressed in Sacred Scripture always has multiple layers of meanings since when God speaks, all of humanity is addressed, thus all of the mental zones of eternity, from top to bottom (see diagrams). The content of God’s Speech – what God wants to reveal to us – are meanings about God, reality, and ourselves. God’s meanings descend into the human mind starting from the top, which give us celestial-rational correspondences of Sacred Scripture. These meanings maintains our consciousness at the heavenly or “angelic” level. God’s meanings in Sacred Scripture form people’s consciousness at each anatomical level.

 

The content of our awareness or conscious life is meaning, but not solely that. We are also conscious of our sensations and our motor determinations and readinesses (movements, stance, tension, vibration). The hierarchy of loves in the affective circulatory system mirrors the hierarchy of meanings in the cognitive respiratory system. This correspondence reflects the organic fact that the affective and cognitive systems develop and operate interdependently Neither can operate independently of the other, just as our blood could not circulate without our breathing. (see earlier section).

 

The Swedenborg Reports are unique because they give us much empirical data about the mental world of eternity, as observed by Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1771) for 27 continuous years of living life in dual consciousness. He was aware of his physical body and its surroundings while he was also aware of the surroundings of his mental body, both material and celestial. In about three dozen books of details Swedenborg described life such as it is for everyone after the dying/resuscitation process. With his dual awareness he was able to observe the vertical community and how we are connected in our thoughts and emotions with those who are no longer attached to a physical body. Swedenborg uses several terms to refer to people after resuscitation, including, good spirits, evil spirits, angels, devils, genii, and others. These terms are familiar to everyone from education and literature. However it is not generally known that these are terms for people after the dying/resuscitation process. They indicate the character of the ruling love of the person, as will be seen below.

 

The influence of people on each other across the dying/resuscitation dividing line was constantly observed by Swedenborg. Here is one instance from the earlier phase of his observations in which he discusses “influx” or the interacting influence in the vertical community. I have added explanatory comments in square brackets [.].

Quoting from the Swedenborg Reports (published in 1753):

AC 6200. Because I have been living - constantly, for nine years now - in company with spirits and angels, I have been able to take careful note of the nature of influx. When I have been thinking, the material ideas in my thought have presented themselves so to speak in the middle of a wave-like motion. I have noticed that the wave was made up of nothing other than such ideas as had become attached to the particular matter in my memory that I was thinking about, and that a person's entire thought is seen by spirits in this way.

[In our mental body we can see each other’s affective-circulatory system and cognitive-respiratory system. Hence we have visual sight of a person’s stream of thoughts and emotions. (That’s a nice feature of our afterlife, don’t you think?)]

But nothing else enters that person's awareness then apart from what is in the middle which has presented itself as a material idea.

[We are aware of only a fragment of an idea we are thinking about. And this fragment is the material portion of the idea. Hence we are not aware of the rational or celestial portions of our own ideas.]

I have likened that wave round about to spiritual wings which serve to raise the particular topic the person is thinking about up out of his memory. And in this way the person becomes aware of that subject matter. The surrounding material in which the wave-like motion takes place contained countless things that harmonized with the matter I was thinking about. This was made clear to me by the fact that from those things spirits living in a more perfect sphere knew everything I had ever learned on that particular subject. It accordingly showed me that spirits take in and absorb everything a person knows, while genii, who are interested solely in his desires and affections, do the same to all aspects of his loves.

 

[ Note these points: (1) one idea or topic is constructed out of “countless things” or concepts and sub-ideas. (2) People in the afterlife have access to each other’s memories, knowledges, chain of thinking (cognitive system), as well as emotions and loves (affective system). (3) Due to their specific loves, people specialize in accessing either each other’s thoughts and reasonings (“spirits”) or each other’s emotions and loves (“genii”). (4) This vertical interaction process also operates across the dying/resuscitation divide so that spirits can access our thoughts while genii can access our loves. However, this vertical interaction process is not conscious either on our part, or on their part.]

 

[2] Let the following example illustrate the point. Whenever I have thought about a person I knew, an image of that person, like that which comes to anyone's mind when his name is mentioned, presented itself in the middle. But round about the image of him - looking like the wings of a bird that are moving up and down - there was everything I had known and thought since childhood regarding that person. Consequently the entire character of that person as it existed in my thought and affection presented itself to spirits in an instant. The like has also happened whenever I have thought about any city. From the sphere round about moving like a wave spirits knew in an instant everything I had ever seen in it or known about it. The same thing has applied to my scientific knowledge. (AC 6200)

 

This is the first time in the scientific literature that an investigator was able to access the vertical community by direct observation. Anyone with dual consciousness would be able to confirm Swedenborg’s observations. Each of will be able to do so after we undergo the dying/resuscitation process which takes about 33 hours, according to Swedenborg’s careful observations for 27 years.

 

Where Do Thoughts Come From?

The phrase vertical community was coined in theistic psychology to designate the fact that God keeps the entire human race integrated in their mental operations and consequently in the breathing of the mental body. This is one of the most amazing scientific findings to be found in the Swedenborg Reports. We are connected or networked into an online synchronous ongoing vertical community through our mental body, which is the organ where thinking and feeling operations take place (see anatomical diagrams). When our cognitive-respiratory system is activated, we experience thoughts coming into our awareness. This is an anatomical or physiological process of the mental body. Now the big question everyone has been asking for a long time:

Where do thoughts come from?

No scientist in the negative bias mode of thinking has ever been able to give a rational answer to this question. One irrational theory is that thoughts don't really exist, and that only electro-chemical operations of the brain cells exist. This is called reductionism in science. Another irrational answer is that thoughts do exist, but only temporarily, while the electro-chemical operations of the brain cells remain active. According to this view, thoughts somehow “emerge” from these electrical activities. Another traditional idea in non-theistic psychology is that thoughts -- cognitive operations -- are memory images created by sensory input. The reason this explanation is irrational is that it equates a natural or physical operation in time and space ("sensory input") with a mental or spiritual operation in eternity that is outside time and space. Sensations and images are nowhere located in the physical body, which contains only neuro-chemical activity. Images and sensations are located in our mental body, which we have from birth, along with our physical body.

A rational answer to where thoughts come from, would have to assume the positive bias of empiricist dualism and acknowledge that the Swedenborg Reports deserve to be examined for their scientific merit. These reports present empirical proof of the reality of the vertical community from Swedenborg's three decades of daily observations in the world of eternity, being in a mental state of consciousness capable of communicating face to face, and conduct conversations and interviews.

The idea of the vertical community means that we are never alone in our mind, but are unconsciously connected to the mind of others in the afterlife in a vertical community network.

 

We have the illusion that our mental world is an individual's world, while our physical and social world is interactive.

 

We know that socially we are not alone in the world of our horizontal community. We may be physically alone in a room or in a swimming pool, but we are not alone in the city. We are well aware of our horizontal community that extends from house and neighborhood, to city and country, and the planet globally. We call it our horizontal community because it is located in physical space and time. But our vertical community is outside time and space, in the eternity of the mental world. There is only one mental world.

Every human being is born a dual citizen, with a physical body in time, and a mental body in eternity, outside time and outside physical space or energy. Our thoughts and feelings cannot be located in time and physical space for they are not made of physical matter or physical energy. Hence it is that we are born into eternity, which automatically makes us immortal.

 

A thought or feeling cannot die because "death" applies only to the natural world of physical time, space, energy, and matter. Our mental body grows as the physical body grows, and at the death of the physical body, the mental body continues its life in eternity. Swedenborg lived consciously in both worlds for 27 years, and was able to confirm by many observations and experiments, that every individual is resuscitated about 30 hours after the death of the physical body and then continues life forever in that new environment.

In Swedenborg's Reports we have the scientific fact, observationally confirmed, that an individual's mental world is actually a social world in which we are surrounded by many others who are in their mental world. While we are not aware of the vertical community, prior to resuscitation, we are fully aware of it after resuscitation when we are no longer conscious in the natural mind through the physical body.

Quoting from the Swedenborg Reports: [“man” = our state before we die; “spirit” = our state after we die]

TCR 475. Man does not know that in respect to his mind he is in the midst of spirits, for the reason that the spirits with whom he is in company in the spiritual world, think and speak spiritually, while his own spirit thinks and speaks naturally so long as he is in the material body; and the natural man cannot understand or perceive spiritual thought and speech, nor the reverse.

[Our mental body identifies with the physical body so fully that we believe we are the physical body. Neither spirits nor us are aware of this networked connection with each other, moment by moment for our entire life. Our physical body eyes cannot see them and their mental environment, while their mental body eyes cannot see our physical body and its environment.]

This is why spirits cannot be seen. But when the spirit of man [= when we become conscious in our mental body] is in company with spirits in their world, he is also in spiritual thought and speech with them, because his mind is interiorly spiritual but exteriorly natural; therefore by means of his interiors he communicates with spirits, while by means of his exteriors he communicates with men. By such communication man has a perception of things, and thinks about them analytically. If it were not for such communication, man would have no more thought or other thought than a beast, and if all connection with spirits were taken away from him, he would instantly die. (TCR 475)

This passage indicates that we have a conscious natural mind or mental body and an unconscious spiritual mind or celestial mental body. The conscious material mind (V, layers 9, 8, 7) thinks in a natural language composed of concepts and ideas that are material or time-bound and place-bound. The unconscious spiritual mind or celestial mental body thinks in a spiritual or universal and innate language of the thought. Hence it is that we are not aware of what's going in our celestial mental body which thinks in a spiritual language, not material or natural language. The spiritual language and thought is constructed solely with concepts and ideas that have “state” and “eternity” in them, and never time, place, culture, history, finance, politics, etc., all of which are tied implicitly to the physical world and its conditions and limitations.

 

These two portions of our mind are functionally connected and influence each other through the laws of correspondences, though we are not aware of this interconnection. Swedenborg's state of living in dual consciousness required that he be conscious both in his natural mind (or material mental body), and in his spiritual mind (or celestial mental body). Normally, we become conscious in our spiritual mind during the dying/ resuscitation process, when we lose our awareness of the physical body. Upon regaining consciousness a few hours later our natural mind and its material contents are with us, but our awareness of them gradually wanes because they are of no importance to us in the new environment of eternity. Instead, our consciousness is now filled with the urgent demands of our ruling love and its sub-loves. These were laying hidden and buried while we were attached to the physical body. Now our ruling love emerges with irresistible power as there is no longer anything physical, legal, or moral that can stop it from fulfilling its desires and anticipations.

 

The passage above also states that thinking in our conscious natural mind is possible only when our unconscious spiritual mind is in communication with other spiritual minds. This is the vertical community. If such communication were cut off, we would cease to think, hence, cease to be human. Our individual “private” thoughts and feelings are spiritually public social events, consisting of interactive exchanges with others in our vertical community. Swedenborg calls this relationship "communication with spirits" and "being in company with spirits."

 

Whether we live in heaven or in hell, and consequently experience  the quality of life proper to each, depends on the habits and loves in our thoughts and feelings that we accumulate over a lifetime of daily choices. Our daily choices depend on the character of those with whom we share loves in the vertical community. The spiritual company we keep determines the character of our vertical community. This is determined by the character or quality of our loves. We hold these loves in common with them. This is what binds us together with specific people and societies in the Grand Human and the Grand Monster of the vertical community. The way each individual mind operates is a consequence of the character of the spirits in the individual's vertical community, moment by moment, as reflected in the person's thinking and feeling, from birth to endless immortality.

 

When we are regenerating the Divine Psychologist changes the connections we maintain with specific spiritual societies. We are faced with temptations that reveal strong hellish loves, providing us with enjoyments to which we seem to be very attached from inheritance and habit. For example, we hate being criticized even when it accurately reflects our attitude or behavior. This is a selfish or narcissistic love that is hurtful to self and healthy development. It is the love of adoring what is one’s own even when it is bad. When we cling to this love and resist giving it up, we are kept networked by the Divine Psychologist with vertical community societies that feed on this love and possess this love to enormous intensity and stupidity.

 

As we cling to the unconditional love of what is our own, we are bonding with those Grand Monster societies where this love is intensified from generations and centuries of cumulative practice and devolution. After the dying/resuscitation process we awaken to this ruling love, and we are spontaneously and irresistibly inducted into that society. We now carry on as one of them forever, feeding on the loves of those who are still on earth.

 

It is the same with all ruling loves that are hellish, such as the love of making people suffer, the love of dominating people for the sake of taking advantage of them, the love of robbing or stealing what belongs to others, the love of seducing and corrupting innocent girls or married women, the love of misleading others spiritually beliefs, etc.. When we are submitting or cooperating with the Divine Psychologist in our regeneration, we are given temptations to resist, and we can do so when we obey rational or spiritual principles of good and truth that we acquire through reflection and study. The moment we resist in freedom as-if by our own effort, a particular temptation by rejecting the hellish love it involves, in that moment we are reconnected by the Divine Psychologist to some specific society in the Grand Human that is populated by people who love the principle or truth by which we resisted this particular evil love. This process of anatomical regeneration of the mental body goes on throughout our adult life. And if it is not completed prior to the dying/resuscitation process, it is completed immediately afterwards.

 

Quoting from the Swedenborg Reports:

AC 50. (...) Man is altogether ignorant that he is governed of the Lord through angels and spirits, and that with everyone there are at least two spirits, and two angels. By spirits man has communication with the world of spirits, and by angels with heaven. Without communication by means of spirits with the world of spirits, and by means of angels with heaven, and thus through heaven with the Lord, man could not live at all; his life entirely depends on this conjunction, so that if the spirits and angels were to withdraw, he would instantly perish.

 

[2] While man is unregenerate he is governed quite otherwise than when regenerated. While unregenerate there are evil spirits with him, who so domineer over him that the angels, though present, are scarcely able to do anything more than merely guide him so that he may not plunge into the lowest evil, and bend him to some good-in fact bend him to good by means of his own cupidities, and to truth by means of the fallacies of the senses. He then has communication with the world of spirits through the spirits who are with him, but not so much with heaven, because evil spirits rule, and the angels only avert their rule. [3] But when the man is regenerate, the angels rule, and inspire him with all goods and truths, and with fear and horror of evils and falsities. The angels indeed lead, but only as ministers, for it is the Lord alone who governs man through angels and spirits. (...) (AC 50)

HH 249. It is rarely granted at the present day, however, to talk with spirits, because it is dangerous.

For then the spirits know, what otherwise they do not know, that they are with man, and evil spirits are such that they hold man in deadly hatred, and desire nothing more than to destroy him both soul and body, which indeed happens with those who have so indulged themselves in fantasies as to have separated from themselves the enjoyments proper to the natural man. Some also who lead a solitary life sometimes hear spirits talking with them, and without danger; but that the spirits with them may not know that they are with man they are at intervals removed by the Lord; for most spirits are not aware that any other world than that in which they live is possible, and therefore are unaware that there are men anywhere else.

This is why man on his part is not permitted to speak with them, for if he did they would know.

Those who meditate much on religious subjects, and are so intent upon them as to see them as it were inwardly within themselves, begin also to hear spirits speaking with them; for religious subjects, whatever they are, when man dwells upon them by himself and does not modify them with various things that are of use in the world, penetrate to the interiors and dwell there, and occupy the whole spirit of the man, and even enter into the spiritual world and act upon the spirits there. Such persons are visionaries and enthusiasts and whatever spirit they hear they believe to be the Holy Spirit, when, in fact, such spirits are enthusiastic spirits.

Such spirits see falsities as truths, and so, seeing them, they not only persuade themselves but also those with whom they inflow to believe them. Such spirits, however, have been gradually removed, because they began to lure others into evil and to gain control over them. Enthusiastic spirits are distinguished from other spirits by their believing themselves to be the Holy Spirit, and believing what they say to be Divine. As man honours such spirits with Divine worship they do not try to harm him. I have sometimes talked with them, and the wicked things they infused into their worshippers were then disclosed. They dwell together towards the left, in a desert place.

Footnote references: Man is able to talk with spirits and angels; and the ancient people frequently talked with them (n. 67-69, 784, 1634, 1636, 7802). In some earths angels and spirits appear in human form and talk with the inhabitants (n. 10751, 10752). But on this earth at this day it is dangerous to talk with spirits, unless man is its true faith, and is led by the Lord (n. 784, 9438, 10751). (HH 249)

For additional detailed discussion on the vertical community see this volume:

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/ch5.htm#vc

 

 

Our Anatomical Roots in the Vertical Community

 

The anatomical diagrams give a schematic representation of the vertical community into which every human being is born through the immortal mental body. Our temporary physical body is shown in the center (diagram 6) and it corresponds to the immortal mental body. They are copies or models of each other, one constructed in physical matter, the other in mental substance. The bottom solid line in diagram 6 marks our birth and our first death. The upper solid line marks our second death entry into the Grand Human societies called “heavens.” The bottom solid line also marks our second death entry into the Grand Monster societies called “hells.” The heavenly mental zones are marked layer 4 (“Third Heaven”), layer 5 (“Second Heaven”), and layer 6 (“First Heaven”).The hellish mental zones are marked layer -9, layer -8, and layer -7. The vertical community refers to the continuous and ceaseless interdependence and interaction that takes place between segments across all the anatomical layers and zones of the mental world of eternity where humanity lives, exists, and is conscious.

 

Our birth is marked at the bottom left, and we climb up the years of development from childhood (layer 9e), to adolescence (layer 8e) to young adulthood (layer 7e). We are not aware of the inherited anatomical connections that influence and participate in our mental development. The diagram shows that our anatomical layer 9e in childhood is connected to the Grand Monster societies in layer -9. Layer 8e is tied in development to layer -8 in the Grand Monster. Layer 7e is tied in young adulthood to layer -7 in the Grand Monster. This is the ascending line of the development of the material mental body from birth to adulthood. This organic maturation process cannot go on by itself but must have the input and assistance from the Grand Monster societies in each successive phase of development. The reason for this connection is that we are born in an unregenerate organic state.

 

To balance out the dynamics, we receive the inflow of mental heat and light through the interaction and assistance of the Grand Human societies in layers 4, 5, and 6. These evoke heavenly traits in us called remains. The Divine Psychologist saves the remains of every heavenly love and intention that we experience. At our second death these are integrated into a heavenly personality that can join one of the Grand Human societies.

 

The Divine Psychologist also manages the external events of our lives so that we may be faced with daily temptations to further our regeneration. During these temptations the heavenly and hellish societies to which our mental body is connected each pull us towards themselves through the loves we cling to in the experience of the temptation. This is the “spiritual combat” by which we cooperate with the Divine Psychologist who is effecting the organic process of changeover in the hierarchy of our loves.

 

When we reach mature adulthood in our twenties we have at our disposal a fully operational rational mind. The rational mental body (layer 7) is a discrete degree above the material mental body (layers 9, 8). Our consciousness and meanings in the material mental body’s cognitive respiratory system, is constructed solely from material concepts, that is, concepts that have time and place in their interior structure or presupposition. Think of an abstract concept like government or relativity theory. “Government” is tied to place and time, hence culture and history. “Relativity theory” is tied to energy, time, and the speed of light and other sub-atomic particles of matter and energy.

 

Now let’s think of a concept that is not tied to time and place. Consider the idea of “omnipotence.” It is not related to time and place, or matter and energy. Consider the idea of “feeling guilty.” It is not related to time, place, or matter, but only to mental states that are organic. Consider the idea that “killing is bad.” This idea can be constructed out of material assumptions involving time and place, or else out of assumptions involving mental things in eternity. For instance, we can distinguish between different types of killing, some bad and some good. For example, “killing for the sake of subjugating a population or group” vs. “killing for the sake of defending family and country from hostile enemies.”This distinction is based on rational principles belonging to eternity, not material principles belonging to physical conditions.

 

Note: Further explanations on Diagram 6 above will be found at: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/mental-psychology-p1.htm#_Toc212519321

 

The rational mind extends from the material mind to the celestial mind. The inner (or upper portion) receives all its assumptions and meanings from the celestial mental body and the world of heaven through layers 6, 5, 4. But the exterior (or lower) portion of the rational mind receives all its assumptions and meanings from the infernal mental body and the world of hell through layers -9. -8, -7. Regeneration hangs on the pivot between these two portions of rational consciousness.

 

If as adults we refuse or are disinclined to undergo the regeneration process, we begin the process of devolution through the hellish traits that anatomically bind us more and more to the Grand Monster societies in layers -9, -8, -7. There is no opportunity to operationalize the celestial mental body in layers 6, 5, 4. The celestial mind or consciousness is not available as a choice during our second death. When we are in that state we welcome the idea of joining the societies of the Grand Monster since our ruling love is rooted therein. When we are free to choose, we always choose according to our ruling love.

 

 

Propositions of Mental Psychology

 

  1. The physical world is a world of virtual objects instantiated in material substance by mental correspondences.
  2. The mental world is a world of real objects instantiated in mental substance by celestial correspondences.
  3. The virtual world is a world of virtual objects instantiated in digital substance by rational correspondences.
  4. Correspondences are cause-effect symbolic functions operating across discrete layers.
  5. The mental sun of eternity is the first discrete layer, being the entry point of God into the created universe. It is the source of living love substance and living truth substance issuing forth in infinite diversity, and creating a living expanse of love-truth organic building blocks. This is the organic sub-stratum, or infra-structure, of the mental world of eternity. Everything constructed out of these building blocks is permanent or immortal. The human self or being is constructed out of these immortal substances.
  6. The mental world of eternity is the second discrete layer. Every mental organ or object contains these living Divine building blocks. At birth, a human being possesses a temporary physical body constructed out of material substances, and a permanent mental body constructed out of mental substances. The mental body has three corresponding systems. The affective system in the immortal mental body is built to function as an organic receptor for love substance. The cognitive system is built to function as an organic receptor for truth substance. When these two systems interact they produce the third system called the sensorimotor system. The operation of the sensorimotor system in the immortal mental body is subjectively experienced by human beings as consciousness or being consciously alive as a unique person.
  7. The experience of consciousness is specific to the discrete layer and sub-layer. The highest consciousness experience that human beings can have is called celestial consciousness. It is the mental layer immediately below, or outside, the mental sun of eternity. In this consciousness we merely react to the inflow of love substance and truth substance, which come together in a unique way in every person’s unique affective organ and cognitive organ. This corresponds to the uniqueness of every physical body, and its heart and lungs, or its circulatory system and its respiratory system. The two systems in the physical body (circulatory and respiratory) correspond to the systems in the mental body (affective and cognitive). These two systems acting in synergy produce the third system called neuro-skeletal in the physical body, and sensorimotor in the mental body. Consciousness is the subjective experience of the operations of the sensorimotor system.
  8. The physical body is the third layer.
  9. Love is a living immortal mental substance out of which is constructed all goodness, attraction, enjoyment, ability, and characteristic, and their uses and benefits to human beings. Love is the only bonding force in the mental world of eternity. It corresponds to gravity in the physical world. Love is received by the affective organ.
  10. Truth is a living immortal mental substance out of which is constructed all rationality, intelligence, and knowledge. All meaning and cultural content are constructed out of truth substance, which is received in the cognitive organ.
  11. Love substance is received by our affective organ in the celestial layer of our mind. It unites with truth substance being received in the cognitive organ of the celestial layer in our mind. Together they unite, as in a marriage, and activate the sensorimotor organ (or system). This activation is experienced by us as celestial consciousness.

    Since love and truth substance in our celestial layer are received in purity, without contamination or distortion, the celestial consciousness that is produced in our sensorimotor system can be called quasi-omniscient consciousness or virtual omniscience. This refers to our ability to instantaneously know and understand everything about anything we think or talk about. Celestial consciousness is produced by divine correspondences in the first layer of existence. The Divine Love and the Divine Truth which are absolute in God exhibit their correspondence in created existence most purely in celestial consciousness.
  12. Our rational consciousness is a discrete degree below, or outside of, our celestial consciousness. There are two sub-degrees in the rational mind. The upper, or interior, degree of the rational mind faces upward to the celestial love, celestial truth, and celestial consciousness. The lower, or exterior, degree of the rational mind faces downward to the material mind. There is therefore a battle going on in our rational consciousness, namely the battle between the celestial-rational mind on the one side, versus the material-rational mind on the other side. The celestial-rational mind is rationally pure and contains only correspondences that are from the Divine.
  13. The material-rational consciousness is produced by material-rational loves married to material-rational appearances of truth. These are degraded loves and distorted truths. Undistorted truths cannot act in synergy with degraded loves. So the truth substance has to be distorted or modified by the person in order to allow it to act in consort with the degraded love. The undistorted Divine correspondences that create our celestial consciousness cannot operate in the material-rational consciousness, but only in the celestial-rational consciousness.
  14. The degradation of love substance and the distortion of truth substance first begins in the material mind, which is the lowest sub-degree of the mind. It is closest to the physical body and world, hence most influenced by it. The loves and ideas in our material mind accumulate through our interaction with the physical world. We express mental properties by using physical properties (e.g., heavy heart, bright future, hot under the collar, etc.). Our abstract principles of science, law, theology, or humanism are all based on time, place, identity, history, culture, science, physical world. These are all material-rational ideas and loves.

    An example of a material-rational love is the love of being first, best, richest, most popular. An example of a celestial-rational love is the love of being useful to others without consideration of whether we receive credit for it (see material and rational loves).
  15. The battle between material and celestial loves goes on until the dying-resuscitation process. When the physical body is no longer in correspondence due to death, we begin our conscious life in the mental world of eternity. This biological process of separation or removal takes about 33 hours. We then awaken in our new mental surrounds. We then undergo the final battle for our future. Our experiences lead us to explore and discover our loves. One ruling love then emerges and is acknowledged above all the others, being at the center, and in total command. That ruling love isolates and removes all sub-loves that are not supportive or congruent. There then remains nothing active in our consciousness but the ruling love and its sub-loves.
  16. There are two types of ruling loves, those that can correspond to celestial loves, and those that are in conflict to them due to selfism and materialism. Celestial ruling loves produce virtual omniscience and heavenly marital happiness between eternal soul mates. The loves that are contrary to this are called infernal loves. When an infernal ruling love is acknowledged by us and we allow it to take power over us, we enter a negative psychological place called hell.
  17. Managing our loves becomes therefore one of the most important activities we will ever have, since it has serious consequences for our welfare and happiness to eternity. What can be more important? This management process is called character regeneration. This lifelong process continues throughout our life and is advanced through the process of temptations. God assumes the role of Divine Psychologist in our mind and supervises the process of character reformation through temptations. The Divine Psychologist arranges the physical and social environment to present us with daily temptations between material-rational principles of action and celestial-rational principles.
  18. Truth substance is the infrastructure that sustains rationality and intelligence. The cognitive organ of the rational mind operates from and with truth substance. Truth substance in the rational mind can be covered over with material appearances. This is what we then see in our material-rational thinking and consciousness – we see the appearances of truth, not truth itself in purity without the covering we put on it. The process of “interpreting” and “reinterpreting” truth is motivated by the love of self, or selfism. Truth substance in our cognitive organ, as it is in itself without covering, is called celestial-rational correspondences of Divine Truth. But when it is covered over by means of material ideas and interpretations, truth in our cognitive organ is called material-rational correspondences of Divine Truth.
  19. Since every human beings inherits the biological tendency to think in material-rational correspondences, people grow up to become adults who live their life through a material-rational consciousness. As a result, a hierarchy of loves is established in people’s character and personality which are justified by material-rational principles of beliefs, religions, philosophies, politics, art, literature, or the online world. Society reflects the inner clash of belief systems that justify competition and conflict as a way of interacting with each other, rather than cooperation and peace. Whenever celestial-rational truth is covered up by material-rational appearances of truth, there is a gradual and inevitable degradation of life towards the most negative and irrational distortions of truth and corruption of love. This is called the “hells” in the human mind.
  20. Absence of truth substance through the distorted coverings of appearances of truth is called destruction and death. This refers to the destruction of happiness and rationality called the “heavens” in the human mind. Since our character is filled with appearances of truth in the form of distorted coverings (or interpretations), we are attached to many loves that are infernal, which means loves that gradually and inevitably lead to hell in our mind. In order to stop ourselves from sliding into our own mental hell and living it in eternity, we must regenerate our inherited character loves that take us there. This requires engaging in mental combat called temptations.
  21. Before the Divine Psychologist brings us into a temptation situation we must be willing to prepare for battle by acquiring mental weapon systems that help us overcome temptations.

    These weapons are constructed by the individual out of truth substance in the form of celestial-rational correspondences of Divine Truth. During the temptation we make use of these weapons of truth. For instance, when we are tempted to lie or cheat in order to gain something we want, we are faced with a conflict of loves. On the one hand we are attached to the idea that we deserve to have this object or situation, even if we need to lie or cheat to get it – which is a material-rational principle or self-justification.

    On the other hand we are attached to the idea that selfish loves will rob us from a happy eternity – which is a celestial-rational principle. The Divine Psychologist puts us into a perfect mental balance between these two opposing loves. By holding on (or “cleaving”) to the heavenly love of peace in eternity, we are willing to let go of the hellish love of aggrandizing ourselves at the expense of others.

    Gradually, over the course of our adult life, we continue to be exposed to these types of temptations every day. As our love for understanding celestial-rational meanings grows and intensifies, we are regenerated more and more in our character loves. At death and resuscitation our ruling love of celestial-rational meanings then takes over, giving us the life of heaven in virtual omniscience. Others who also acquired such a ruling love, then form harmonious communities of heavenly societies or Grand Human, where couples live in eternal love and endless mental development.
  22. When we are in dream consciousness we possess a dream body with which we may enjoy enhanced sensorimotor abilities such as flying, seeing through walls, teleporting instantaneously to another location, not being dependent on eating or breathing air, socializing and chatting face to face with other dream bodies, experiencing intense sensations of pleasure or pain, happiness or fright, riches or poverty, alone or with another or with many. These enhanced powers of consciousness in the dream body are the product of the marriage between loves in the affective organ with ideas and images in the cognitive organ.

    The dream environment or world is constructed by the sleeping person’s loves and ideas acting together. Some loves we have cannot marry or act together with the ideas and images we have when awake. But when we are in sleep mode we construct ideas and images that are in harmony with those loves, and the two can get together, producing the dream environment and its consciousness.
  23. The particular consciousness we are living is localized to each discrete layer in the mental world. The three systems in our mental body provide us with three discrete layers of consciousness, along with sub-layers in each. The three principal layers are the celestial, the rational, and the material. Our consciousness in the celestial layer gives us quasi-omniscience.
  24. Human life is mental life. There exist an exact point by point correspondence between the physical body and the mental body. Every single operation or event in the mental world has a precise correspondence with a single event in the physical world. Without this precise and synchronous corresponding action of the two, there would be no physical world, no mental life, no self or consciousness, no immortality.

    Since human immortality depends on these precise laws of correspondence between the mental and the physical, it is provided by God that the physical universe will never cease to exist. Further, the physical universe with its stars and planets will continue to expand and multiply endlessly, to correspond to the endless multiplication of human beings in eternity. The more human beings are in eternity the more the human race can continue to evolve endlessly to perfection, thus, toward God. The closer human beings evolve towards God, the higher and greater is our consciousness, thus, our happiness, love, and rationality. This ever higher consciousness reverberates across the mental world of eternity, entering the individual consciousness in every immortal and unique mental body (or mind, or spirit).
  25. The mental world is organic because its building blocks – love and truth substance, are organic and spiritual, that is living. All living objects are organic. All organic objects develop, evolve, and progress on a continuous basis. This never ceasing change or organic life occurs in two discrete and opposing modalities or directions of life. One is in correspondence with the order or arrangement of love and truth substance billowing forth from the mental sun of eternity, and forming an environment for all mental objects in which to exist.

    These mental building blocks are of the Divine substance, providing for the existence of the two worlds. These building blocks have an inherent organic life and immortality of their own. It is the Divine life itself forming the substance out of which the two worlds are built or constructed. This Divine order is known to us as the consciousness of heaven that is produced by love substance being received in our affective organ and truth substance received in our cognitive organ. This heavenly consciousness contains the eternal development and evolution of our love, goodness, rationality, and marital happiness.
  26. The reception of Divine love and truth is automatic and spontaneous with every human being through the mental body. Love substance enters our affective system in the celestial layer of the mental body. Truth substance enters the cognitive system in the celestial layer. Love substance seeks truth substance to be united to, as in a marriage of soul mates. These two substances are conjoined or married in God.

    When love and truth substance enter the created mental world of eternity, through the mental sun, there is a separation or disunion between the love and the truth. The affective organ and the cognitive organ operate independently. They have to arrange themselves in such a way as to coordinate their action. There is an irresistible urge or impulse for the love substance in the affective organ to seek out and re-arrange the truth substance in the cognitive organ. A union can then be formed between love and a suitable truth.

    The love substance and truth substance, now re-united, can produce a living offspring or an organic product that we experience as our consciousness, our very own life, our self. This is our immortality. This is what matters to us more than anything. Everything we want depends on this immortality. But there is a way of losing it!
  27. Losing our immortality refers to losing our organic eternal life that consists of ever increasing marital happiness and rationality. The expression “to die” or “to be destroyed” refers to losing this eternal happiness and rationality. But “losing” is the consequence of “choosing.” Amazing as it may seem, we each have a strong urge to destroy our eternal development and happiness. People accomplish this self-destruction by changing the order of life that is inherent in the inflowing love substance and truth substance. This modification is a corruption and a distortion, which gets the mental body going on a downward development or progressive devolution.
  28. When people awaken from the dying/resuscitation process, they begin consciousness in a new medium or modality, with new abilities, and a new order and social environment. The laws of correspondence produce an outward environment around the mental body. This outward objective life or consciousness is populated with other mental bodies that are similar or related through the operations of the affective and cognitive systems they each have.

    For instance, people who choose to hang on to the love of possessing status over others, hang out with other people who have this love. They form a community or mental society in which they can practice with each other all the plans and intentions that support this love of status over others. People may be stuck in such a society forever, unless they choose to let go of the love of status. Their unwillingness to let go of that love no matter what the consequences are, binds them together into an eternal hell. It is called a hell because the organic unity or consciousness produced within such a society is contrary to the order of its own interior building blocks, which are heavenly.
  29. The activity of striving to maintain disorder, or a contrary order, to one’s own building blocks, results in progressive deterioration of consciousness. It gradually sinks deeper and deeper into total and radical opposition to love, truth, and beauty. This results in greater and greater immersion of their consciousness into what is contrary to Divine order, namely, selfishness, arrogance, insanity, irrationality, delusion, cruelty, bestiality, hatred for anything good or true, hatred of God, hatred of innocence and children, hatred of the marriage bond and fidelity, love of mad fantasy, love of misery, love of ugliness, love of war, love disunion, love of deception, attraction to deformed human faces and bodies, love of depriving others of their goods, rights, and freedom, and many more.

    Our hellish consciousness is the active opposition and inversion of our heavenly consciousness. After resuscitation we continue life on the same course of loves that we had organically developed and grown since birth. One organic order leads to immortality in heavenly consciousness. The other order organic order leads to immortality in hellish consciousness. Managing this outcome ahead of time is therefore the most important task we have now.
  30. Mental development since birth requires mental feeding, just as the physical body requires heat, air, water, and food on a continuous basis. The mental body requires the things that correspond to these physical things. “Heat and food” in the circulatory and digestive system of the physical body correspond to “love substance” in the affective system of the mental body. “Air and water” taken in through the throat and respiratory system of the physical body correspond to “truth substance” in the cognitive system of the mental body. “Mental air substance” corresponds to “physical air substance.” The cognitive organ operates when it “breathes in” or receives the mental air that is made of truth substance. If you were to prevent love substance from entering the affective organ, our consciousness of all loves would instantly vanish and no longer be in existence. Without loves in our affective system, the system stops operating. We fall into unconsciousness forever, as if non-existent.
  31. Love and truth substance enter the mental body on a continuous basis from birth to endless immortality. The result is that we are able to have the consciousness of having affections and ideas. To be alive as a person or unique individual means to be conscious of loves and ideas that are our very own. If we got our loves from another person we would not feel these as our own love, but their love. We would feel like we are possessed by them, by their love, doing what their love wants, not what we want.

    This would be eternal hellish slavery to others. It would make hell possible in our mind, but not heaven. For heavenly consciousness to exist in our mental body we must develop and evolve our own loves from birth onward, but mostly beginning with young adulthood when we start asking and figuring out what we want, each of us as a unique individual. We continue gathering many loves that we hang on to. A unique personality or collection of loves and ideas shapes itself around us. This collection of loves matures and becomes the basis of who we are as a free self.

    When we resuscitate our mental body is well advanced in possessing and hoarding its collection of loves that we have accumulated through our daily choices until the dying process put an end to it. If our collection of loves can be organized into a heavenly collection, we can join a mental society in a heavenly environment. But if the collection of loves in our mental body refuses to be organized into a heavenly order, because it is in a selfish or hellish order, then we join a mental society in a hellish environment. This is the organic process of love and choice.
  32. The above proposals represent a medical or organic definition of God, heaven, hell, and immortality.

    Every human being is born into the mental world of eternity. Every individual is a complete actuality. Each of us is complete, and there is only one mental world of eternity into which we are each born with an immortal mental body. It follows that all human beings “overlap” as it were, each of us being a complete mental world as well as living in it. Hence each of us has the same mental sun of eternity at the center, or at the top, of their being or soul.

    Whenever our consciousness ascends to the highest layer of our organic mind in the mental body, which is called the celestial layer, we can see the mental sun shining towards us from the appearance of a distance similar to what we see when we look at our sun with the physical eyes at mid-morning. It is in this highest mental layer that our reception of love and truth substance is pure, because uncorrupted by our selfishness, and undistorted by our material ideas or principles. These celestial meanings and principles can be accessed in our rational consciousness through the operation of correspondences.
  33. We cannot have celestial consciousness until after the physical body and material mind have been removed from our personality, thus not until after resuscitation. However we can be conscious of rational ideas and principles that correspond to the celestial consciousness. For example, people might come up with the idea that to be selfish is often better for us than to be altruistic all the time. This may be called a material-rational proposal or principle. It requires rational thinking in order to come up with it, or in order to understand it when we hear about it from others. But the rationality we use in this type of thinking is based on material ideas and experiences. For instance, people might point to the case of others who have tried to be altruistic and ended being punished for it. This is a material objection, based on the physical experiences of people that we hear or read about.
  34. Now we can also look at the situation from a rational perspective that is not based on material facts, but based on celestial ideas such as the mental sun of eternity, God, immortality, eternal mental body, love substance, and truth substance. These celestial facts and principles create our rational consciousness that is non-material, hence not contaminated by meanings and assumptions based on time, place, history, socialization, identity, culture, education, science, literature. The content of the conscious celestial-rational layer provides a consciousness in which we have a perception of the heavenly mental state. No “rational” argument or proof can be presented that is final and conclusive forever, until we acquire this perception or consciousness of heaven as a mental state that we already possess in our mental body.
  35. The physiological or medical process of regeneration, or character reformation, is initiated during adulthood by our love for the heaven we perceive in our celestial-rational layer. Our celestial-rational thinking is a discrete degree above our material thinking, and greatly enhances our ability to explore the rational zone of the mental world of eternity.

    We may at first only get a brief glimpse of it, but this experience is so deep, delightful, and impressive that it changes our lifestyle orientation and puts psychological pressure on us to “clean up our act” in order to obtain that heaven for ourselves. We know what we have to do when we start thinking rationally, and loving to do that more and more, instead of hating it. Our material consciousness before it is regenerated, either hates the celestial-rational or denies its existence or reality.

    When we are in the usual material consciousness of our daily activities, we have the ability to compel ourselves mentally to think more rationally. No one lacks this ability. The Divine Psychologist guarantees through omnipotence that that no human being can lose the ability of thinking rationally. When we approach this rational thinking out of curiosity or love for truth, we begin to see our life in a more actual or real perspective.

    If we are committed to thinking rationally we can figure out that our real life is our mental life and that we need to look at ourselves as mental beings, not physical.

    Our future lies in the mental world of eternity, not in the physical world of time.

    Rational thinking also allows us to figure out that this reality could not function unless an omnipotent and omniscient God made it happen, taking care of every detail. Rational thinking shows us that God cannot control the whole without controlling every part.

    And through this rational approach in our thinking we discover that we can talk to God and that God is present in our mind as the Divine Psychologist who is managing the mental events that keep us evolving and surviving in a healthy state. God as God manages all physical events, while God as Divine Psychologist manages all mental events.
  36. On the other hand, we can give in to a love of materialism, elevating it above the rational and celestial. In this mentality people believe in “rock bottom” reality, thinking that what is material is more real than what is mental. They compare thoughts and imagination to “castles in the air,” thus not real. Real things are physical and what Is not physical is not real, or not as real.

    This material limitation in human thinking prevents growth in the celestial layer of the mental body. When materialism is valued in our thinking by unconditional love or respect for it, we are constructing the basis for our material-rational consciousness. We may oscillate for awhile between mental states of material-rationality and mental states of celestial rationality. But as we mature into adulthood we begin to favor one over the other, and by the end of the operation, when we are facing the dying-resuscitation process, we have evolved a mental physiology that is based primarily on either a heavenly orientation of altruism and rationality, or based on a hellish orientation of selfism and insanity.

    Day by day, hour by hour, and minute by minute, our choices of living cumulate, some into heavenly pile, some into the hellish pile. The Divine Psychologist insures that in this process of oscillation none of the roots or loves in the two piles come near each other, for this would mean their mutual destruction.
  37. People sometimes say about someone that he was a hurtful man, often ruthless, but that he tried to make up for it with other traits such as being supportive of family, supportive of charities and volunteerism, and having engaged in military or government service. The idea here (which is material) is that the good things a person does should be weighed against the bad things, and sometimes there can be a balance.

    zzzz But a rational idea of this is that our hellish loves cannot be counterbalanced by our heavenly loves, and that whichever we hold on more strongly, that is what we will end up with, and all the heavenly loves that are contrary, will be dropped or killed. After resuscitation the mental body cannot support both because one wants to destroy the other. They are organically opposed. The mixture of both loves cannot continue as before while we were still attached by correspondence to our physical body. Now the mental body is freed from connection to the physical world and no longer tolerates the mixture. If the ruling love is heavenly, all the hellish loves are put to rest. And if the ruling love is hellish, all the heavenly loves are put to rest. Thus we become a pure individual, either purely good, altruistic, and rational, or purely bad, selfish, and insane.
  38.  Consciousness is the substance of life. It is produced by the joint interaction between loves in the affective organ and ideas in the cognitive organ. The result produces the sensorimotor organ that carries consciousness. Operations and modifications in the sensorimotor system of the mental body are specific to each layer of the mental world. Our individual mind or mental body overlaps with other mental bodies since there is only one mental world of eternity where mental operations can exist. Hence the discrete layers of the mental world of eternity will also be the discrete layers of each mental body or person. Consciousness has different properties at each of these layers. The highest consciousness human beings can achieve is called the celestial degree of layer. The layer below that is called the rational consciousness, and the lowest is called the material consciousness. Our consciousness moves up and down these discrete degrees and their discrete-sub-degrees. When our consciousness is stuck for a long time in the material layer, we lose control over our moods, experiencing large swings, and we become slaves to our material loves and its faulty reasoning process. We show symptoms such as lower productivity, lowered capacity, weakness, depression, irrational and irresponsible behavior, cruelty, selfishness, egotism, deception, hypocrisy, manipulation, addiction, lawlessness, self-destructiveness, and so on. These negative and unhealthy behavior patterns and personality habits are the result of the material consciousness which has an organic built in progression towards greater and greater chaos. After the dying and resuscitation process, this consciousness remains as the only active layer, producing what is called the consciousness of hell in one’s mind.
  39. In contrast, the rational consciousness that is above the material consciousness, has the capacity to progress in either direction, evolving upwards towards the celestial consciousness, or devolving downwards towards the material consciousness. To evolve upward we need to acquire celestial meanings or ideas in our cognitive organ that can attract a celestial love to unite with, producing the elevated consciousness. We can consciously acquire and provide such celestial meanings as companions to celestial loves that inflow into our affective organ. The more such celestial meanings we acquire and love, the more our consciousness comes near the celestial layer. It will be in this layer to eternity after the dying and resuscitation process. The celestial consciousness produces what is called heaven in our mind. This heaven is maintained as a marital pair in eternal happiness possessing quasi-omniscience as celestial avatars of the Omniproprium. We no longer have a self of our own, as we had before in the lower forms of consciousness. Our celestial self is a virtual self in which we prefer not to have anything whatsoever that belonged to our self from before. We act as if we have no self of our own, and willingly become a consciousness produced by God’s loves and God’s truths now active uncorrupted and undistorted in our mental organs. This is our heaven in eternity.
  40. It makes obvious sense that it is to our greatest advantage to manage our adult life in such a way as to regenerate our character from a hellish to a heavenly love and consciousness. The rational mind is well suited for this spiritual battle for our eternal future. The rational layer of consciousness can alternate between a material mode and a celestial mode of representation. This alternation, or up-down oscillation in consciousness, is the key to managing our future in eternity. The material-rational consciousness tries to justify selfism through material meanings and principles of reasoning. As part of this reasoning process, one thinks that there is nothing but self. Human beings can only rely on human beings and their desire to conquer and survive. God is rejected as a possibility because only what is material exists or is real. Selfism and discrimination are justified by various lifestyle ideologies. Doing good is seen as a counterbalance to doing evil. This makes evil acceptable or unavoidable. But the celestial-rational meanings and reasoning process see through all these materialic assumptions and inaccuracies, and recognizes that God is omnipotent, which necessarily implies that no one has any power on their own to do anything, not even to breathe or think. The celestial-rational consciousness is able to figure out the rationality of God’s omnipotence and understands that our self is virtual not actual. I cannot move my eyes, recall a name, or finish a sentence on my own, but do these things through God doing them through me. God honors me as a consciousness with a free agent. My celestial-rational consciousness makes it obvious to me that it is God’s omnipotence that maintains my sense of freedom. Just as the sense of freedom of a two-year old is maintained by the parent without the toddler’s awareness, when the parent directs and moves the child’s direction of movement, or moves a dangerous object out of the way, or lifts the child toward the object it is reaching, etc. Throughout this activity the child only senses of being free and doing what it wants. This conscious sense of freedom is necessary for our consciousness as a human being, hence our eternal happiness in a heaven. God manages everything in our mind and in the two worlds so that we are made capable of achieving this heavenly state of consciousness. This is a perfect world since nothing can exist or occur that does not contribute to this ultimate purpose of life and the world
  41. How do we know what is genuinely or truly heavenly or celestial, and what is hellish or infernal? How do we separate what is real and accurate from what is theory that may not be correct? Which theory or morality system is real and true, and which are misleading and erroneous? How do we know if an idea is material-rational or celestial-rational? The process of regeneration creates an ever clearer and more definite perception and understanding of this critical difference between material and celestial thinking in the rational mind. It helps to identify the ruling love that directs all thinking in these two contrastive modes. The ruling love in the material-rational thinking is the consciousness of selfism, while the ruling love within the celestial-rational thinking is the consciousness of altruism. From this begins the sequence of thinking that leads to justifying hell or justifying heaven.
  42. The lower the level of consciousness, the less we are able to recognize rational truths that are based on celestial meanings and ideas of God and altruism. At the material level of thinking about God and the afterlife we have the idea of heaven on earth, this being a physical heaven, not a mental one. This physical heaven in the afterlife has to be earned by being member of a physical community of practice. Without physical worship, there is no spiritual payoff. God and heaven are bound up in material notions of earning one’s place through physical membership, ritual, history, and following leaders and guides who, we are told, see things we don’t see, or sense things we don’t, etc. All this is going on in the material consciousness. Rational consciousness is excluded. Individual understanding is set lower than group leadership and group formulation. Hence obedience is required even without understanding. But in our rational consciousness we can see that the afterlife of eternity is a mental world (some people use the term “spiritual world”). The world of eternity is in our mind. Heaven and hell are in our consciousness. Hence in order to prepare for this mental life in eternity we need to manage our mental things, our loves, our ideas, our consciousness. This is what eternal life is made of. And so we can understand that membership and physical ritual will not change our loves. We will remain such as we have been, living the same loves, experiencing the same consciousness. Hellish loves will take us to a hellish consciousness and life. Heavenly loves will take us to a heavenly consciousness and life. Since we are born with inherited hellish loves, and since we acquire new ones of our own, it follows that character regeneration is necessary for a heavenly eternity. Ridding ourselves of selfish loves and enjoyments makes room for acquiring altruistic loves and enjoyments. Our heaven is made of these. We live in them. We are them. We must acquire them prior to dying and resuscitation, and it takes years for the process to unfold. It does so to the extent that we are willing to cooperate in the process. This means managing our temptations in spiritual combat.
  43. Consider the material-rational philosophy of “might makes right.” Does it? No, because there is a future accountability to the loves that bind us to selfism. Whatever loves we practice, we are bound forever to them. The only way to escape this viral bond is to get rid of the virus, which in this case is the enjoyment of a selfish love that hurts others. From a higher rational consciousness however, we can see and understand that unless we willingly destroy this enjoyment, the love cannot go away. It stays forever, acting on us, as does every love we cling to. Selfism has many sub-loves such as the thoughtlessness of cruelty, the contemplation and performance of infidelity, the love of deception or getting away with things, shallowness of personality with an involvement that centers on self in everything such as art, literature, knowledge, music, dance, etc. Self-involvement is contrary to rationality since self-involvement leads at the end to a life of hell. Self-involvement is an antidote to happiness. Altruism refers to one’s involvement with others in a positive or beneficial way. Altruism leads us to focus on acquiring skills that are valued by the community due to their usefulness. For example, some athletes may train very hard in order to gain fame and riches. If they don’t obtain these, they are depressed and stop trying to work on their skills. They are operating with a material consciousness. Other athletes train hard in order to compete in fair competition for the best athlete. This is their strong motivation. If they don’t win, they are happy for the winner who proves to be the best. They are happy to participate in a good process, to be part of the process of fair competition. They feel validated by that participation in honesty and earnestness. This is their true reward, what they value most about it. This is their love, why they are doing it. They are operating with a rational consciousness. A material consciousness cannot create a heavenly community, cannot survive in it, but a rational consciousness can and does. The material consciousness of selfism within earth bound conditions destroys a mental community of altruism that is dependent on mutual and reciprocal support. Selfism cannot be happy in a heaven of altruism, hence cannot exist there, or reach there.
  44. Heaven is a mental consciousness in our celestial layer. It is created by love substance and truth substance. Love is spiritual heat. It corresponds to physical heat and gravity in the natural world of matter and time. If you suddenly removed gravity or heat from the physical world, what would happen? First there would be a dissolution, so that no two particles could cling to each other. No object could therefore exist. All movement would cease. No organic process or life could exist. All coherence would cease. There would be no universe left. Corresponding things would occur in the mental world if you removed the substance of love. No two ideas could be bound together to make up an assertion. Thus, no knowledge would be possible. No activity could occur as the body would not be able to move without motivation or love energy. All social life would cease. All mental states would freeze and disappear. Consciousness would cease. Without love there is nothing. This love is what is called altruism. Divine love is altruism. This love is to love others, not self. Altruism is the desire to make others happy through our own skills and choices. Altruism is married to justice and honesty, and together they produce perfect human beings. When we turn altruism energy into selfism, altruism perishes and selfism takes hold in our loves.
  45. Why could we not have been born into the mental world alone? Why do we need this temporary physical body and the natural world around us? The answer is that the physical world is needed in order to train our mental organs to function and in order to provide our consciousness with social content. Our temporary physical body provides us with contact with the physical world and its laws of order. Our mental body is being trained by correspondence with the physical body. The two bodies are exact copies of each other in anatomy, physiology, and genetics – but not in composition. The physical body is composed of physical building blocks from the natural sun, while the mental body is composed of mental building blocks from the mental sun of eternity. Once our mental organs are trained to operate and filled with content, we can mature our loves and thoughts during adulthood, and all the way to old age. This mental maturation process allows us to develop the rational and celestial layers of the mental body. These are the two layers in which is contained our heavenly consciousness. The purpose of this initial connection to the physical world is to provide us with the opportunity of developing our material consciousness (loves and ideas), after which we can develop our rational consciousness through regeneration. If we do not develop the celestial-rational mind through regeneration, the celestial mind cannot function after the dying and resuscitation process. Hence we awaken and must remain in the material consciousness. This consciousness can be adequate while connected to the physical body, but it is inadequate after resuscitation. When we are in the material consciousness after resuscitation, we sink into a state of insanity and savagery called hell in the mind.
  46. Everything therefore depends on successfully managing our regeneration! Can you think of anything that can be more important to you?
  47. Why then do most people reject dualism, reject the idea of resuscitation, reject the idea of heaven and hell? The answer is that it is impossible for our material consciousness to perceive the reality of dualism, the mental world of eternity, and God’s direct management of our mind through love and truth substance that make up our affective and cognitive organs. These ideas require rational meanings and rational content to think about, to figure out, to see objectively as the empirical reality. The idea of being “born into eternity” requires a rational way of thinking that is free from the materialism imposed on us by the sensory organs of the physical body that reflect the physical world and its limitations of time and place. The idea of living in a mental world is a rational idea devoid of material counterpart. The material idea is that we are living in a physical world and that our sensations and thoughts are in our physical body or brain. When we die, that’s it. No brain, no individual. This is a perspective limited by physicalistic ideas bound in the empiricism of the senses. What is outside this empiricism is considered not real or “just the imagination” or “just a dream” etc. The rational thinking can begin when we consider dualism in the positive bias. We set aside the limitations of the negative bias of monism and materialism. We allow our thinking to work without these limitations. Rational thinking is then possible. The positive bias says that dualism is possible and that we need to investigate it as if it existed. This assumption allows us to start making scientific proposals about the mental world of eternity.
  48. We are discussing scientific proposals in the positive bias science. We are not discussing dualist ideas from other sources such as religion, philosophy, the literature on spirituality, or science fiction. Scientific proposals in the positive bias mode have specific methodological requirements that must be met. First and foremost is the requirement of rational theory, demonstration, and proof. An instance of this that you are somewhat familiar with is geometry. It makes rational proposals about the existence of planes and points in a mental world, then proceeds to give “proof” of facts about this mental world of geometry. Other scientists can verify the logic of the proof or demonstration, as long as they are willing to accept the initial proposals about the existence of planes and points in the mental world. With this acceptance, or positive bias, scientists are able to verify the proofs of geometry others are presenting, and can do research in the mental world of geometry to discover more facts about it and its properties. These scientific discoveries about the mental world of geometry are useful to us in the physical world because there is one to one correspondence between the physical world and the mental world, so whatever is discovered about the mental world will have a corresponding property in the physical world. Knowing this can then be applied for uses.
  49. The current proposals I am making about the mental world of eternity also requires the positive bias. This means that scientists who want to do research in this area need to adopt the positive bias on dualism in order to evaluate its scientific proposals. Various proposals on dualism have been made in the literature, as for instance the proposals of Descartes that are being echoed somewhat in the history of modern psychology. However dualism has been rejected in psychology since the 19th century. Contemporary neuroanatomy and cognitive science reject dualism and associate all our mental life with the activity of the physical brain. However there is going to be increasing pressure in the future on scientists to adopt the positive bias on dualism given the fact that psychologists in the negative bias have not been able to unify psychology into one science. Instead psychology remains composed of various factions and approaches that do not recognize each other or each other’s research and methodologies. This fragmentation shows in the relatively low levels of success psychology has achieved in applying itself to societal and personal problems such as crime, depression, mental illness and counseling, ineffective training and instruction methods, ineffective conflict resolution knowledge so that society continues to suffer from discrimination, wars, abuse of women and children, terrorism, genocide, drug addiction, violence, sexually transmitted diseases, etc. These numerous failures can be due to the inadequacies of the negative bias in psychology which prevents rational proposals from being researched and evaluated.
  50. Scientific proposals of dualism need to be holistic and internally consistent. The proposals ought to add up to a holistic explanation of all the major facts about the mental world. In this case, what makes my proposal rational, holistic, and consistent is the introduction of the assumption of correspondences as the basis of all cause-effect mechanisms or actions. This is a fundamental departure from Descartes and all other proposals of dualism in the history of science. The only other scientific work that has proposed the cause-effect mechanism of correspondences is that of Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772). The operation of body-mind correspondences can be observed and investigated by researchers (see my earlier work). Another methodological component of my proposal is that the mental world is organic and anatomical. This is essential for the proposal to be scientific. Science requires that if the existence of a function is being proposed, it must be based on some organic structure, which means a synergistically functioning anatomy. Every human mind is a mental body, and every mental body is in the mental world, and there is only one mental world, and this is anatomically defined and described. This achieves the requirement of holistic proposals. Nothing is left out, and all of it is integrated with what is already known in the negative bias. My proposal is not denying or rejecting any of the already existing psychology. I am adding a new dimension to it in the positive bias so that we may be able to do cumulative research on body-mind correspondences and regeneration of our character.
  51. The material consciousness, its thinking, and its loves or intentions, is necessary for our mental development to adulthood. The negative bias is a natural part of this development. But once we attain adulthood and full mental development, we are capable of functioning in rational consciousness as well as in material consciousness. Our first forays in rational consciousness is “impure” or “spurious” because we are basing our rational ideas and proposals on material concepts and assumptions. These initial impure proposals are not truly rational, but they appear to be because the material ideas have been “abstracted out” or “bracketed out” so that the concepts that are left appear free of the physical world, but they are not. Hence these are called “material-rational” proposals and ideas. At this level of thinking it is possible to make various quasi-dualist proposals that the material consciousness accepts as appropriate. For instance, at this level of thinking people have proposed ideas about God and the afterlife that contain physical limits. For example, it is expected that when we resuscitate from death we come back into the physical world. Heaven and hell are imagined as physical tortures. God is associated in terms of physical events, physical rewards, physical punishments.

    Or to take another example, people make proposals about the mental world with physical ideas and mechanisms, such as the idea in cognitive science today that the mind is an “epiphenomenon” that “emerges” from the brain and rests on it. So no anatomy is provided for the mental organs other than the brain. There is no legitimate way of explaining how we interact with others mentally in the mental world, or how we form friendship or bonds with others that is not merely physical and temporary. My proposal gives specific explanations of mental development in relation to mental anatomy and regeneration. I give a medical or anatomical definition of heaven and hell, and I specify the mechanisms by which we communicate with God to effect regeneration. My proposal specifies the dying and resuscitation process and the continuation of mental development in our immortality. None of these topics are available for discussion and analysis in the negative bias psychology, nor in any previous dualist proposal other than that of Swedenborg. My proposal gives a scientific definition of God in terms of the mental sun of eternity and how God operates in our mind through love and truth substance that compose the building blocks for our mental organs. This rational concept provides the scientific definition for our immortality.

    No other proposal has given a successful scientific account of God, the human mind, immortality, and the physical world. It is important to reclaim God for science. Historically and traditionally, God has been abandoned to religion and spirituality, with the result that God has been banned from public education in democratic countries today. It makes sense to separate religion from state and government because government is for all the people, and religion is sectarian. Different religions exist and they are conflictual and divisive in society because they participate in politics as part of their religious practice. Science is free of such disputes because it deals with universal ideas and methods that are above sectarianism, above politics, and above personal interpretation. God must be reclaimed for science through the proposal of substantive dualism, such as this one.
  52. Our mental body seeks experiences through surrogate mental bodies in virtual worlds. These include:
    ** a dream body for the dream world
    ** a fantasy body for the fantasy world
    ** a virtual body (or “avatar”) for the virtual world (or “digital world”)
    ** a celestial body (or “angel”) for heaven
    ** an infernal body (or “spirit”, “demon”) for hell

Since there is only one mental world, with one mental sun of eternity, these surrogate bodies and virtual selves are in that one mental world. For instance, in virtual worlds we gain our consciousness by maintaining one or more avatars. Since our virtual self is behind each avatar we maintain, there is only one avatar we have, and all the others are “alts” or alternate avatars feeding our one virtual self. Currently we maintain different avatars for different in-world interfaces. But in the near future we will be able to have just one avatar that will move across all the virtual world platforms and interfaces available. It will then be more obvious that there is only one virtual world and every human being has an avatar in it, whether activated or not. This is our virtual presence in digital information spaces. The consciousness we have through our avatar in the virtual world is different from the consciousness we have from the other surrogate bodies of our one mental body.

We are most familiar with our dream avatar that gives us consciousness in the dream world. All human beings experience the dreaming consciousness through their dream body. You may or may not recall seeing your dream body in one of your dream episodes over the years. When the dream world environment is constructed out of our material consciousness in the mental body, the content of the dream is like a video of the physical world. Things may be presented in a surrealist context that appear to alter the properties of the physical world. Dreamscapes and dream events are instantiated through the laws of correspondence. Loves and desires in our affective organ are constantly longing and seeking for ideas in our cognitive organ that they can conjoin with. Dreamscapes and dream events are produced by these loves finding ideas to conjoin with.

It is similar with daydreams or fantasy content that we produce through our fantasy body. The “imaginary” world or environment is produced by our rational consciousness in the mental body. When our fantasy body constructs fantasy situations, fantasy people, and fantasy events, from a material-rational consciousness, the content of the fantasy is idealized. An idealized rendition of the material world appears rational, but when analyzed, it reveals material ideas within it. Idealized material characters and events are produced by children at play, and by writers and directors of drama for the consumption of entertainment. But when our fantasy body constructs fantasy situations, fantasy people, and fantasy events, from a celestial-rational consciousness, the content of the fantasy is visionary and representative of heavenly life in eternity.

  1.  The virtual self establishes social presence through the appropriate management of an avatar and its alts. For instance, when first becoming a Resident of the virtual world called Second Life, one acquires a generic avatar. One can easily spot “newbie” avatars by their facial and body features that appear cartoonlike, including the clothing. The generic clothing that male and female newbie avatars wear are identical and robotic. After a few hours of experiencing their avatar consciousness people develop the desire of managing their avatar appearance, to make it more personal to who they want to be in the virtual world of Second Life (SL). The material-rational consciousness idealizes the appearance of one’s virtual body. In-world observation in SL reveals the diversity of idealized selves in the human race. In SL most of the avatars appear as beautiful, well formed, attractive, and healthy looking male and female individuals in prime life. This is the constructed and idealized vision we have of our virtual body. Making oneself look attractive, even sexy, through modifying our avatar body shape and selecting clothes, is a principal mechanism for establishing social presence in SL. There are a minority of people who operate in their ideal within an oppositional or contrastive visibility, so that their avatar appears in the shape of an animal or object, even a mere cloud of white smoke. Another minority in SL appear as medieval warriors carrying defensive and offensive weapons wherever they go. There are “vampire” groups, “afterlife” devilish groups, bondage-servitude partnerships, and other forms of traditional idealized humans.

    Social presence requires visibility and communication. The attractive appearance of the avatar body of the majority of SL Residents is the result of the fact that social presence is more intense, satisfying, and successful when their consciousness of themselves and others is formed by very positive avatar bodies. When Residents look at an avatar they respond emotionally to its appearance. Sometimes an avatar appears on the screen that evokes the emotion of repulsion or even disgust. When Residents see a very attractive avatar they may experience an emotional need to become more conscious of its virtual sphere. Several practices have evolved as to how this is done. A common practice is to right click on the avatar’s body, or on the name tag that always appears above the head. This brings on a Profile window giving the birth date of the avatar, the Groups that the avatar is a member of, and various other details about the avatar that the Resident owner has chosen to list there. There is also a button for delivering an instant message to that avatar’s IM chat window. There is also a voice chat option allowing Residents to talk to each other while continuing to manage the movements and appearance of their avatars on the screen.

    Communicative interaction and visual co-presence are possible through the avatar body for people who are distant from each other both geographically and culturally. A significant industry and economy in-world has developed within the first five years of SL’s existence. The free download software interface called the SL browser, has hundreds of technological affordances for building and creating virtual environments. Anyone with a penchant for design for buildings, clothes, art, interaction scripts that make avatars move in a certain way and dance, can use the software to create things that people want to buy for their avatars, their friends’ avatars, or for themselves in the physical world. Exploring the in-world of SL through Search links and teleport Maps reveals an endless succession and variety of places such as buildings, shopping malls, yard sales, fancy fashion stores, fun rides, gorgeous gardens, art and history galleries, streets and city blocks. This rich virtual environment is cumulative, produced by the hundreds of thousands of Residents that spend hours in-world every week or month. Hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars in the form of Linden dollars (L$) exchange hands among the Residents for these objects and services.
  2. The virtual consciousness that we have through our avatar body is a mental venue for establishing bonding forces with other people through their avatar bodies. The social organization of the virtual world is formed by the practices that Residents perform through their avatar. Right clicking an avatar’s body allows us to penetrate the social and psychological sphere of that avatar. For instance, we can read the avatar’s Profile statement which often explains what the Resident is looking for through the avatar body (e.g., friendship, new experiences), or is not interested in (e.g., role playing games, or sex talk). You can also inspect the names of the Groups that the avatar belongs to. This list reveals the avatar’s body extensions or virtual networks it is attached to. Each network node or “Group” is indicative of the loves and ideas that are married in the Resident’s mental body. For example look (below) at this sample of Groups found through the Search engine in SL.

 

 

Anatomical Diagrams

Diagram 1: Schematic Representation of a Human Being

(see explanations at:
http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/mental-psychology-p1.htm#_Toc212519327)

 


 

Diagram 2: Schematic Representation of Male and Female Anatomy

(see explanations at:
http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy28/409b-g28-lecture-notes-p1b.htm#anatomy)


Diagram 3: Two Stages of Male-Female Unity

(see explanations at:
http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy28/409b-g28-lecture-notes-p1b.htm#anatomy)

 


Diagram 4: Formation of Man and Woman as Reciprocal Units

 


Diagram 5: Male and Female Anatomy, Part 2

(see explanations at: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/mental-psychology-p1.htm#_Toc212519324)


Diagram, 6: The Vertical Community

(explanations at: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/mental-psychology-p1.htm#_Toc212519321)

 


Diagram 7: Anatomy of the Mental Body (celestial, rational, material)


Diagram 8 – Table Listing the Mental Bodies

Name

Discrete Layer

Description

 

CELESTIAL
MENTAL
BODY

VII

4

Celestial—interior rational

5

Celestial--external-rational

6

Celestial--interior-material

RATIONAL
MENTAL
BODY

VI

7i

Rational—interior or celestial

7e

Rational—external or materialized

MATERIAL
MENTAL
BODY

V, II, II, IV

8

Material--abstract

9

Material--corporeal

10

“Spiritual body”

PHYSICAL BODY

I

11

“Limbus”

12

Physical body

 


Diagram 9: Synergy between the Physical Body and Mental Body

(see explanatory note above)

 

Diagram 10: Immediate and Mediate Influx

 


Diagram 11: Consciousness Prior and After Regeneraiton

 

 


Diagram 12: Mental Layers in Sequential and Simultaneous Order

 


Diagram 13: Layers


Diagram 14: Mental anatomy of Husband and Wife

 


Diagram 15: Ascending and Descending Development

 


 

Diagram 16: The 12 Anatomical Layers of Creation, Existence, and Reality

 

ANATOMICAL
LAYERS

DISCRETE DEGREES OF LOVE

ACCOMPANYING DEGREES OF MEANING

CONSCIOUSNESS

1, 2, 3

Divine Love
(mental heat)

Divine Wisdom
(mental light)

God
(Divine-Human)

4, 5, 6

Celestial loves

Celestial-rational meanings

Heavenly
(Grand Human)

7

Rational loves

Rational meanings

Rational

8, 9

Material loves

Material or natural meanings

Material or natural

10, 11, 12

temporary and permanent body coverings)

 


 

Diagram 17: Three Phases of Marriage

 

 


 

Diagram 18: Dual Citizenship

 


 

Diagram 19: Birth, Death, and Eternity

 


 

Diagram 20: Correspondences Between Physical and Mental Body Systems

 

AFFECTIVE
ORGAN

circulatory / cardiovascular /digestive / endocrine

COGNITIVE
ORGAN

respiratory / pulmonary circulation / diaphragm / thoracic cage / mouth

SENSORIMOTOR ORGAN

nervous / skeletal / muscular/ integumentary /

The physical body and the mental body correspond to each other in structure and function. By studying body-mind correspondences we can construct charts of the mental world of eternity. Knowledge of mental physiology can assist us in mental navigation and regeneration.

 


 

Diagram 21: Maturation and Development

 


 

Diagram 22: Developmental Stages Before and After Death

 


Diagram 23: Maturation and Regeneration of Consciousness

 

 

Overall Explanations of the Diagrams

 

Anatomically, everything about men is made of [truth/love] mental genes (i.e., truth outside with love inside), while women are made of reciprocal [love/truth] mental genes (love outside with truth inside). This anatomical reciprocity in their immortal mental body makes it possible for the two to form a mental unit of one. This means that her external material loves are conjoined to his external material truths, and his interior rational loves are conjoined to her interior rational truths (see Diagram 2).

 

The male physical body (bottom left of diagram 3) is the outermost component of a man living on earth. A discrete degree inside this outermost shell of matter is the mental body. We cannot see the mental body with our physical eyes because physical eyes can only sense physical stimuli or objects. The mental body is a discrete degree within, which means one cannot merely go from the physical to the mental in a continuous path or line. The mental cannot “emerge” from the physical because a higher discrete degree cannot emerge from a lower, there being no path between them. This idea makes sense only if you take into consideration the idea that God created layers in the mental world and the physical world, and these layers are in discrete degree relations to each other.

 

An analogy to discrete degree in physical terms would be the idea of transportation from one place to another. Transportation on earth is in discrete degrees when we consider land, water, and air. If you travel by car as far as you can get across an island or continent, you arrive inevitably at the coastline. You can drive no further. Transportation on land ends there. Transport by water is a discrete degree different from transport by land. Instead of a car one needs a vehicle that works for water, like a boat or submarine. Likewise with air transport and space travel, one needs an airplane and a rocket.

 

In a similar way the mental world of eternity is layered by discrete degrees. This means that each degree or anatomical layering is going to be different in crucial ways from other layers. The same operations cannot take place in the same way in different layers. The layer of the mental body is a discrete degree within the layer of the physical body. Since discrete anatomical layers cannot interact directly there is another mechanism that functionally and operationally ties the layers together. This operational law is called the law of correspondences.

 

Each discrete degree is called an environment or zone. The zones in the mental world of eternity expand from the top down. This is called successive order or sequence of discrete degrees. The same arrangement can be transposed representationally into a simultaneous order or arrangement of discrete degrees (see for example this diagram on layers).(REMINDER: if you use Control-click, instead of just a click, the page and diagram will open in a new window, and this is more convenient as you continue reading the text.)

 

The mental body actually has three discrete sub-degrees, namely, from top down, celestial layer, rational layer, and material layer. During our daily activities here on earth our consciousness operates in the material layer, which is closest to the physical body. Our material loves in the affective organ seek out thoughts and reasonings that are material bound or sense bound, and the two together give us our material consciousness in daily living. But we do not just operate in the material zone with material ideas and material loves. At some moments during the day our consciousness can rise to the rational degree so that we become aware of a new dimension to existence and our life. From rational thinking we can look down a discrete degree below and recognize whether the material thinking corresponds to the rational thinking, or is contrary to it, which means that it corresponds to the inverse or opposite to the rational. The rational mind can look down upon the material mind and guide it to think in a way that agrees with the rational.

 

In this way our material thinking in daily life is less influenced by the appearances given through the limitations of the physical senses. For example, in time of war men of honesty and honor rise to defend country and family. When in battle and engaged in killing the enemy, the soldier who is immersed in material consciousness, experiences enjoyment when killing enemy soldiers. After the kill, he experiences enjoyment and pleasure in pillaging, destroying, even raping the victims. But the soldier who rises above this material consciousness thinks about what he is doing in a rational way. He responds to rational loves, not material loves. There is universal compassion in rational love, and the desire to harm no one, and to acknowledge and respect all humanity and its diversity under God. When a soldier is in a rational consciousness, he does his job well, killing effectively, but he is not enjoying it, and he instead, wishes to spare him the agony of suffering. He kills effectively to kill, not to maim and prolong the suffering.

 

Anatomically, material consciousness is external to rational consciousness. The external layer of the mental body is adaptive to the physical body and environment. Our material consciousness is formed out of these external loves and truths. These external or “lower” forms of the affective and cognitive systems are adapted to the physical environment of time and space. Material consciousness is based on ideas that are inherently “materialic” and “monistic.” This means that we deny the existence or reality of God and the mental world of eternity because we cannot comprehend that such a thing can or would exist. Our material loves and ideas are bound to earth and to the physical conditions of life. People who hold to a religious creed of the afterlife have material ideas about it, as for example the idea that the afterlife will be back on earth, this one or some other one that is like it, though perhaps more perfect than before. This is a material idea of the afterlife and is conjoined to the material love of physical things. In the material consciousness we experience the “rational” as less real than the “material” which is based on the physical. Hence for the afterlife to be “real” it must exist in a physical world with a physical body.

 

But the rational consciousness we have at a more interior level of our mental body, sees the rational as real and eternal, and sees the material level is temporary and of no lasting value. Our rational ideas include the idea of God and the dual world. Rational thinking understands that the afterlife is in the mental world outside the physical world and time. This mental afterlife is also called the “spiritual world” which is defined as outside the physical world of place and time, that is, in eternity. “Theistic substantive dualism” refers to the idea that God created a world of physical matter in time, and a world of mental matter in eternity.

 

Mental matter, or substance, originates from the mental sun of eternity which is God’s entry point into created existence (see Diagram 1). Mental heat is love substance and mental light is truth substance. Love and truth substance are united in God in infinite diversity and are the building blocks of the created universe. Mental heat and light issue from the mental sun and create an expanse or sphere around itself. This sphere is composed of mental dust particles composed of love and truth in endless variety. Love particles are attracted to truth particles when they match or correspond to each other, forming a bond or marriage as with lovers and conjugial partners. This force of “love striving to reunite with its truth,” is the basic energy of existence, creation, and all life. It corresponds to the “unity of one” that is formed out of two minds, in the conjugial couples that live in their celestial consciousness in eternity.

 

The bond and energy of love operates in the affective circulatory system of the mental body. Our ruling love determines our “heart and character,” or

Our heart and character is our ruling love. For instance, in material consciousness we are attached to success and money. What is this attachment, this love? Sometimes it is selfishness and egotism. We want the money and success so that we have more power to obtain what we really want, to get away with what we really want to do, which otherwise we could not. “Important” people are treated better and have special privileges. The focus is on what “we” want to do, what “I” want, what I need, how I see it, what I think it should be.

 

Material Loves

 

Some of the material loves that are married to these self-centered ideas include:

 

When our consciousness is rooted in material loves that have not been regenerated our thinking adjusts itself to those loves, resulting in material thinking. This type of thinking reduces all rational ideas into material abstractions. For instance, when we think about the possibility of an afterlife we can only think of a material heaven and hell. Our cognitive inventiveness is guided by our material loves to come up with ideas and principles that are compatible with those loves, and at the same time puts on a filter of perception that acts like a smoke that clouds the vision. In this way the material loves can create a material consciousness that is incapable of seeing or perceiving rational ideas that are rooted in celestial order and meaning.

 

As a result of this, material loves cannot regenerate themselves. With our inherited negative traits we would be condemned to an eternity of hell from birth onward were it not for the activity of the rational mind that is situated in the rational mental body (VI), anatomically located just above the material mental body (V). What is anatomically situated “above” is also more “interior,” which means superior in functioning and potential, because it is closer to the mental sun. “Closer” corresponds to “less distorted reception” and “farther out” or “lower and external” corresponds to “more distorted reception” due to the filter of material loves.

 

When we are willing to raise our consciousness to the interior rational mind (7i) we think with meanings and concepts that are celestial-based. Not one idea in the interior rational mind is material. This results in an entirely different way of thinking, called rational thinking. The thoughts and principles of rational thinking cannot be united with material loves. Our material mental body has no conscious awareness of what is a discrete degree above itself (or what is a discrete degree within itself). When our material consciousness hears about regeneration the idea we have is that God regenerates us and that we don’t have to do anything except let God do the work with omnipotence. Our role is to submit and be passive. However this idea is seen differently in our rational mind.

 

Rational ideas about God and us are based on God’s omnipotence and love. Every single thing that exists or event that occurs is God’s doing through omnipotence. Hence we can understand that God could regenerate every human being in an instant, and place all people into heaven. There would be no need for the existence of hells and suffering, for catastrophes and sicknesses, for accidents and incompetence, etc. But there is! And God is omnipotent. Hence we must look for a rational reason why God has not done this. Rationally we can understand the idea that heaven is not a place where God can take us. Heaven is nothing else but our heavenly loves. We only have that heaven where our heavenly loves are. God cannot give us heavenly loves and compel us to believe that these loves are our own loves. They are not. And that kind of heaven is not something we would call a heaven. The only heaven that we can call our heaven is a heaven where our loves are. The home of our own loves. Our happiness is our loves. Someone else’s loves cannot make us happy.

 

Hence it is that God cannot transplant people into heaven, or reward people by bringing them to heaven. But we cannot accept this when we are in our material consciousness. We can only think of heaven as a place of reward, a place where we can find things we love and like. Notice: “things” we love. So for instance if we love ice cream, there will be limitless access to it. If we love sex, there will be limitless access to that. If we love luxurious houses and great art, we will have that in our heavenly dwelling places. The material filter does not allow us to perceive that to love these things is to respond from material loves, not heavenly loves. In our rational consciousness we can perceive that ice cream, surfing, car racing, promiscuity, popularity, social power, leadership position, business success, etc., are not going to create a heaven in eternity, but a hell.

 

A good exercise for you would be to figure out why this is so, or how this is. Why are these things incapable of creating a heaven in eternity?

 

Our rational thinking is based on celestial-rational correspondences. These meanings are the most interior that we can have, and they are infinite in number or complexity. We can spend an eternity living in these celestial-rational correspondences of Divine Rationality or Truth. We receive these meanings with the mental light that streams into celestial mental body. In our rational consciousness we can contemplate these celestial meanings and understandings. We can see that our loves are called “heaven.” Celestial loves are organized by the ruling celestial love, which is the love of others for the sake of God’s good in them.

 

When we raise our consciousness from the material to the rational we can perceive the celestial truth that we are to love God’s good in people, but not their evils. Sometimes people discuss “unconditional love” as the love we can have for a person as a totality. Often people say that they have such a love for their children, or for their spouses, or soulmates. But from a rational perspective free of material ideas, we can see that it is wrong to love both the good and the evil in a person. It is wrong to love evil. To love evil because it belongs to a loved one, is a material idea that comes from a material love.

 

The ruling material love is the love of self for the sake of self, and the love of others for the sake of self. All material loves are ruled by this one love. They support it, believe in it, justify it, feel self-righteous about it. This ruling love puts up a cloud of smoke to prevent rational ideas from being perceived. All “good” is defined as that which agrees with the ruling love, and anything that disagrees with it, is called evil and false. This kind of thinking cannot reform itself, cannot regenerate self. Only rational loves can compel the material thinking into change. With the change of thinking comes new material loves that are compatible with the celestial order. These material loves have rational loves within them. For example, when we are in our rational mind while filling out our income tax returns, we experience the joy of paying taxes for the sake of supporting the government’s work. We see money as an instrument of God for creating a society that can help people regenerate and prepare for the afterlife of eternity. We consider it a privilege to be able to contribute to this celestial use by paying our legal taxes. We have to pay them, but we can feel unhappy about it (material perception), or we can feel joyful and blessed (rational perception).

 

Rational Loves

 

Here are some examples:

 

If you study the list of material and rational loves, contrasting them, you will notice that material loves are forms of love of self (egotism, selfism), while rational loves are forms of love of community (altruism, sociality). Rational consciousness is above material consciousness because rational loves and ideas focus on the world of eternity, immortality, and permanence, while material loves and ideas focus on the world of time, death, and impermanence. The rational represents and characterizes the “humanness” of human beings, while the material represents and characterizes the “animal” aspect of human beings.

 

Our material consciousness is in itself sub-human and is similar to that of animals. People love animals, and especially their pets, because they can identify with the animal mind through their material mind or consciousness. The consciousness of our pets is devoid of all rational ideas and loves. We cannot explain to them the difference between a news story on TV and a soap opera. They cannot learn to know about income taxes or religion. Animals do not have the mental anatomy that reaches the rational level of consciousness in the mental world of eternity. Animals cannot see the mental sun of eternity as humans beings can. The mental dust that fills the mental world of eternity is composed of love and truth particles. The mental regions further out from the mental sun as a center are filled with mental dust particles that arrange themselves in clusters and forms that are “materialized” and less “rationalized.”

 

As the clusters of love and truth particles become more and more compounded, they become less and less rational, and more and more “material.” The consciousness we have in the outer or lower regions of the mental world is made of these compound particles that are material and “rigidified” in comparison to the “flexible” and “rational” consciousness that is composed out of simpler and purer clusters of mental dust. The highest form of human consciousness is above the rational, and close to the mental sun. Celestial loves and their ideas are purified correspondences of the Divine loves and truths. These are the most rational, hence the most human. Love and truth substance within the mental sun itself are perfect and infinite in rationality and consciousness.

 

The highest form of human consciousness is therefore the purely rational. This is also called the celestial consciousness. After resuscitation we rise to the highest level of consciousness in proportion to our loves and truths. Rational loves and rational ideas give us the celestial consciousness of conjugial love and of the universal mental community called the Grand Human. If we underwent the work of regeneration and character reformation, we resuscitate with our rational consciousness, and this is capable of activating the celestial mind and its celestial consciousness. We then live in a heaven with our soul mate amidst friends in splendid surrounds.

 

But if we did not undergo character reformation, we resuscitate with our material consciousness. These material loves and ideas are adapted to the physical world and its conditions. Material ideas and loves are not suitable for healthy survival in a mental environment that is structured on what is rational and altruistic. The ruling material love of “always me first” surrounds itself with irrational ideas that justify the outlook of selfism and selfish ways of acting towards others. This egotistical ruling love bans all altruistic loves and all ideas and principles of rationality and truth. As a result, the person now becomes an “evil” caricature of their former selves. Their material consciousness after resuscitation gets rid of all remains of rational consciousness. This new type of person is called a “devil” in comparison to the rational person in the celestial consciousness called “angel.” Humans in the “devil” state of mind live together in “infernal” societies called “hell.” Together and universally they form the Grand Monster in the mental world of eternity.

 

Material Thinking and Rational Thinking

 

The three levels of human thinking are called material, rational, and celestial. The rational thinking, being in the middle position, acts as a go-between uniting the celestial and the material by being able to look up to the celestial, or look down to the material. Hence our mental anatomy includes a material-rational level of functioning, and a celestial-rational level. Prior to the dying-resuscitation process our celestial thinking is not directly accessible to our conscious rational mind. Nevertheless, our conscious rational mind can arrange its meanings and principles to correspond to the celestial mind. It is the celestial mind in which human beings are complete in their mental development. Our ability to arrange our rational meanings and understandings in the celestial order provides us with a source of new powerful human potential.

 

When we reach maturity in young adulthood, an important internal mental task facing us is reformation of our thinking from material-rational meanings to celestial-rational meanings. This is a massive clean-up job known in allegorical literature as the Twelve Labors of Hercules:

Inner Meaning: As philosophical, moral, and eventually allegorical overlays came to be applied to his death-cheating superhuman exploits, behind their outer, literal meaning, the Hercules figure came to represent an inner mystical tradition, and thus the labors could be interpreted in terms of the spiritual path.

From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Twelve_Labours

 

The ancients or pre-moderns were experts in what was then known as the “science of correspondences.” This was confirmed by Swedenborg when he visited their mental habitations in their own secluded celestial regions of the Grand Human. The most ancient generations were socialized into the everyday practice of the science of correspondences. Today as moderns, we can introduce the science of correspondences in early public education and add it to the basic information literacy skills every human being needs.

 

All the world’s Sacred Texts are written in celestial correspondences (see my extensive analysis here). This is because Divine Speech is always addressed to the entire human race and first enters human consciousness in the celestial mind. The Sacred Scriptures in the Grand Human is written entirely in celestial-rational correspondences of Divine Truth and gives people in that consciousness a state of knowledge and wisdom called quasi-omniscience.

 

The celestial-rational consciousness in our conscious rational mind gives us the ability to rearrange our material meanings to make them fit with the celestial order. The knowledge of correspondences allows us to explore the celestial-rational world, which is the world of our future in heaven. Above all, this knowledge gives us the ability to cooperate with the Divine Psychologist in the lifelong process of regeneration or reformation of character.

 

Our material loves have to be reformed by our rational loves, and our material principles have to be reformed by our rational principles. We can develop the ability to live in both material and rational consciousness at the same time, throughout the day’s activities. It is like creating a biographical video of our daily life. The rational thinking looks down on the material thinking and is able to evaluate it, whether it is rational or irrational, wise or foolish, beneficial or hurtful, ethical or unethical, good or bad, right or wrong. This is called metanoid perception.

 

Our conscience is located in our rational consciousness.

 

Everyone is conscious of that portion of our rational mind called “conscience.” In the word “conscience” we see the root “co-“ meaning “together,” and the root “-science” meaning “knowledge.” The word “together” refers to the human race in totality. All human beings have a built in anatomical organ called conscience. The content of conscience is universal and independent of time, place, culture, and mentality. This is because the conscious celestial-rational mind spontaneously reacts by correspondence to the celestial mind itself. And the content of the celestial mind is the correspondence to Divine Truth and Rationality. Conscience is the expression of God’s truth in our conscious rational mind.

 

We can expand our conscious access to the whole rational mind by paying attention to how we do our every day thinking by spontaneously using the language of correspondences. For instance, when we think about a career we use the image metaphors of moving with the physical body, such as “moving up” or “getting ahead” to refer to being “promoted” to more advanced responsibilities. Self-witnessing your thinking on the daily round of activities will show you that you constantly make use of the physical body when talking about the mental body or mind. The reason of this is that the two bodies act in correspondence with each other.

(Note: For additional discussion on self-witnessing one’s thinking see the article on my discovery of sudden memory.)

 

Metanoid Self-Witnessing and the Discovery of Sudden Memory

 

It is possible to focus on many of the thousands of acts of willing (affective) and thinking (cognitive) that we perform every day. Note that normal social life does not require this kind of self-witnessing and self-knowing. Society requires that we know things outside of ourselves, like the history of our country, or the multiplication table, or how to read instructions and write messages. But there is no social, legal, or professional requirement that we monitor our feelings, motives, thoughts, and interior dialog with ourselves.

 

Once in awhile, if we get called on the witness stand in a legal context, we might have to report on some of our willing and thinking. We are asked, Why did you do this? Or, What did you decide then? Or, Were you in love with her at that time? Etc. It is required by law that we answer honestly, but knowing the answer is not a requirement. In that case we reply, "I don’t remember," and the court accepts it. But the court does hold us responsible for knowing things outside of ourselves, such as, Did you see him or not? and, Were you ever contacted by this person, etc.

 

And yet, for our eternal fate in the afterlife, this external knowledge is not at all crucial, and will only last us as long as we are connected to the physical body, while the usefulness of the interior knowledge will last us to eternity. Clearly, the interior knowledge is immeasurably more important than the external knowledge, and yet, prior to our reformation, everyone favors the external knowledge, and pursues it, hardly paying attention to the far more crucial interior knowledge, which is knowledge about the character of our willing and the content of our thinking all day long. Swedenborg points out that

The knowledge of a thing must come first in order that there may be a perception of it. (AC 5649)

 

Having practiced the self-witnessing discipline for almost four decades now, I am able to say various things about it that may be useful to others. An amazing discovery was the existence of "sudden memory" which refers to the stream of thought that is our actual mental life in the material mind. This stream of thought is the outward form of our affections or loves. The quality of our affections is the result of the particular spiritual societies with which we are in contact as the sequence of thoughts proceeds moment by moment. When we perform self-witnessing we are able to "tune in" to the stream of thought while carrying out one’s routine tasks all day long. This is not like meditation and deep reflection which are activities that occur when we stop our tasks and sit seemingly doing nothing, thus disengaged from the surrounding pace of events. I shall explain the difference further.

The stream of inner thinking accompanies every outward act, and this a characteristic of human life. Every person is able to tune in and listen to the interior sequence or “wave” of thoughts, and become aware of it. What is amazing is that the instant one tries to reflect on what was snatched from the stream, it is mostly gone and unavailable to conscious inspection or reflection. One has the experience of simply not being able to remember what it was. It’s quite unsettling. How do we get hold of the mental stream or even, some of it, long enough so we can examine it in greater detail? You may be familiar with this experience when, upon awakening, you are still affectively filled by the sphere of your vivid dream, but the instant you try to reflect on what it is so you can put it in words, it remains unavailable to the conscious mind, staying just out of its reach—like the "tip-of-the-tongue" phenomenon when you’re trying to think of a name or word you know but can’t quite think of it.

 

The tip of the tongue (TOT or Tot or Presque vu) phenomenon is an instance of knowing something that cannot immediately be recalled. TOT is an experience with memory recollection involving difficulty retrieving a well-known word or familiar name. When experiencing TOT, people feel that the blocked word is on the verge of being recovered. Despite failure in finding the word, people have the feeling that the blocked word is figuratively "on the tip of the tongue." Inaccessibility and the sense of imminence are two key features of an operational definition of TOTs

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tip_of_the_tongue

 

Psychology teaches that there are two types of memory: short term and long term. The first lasts for several seconds—like the phone number we look up and then dial. If we wait more than a few seconds to dial it, we have to look it up again. We move things from short term to long term memory by repetition and rehearsal with the motive to recall it later. So you can memorize things in this way and place them permanently in your long term memory where you can recall it when you want to. Sudden memory on the other hand, seems to work for a second or two and then it’s gone. This is why I call it "sudden" memory—suddenly come and suddenly gone in our conscious awareness. This is the reality of our stream of consciousness under normal conditions.

 

But self-witnessing skills allow you to snatch things from sudden memory and put them into short term, then long term memory where the record of the thoughts can be analyzed and evaluated.

 

I discovered that trying to think in words and sentences slows down the stream of consciousness so that it’s easier to become aware of what it is. This is somewhat like giving a "blow by blow" description to an imaginary tape recorder of what one is thinking, observing, and reacting to. It seems to slow the stream down for awhile, enough so that one’s short term memory retains more of it, so that one is able to get a fix on what the topic is and its semantic direction. In short term memory we can be aware of the thinking and evaluate it. Once in short term memory we can put it into long term memory by mentally rehearsing it, or by making a physical record of it such as a written or recorded note. The mental discipline of self-witnessing pays off because it gives conscious access to one’s normal everyday affections and thoughts.

 

Daily self-witnessing practice enables us to exert rational control over our interior dialog, our daydreams, and our emotional reactions to events, moment by moment, all day long. Self-witnessing reveals sub-conscious attitudes and hidden interests. It gives us the capability of exerting control by consciously choosing to stop or to interrupt a particular line of thinking, feeling, and emoting. I use the expression "self-regulatory sentences" for silent verbalizations or instructions that we can give ourselves to control the stream of thinking: e.g., "Stop it. Why are you wasting time thinking these useless things?" Or: "That’s not a nice thing to think." Or: "How low can I get to be so fascinated by that sort of thing?" Etc. This gives people greater conscious control over their mental life allowing them to clean out the mental pollution that reigns in it from heredity and culture. (See section on The Practice of Renting Out Your Mind and see the Web search results for “pollution of the I”)

 

It is not possible for humans to do anything without the normal accompanying thinking stream. Try it. Start doing something, and then try to continue doing it without thinking anything at all. Being without thoughts. Your physical body will stop all movements and you will be frozen in matter, like Lot’s wife becoming a pillar of salt. When people stop thinking they fall into a coma so that their physical body can do nothing. To think continuously non-stop is the normal biological state of a human being.

 

The expression “renting out your mind” refers to giving up some control over the content of our consciousness. In our modern lifestyle it is easy for people to give up control over most of the content of their thinking. For instance, when people sitting in a waiting room, they watch the TV screen or read a magazine that is on the table. The content of their consciousness during the waiting time will be almost completely determined by the program or article. They get into a car and immediately switch on the radio or some personal media device. These will select and determine much of the content of their consciousness while driving. As soon as they get home they watch TV, or walk around with an audio device plugged to the ear, or read the newspaper, etc. This is normal behavior for our generation. As a result everyone needs to assess objectively what proportion of their consciousness is determined by self vs. others. This can be done conveniently by keeping notes or an audio recording of a Thinking Log in which you identify the proportion for that episode or hour (e.g., “Got absorbed in watching 3 hours of TV. Proportion: 10 percent my choice, 90 percent movie choice.”)

 

By monitoring and controlling the content of our consciousness, we take charge of our material mind. The higher or more interior rational mind gains control over the material mind, which is made to submit through temptations. The result of the temptation is that rational principles of altruism prevailed over material principles of selfism. After this, the material mind is obedient to the rational mind and there is no longer a conlict or resistance. But this applies only to the specific type of love involved in that temptation. Since we have numerous loves, it takes a lifetime of temptation experiences to render the material mind completely obedient and willing to arrange itself by correspondence with the rational mind, and thus the celestial mind. This is called the regenerated person, or the regenerated mental state. However it is a process that is actually never fully completed.

 

If we fail to take charge of the content of our material consciousness we give up the choice that we each have at our second death. This is when we enter the final place of living in society with either those in the Grand Human or those in the Grand Monster. This all important choice is given up when we give up control of the content of our consciousness. This content is formed by the loves and enjoyments we had when renting out our mind others who make the choice for us. The accumulation of loves so formed over a lifetime cannot be tossed aside at that final choice because love has a powerful determining hold over our thinking, especially so after the dying/resuscitation process. By monitoring and managing the content of our thoughts we make the choices for those loves that are going to make us truly happy, from within, to eternity. With those loves we can enter our heavenly life in company with our soul mate in a society of peaceful neighbors and devoted friends.

 

Have you listened in on yourself lately?

 

We cannot trust the reputation or opinion we have of ourselves, for this is subjective, biased, and self-serving. The check mark we place on self-rating scales are inflated or deflated in accordance with our vanities: How good am I? How often do I get mad? Am I ever unkind or gross? What kind of mistakes do I make? How happy are the people around me with my conduct? Etc. To answer such questions objectively and accurately we must witness our life.

 

To react to what we observe is to make an evaluation of our willing and thinking. This evaluation is from a rational level, looking down, while the stream of thinking that we are observing is from a material level. An analogy might be standing on a bridge and looking down on the flow of a semi-transparent river and inspecting its contents—stones, fish, debris. These things represent the content of our mind—knowledges, truths, and falsifications of truths. The flow of the river is the sequencing of the thoughts, their reasoning and coherence. What do you think is holding the stream of thinking in a coherent or meaningful sequence or direction? A related question is this: What allows people to think logically and to solve a problem logically? Where does logical thinking come from? And note as well that people also think illogically.

 

The answer anatomically is that when the material mind is in correspondence with the rational mind it then thinks logically, as if spontaneously out of nowhere. But when the material thinking is unwilling to arrange itself to agree with the rational, it thinks illogically from itself. It s own logic is not capable of recognizing that its thought sequence is not logical. For example, when we are suddenly emotionally challenged, as when a stranger on the road insults us, we “fly into a rage” and “see red” like a bull. We cannot see that our rage makes us illogical and dangerous. We think sequences of thoughts that falsely or inadequately represent the situation. We make quick judgments that turn out later to be wrong. The material consciousness has no objective knowledge of itself, but only a subjective one from within. In that mentality, whatever we love we call good, and whatever ideas agree with that good, we call true and logical.

 

The only solution for the material mind is to let the rational mind decide what is good and true. The rational idea of good and truth corresponds to the celestial idea of good and truth, and this corresponds to Divine Good and Truth. Prior to reformation and regeneration our idea of good and truth is not aligned with the celestial idea of good and truth. Reformation is the effort we expend in separating things in our mind that correspond to the rational-celestial, and those that do not. We thus establish a conscious celestial-rational mind and consciousness. This is the mentality we need to effect regeneration. Without rational loves and truths the material mind cannot face spiritual combat. Only higher principles can give us the intensity of love and motivation for

 

 

 

 

The 12 Anatomical Layers of Existence and Reality

 

(This is Diagram 16 in the anatomical charts)

ANATOMICAL
LAYERS

DISCRETE DEGREES OF LOVE

ACCOMPANYING DEGREES OF MEANING

CONSCIOUSNESS

1, 2, 3

Divine Love
(mental heat)

Divine Wisdom
(mental light)

God
(Divine-Human)

4, 5, 6

Celestial loves

Celestial-rational meanings

Heavenly
(Grand Human)

7

Rational loves

Rational meanings

Rational

8, 9

Material loves

Material or natural meanings

Material or natural

10, 11, 12

temporary and permanent body coverings)

 

The mental sun of eternity (see Diagrams) is the entry point of God’s Divine Love into creation, existence, and reality. God creates, constructs, and manages every detail in existence through the interior structure or constitution of every object and property. In God’s consciousness infinite things make one. In other words, God integrates everything into a rational system or coherent and organic unit. God creates 12 substantive layers that are organic and evolutionary through interior constitution. God builds from within outward, or what is the same, from top down, through a series of discrete degrees or substantive layers.

 

Each layer is non-overlapping because it is constructed from a different substance conglomeration. All objects within a layer or “universe” are proper to that layer and cannot mix or touch adjacent layers. However the layers are functionally connected by the laws of correspondences. There is therefore a sequential order of discrete degrees, which is top down (or from center outward), and a simultaneous order of discrete degrees, which is from center outward as in concentric circles. All events in a lower degree are effects caused by the corresponding events in the immediately adjacent upper degree. In this way God maintains omnipotent control over all things that have existence in the created universe.

 

Every human being is born into these 12 layers, develops sequentially across the layers, but functions simultaneously at maturity. The organ of the soul contains the unique mental genes of each immortal human being. It is located in layer 3 and is not accessible to our consciousness. It has been called “God’s abode” with human beings. The highest conscious life we can have is called the celestial or heavenly consciousness. It exists in three modalities called interior-celestial-rational (“Third Heaven”), spiritual –rational (“Second Heaven”), and spiritual-natural (“First Heaven”). Our consciousness gains access to the celestial degree of life starting at our second death when we enter the Grand Human society of our love.

 

Our rational consciousness begins when we reach maturity at young adulthood. It is at that time a materialized version of the rational, and this is not actually rational but only appears to be. The true rational begins when we undergo reformation and become enlightened by realizing the reality of dualism, the afterlife, eternity, God, heaven and hell.  This rational is in correspondence with the celestial-rational and forms our new character and personality through the process of regeneration.

 

When we acquire the celestial-rational arrangement in our rational thinking we are capapble of undergoing spiritual temptations. God in the role of our Divine Psychologist, manages the details of our character reformation through temptations that we are given to face in daily life. We then must use the principles of rational truths that we have acquired through the celestial-rational meanings and ideas. These principles include the idea that we must fight against our temptations as-if of our effort and suffering, but knowing all along that it is God who is managing and effecting through omnipotence. God wills that we live the experience that we are alone, fighting by our own effort. Without this, we would not fight. And we must fight if we are going to make our choices in freedom. When we choose in freedom, we choose according to our ruling love. This remains with us to eternity and can make up our heavenly life of happiness and conjugial bliss with a partner.

 

Note from the table (Diagram 12) that all the degrees of creation and reality begin with God’s Divine Love, which is the mental heat that continuously streams out of the mental sun of eternity, and creating the 12 anatomical layers of existence around itself. Divine Love is the source and origin of our celestial loves, and these are the cause of our rational loves, which are the cause of our material loves. Love is therefore the power that drives and determines the whole of creation. God rules through Divine Love that is within our celestial loves. These are the organic operations of the affective circulatory system of the celestial mental body (V). These operations are the cause of the operations in the affective system of the rational mental body (VI), which causes the events in the affective system of the material mental body (VII).

 

Loves construct the thoughts in the cognitive respiratory system. One can think of an idea as the cognitive embodiment of a love. We cannot see the love, but we can see the idea. This is why meaning is called mental light. But feeling is called mental heat. Heat is visible as light. Heat is the substance; light is the form. Heat within is the interior structure of light on the outside. Love and ideas together have the power to instantiate the actuality that is our consciousness. Celestial loves give us a heavenly consciousness which is quasi-omniscient. Rational loves give us the awareness of celestial consciousness, so that we can have it available to us now, while we are still attached to the physical body. After the dying/resuscitation process this rational consciousness allows to access our celestial consciousness. Without this intermediary operation we would not be able to bridge the gap between the natural-material life on earth, and the spiritual-celestial life in eternity.

 

Mental Content in Eternity

To be happy in an afterlife of eternity people must have a mental environment filled with content and meaning. What would a dream be without content or meaning? Nothing but darkness of consciousness, so that a dream would be an experience no different from a no-dream. Where there is no mental content, there is no heaven. The content of the afterlife begins with everything that is in our mind at the death of the physical body. Upon resuscitation a few hours later, our consciousness of the mental environment, of the people, and of the events that are going on around us, is similar to the natural content that we have acquired during our connection to the physical body. This is made of our experiences, memories, knowledge, involvements, and plans. Everything that we have ever sensed, thought, or felt through the physical body is permanently recorded in the mental events we had during those experiences and to which they correspond.

 

This is why the environment around us in eternity is similar in content to the environment around us here. You know this is true of our dreams. The content of our dreams consist of objects we are familiar with in awake states, such as people, houses, animals, clothes, beaches, mountains, food, flowers, etc. This is also the content of our celestial mental body (VII) or layers 6, 5, 4). The societies and cities in the heavens of the Grand Human consist of ideally beautiful and harmonious architecture, art, as well as orderly and peaceful interactions between citizens who love their neighbors more than themselves. In contrast, the societies and cities in the hells of the Grand Monster consist of perversely ugly and disharmonious living conditions, as well as disorderly and warlike interactions between citizens who love themselves more than their neighbors.

 

Although the content of your dream may be similar to the objects around you when you are awake, we know that the content in each case is made of different substances. When we are awake the physical objects around us are made of matter such as mineral elements, gasses, atomic particles in spatiotemporal arrangements and motions. These physical elements or materials are called “inert” and as we all know, cannot be easily manipulated or built from scratch. But the objects in our dream world are made of mental stuff called “substance” to distinguish it from “matter.” Things made of substance are mental things, while things made of matter are physical things.

 

Mental things made of substance are easily constructed, instantiated, or rezzed in the mental environment. We do not feel any effort of construction when we are constructing our dream filled with mental objects. It is a spontaneous process or activity governed completely my our loves. Each love has the power to construct thoughts and images that it finds pleasing and consumable or pleasurable. This is the consciousness of it. The pleasure or enjoyment in our conscious awareness is the organic embodiment of love in the sensorimotor system of the mental body. It is called our “living experience.”

 

Every mental event is an object constructed of immortal substances (mental heat and light substance). A thought or idea is a mental object. An imagined castle is also a mental object (as in “castles in the air” – which refers to unrealistic thinking). Prior to our separation from the physical body through the dying/resuscitation process, our inventory of mental objects is in a disorder or disarray. The mental states in our celestial layers (VII or layers 6, 5, 4) are mixed helter-skelter as in a heap or in a soup. The mental states in our inherited natural layers (V and VI or 7, 8, 9), are hellish prior to regeneration and character reformation. After resuscitation, our mental physiology goes through spontaneous organic operations of new mental experiences that involve us with other people whom we encounter. This spontaneous change process ends in the complete and total separation of heavenly and hellish traits, loves, and enjoyments. All the inherited and acquired hellish loves are assembled by the Divine Psychologist in one hierarchy ruled by a chief selfish love, and all the regenerate heavenly loves are assembled in another hierarchy ruled by a ruling altruistic love.

 

Our two personality halves are now complete opposites of each other. Now the two opposing ruling loves engage us simultaneously so that we are pulled in opposite directions simultaneously. This process feels like dying and losing all life. We feel the urgent necessity of making a fateful decision. We either face our hellish ruling love, turning our back to the heavenly ruling love, or else the reverse: we face our heavenly ruling love and turn our back on our hellish ruling love. There is no in between compromise possible because a ruling love does not allow a contrary love to exist within its vicinity or hierarchy of loves.

 

In this process of ultimate and final choice of our eternal destination, the individual feels a strong love and attraction to the ruling love that is acquired during life through the physical body. This ruling love now powerfully directs our free choice to decide which side of ourselves we are going to give up. Whichever side we choose, the other side is rendered motionless and as-if dead, unable to start up again in our consciousness. It is laid to rest forever. This final choice and separation is called our second death. At this point our consciousness becomes this ruling love and we find ourselves in company with others who have a like ruling love. This final state of life in endless eternity is called either heaven or hell, depending on its content.

 

It makes rational sense therefore to want to prepare ourselves for that fateful choice that is to last us to endless eternity. It’s a big difference whether we live our eternity in the irrational disarray of hostility and savagery in our hellish mental states, versus living in the rational order, happiness, and friendship of our heavenly mental states. This choice is something we must manage now and throughout the rest of our life “on earth.” The process by which this management is achieved is called regeneration. This involves clinging to rational loves, which provide us with rational-celestial truths and principles by which we can resist temptations and cumulate progress towards complete separation from inherited material traits and enjoyments that are “evil,” that is, contrary or opposed to the celestial arrangement (layers 6, 5, 4).

 

 

Research Methodology in Mental Psychology

 

The current research methodology in psychology has developed and matured in the 20th century. It is based on the philosophy of monism and the negative bias in science against dualism. God is excluded. The afterlife is excluded. Anything mental is excluded, unless redefined operationally in terms of brain activity and measurement. Personality is redefined in terms of physically measurable behavioral activities, while consciousness and thinking are reduced to neuro-chemical operations in the brain and body. This attitude and perspective is called “reductionism in science.” Some people like to use the phrase “scientific objectivism” or “realism.” Others who oppose objectivism have proposed a mentalism that is also reductionist, though in a different way (see Lakoff, Johnson, and others in the Readings on body-mind correspondences).

 

The exclusion of dualism, the afterlife, and God is a philosophical decision that can be called a “bias” since it has not been proven, and most scientists would not even try of proving it. It is just an assumption, an orientation, a mutual agreement or “creed” to exclude from science certain topics and issues, when they cannot be measured by physical behavior or measurement. All disciplines of science have such “departing assumptions” that are merely accepted and not proven or provable. It is like a “constitution” or like the ethical by-laws adopted by a profession or community. No scientist is expected to prove that there is no God or afterlife. It is just excluded from any human behavior and explanation of human behavior that is kept within the framework variously called “objectivism,” “positivism,” “physicalism,” “realism,” or “behaviorism.” This philosophical “monism” may therefore properly be called a “bias,” as in the “reductionism bias,” or the “negative bias.”

 

Similarly, the exclusion of monism by accepting dualism instead, is not provable, and therefore can be called the “positive bias” in science. We thus have a historical and intellectual paradigm clash between the negative bias in psychology and the positive bias in psychology. The negative bias denies the existence of purely mental phenomena, the afterlife, and God as explanatory concepts in human behavior. The positive bias in psychology asserts the existence of two worlds in which we live, namely, the physical world through our temporary physical body, and the mental world of eternity with our immortal mental body (see anatomical diagram 1).

 

The reason that the negative and positive paradigms clash is that the negative bias paradigm requires physical measurements to establish the existence of a phenomenon. This requirement automatically excludes anything that is not physical. For instance, God is excluded because there is no physical measurement of God available. Also, life after death is excluded because there is no physical measurement of anything after death. Likewise, feelings, thoughts, and consciousness are excluded, unless they can be reduced to physical measurements. In other words, it is logically impossible to prove physically that something non-physical exists.

 

Think carefully about this: it is logically impossible to prove physically that something non-physical exists.

 

This is why dualism starts with the positive bias, which is the assumption that there are two worlds, one is physical in time, the other is mental in eternity. The time/eternity dualism is therefore the departing assumption. The current proposal of mental psychology is called substantive dualism based on correspondences. The history of psychology keeps track of dualism, as for instance tracing the modern beginnings of monism to R. Descartes (1596-1650). This is historically ironic because Descartes is also known for his strong advocacy of dualism, which was that human beings have a physical or material component in the body, and a purely mental or “spirit” component in the “soul.” This is a traditional body-spirit dualism that runs through the history of literature since its beginning thousands of years ago.

 

E. Swedenborg (1688-1772) was the first modern psychologist who advanced dualism to a scientific status by describing the “spiritual world” of eternity as the mental world where are to be found mental objects such as sensations, thoughts, and feelings. Swedenborg was the first scientific mental psychologist who worked out the details of substantive dualism. I call this dualism “substantive” because it specifies the substance, or mental material out of which mental objects are constructed, and how these mental objects interact with each other. In his books such as Rational Psychology (1742) and related mental physiology works, Swedenborg proposes the laws of body-mind correspondences that play a major role in mental psychology today.

 

In my adaptation of Swedenborg’s theistic mental psychology to modern psychology, I have retained all the major elements he has confirmed by direct observation over a period of 27 years during which he was able to be fully conscious and functioning in both worlds.

 

The positive bias includes the assumption of the operation of the laws of correspondences. These cause-effect laws are required for a scientific approach to substantive dualism in psychology. In other words, it is assumed that every phenomenon involving the physical world and body in time, is called an “effect,” while the cause of each physical effect is a phenomenon involving the mental world and body in eternity. Mental events are therefore the cause of all physical events.

 

The cause-effect laws of body-mind correspondences can be discovered empirically, as I have described in various places (e.g.: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/correspondences.htm).

(REMINDER: if you use Control-click, instead of just a click, the page and diagram will open in a new window, and this is more convenient as you continue reading the text.)

 

Once the assumption of dualism is granted (without proof) there is a variety of data sources and data management procedures that become available to mental psychology. For the past fifty years I have developed and applied empirical data management procedures involving the following approaches to mental psychology:

Additional research approaches will no doubt be developed by future researchers in mental psychology.

I want to note here that all the major assumptions and principles in mental psychology that I have proposed, can be found confirmed by the direct empirical observations recorded in the Swedenborg Reports (18th century) (see my detailed descriptions in the Theistic Psychology volumes).

I have it made it possible for readers and scholars to explore my data management efforts in mental psychology over the past four decades, by making available on the Web much of my scientific thinking and publishing since 1960. The following topical directory links will give you access to almost all of it:

  1. Links to Full Access Recent Online Books by Leon James
    http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/booklist.htm
  2. Directory of Full Text Articles and Books Online (1960-2008) 
    http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/leonarticles.html
  3. Scientific Neologisms Coined by Leon James in Psychology For the Period 1958-2008 
    http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/neochartp1.htm
  4. Swedenborg Encyclopedia of Theistic Psychology
    http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/gloss.html
  5. Dr. Leon James Home Page Hawaii --  up since 1996
    http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/leon.html
  6. List of Publications by Leon James
    http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/leonpublish.html

Examples of data applications can also be found in the reports of my students over the past thirty semester. Consult this list of links that connect you to more than 200 student reports in spiritual psychology, theistic psychology, and mental psychology:

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/swedenborg.html#students

 

Rational Psychology vs. Empirical Psychology

 

The science of psychology exists in two modalities, negative bias and positive bias. The negative bias psychology developed in the twentieth century. I have personally witnessed this development since the 1950’s when I began my training as a psychology researcher, writer, and professor (see my article on Historical Autobiography: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/499ss99/pun/ccp1.html)

 

The negative bias mode of psychology is strictly empirical and physicalistic, some people use the word “behavioristic.” I call it a “negative” bias because it denies without any proof the existence of real things that are not physical and natural. For instance, God is not admitted as a scientific cause-effect reality. No scientific explanations are allowed or sanctioned unless they involve a physical operation, record, or measurement. Since no physical measurements are available to define or “operationalize” the concept of God, it is excluded as a possibility. The faithful practice of this negative bias in science insures that no knowledge of God can enter science.

 

The negative bias is a difficult to maintain when it is examined rationally. The principal argument against the negative bias is this: What if it is wrong?

 

The negative bias against the existence of God hasn’t been proven and no proof will ever be given. This is because giving proof is a logical process, and one cannot give proof of an illogical assumption or idea. If God exists, and if God is not physical, then no physical measurement of God is possible. To insist on a physical measurement of God is therefore illogical. This illogical assumption cannot be proven. Hence it remains a negative bias. The consequences of psychology maintaining the negative bias are unfortunate. As will be discussed later, the ability of psychology has remained relatively modest and small in the major applied areas of improving instruction, training, parenting, marriages, societal social ills, mental problems, addictions, low productivity and inventiveness, conflict management, and so on. We should carefully examine the possibility, and I think the likelihood, that psychology’s unspectacular record of effectiveness is due to an important extent, to the strict reductionist empiricism of the negative bias methodology.

 

According to the science of psychology today, and for the past century, there are no mental objects such as sensations, thoughts, and feelings in their own right. These are called “epiphenomena” or “emergent phenomena” tied physically to neuro-chemical operations in the brain. The “mind” is not a real object but a word actually referring to the operations of the physical brain and body. This position is called “reductionism” because it “reduces” two worlds to just one. The mental world of the mind and consciousness that we all experience as our self and our life, is therefore an illusion, an abstraction, an idealization, in short, not real. The word “real” is reserved only to physical measurements.

 

If however the negative bias position is wrong, then science has illogically cut itself forever from finding out the true reality.

 

The positive bias in science is actually the reciprocal of the negative. Here it is assumed without any proof, that God exists and that reality actually consists of two worlds, one physical in time and space, the other mental or spiritual outside time and space, which is called eternity.

 

Now in order to make this definition of reality into a scientific premise, assumption, or principle, it is required that a scientific account or elaboration be given, along with the mere assumption of two worlds. According to regular polls carried out over the past half-a-century, the majority of people, including scientists, declare their belief that God is real. Since the majority of scientists believe in the actual reality of God, it is obvious that scientists have to pretend that there is no God when they write up their experiments and apply for research grants that is explicitly or officially run by negative bias rules. I use the expression “academic schizophrenia” to refer to this intellectual pretense. I myself have practiced it for several decades of published works in sanctioned or “approved” journals.

 

I believe that scientists, including myself, have put up with this academic schizophrenia because they don’t have intellectual weapons that are effective against the negative bias. Everyone is socialized into the idea that God is for religion and is for our afterlife concerns, and therefore it should not form part of our concerns in this life in the physical world. Hence God has been relegated to a mere belief system. This is unfortunate for science because it limits its future effectiveness in helping people and society to improve their condition. If we assume that God is a reality, and if we define God as omnipotent, then it is obvious that God must be actuating every activity, movement, or force in the world.

 

Here is where the scientific thinking and methodology takes over to insure that a rational and comprehensive account or theory be provided for the empirical consequences of this assumption. In order for the assumption of an omnipotent God to become a scientific premise it is required to present a rational proposal about the method or mechanism by which God manages all forces and events in reality.

 

This has been provided in mental psychology, and everyone is invited to examine the scientific adequacy and completeness of its theories and methods. The following is a list of specifications for what a rational psychology should be in its dualism and in its scientific and theoretical methodology. If you examine my entire proposal you will see that all of these requirements have been met.

 

(1)   It is required that the explanations in mental psychology about the existence of a non-physical God be comprehensive, so that they are able to deal with most of the obvious issues that come up upon examination and analysis of such an idea.

For instance, explanations about:

God’s relationship to reality.
God’s activities in the physical world, and their purpose.
God’s relationship to daily life and mental development.
God’s relationship to the afterlife, immortality, heaven, and hell.
God’s relationship to marriage and love.
God’s relationship to Sacred Scripture, religion, morality, history, culture, society.
God’s relationship to animals, plants, hurricanes, wars, evolution, the Big Bang and its future.

 

(2)    Since two worlds are assumed, it is required to define human beings biologically and organically as being born with two bodies that correspond to each other, point by point, in structure and form, but not in substance. Biological systems are organic, have a structure or component parts, adapt to the environment, and develop and evolve over time.

More specifically:

The physical body is born in the physical world of time and disintegrates at death, while the mental body is born in the mental world of eternity, and is immortal or permanent. The mental body contains our mental organs that operate and produce our threefold mental life of sensations, thoughts, and feelings. The sensory organs of the physical body and brain contain neuro-chemical messages or signals that activate by correspondence the sensory-motor system of the mental body. This is what gives us the sensation of consciousness of our environment. The sensations, thoughts, and feelings are mental events, not physical. Mental substances cannot exist in the physical world, and physical matter cannot exist in the mental world. Right from birth our mind and self is the mental body, not the physical. When the physical body is detached by the dying process, the mental body is “resuscitated” or “awakened in consciousness,” and the person continues immortal life in the mental body in the mental world of eternity.

 

Since the mental body is constructed out of organs acting as a system, its life must be explained as cumulative and developmental. Mental life must also be defined as healthy or unhealthy. For instance, “heavenly” mental states are healthy and in the arrangement of positive evolution, while “hellish” mental states are unhealthy and oppose or disrupt the normal arrangement, creating a path towards cumulative devolution. Personality development and “spiritual growth” is either in the modality of mental evolution or of devolution. This medical or biological definition of heaven and hell is in contrast to the religious or moral definitions, which involve “judgment” and condemnation by a higher power (God) or principle (karma).

 

(3)   It is required that the proposal of mental psychology be based on human anatomy and what is already known about the physical body. The “organic” mind is to be defined as a threefold system of organs in the mental body (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor), corresponding to the three in the physical body (circulatory, respiratory, neuro-muscular).

In particular:

The requirement of a body-mind correspondence serves as an empirical methodology for first observing facts about the physical body, and second, showing how the mental body acts precisely in the same manner, but in the mental world. Body-mind correspondences are actually cause-effect laws between mental or spiritual phenomena and physical phenomena. It is necessary to show and discover these correspondences empirically. In mental psychology data are gathered about the universal fact that all humans describe mental events in terms of physical events (e.g., “He’s got a good head” meaning, he is intelligent).

Data are also gathered that show that Sacred Scripture is written in the language of correspondences, so that when these are applied to the literal meaning, one obtains the corresponding mental meaning. It is shown in mental psychology that the correspondential meaning of Sacred Scripture from several religions refers to mental anatomy and development. This amazing consistency across centuries and cultures, is strong empirical evidence that the assumptions of mental psychology, as stated in this list, are confirmed by empirical evidence.

 

(4)    It is required that mental psychology qualify as a cumulative scientific enterprise that allows other scientists and researchers to discover new knowledge about its topics and issues. To achieve this it must provide a valid methodology that other scientists can practice for the conduct of cumulative, professional, and institutional research.

For instance:

Mental psychology in the positive bias modality has evolved over many centuries. The history of psychology “dates back to the ancient civilizations of Egypt, Greece, China and India.” An empirical confirmation of the assumptions and principles of mental psychology can be found in the Writings of Swedenborg (1688-1772). He advanced scientific understanding of the relationship between the brain and personality, and of the physical and “spiritual” body, through a God-given unique ability and special mission, to report as a scientist what he could observe about the afterlife when given the amazing ability to be conscious in both worlds simultaneously, which he was for 27 years, and described in about 30 published volumes, that have been translated since in many languages and studied by interested scholars and scientists such as myself. Mental psychology in its current modern version (2009) is learnable as a body of knowledge by college students who acquire the ability to give rational and anatomical solutions to new issues that they had not yet been exposed to in readings.

 

(5)    For mental psychology to be a universally acceptable science, its explanations and principles are required to be consistent with common sense as well as rational sense.

In particular:

The negative bias of monism and reductionism lacks credibility to the vast majority of people on the planet who worship God as a central reality of life. Besides flying in the face of people’s common sense, the negative bias in psychology also lacks rational sense. Compare physics or chemistry or biology to psychology, and you’ll see the obvious contrast. A science has a rational and coherent structure at the core around which a framework is extended through research. New elements in the framework must conform to what is already known about the core. In psychology there is no such coherence, agreement, or acceptance of a core among the dozens of “schools” and “approaches.” Hence the negative bias empiricism has not produced a rational system.

In contrast, the positive bias theism and dualism is a rational system analogous to geometry, mathematics, logic, or linguistics. These disciplines are sciences, have a methodology, a cumulative history by independent scholars and researchers. These rational sciences also have applications in engineering, law, economics, meteorology, and others.

Mental psychology is a rational science, deductive in its procedures, and empirical in its confirmations. It starts with the positive bias assumption of the existence of an omnipotent God, and proceeds with logical conclusions from this assumption. These conclusions must then be explained theoretically and consistently. Finally, they must be extended into the practice of daily living.

 

Topics and issues of daily concern that must be explained rationally and fully by mental psychology include:

Inherited traits; consciousness; mental development; personal interaction with God; character reformation; good and evil; right and wrong; lifestyle morality; spiritual beliefs; Sacred Scripture or Divine Speech; gender and marriage; dying and the afterlife; heaven and hell; inhabited planets; psychic phenomena and witchcraft; and some others.

 

(6)    Explanations in mental psychology are required to be cause-effect functions or relations, in contrast to behavioristic and empirical psychology in the negative bias mode, which is correlational, rather than cause-effect.

More specifically:

In the positive bias mode of theism and dualism, there are two discrete worlds, each real, and they are constructed to act synchronously or interdependently in such a way that a particular mental phenomenon is the cause, while its corresponding physical phenomenon is it effect. All explanations in mental psychology must be dualist and must specify synchronous cause-effect activity based on mind-body correspondences. For example, goal directed walking in daily life is the physical effect, while our motivation in the goal is the cause. In the negative bias empiricism, the goal motivation is reduced to brain activity. The walking and the brain activity are correlated empirical facts. Physical measurements of neural activity in the brain are correlated with physical measurements of muscular activity in walking. No cause-effect relationship can be offered in the negative bias mode, only observational correlations, at both the general level, and the specific or micro level. At all levels of observation, measurement, and explanation, only these correlations are provided in monist “physicalistic” or “materialic” science (some people use “positivistic”, but I think this could be confusing).

 

From a rational perspective, it is reductionist and inaccurate to designate the brain activity as the “cause” of the muscular activity of walking, when it is merely an observational correlation. As it was well known to authors prior to the 20th century, the causes of natural events are located in “spiritual” events, and ultimately in God, who is called the First Cause. To take another example, consider what is the cause of your car going faster when you press the gas pedal. A monist or material perspective would identify the cause of the car going faster as the greater amount of fuel injected into the combustion chamber, when the gas pedal is pressed down. But a dualist perspective sees that this is only a mechanistic correlation. The idea of “more fuel” and “pedal press” are correlational observations of what happens when this happens. The cause must always be in a discrete category away from the effect, or else it is not a cause but a correlation. The cause must be in the mental world, while the effect must be in the physical world. In this case, the cause is the mental desire to want to go faster, while the physical effect is the foot pressing the gas pedal. In mental psychology, all physical behavior is required to be related to causal mental behavior (‘motive or desire” and “body act”).

 

In general, dualist rational systems in science provide true cause-effect explanations between the two worlds, while monist empirical systems provide correlations at the physical level. Cause-effect functions are always deductive, while correlational functions are always inductive. Deductive relations are top-down cause-effect rational “control” mechanisms, while inductive relations are bottom-up idealized abstractions, rather than control mechanisms.

 

In Summary

A dualist and theistic mental psychology that is also scientific, rational, and researchable, is required to provide rational ”systems” explanations of all its concepts and measurements. These involve specifications and definitions of:

(1)   Comprehensive, top-down control of phenomena in the two worlds

(2)   Biological, organic development and evolution

(3)   Body-mind correspondences, empirically discoverable

(4)   Valid methodology for research by other scientists

(5)   Acceptable to common sense as well as to rational analysis and reasoning

(6)   Cause-effect relations across discrete degrees of correspondence (mental-physical)

It is my claim that mental psychology, as I have presented it in the context of modern psychology, meets all of these requirements. Anyone examining what I have presented can verify the accuracy of this claim.

The following list of questions represents areas of ignorance for the negative bias psychology as long as it restricts reality to what can be measured physically (“data”), and to explanations that are abstracted from physical measurements (“grounded theory”). In contrast, mental psychology includes both physical and non-physical measurement procedures, and therefore can elaborate definitive and rational answers to all of these questions:

  1. Is there an afterlife?
  2. What happens during the dying and resuscitation process?
  3. What are the chief mechanisms or instruments by which God manages the universe?
  4. What is God’s purpose in creating the universe?
  5. If God is perfect and omnipotent, why is there suffering and evil in existence?
  6. What is the soul, and what is its relation to the mind or spirit?
  7. Do we have a body in the afterlife? Is it functional like this one?
  8. How do we locomote in the mental world with the mental body, since there is no space?
  9. Is there a heaven and a hell, and who gets to go to either?
  10. What is “daily” life like in heaven and hell? Are there cities, jobs, a government?
  11. Is Sacred Scripture really Divine Speech? It seems so pedestrian and ordinary.
  12. Where does gender come from? What is the ultimate difference between male and female?
  13. Why is it more exciting and interesting to explore “hellish” experiences in comparison to “heavenly” or “saintly” ones?
  14. Is there such a thing a s “sin” and “karma”?
  15. Who gets to decide what is absolutely good vs. evil, right vs. wrong, moral vs. immoral?
  16. What accounts for the fact that half of all marriages end in divorce? How can this be remedied effectively?
  17. What is love? Where does it come from? How important is it?
  18. What is freedom? When are we free? What does God have to do with it?
  19. How do we decide who is a good person? What is good?
  20. What is rational? What does the rational have to do with our eternity and our relationship to God?
  21. Are there angels and devils? Who are they? Where are they?
  22. What is the source of our feelings, thoughts, and consciousness?
  23. What makes people unique?
  24. Why does each religion have a different idea and name for God? Why are their Sacred Scriptures so different from each other, even opposed? Is there not only one universal infinite God?
  25. Is there human life on other planets? What determines this?
  26. What are vices and virtues, loves and lusts? Is there an objective way of identifying them?
  27. Why doesn’t God appear at the United Nations and declare Himself to the world? Would this not be the most direct or effective way of getting people to know that there is in fact a living God who is aware of us and wants a relationship with us?
  28. Why does God want a relationship with individual human beings? Is God in the mind of everyone? How can we connect with God in our mind?
  29. How does our mental body develop as the physical body grows and matures? What governs the developmental steps? What is the role of God and of heaven and hell, in this cumulative organic mental growth process?
  30. And many more.

It may be difficult to believe that one discipline today can have answers to all these life issues that have puzzled writers for thousands of years. And yet the ability of mental psychology to do this can be confirmed by studying the material I have brought forward for consideration (see the current notes (this document) as well as the prior materials which are listed and linked above.

 

Mental psychology has this amazing explanatory power because it is a rational deductive system from the top to the bottom. The “top” refers to God and the “bottom” refers to physical measurements and objects. Mental psychology is designed to fill in all the in-between. For instance, the instrument by which God creates building blocks for things that exist, is specified as the mental sun of eternity. Scientific knowledge in mental psychology is advanced through the empirical investigation of body-mind correspondences as they occur in people’s daily thinking and talking. These same correspondences also appear in Sacred Scripture samples from all major religions.

 

The knowledge and method of correspondences allows us to fill out the details of the mental world by relating them to the details of the physical world. What cannot be measured physically (mental world phenomena), can be specified and built up by rationally extracting correspondences from its physical counterpart. For instance, by studying and measuring the operations of the circulatory system in the physical body, we can fill out and specify the organic operations of the affective system in the mental body. Similarly with the respiratory and cognitive systems, and with the neuro-skeletal and sensorimotor systems.

 

The method of mental-physical correspondences (some people say “natural-spiritual” correspondences), applies to all features of life in eternity. For instance, mental navigation and displacement correspond to physical navigation and displacement. Physical geography and astronomy are exact correspondences of mental geography and mental astronomy. Government structures in physical societies correspond to government structures in mental societies. Additional methods of rational inferencing are available from correspondences with the virtual world and the dream world (see next Section on avatar psychology, which is a branch of mental psychology).

 

Dualist Empiricism

 

A basic and essential feature of mental psychology is that it is “grounded” in dualist empiricism. I also use the expression “substantive dualism” (see my article on Substantive Dualism: Swedenborg's Integration of Biological Theology and Rational Psychology at http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/dualism.html

 

The empiricism of dualism had not been discovered until the 18th century writings of E. Swedenborg, as mentioned before several times above. The reason is that no scientist before him had the scientific ingenuity of “imagining” or “reconstructing” life after death. Absolutely nothing was known about mental states after death. Only fragmented fantasies by various sorts of writers can be found in the history of the past. Today, checking with a Web search engine on the afterlife, heaven, and hell, one finds an endless stream of fragmented speculations and imaginative accounts, but no empirical facts or observations. Mental psychology, grounded in rational empiricism and organic anatomy, has constructed a rational “systems” account of the human body, the human mind, and the afterlife of eternity.

 

This top-down deductive rational system is extracted by logical reasoning from the initial positive bias premise, namely that an omnipotent God exists (see my article on:

Ten Rational Conclusions Derived From the Proposition That God Exists, at:

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/ch1p1.htm#conclusions

and

Theoretical Implications of God's Omnipotence, Omniscience, and Omnipresence, at http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/omnipotence.htm

 

In general, thinking within the perspective of rational empiricism in dualist mental psychology, we need to extend explanatory theory by staying within the following derived principles. All future extensions and developments in dualist empiricism must be consistent with its initial assumptions and principles, a few of which are summarized in the following listing.

 

  1. The mental world that is familiar to us all, is the mental world of eternity. I often refer to this proposition as “discovering the mental world of eternity.” I consider this my greatest discovery in fifty years of science (see here: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/neochartp1.htm).
  2. The mental sun of eternity is the instrument by which God constructs and manages all things created outside and from the substances streaming out of the mental sun.
  3. Broadly identified, there are four distinct layers, zones, or levels in the created universe, which consists of the mental world in eternity and the physical world in time.
  4. The mental sun and the mental world are living human-divine organic entities broadly called “love substance” and “truth substance.” These living human-divine components constitute and create the anatomical layering of the two worlds.
  5. The organic layering of the mental world is by “discrete degrees” of existence, so that there is no direct or substantive exchange between layers. Instead, the events at each layer communicate or function together through the built in laws of correspondence. These laws are empirically discoverable.
  6. The first mental layer is “at the top” or “at the center”, both models applying synchronously (vertical and concentric arrangements). The mental sun is at the top or center of the mental world of eternity, creating it as an expanse out of the substances from itself streaming out. The operation of the physical or natural sun (or star) corresponds to the operation of the mental sun. In both cases the sun creates an expanse around itself, and fills that space with the substances from itself.
  7.  The mental world is therefore a rational ether filled with living organic building blocks that are suitable to construct organic subjects that constitute a “human mind” or unique individual. In this rational ether there floats around particles of “love substance” and “truth substance.” These have a built in propensity to seek each other out and re-unite, as they are united in God, but exit separately from the mental sun into the mental world or rational ether.
  8. There are two arrangements of the living human-divine mental dust that form themselves into mental genes or building blocks. One is the masculine arrangement, namely, a love particle surrounded or contained within a truth particle. The other is the feminine arrangement, namely, a truth particle surrounded and contained within a love particle. The mental genes of each person are contained in an initial “packet” or conglomerate, called the “soul.” There are therefore male or masculine souls and female or feminine souls.
  9. The second major layer or expanse, below or around the mental sun, is the celestial zone, layer, or discrete level. The consciousness we have when we are located in this layer is called a celestial consciousness, and is the highest or closest human beings can get to the mental sun and God. Our consciousness in this layer is initiated at our second death, which is in sequence of development after the first death.
  10. The third major layer or degree of the mental world is called rational consciousness. The affective and cognitive systems of the mental body function at this level through undisturbed correspondences from the affective and cognitive systems of celestial consciousness. Rational consciousness exists at two sub-levels or sub-degrees within the rational degree itself, one higher or more interior, the other lower or more external. The higher more interior rational zone functions in correspondence with the celestial consciousness, while the lower more external rational zone functions in reverse correspondence relative to the material consciousness below it.
  11. The fourth major layer or degree as we proceed downward from the mental sun, and outward in circumference, is called material consciousness. The affective and cognitive systems of the mental body function at this level in correspondence to the material world that we experience through the physical body, which is still lower and more external than the material mind. Material consciousness can potentially be rearranged to be in correspondence to the rational-celestial correspondences, instead of the physical-material correspondences that are in reverse arrangement to the celestial, and therefore to the human-divine in the mental sun.
  12. Mental growth and spiritual development consists of two phases, unregenerate and regenerate (see Diagrams). From birth to adulthood the person progresses towards the maturation of the physical, material and rational zones. The celestial zone is not matured until the second phase, which starts in adulthood and ends with the dying-resuscitation process. The second phase begins with the reformation of our ideas from the material-rational consciousness, which is external, looking outward and down towards the physical world and correspondences. After reformation, which can take a few months, regeneration of character begins through facing and fighting temptations brought to each person at the right moment by God, who in this role is called the Divine Psychologist.  Regeneration consists of the anatomical rearrangement of material loves and ideas into the celestial rational arrangement that is in correspondence with the celestial and the human-divine. Before regeneration our loves are selfish and our ideas irrational or materialic. Regeneration proceeds throughout one’s lifetime on earth while still attached to the psychical body.
  13. If regeneration does not proceed prior to the dying-resuscitation process, the person is consciously awakened in the mental body without the celestial layer being functional or active. People who are in this mental situation undergo therapeutic experiences designed specifically for each person to allow the individual to discover their ruling love. Part of this process is therefore the anatomical or surgical separation of material and material-rational loves that can correspond to celestial arrangements, and material loves that cannot correspond to the celestial. When this separation is completed the individual undergoes the second death, which is a process that inserts the person into one of the numerous societies that form the two mental conglomerations of the afterlife: the Grand Human conglomerate of celestial consciousness, and the Grand Monster conglomerate of infernal consciousness.
  14. The Grand Monster conglomerate is the location, depository, and origin of all selfish loves “married” to irrational ideas, and producing the infernal consciousness called “hell.” In this retrogressive and progressively devolving human consciousness, people live in a fantasy environment that spontaneously arranges itself to be opposite to the celestial arrangements of altruistic loves married to rational ideas. People in the infernal consciousness experience all the emotions of hell known to humankind – hatred, fear, anxiety, vengeance, greed, egotism, deception, depression, lower productivity and inventiveness, stupidity, arrogance, inability to be rational, etc.

    These “hellish” human mental states congregate and coalesce with each other, arranging themselves in an infernal hierarchy of bad to worse to the still worse. This endless devolution of negativity and depravity robs them of the last shred of their humanity, becoming an insane raving savage and sub-human individual. The variety of these insane mental states were known throughout history and receive in the literature such names as devil, demon, genii, siren, succubus, satyr, dragon, snake, scorpion, vampire, etc. Each of these names or roles corresponds to a particular hellish or “infernal” ruling love, with its hierarchy of hellish sub-loves, called “minions” that serve and do the work for the ruling love.
  15. The Grand Human conglomerate is the location and depository of all altruistic loves “married” to rational ideas, and producing the celestial consciousness called “heaven.” In this positive and progressively evolving human consciousness, people live in a rational environment that spontaneously arranges itself to be consistent with the celestial arrangements of altruistic loves married to rational ideas. People in the heavenly consciousness experience all the emotions of heaven known to humankind – altruistic love, reliance on God, mental peace, compassion, forgiveness, generosity, harmless, honest, enthusiastic, higher productivity and inventiveness, wisdom, humility, the ability to be remain rational, etc.

    These “heavenly” human mental states congregate and coalesce with each other, arranging themselves in a celestial hierarchy of good to better to the still better. This endless evolution of positivity and wholesomeness enriches their humanity, becoming an “angel” person that possesses the highest human virtues and power. The variety of these heavenly mental states were known throughout history and receive in the literature such names as angel, saint, hero, inventor, discoverer, leader, founding father, chivalrous knight, muse, princess, fairy, lamb, horse, dove, flower, song, etc. Each of these words or roles corresponds to a particular heavenly ruling love, with its hierarchy of sub-loves, called “ministers” that do the work for the ruling love.
  16.  The fifth and final or outermost layer, at the very bottom of the universe, is the natural world and our physical body. This endlessly complex anatomical marvel is nothing but a copy of the mental body, and constructed out of inert matter, or elements that originate in the sun, or other stars. While the mental body is constructed out of living and immortal components from the mental sun, the physical body is nothing but inert matter. The marvelous structure of the temporary physical body is a replica of the permanent mental body.

    The physical is made of inert matter. As a result it is not possible for the physical body to contain mental operations or states such as sensations, thoughts, and feelings. These mental events can only exist in the mental world. The dying-resuscitation process, which takes about 33 hours, is a Divine surgery by which God separates the physical body from the mental body. These two bodies are intertwined, organ by organ, nerve by nerve, fiber by fiber, and cell by cell. Only Divine omnipotence with infinite wisdom is capable of performing such a complex and delicate task on a routine basis day by day, forever, as the human race continues to expand endlessly into the future evolution.
  17. The Grand Human and the Grand Monster is an instrument used by the Divine Psychologist to manage every person’s daily consciousness and eternal development. For instance, consider what happens with you when you experience a temptation like
    “Should I have this extra beer before I drive home or not?” or,
    “Should I keep quiet about that or should I lie to have my way?”

    God must manage all our temptations in order to make it a positive growth process, rather than a devolving negative one. When we give in to a temptation that God has arranged for us, our mental growth is interrupted and we begin a downward or backward slide into unregenerate consciousness, which originates in and is fed by the societies of the Grand Monster. When we resist a temptation, our regeneration progresses, and we are better off. There is a lifelong series of temptations that  the Divine Psychologist arranges and manages for each individual who is willing to submit to the process of regeneration. Those who are not willing to submit, quickly fail all their temptations, embracing a hellish personality that ties them forever to a particular infernal society in the Grand Monster. Everyone ends up where their love is.

    There is therefore an involvement and participation of the Grand Human and Grand Monster societies in eternity whenever we evolve towards heaven or devolve towards hell. This involvement in the mental state and fate of every individual is called “the vertical community” (see more here: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/gloss/vertical.html )

 

Rational Psychology and Rational Methodology

 

Rational psychology is the scientific exploration of the mental world of eternity.

 

The empirical exploration of the mental world is possible. Objective observation of the mental world is possible because every human being has the spontaneous ability to make such observations. Since there is only one mental world, and every human being is mentally present in that world, therefore the events that take place in the mental environment are objectively observable by all who are present. Consequently, rational psychology can be an empirical science.

 

Ordinarily in daily life, people’s focus of awareness, or consciousness, is relatively abstract or “idealized.” There is only a general level of integration of the sequence of events into comprehensible units called “episodes” or events. For instance, review in your mind what you were doing about one hour ago. Pick a segment of about two minutes in that hour. Now describe it to yourself: e.g., “I was putting on my shoes when I remembered that I forgot to turn on the coffee machine. So I went to the kitchen, turned it on, and walked back to the bedroom, finished putting on my shoes, and then the phone rang.”

 

Now examine one of these events, say: “finished putting on my shoes.” This is an idealized summary or abstraction of the actual event. How would you describe this event in more detail? For instance: “I picked up the shoe and sat on the bed. I slipped it on. I tied the lace. I got up.” This description is also idealized, consisting of abstract summaries. You can see this when you try to describe the details of one of these sub-events, e.g., “I tied the lace.” You might construct some description like this: “As usual I had trouble with tying the laces for this pair of shoes. They are too long. So I have to double tie them and it doesn’t always come out right and I have to start again. This time it was OK right the first time.

 

Now you might think that this is pretty detailed actual rather than abstract and general. But you can see that it is still just as abstract as before when you try to describe a sub-segment of the sub-episode, e.g., “it doesn’t always come out right.” This is clearly a very broad abstraction when you start “unpacking it” by starting to outline just some of the things that are actually summarized in this little statement. For instance you might describe the history of emotional involvement that you have had with tying your shoes, all the way back to when you were a little child and various adults tried to teach you how to do it. Some of these teaching exchanges were traumatic and upsetting. And then you might want to describe all the times over the years that your shoe laces would come untied, at the wrong time, like when you were running, and what happened then, etc. etc.

 

From this type of analysis of just one of your little descriptive self-statements, you can see that there is a whole history of occasions and episodes, emotions and thoughts, which are tied into it, and form an organic part of it. All this unitizing wholeness of the series of episodes together gives it its actual meaning, actual experiencing, or consciousness. If you keep going with this analytic process, analyzing sub-parts as you go into more detail about an event, you will discover the amazing conclusion that the description of an event or episode can be unpacked endlessly. There is never an end to the unpacking that remains.

 

This conclusion can be extended into a universal law of the mental world, namely, that every mental episode or event is tied into the network of all episodes in the mental world of eternity.

 

The mental world of eternity is united whole entity. Every mental event is tied to all other mental events and an endless regress and progress that includes the entire human race, past, present, and future. This amazing rational structure of the created universe reflects and corresponds to God, specifically the universal idea that “in God infinite things make one.” This is a rational way of understanding the idea that God is infinite. God is not merely infinite. God is a Divine Human Person in whose mental life infinite things are organized and arranged into a rational whole or unit. This Divine mental consciousness is organic and substantive. This organic living substance is the source of an endless variety of mental heat and mental light particles that flow out of God into the mental world through the mental sun of eternity (see Diagrams).

 

The mental world, which is the environment for our mental life, is an immense expanse of rational ether or space that the mental sun forms around itself, and fills that space with mental dust particles of heat and light that form themselves into male and female gene units (see Diagram 2). These are the building blocks for male and female mental bodies containing the affective circulatory system, the cognitive respiratory system, and sensorimotor consciousness system (as discussed above). Surrounding the mental world of eternity from the exterior is the physical world of time and matter. The physical world is therefore the container within which is located the mental world of eternity, within which is located the mental sun, which is God’s aura and entry point into the created universe.

 

It is most basic to understand that since God is infinite and Divine, it is not rationally possible for God to give away a portion or particle of Himself, or to get rid of it so that it is no longer His. If this were possible, God would no longer be infinite since there would be a part that is not God’s which would no longer be part of the infinite. This destroys infinity. So it is not possible. Hence it is not possible for God to give away the construction blocks out of which everything that exists in the mental world of eternity and in the physical world of time.

 

This leads to the astonishing realization that if you analyze what anything is made of, you will find that the inmost framework or substance is God’s heat and light substance, hence God Himself. God’s heat substance is also called love substance, and God’s light substance is called truth substance (see Diagrams).

 

The framework of reality is therefore Divine love and truth. These are living eternal substances. They are the basis for the reality and existence of human consciousness. The affective circulatory system of the mental body is constructed out of love substance, while the cognitive respiratory system is constructed out of truth substance. Love substance entering our affective organ gives us the heat of life, its energy, its power, its abilities and virtues. Truth substance entering our cognitive respiratory organ gives us the light of life, its consciousness, its rational awareness and understanding.

 

In addition to this immediate and direct co-presence of God within the inmost framework of our being and consciousness, there is also an indirect co-presence of God in our conscious awareness. It is most important for us to understand this distinction between God’s two types of co-presence with each individual of the human race. The immediate and direct co-presence is unconscious, but it is rationally knowable. The mediate and indirect co-presence with God is conscious and we can become aware of it. When we do, then God’s co-presence and new role is referred to as the Divine Psychologist.

 

God as the Divine Psychologist in our conscious life is vastly more of a Divine co-presence than God in the unconscious interior framework.

 

God the Divine Psychologist is in active collaboration and dialog with the person. We enter this state of co-presence with God when we acknowledge reality as theistic dualism. I have attempted to describe the features of this reality in several recent online books on theistic psychology, mental psychology, avatar psychology, and rational psychology (see this directory for access).

 

Empiricism in theistic rational psychology is objective, interpersonal, and cumulative. The mental world is an environment in which we can objectively perceive objects and events. The perception of the mental environment involves the sensorimotor neuro-skeletal system of the mental body. Our individual consciousness can move through various zones in the mental world. There are several such zones created by the mental sun around itself:

 

This entire whole is a Divine-Human rational system created by Divine love and truth, and maintained by them in existence, moment by moment. In other words, the created reality cannot live by itself but must be kept alive by continuous injection from the inmost (God through mental sun) to the outmost (physical matter). The mental sun of eternity continually injects and maintains all things in the mental world in a rational arrangement that is consistent with the purposes of Divine love. (see diagram 16)

 

Because this entire whole is a rational system, and because we are within it looking around at it, we are capable of describing it as a reality that is around us, within which we exist, and which we can describe and understand through our rational thinking abilities. We can thus reconstruct reality and the universe by diagramming the details that we can observe, and arranging them in a rational, theoretical, and scientific account. This account is a cumulative science that any researcher can contribute to and be part of when using appropriate rational methods of investigation.

 

There are three steps in this process: if you think it, title it and diagram it in such a way that you can tell it to others. It is only in the telling that you can gain your own interior understanding of it. Consciousness is a process of sudden memory: see my prior articles at:

  1. Community Archives and Records
    http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/updates/lee/Section5.2.3.html
  2. Discovery of Sudden Memory
    http://www.theisticpsychology.org/articles/early/enactment.html
  3. Sudden Memory Components
    http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/LEONJ/updates/lee/section8.1.2.html

 

We can take full credit for everything we write down from our own thinking (under copyright protection), but we cannot take full credit for everything we think. There is no copyright protection for what we think. There are no laws about mental events. All individuals in prison can think freely within their own mental privacy. What we think is sourced in the mental world of eternity and belongs to a living whole, which is the mental life of the human race.

 

Take a minute or two of quiet reflection with your eyes closed, body relaxed, and the breathing slow and regular. In this physical position your mental body can loosen its identification with the physical body, and thus for a few moments gives you a certain freedom to rise above the material ideas that are rooted and limited through the physical body.

 

When you put yourself in this reflective mental state, with the physical body quieted down, and the physical environment not directly intruding by noise or activity, your consciousness can awaken at the zone above the material mind called the rational mind (see diagram 16 and related diagrams). At first this rational mind is tainted with the material ideas and abstractions, and therefore must be called material-rational. But with more reflective practice you can become conscious of a rational thinking that is not tainted by the material limits of the physical body and world. This is not a method of the traditional “meditation” in which you try to rise above thinking. Rather, it is a method of thinking in the rational mode  (see level 7i in prior work on The Organic Mind: Chart of the Anatomical Layers of the Mind at:
http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/mental-psychology-p1.htm#_Toc212519314 )

 

Where does this purely rational thinking come from?

 

Celestial Loves and Consciousness

 

It is thinking that corresponds to the celestial mind (V) (or layers 6, 5, 4) that is immediately above the rational mind in the mental body (diagram 16). The celestial zone is immediately surrounding the mental sun of eternity. That layer of the mental zone of eternity is organically constructed in a more interior arrangement so that its reception of love substance from the mental sun is unfiltered by selfism, as it is in the material mind that is not yet regenerated or rearranged in the order consistent with the celestial.

 

The rationality of celestial thinking in the cognitive organ is guided by celestial loves in the affective organ. The ruling love of the celestial consciousness is sociality or mutual bonding. Selfism is opposite to this love and breaks up bonding and community formation. The Divine purpose for all that exists (“reality”) is to keep up the endless evolution of bonding forces in the human race, in which each individual is immortal and born into eternity. All the layers of the mental world are available to every individual, and are located within the mind of every individual. Each person chooses the consciousness layer at every moment of life by clinging to and activating various loves in the affective organ. Our ruling love arranges all the other loves in a hierarchy that is obedient to itself. Ultimately it is our ruling love that determines our eternal future and happiness.

 

The celestial ruling love of altruism, sociality, and community arranges thoughts in a rational order that is an image and correspondence of the order called Divine Wisdom. Hence it is that when our consciousness is in the celestial layer of the mental world, we have the experience of quasi-omniscience and quasi-omnipotence (see prior treatments as in the Organic Mind). God can give us more interior things when we are co-present through our ruling love of altruism and community bonding. The more interior things are closer to the order of Divine Love and Wisdom. Hence our consciousness reaches more interior levels of existence the more we evolve into our celestial layer.

 

The first and primary bonding in altruism and community is the dyadic conjugial couple of soul mates united by conjugial love (see also Diagram 3).

 

This begins on earth with the physical body and is called the “spiritual marriage” in prior work. See also Diagram 4 ). The celestial layer can influence by correspondence the lower rational layer – if we cling to rational loves more than we cling to material loves. We can consciously set aside the ruling love that supports our negative bias and our materialic thinking that is ultimately rooted in the ruling love of selfism. We can decide to cling to another ruling love that is provided by God, namely the unselfish love of bonding with one’s conjugial partner. This is actually possible only when it is a sincere love so that we are prepared to engage in “spiritual combat” against the temptations that God brings into our mind and into our daily life.

 

To the extent that we are sincere in this combat of reformation of character, to that extent we can be “regenerated” by God into a “new human being” that is celestial in nature, instead of material. We are born into a material mind and natural life through the physical body. Our mental body completely identifies with the physical body until the dying/resuscitation process which occurs about 33 hours after the physical body is “dead” or completely non-functional in all ways. At that moment the mental body is liberated from that identification and surgical interconnection in all its fibers and cells. Our consciousness then becomes suddenly aware of the environment or surroundings in the mental world of eternity into which we were born since the beginning but had not been conscious until after resuscitation. Now we discover that we can see and relate to all the other people who have left the physical body since the beginning of the human race. Quite something to look forward to, don’t you think?

 

Emanuel Swedenborg (16668-1772) was the only scientist in modern history who had a dual consciousness simultaneously in both worlds from age 57 to 82, when he passed on permanently. He confirms by actual experience and observation that he was able to see and speak to many historical figures he knew about from the world literature and had lived hundreds of years before Swedenborg. He also confirms by observation many other propositions of mental psychology, including resuscitation, mental sun, second death, correspondences, Grand Human, Grand Monster, conjugial couples, vertical community, and more – see the extensive presentations in my online work Theistic Psychology).

 

When we are resuscitated in the dying process we begin our conscious life in eternity. Again it is our ruling love that determines everything. The mental objects and people around us must conform to this ruling love. If it is a selfish ruling love then we are surrounded by selfish people who make our life miserable. The only time we gain some enjoyment is when we can make their life miserable. In this way we live an endless life of mental “hell,” trapped by our own unwillingness to let go of the selfish ruling love and all its supporting sub-loves. There is an endless variety of selfish loves and sub-loves or “affections.”

 

Similarly, there is an endless variety of altruistic loves that build community, from the couple to the neighborhood, to an entire society, and to all the mental societies in the Grand Human that form the mental world of the universal human race. Human loves and thoughts exist in this immense mass of human beings who are so united and bonded that even the breathing of each person influences the breathing of the entire mental society, and from there the entire collection of mental societies. The loves and thoughts reverberate across this massive intersubjective human network or “humanopshere.” The reverberations or “tremulations” have their distinct pattern, with higher or more interior loves and thoughts reverberating to lower more exterior thoughts and loves. This is the source that exerts its influence on our rational and material thoughts and loves.

 

Consciousness and Conscience

 

Consciousness is the exploration of reality. Conscience is the voice of our rational mind. Consciousness is to be conscious of the environment through the body. Conscience is the voice of God speaking through our rational mind when it is arranged to correspond to the celestial mind and its order of loves and meanings. Conscious awareness of our sensorimotor system provides us with our consciousness. We use our sensorimotor system to inform us of the environment, that is, to make us conscious of it. The operation of the sensorimotor system is therefore our consciousness.

 

Since there are discrete anatomical layers or zones in the mental world, it is necessary that we be equipped with an avatar body that is rezzed within the environment that belongs to each discrete degree of existence. In our daily consciousness we rez our conscious material mental body whose sensorimotor system provides us with contact with the physical body and its world. When we get into a reflective mood and are able to keep the physical body quiet and relaxed, we rez a rational avatar and move around with it in the rational world. When we sleep we can rez our dream body with which we can live in a strange topsy-turvy world for awhile. All day long we can take time out and rez a fantasy avatar while we are having an absorbing daydream or reading an absorbing novel.

 

When our consciousness is in the material avatar we can reason abstractly with material loves. For instance, our love of becoming famous and rich for the sake of its rewards (a material love) can direct our thinking into planning a career and acquiring the knowledge it requires, including the many long hours of study it takes to prepare for exams and getting an academic degree or a license to practice. These persistent mental efforts towards success are sourced, directed, and determined by the material loves we cling to. Our life’s enjoyment and satisfaction depend on these loves being fulfilled in our consciousness.

 

Our loves desire consummation and fulfillment in existence, and they reach that matured state when the events hoped for come true. The consciousness we experience when our hopes come true is the happiness and joy of our loves. Our loves find their fulfillment in that consciousness itself. A love at last feels like it exists only when it is consummated in our consciousness.

 

When we reach maturity or adulthood as a human being, we become conscious of a new conflict in our consciousness. This is the voice of our conscience echoing the meanings of the rational mind. Conscience is a rational island or mountain on the vast ocean of the material mind. Our daily consciousness in the material mental body or avatar is bonded with the physical body, so much so that we believe ourselves to be the physical body.

 

Selfism vs. Altruism

 

Our material consciousness is made of material loves in the affective organ married to material thoughts in the cognitive organ, as discussed before. When these loves are not yet regenerated they are in the order of selfism, thus contrary to altruism and rationality. Selfism opposes altruism.

 

Selfism is the love of things for the sake of self alone. If something does not benefit self, but only others, selfism hates it and is unhappy. Altruism is the love of things for the sake of others as well as self. If something benefits others, altruism loves it, even when it does not benefit self. If something benefits self alone, altruism is unhappy. Until adulthood selfism and altruism occur to us in different situations. Once we are mature we are led to settle into the ruling love of one, or the other. If we settle into selfism, all altruism is gradually suffocated and dies in us. If we settle into altruism, all selfism is gradually suffocated and dies in us.

 

For instance, if we strive towards being in altruism, then when we hear that someone wins the lottery, we feel happy for them. Or when the opposing team wins because they played a better game, we can feel some happiness for them because they worked so hard to win fairly. But selfism hates it when the opposing team wins, and even passes on to hating the opposing team as well, as for instance by ridiculing them or falsely accusing them of something.

 

Conscience is a rational voice or awareness in the material mind when it is anatomically hooked to respond to the rational mind, which in turn anatomically responds to the celestial mind, which in turn responds to God through the mental sun of eternity (see diagram 16). This is why some people refer to conscience as the “voice of God within the person.” The Divine Psychologist manages the voice of conscience as an effective tool to prod us into regeneration. God cannot force people to regenerate because if that happened we would no longer feel free as an independent individual. We would no longer be able to be happy and explore reality from love and interest. To be forced to be good would be like being in a mental prison. It is not possible for a perfectly loving God to impose this cruel fate on anyone. Therefore God cooperates with the ruling love to which the person insists on clinging.

 

God’s cooperation with a person’s ruling love is conditional. Only that is allowed to occur which God can turn into ultimate good for all concerned, even the entire human race. In other words, God’s omnipotence and omniscience allows the imposition of limits on selfism and irrationality. For instance, in the hellish mental states of the Grand Monster, people are unable to give vent to their evil fury upon others. God uses the people there to counteract each other so that only some of their wicked plans come into reality, and only to the extent permitted. God manages evil things just as much as He manages good things. Without this there would be no omnipotent control, and creation would not be a perfect eternal system.

 

Using the avatar body we can explore each zone of the mental world of eternity. For instance, we explore the dream world with our dream body using the “mouselook” camera action (we can see everything but we don’t see ourselves). We see other dream bodies. It may surprise you to learn that these avatar bodies are not “just a dream vision.” They are the dream bodies of other sleeping people! What an amazing discovery! Even more amazing is the idea that when you are reading a novel, your fantasy avatar is there in the novel and believes itself to be there in the novel with the characters. It is the same when you are watching a movie. If the movie is absorbing, you totally identify with the fantasy avatar you rez to witness the events in the story. Children at play clearly exhibit this phenomenon of identifying totally with the fantasy avatar that they rez in the mental play they are performing with themselves.

 

The voice of conscience allows us to become aware of our rational avatar. We can learn to explore rational consciousness through this avatar. We can explore the rational zone of the mental world of eternity. The lower end of this zone is tainted with material ideas, but the interior higher end is pure rational, forming a perfectly harmonious correspondence with the celestial consciousness. For this to become reality in our mind we must face temptations in daily life and fight to overcome them as of self, but rationally knowing that it is the Divine Psychologist who is actually managing the events. When we are sincere in this realization, we experience co-presence and love for God, and with that comes the ability to acquire all heavenly powers, virtues, and intelligences. From a selfish and material person we become a peaceful and useful neighbor and companion. In the spiritual marriage of the regenerating conjugial couple we can find a vehicle for enlightenment and productivity that is inventive and useful to society and through that, to self.

 

 

Avatar Psychology and Neuroscience

 

The Body as Mind or the Mind as Body

 

First this:

Consider this conversation between the leader of an interplanetary explorer fleet and one of the fleet commanders (taken from a story by science-fiction writer Terry Bisson as quoted in “How The Mind Works” by Steven Pinker, W.W.Norton, 1997)

“They're made out of meat.”

“Meat?”

“There's no doubt about it. We picked several from different parts of the planet, took them aboard our recon vessels, probed them all the way through. They're completely meat.”

That's impossible. What about the radio signals? The messages to the stars?”

“They use the radio waves to talk. But the signals don't come from them. The signals come from machines.”

“So who made the machines? That's who we want to contact.”

“They made the machines. That's what I'm trying to tell you. Meat made the machines.”

“That's ridiculous. How can meat make a machine? You're asking me to believe in sentient meat.”

“I'm not asking you, I'm telling you. These creatures are the only sentient race in the sector and they're made out of meat.”

“Maybe they're like the Orfolei. You know, a carbon-based intelligence that goes through a meat stage.”

“Nope. They're born meat and they die meat. We studied them for several of their life spans, which didn't take too long. Do you have any idea of the life span of meat?”

“Spare me. Okay, maybe they're only part meat. You know, like the Weddilei. A meat head with an electron plasma brain inside.”

“Nope, we thought of that, since they do have meat heads like the Weddilei. But I told you, we probed them. They're meat all the way through.”

“No brain?”

“Oh, there is a brain all right. It's just that the brain is made out of meat.”

“So ... what does the thinking?”

“You're not understanding, are you? The brain does the thinking. The meat.”

“Thinking meat! You're asking me to believe in thinking meat!”

“Yes, thinking meat! Conscious meat! Loving meat. Dreaming meat. The meat is the whole deal! Are you getting the picture?”

The above is quoted in Networks as Mind and Self in Cyberpsychology by John Suler
http://www.enotalone.com/article/2456.html

 

When we are immersed in the level of material-rational consciousness (V or layer 7e), we construct two types of materialic reduction of the rational. One reductionism in science is empirical or bottom up. This means that we start from the physical brain or body anatomy and pull the mind down into it, reducing mental objects and events to physical objects and events, namely, electro-chemical spatiotemporal operations in neurons. This bottom-up reductionism is evident in most of the neuroscience literature today.

 

Top-down reductionism is to start from a mental object or event, reducing it or leveling it to physical operations in the brain. This definition is advanced in linguistics, philosophy, and those in theology who want thereby to become “scientific.” Neuroscience and cognitive science today are strictly physicalistic or monist intellectual systems. Hence current popular expressions such as “philosophy in the flesh,” “biology of ethics and morality,” or “molecules of emotion and the body mind,” become efforts of reducing and pinning down dualist ideas (mind is real) to monist methodology (mind is body).

 

Mental psychology offers a discrete alternative to these reductionist approaches, avoiding reductionism by defining the human being as being born with two bodies, one in each of two discrete worlds. Our temporary physical body and our immortal mental body are point-by-point copies or models of each other, but in different substances and worlds. They also function together synchronously through the cause-effect laws of correspondences that integrate the physical and mental worlds as synergistic systems. Every operation or action of the physical body is the effect, whose cause is in the corresponding operation or action in the mental body. This cause-effect interaction or correspondence provides mental psychology with an objective methodology, making it possible for it to remain scientific and part of science as a whole.

 

The attempt to locate mental events in the body is seen as a necessary step for all the mental disciplines that strive to be scientific, like linguistics, philosophy, psychology, theology, sociology, pragmatics, and others. Locating mental events in the physical body is scientific reductionism, while locating them in the mental body is scientific dualism.

Without the anatomical concept of a mental body one automatically falls into reductionism.

 

Proposing the existence of the mental body saves the Western intellectual and scientific enterprise, and brings it into harmony with Eastern philosophies and ancient perspectives on reality. The evolving social-biological technology is bringing to light the reality of dualism, which has been known to humankind since the beginning of the race. The discovery of the mental body and its anatomy marks the death of reductionism in science. Not the death of neuroscience, but only its reductionist bias. Dualist neuroscience has a bright scientific future, taking up all the body-mind correlations it has already uncovered, and going forward to the neuroscience of the mental world of the afterlife. This makes possible the true science of cause-effect relations between the immortal mental body in eternity and the temporary physical body in matter and space.

 

Reductionism in neuroscience is the idea that thoughts and emotions are embodied in the physical body. Thoughts and emotions must indeed have an “embodied” presence in order for them to be anything and to exist. But this embodiment is their presence in the mental bodies (II to VII), not the physical body (I). Physical molecules don’t have emotions and are not themselves emotions, but they correspond to emotions in the mental body. Sensory and neural activity in the physical body correspond to sensations and motor determinations in the sensorimotor system of the mental body. Mental events are organic operations of mental organs constructed out of immortal substances and molecules from the mental sun of eternity (see Diagram 1). Mental psychology specifies the correspondences between the three physical systems and the three mental systems, namely, affective/circulatory, cognitive/respiratory, and sensorimotor/neuro-muscular.

 

The human awareness of meaning, rationality, and consciousness is defined as the operation of the sensorimotor system in the mental body. “Mental light” from the mental sun of eternity produces human consciousness or self-conscious awareness of meaning, rationality, and its conceptual elaborations that are variously known as theology, morality, literature, science, common sense, conscience. Mental light is received by the cognitive respiratory system in the mental body, and mental heat is received by the affective circulatory system. Together they produce the consciousness in the sensorimotor system. (See Diagrams)

 

The end of reductionism will allow the realization that death does not mark the end of science. The dying/resuscitation process is a medical procedure. The mental progression towards the second death is a biological process of organic development. The process of organic induction of an individual into the Grand Human or Grand Monster is available to our rational analysis. Locomotion and social interaction in the afterlife follows specific laws. Spiritual sociology is the scientific study of how people congregate in the mental world of eternity and establish communities within which people follow certain interaction rituals and activities. Spiritual linguistics is the scientific study of correspondences in semantic structures in cognition after separation from the physical body.

 

Dualist mental anatomy specifies the correspondences between mental body events and physical body events. Many useful correlations between “mental” events and physical events in the body have been established by reductionist neuroscience and genetics. For instance, it is known that materialic, corporeal, or sensory bound thinking (V or layer 9 and 8) is correlated with activity in the mid-brain or lower brain regions, while rational and “higher order” thinking (VI) is correlated with brain activity higher up and in the frontal cortex or “new brain.” These correlations are present due to the correspondences that activate together both types of events. The mental events take place in the mental body when it is in correspondence with the neural events in the physical body. The mental is the cause, the physical is the effect.

 

It may seem contrary to physicalistic appearance to designate the mental as cause of the physical, instead of the other way round. It appears from the physical evidence that if people ingest alcohol (apparent “cause”), they will then feel a change in mental state (apparent “effect”), which they may enjoy and may want to return to again and again by repeating the drug ingestion. However the situation is more complex than this simple minded view of how it appears to be. For instance, what causes the person to ingest the alcohol? This answer requires the identification of a mental event. Possibly people want to experience the specific mental state that they know is correlated with the ingestion of alcohol. Ingest x amount of alcohol and you will feel y type mental states, sometimes called feeling good, feeling high, or being drunk, etc. This is an observation of a correlation between a physical event (ingesting alcohol) and a mental event (feeling high).

 

So it is a mental event in the affective circulatory system of the mental body (wanting to feel high) that is the cause of a physical event in the physical body (ingesting alcohol), which is correlated with another mental event (feeling high). Here is a general representation of cause-effect chain:

biologically inherited predisposition for enjoying altered states of consciousness(A) à figuring out how to get a particular drug into your system (C) à physically ingesting it and suddenly experiencing distinctly different physical sensations(S) àattributing the sensations to the drug(C) à feeling good (A)

What about ingesting a drug unknowingly (somebody slipped into your glass), does it not lead to mental events such as feeling high?

biologically inherited predisposition for enjoying altered states of consciousness(A) à suddenly experiencing distinctly different physical sensations(S) àattributing the sensations to being sick or poisoned(C) à feeling awful (A)

The difference shows that the physical drug does not cause the good feeling.

 

Consider what happens when the physical body is injured or sick. We can observe that symptoms of physical deterioration such as organ malfunction, hormone imbalance, pain, dizziness, blurred vision, extreme weakness, or difficulty in breathing, are correlated with mental states such as emotional distress, rage, panic, fear, anxiety, helplessness, impaired thinking. Specific physical symptoms are correlated with corresponding mental states. Blurred vision and difficulty in breathing correlate with impaired thinking. Organ malfunction, hormone imbalance, and pain correspond with emotional distress, rage, and fear. The chain of causation is as follows:

 

biologically inherited predisposition for experiencing emotional distress of various types(A) à the occurrence of corresponding types of  injuries or sicknesses in the physical body à experiencing the sensations of some injury or sickness (S) à experiencing emotional distress corresponding to those sensations (A)

 

The law of correspondence is the primary method of management that God built into the creation of the two worlds. We can assume that the earliest generations of humanity on this earth enjoyed a life in the physical body that was free of injury and sickness. Nature was entirely friendly and benign because people’s mental states were good and community spirited. But at some point selfishness began to be practiced for the sake of experiencing selfish emotions, enjoyments, and pleasures. For example, people began to seek out the mental sensation of cruelty. This affective mental state (A) is produced by willfully inverting the incoming impulse of altruism into its opposite. Once selfish and cruel enjoyments began to be practiced God collected those committed to them into an afterlife of hell where they could practice on each other. Those who chose to cling to altruism were collected into an afterlife of heaven. In this way was formed and continues to be formed, the societies in the Grand Human and the Grand Monster (see anatomical diagrams).

 

Today we are born into inherited disorder of the mental body. The myriad of people who have been inducted into the Grand Monster are completely dependent for their survival on disorderly things in the physical world that have arisen or were caused by negative mental states to begin with. Humanity can eliminate earthquakes, famine, pestilence, or other natural disasters befalling populations by zzzz

 

Definition of Avatar

 

Avatar refers to a sensorimotor surrogate or “body” that can function in a new medium, and with which the person or “owner” identifies, that is, treats “as-if” it is one’s self. As a result, the person’s consciousness is enhanced through the avatar. The person is aware of the things that are accessible to the medium or environment in which the avatar exists.

 

According to historical and literary sources the word “avatar” is from a Sanskrit word meaning “incarnation” of mental spirit into a physical body. In the religion and literature of Hinduism many spiritual incarnations have occurred and continue to occur. See for example the following Web source (Wapedia):

Avatar or Avatara (Sanskrit: अवतार, IAST Avatāra), often translated into English as incarnation, literally means descent (avatarati) and usually implies a deliberate descent from higher spiritual realms to lower realms of existence for special purposes.

The ten avatars of Vishnu, (Clockwise, from Left upper corner) Matsya, Kurma, Varaha, Vamana, Krishna, Kalki, Buddha, Parshurama, Rama and Narasimha, (in centre) Krishna

1. Avatars of Vishnu
2. Other kinds of Avatars within Vaishnavism
3. People who have been considered avatars outside the orthodox tradition of Hinduism
4. Criticism of Avatars in contemporary Hinduism
5. See also
6. References
7. External links
From: http://wapedia.mobi/en/Avatars

The idea of mind incarnating in body, or “incarnation,” is anatomically explained in avatar psychology, where it is called body-mind correspondences (see Diagrams). The discussion below will show that what has been called “spiritual incarnation” can be understood as the act of putting on one of the seven avatars or avatar bodies that human beings and God possess through the anatomy of the mind and body, and how these produce consciousness.

 

The purpose or motive we have when our mind undergoes incarnation into an avatar is to assume upon ourselves, or to put on, the consciousness of the avatar’s sensorimotor system. In this sense we are incarnating or “rezzing” a body that is suitable for activity in a specific world or medium of interaction with others and with objects in that world. Our mind can now identify or assume the new identity with a new consciousness that is produced only in that medium or world and only through that avatar body. Our mind is anatomically coupled to that body. It will be shown that the coupling consists of re-attaching the sensorimotor system to the avatar body.

 

Now our affective circulatory system and our cognitive respiratory system are attached to the avatar’s sensorimotor system. In the virtual world, it is still us, invisible behind the avatar at the keyboard in our private rooms, and it is us because it is our loves and our thoughts that direct the activity of our avatar. But now our loves and our thoughts are activated in concert with a new sensorimotor input, and new living environment in a different medium of space and object. The information technology is going to grow more and more into a social-biological technology.

 

Increasingly people’s relationships and work will be avatar-mediated in a digital environment. We need to understand how this ubiquitous computing and continuous networking is going to affect human consciousness. How are we to prepare for it? What are the dangers? How do we manage this new consciousness for a better human being? How does avatar-mediated intersubjectivity grow into an information community? More and more people are now discussing and writing about these new issues that face society, as you can see when searching for terms like cybercultures, cybercommunities, cyberpsychology, avatar psychology, e-learning, virtual worlds, immersive worlds, games, Second Life, and many more.

 

A human being has access to several avatar bodies, each suitable for a different modality of consciousness. Hence avatar bodies serve to enhance human consciousness or awareness of an environment or world. People “rez” an avatar body by actually doing it when needed. They do not have to actually know or focus on the source of their consciousness. The avatar rezzing is automatic. An avatar may not ever be rezzed by its owner but it always exists regardless of it being used or not. All human beings can explore and navigate through the seven worlds or modalities of consciousness.

 

The Seven Avatar Bodies

 

The social-biological technology is inexorably drawing people into the virtual world. People undergo a process of organic induction into the virtual world. They eventually will discover two amazing things. One is that there is only one virtual world. The other is that that everyone has a virtual avatar, whether they use it or not. It’s part of the human race. This awesome discovery came to me in 2008 when I became a resident of the virtual world of Second Life.

(REMINDER: if you use Control-click, instead of just a click, the page and diagram will open in a new window, and this is more convenient as you continue reading the text.)

 

The context that justified this insight was my awesome discovery of the mental world of eternity. I have been researching and studying Swedenborg’s Writings since 1981 and have written several online books on the “spiritual world of the afterlife” in relation to psychology. And yet, strangely, it was only after 2000 that I began to see that the spiritual world of the afterlife is nothing else than the mental world of eternity where we are now, into which we were born, and from which we will never leave. More specifically, my discovery was that there is only one mental world, and that it is the world of eternity.

 

From the point of view of psychology this discovery is as critical as Freud’s discovery of unconscious motivation and Jung’s discovery of the human archetype. This may sound like hyperbole – until you allow yourself to discover your 7 avatar bodies. The main purpose for making this online book available and using it in my teaching, is that it can lead people to discover their mental anatomy and to explore their avatar bodies. Every human being is born with them (see Diagrams). The discovery that there is only one mental world, and that it is the afterlife of eternity, is a discovery that must be made by each person.

 

Anthropologist-linguist Tom Boellstorff writes about this in his book Coming of Age in Second Life (2009):

…virtual worlds highlight the virtuality that has always been part of the human condition. …virtual worlds make us “even more human” (Levy 2001)...online worlds draw upon a capacity for the virtual that is as old as humanity itself, but aspects of selfhood and society within them are novel. Virtual worlds do not lead to an erasure of the human: as one Second Life resident observed, a virtual world can act as “another platform for the human OS [operating system].” They do, however, transform what human can mean, recalling how “we have used our relationships with technology to reflect on the human” (Turkle 1995).

From: Tom Boellstorff, Coming of Age in Second Life, 2009:238.

It is my instructional hypothesis that people who discover and explore their seven avatar bodies can use them for discovering their loves and preferred modes of consciousness. Knowing this, gives people the ability to manage their daily efforts in character improvement and increase in human potential. Effective management in this lifelong and life struggling endeavor requires methods and principles. This is what you’ll find in this book.

 

Human beings by birth have seven avatar bodies available to their consciousness:

I.                   physical body

II.                dream body

III.             imagination-fantasy body

IV.             digital body

V.                material mental body

VI.             rational mental body

VII.          celestial mental body

We have these seven bodies from birth as a human being. Each is an anatomical structure and has the three anatomical systems called the affective circulatory, the cognitive respiratory, and the sensorimotor consciousness that is adaptive to its own realm of receptivity, activity, and operation (see anatomical diagrams). The seven avatar bodies are operational simultaneously through various phases of human development. When we are infants our avatar bodies are not yet adapted to conscious functioning. The celestial mental body actively but unconsciously participates in the infant’s progression of stages. The mental heat and light, or love and truth substance, from the mental sun of eternity inundate the seven avatar bodies through a vertical series of discrete anatomical degrees (see Table 8).

 

The celestial avatar body is the first in line to receive love substance (heat) in the affective circulatory system and truth substance (truth, rationality) in the cognitive respiratory system of the celestial mental body. This produces the quasi-omniscient angelic consciousness in the highest modality called the Third Heaven. The co-action of the interior rational celestial loves and meanings is called the celestial marriage. It represents the conjoint self of husband and wife in conjugial love.

 

Whatever activity is going on at one discrete degree or layer becomes the cause of its corresponding action in the immediately lower degree. By means of this law of sequential order God maintains all events and functions in a simultaneous discrete order.

Note: this distinction is explained and discussed in a number of places online. You can google or yahoo the expression, or you can examine these sources directly:

Simultaneous and successive anatomical features by Leon James
http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/LEONJ/anatomy.htm
http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/mental-psychology-p1.htm#_Toc212036230 http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/gloss/harmonizing3.htm#successive
http://www.theisticpsychology.org/books/theistic/ch9.htm#successive

Discrete Degrees in Successive and Simultaneous Order Illustrated by Diagrams by Rev. N.C. Burnham
http://www.theisticscience.org/books/burnham/index.htm

 

The celestial mental avatar (VII) reacts to the Divine Love (heat) and Truth (light) without distortion by selfish loves and self-centered ideas. Our celestial avatar body is completely obedient and receptive to the Divine inflow through the mental heat and light from the mental sun of eternity (see Diagram 1). The celestial marriage of the affective and cognitive operations produces our celestial consciousness (also called “angelic”), which instantiates a mental environment of peace, beauty, and art called the human heavens. In religious literature for the past twenty centuries it has sometimes been called the “Kingdom of God” which is “within” the eternal human mind.

 

It is clear from this that it had been known for thousands of years now that the afterlife of eternity (“Kingdom of God”) was the same as the mental world we are in now (“is within you”). But the knowledge and understanding of this critical feature of human beings was lost in history, especially since materialic science over the past two centuries has been so aversive to discussing the afterlife and God. (See my discussion of the positive and negative bias in science at: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/ch1p1.htm#topic1 )

 

The rational mental body (VI) of the infant is reactive by built in anatomical correspondences to the celestial mental body (VII) and its operations. This too remains unconscious to the individual until later in childhood. By the time the infant has grown into a young adult of 20 or so, the rational mental body (VI) is capable of producing consciousness or conscious awareness of the rational zone of the mental world and its environment of rational objects.

 

The material mental body (V) develops simultaneously by reacting to two sources. One is the rational mental body (VI) immediately above. The other is the physical body (I) immediately below.

 

The anatomical arrangement in terms of top down sequence is as follows:

 

The material consciousness is in between rational consciousness (above) and physical consciousness. This is not the same as the physical body since so-called “physical” consciousness is mental, not physical. It is the mental conscious awareness of the operations of the physical body. The physical body and the material mental body are exact point by point correspondences of each other. Every operation in the circulatory system of the physical body is exactly the same as a corresponding operation in the affective system of the mental body.

 

The idea of point by point correspondence refers to all the levels of structure of the human body: overall anatomy, single organs, particular cells, their physiology, biochemistry, genetics, and beyond. Avatars are exact replicas of each other but in discrete degrees of relative operation and functionality. Our celestial avatar body achieves the highest consciousness possible for human beings and is closely dependent on God’s avatar bodies. The celestial is also called the “interior rational” which is dependent on God’s Divine Rational. (For a discussion on God’s Incarnation, viewed from the Western Christian perspective and in relation to mental anatomy as discussed here, see my article The Scientific Meaning of Christmas: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/christmas.htm

 

The lower or external modality of the material mental body is called the “corporeal” mind. It is closest to the physical avatar and identifies with so completely that our conscious impression is that we are the physical body and were we to lose it we could not continue to exist. But the upper portion of the material mental body is called “sensuous” or “scientific” because it is less concretely sense-bound and data bound than the corporeal modality of function. The higher modality of the material mental body is capable of abstracting the sensory input from the physical body. In this way it can form principles and gain management control over physical events. The abstract or “scientific” modality of the material mental body is directed by the rational mental body. Without this rational direction from the rational mind, we would not be capable of pragmatic action in accordance with our goals in the material mental body and the physical world.

 

I. Physical Body or Avatar

 

for exploring the physical world until the dying/resuscitation process. While we still have our physical body our material mental body identifies with it completely so that we actually feel ourselves to be the physical body. This identification is so strong that we imagine that if we lost our physical body our self would cease to exist. This perspective or philosophy is called “reductionism.” But when we raise our consciousness to the rational mental body we can see that there are two worlds, one physical, the other mental. This scientific dualism is also theistic because the mental world is constructed out of mental ether supplied by the mental sun of eternity. This is the source of Divine love substance and Divine truth substance. These two substances form the building blocks of mental ether and the mental body.

 

Without the concept of God there is no explanation for love substance and truth substance since these are living substances that exist only in a person or Divine being. Human loves are of a discrete degree different from animal loves. The difference is caused by the mental anatomy of human beings, especially the rational and celestial mental bodies. When the material mental body is left to itself it is in the same degree of intelligence and loves as animals, but more advanced in evolution and on a higher “branch” of the species tree. But no matter how advanced this material evolution gets -- and it may go on without end! – the animal and material mind or consciousness will forever remain material. Its thinking will be material. Its loves will be material. This is the effect of anatomy. It provides functions and limits beyond which that anatomical structure cannot go.

 

This is also why the material mental body is also the locus of the human hells – all the hellish loves and enjoyments, all the hellish thoughts and insanities, all the hellish consciousness. The human hells are in every human being because mental objects and places are “appearances” or external representations and correspondences of interior loves and thoughts. The material mental body does not become a hell until after the dying/resuscitation process by which our physical (I) and virtual (V) avatars are “killed” or separated from the material mental body. From the first death to the second death, the material mental body undergoes physiological changes by which it is made ready for the next phase which is permanent.

 

If prior to the first death, the material mental body has been “regenerated” or rearranged in the order of the rational mental body, then the celestial mental body has been prepared for induction into a suitable or compatible the Grand Human society or “heaven.” There is no further need for the material mental body and it becomes physiologically inactive or inert. But if regeneration of the material mental body did not take place prior to the passing into the afterlife of eternity, then the celestial mental body is not anatomically ready to be inducted into the Grand Human societies. The material mental body remains the sole locus of consciousness since the rational mental body has been completely materialized. Material consciousness by itself is adapted to life with a physical or digital avatar, and is consequently not suitable for the mental world of eternity which requires rational loves and rational thinking.

 

Material loves and material ideas when left to themselves unmanaged by rational loves and ideas, create a hell in the human mind. After the second death the person’s material consciousness becomes a human hell. The material mental body then takes on the appearance of a devil, demon, satan, succubus, vampire, siren, etc. These hellish characters are “archetypes” within each individual. The material mental body now identifies with one of these archetypes and surrounds itself with other material mental bodies who are in the same consciousness. Together they create the societies of the Grand Monster by collaborating in the co-construction of a hellish outward mental environment in which they play the infernal roles of their choice. The material mental body in the rational ether of the mental world after death is activated by infernal or hellish loves and the ideas of insanity that serve the goals of these loves.

 

Note: You can read an eyewitness account of the conditions of life in the human hells written by Swedenborg. This book titled Heaven and Hell (1758) is well known in the literature and has been translated in many languages: http://www.swedenborgdigitallibrary.org/contets/HH.html

                                                                                                       

II. Conscious Material Mental Body or Avatar

 

for exploring the material zone of the mental world. It has three “alts” or surrogates that operate in three sub-zones of the material mind: dream body (III), imagination body (IV), and digital body (V). The focus of our consciousness, or conscious awareness, is in the conscious material mental body (II) when we manage our daily activities. It has two modalities of operation. The lower modality called “corporeal” and is sense-bound. The thinking is sense-bound and the consciousness is sense-bound or limited by what pertains to sensory input (time, space, energy, matter, place, sequence). A higher modality is called “abstract” or “scientific” (IIi) consisting of higher material ideas and reasonings that are based on idealizations or ideal representations of the concretely sense-bound ideas (IIe). We alternate between these two modalities in different situations or challenges we encounter in daily life.

 

III. The Dream Body or Avatar

 

for exploring the dream world while in the mental state of sleep. When we “put on” the dream body we are inworld surrounded by mental objects that are representatives of objects with which we are familiar through the physical body. Putting on the dream avatar means that our conscious material mental body identifies totally with the dream body, which is one of its regular surrogates. The dream is therefore experienced as completely “real.” When our conscious material mental body (II) stops identifying with our dream avatar, the dreaming ceases. When awakening from the state of sleep our conscious material mental body can recall from memory parts of the dream.

 

Our dream avatar can be mentally co-present with other dream avatars, in which case we see or interact with them in a conjoint dream world. This is a mental co-construction by those who are socially co-present through their dream body. This conjoint dream world is also called dream intersubjectivity.

 

IV. Imagination-Fantasy Body or Avatar

 

for exploring the world of imagination, fantasy, day dreams, recreation, literature, theater or movies, art, aesthetics, music, dance, sports, inventiveness, curiosity, insanity, obsession, and more. The material mental body rezzes the imagination avatar many times a day, and in multiple daily situations and tasks. As children our consciousness might spend the greater portion of the day in the fantasy or play-acting body, and the greater portion of the night in the dream body. This indicates that the material mental body (V) and its surrogates or alts (II, III, IV), have to undergo organic development before consciousness can begin functioning in the rational mental body (VI).

 

Diagram 7 (Do a control-click) shows that “loves” instantiate appearances and objects in the mental environment, thereby forming our consciousness. When asleep, the material mental body (V) rezzes the dream avatar and identifies with it, that is, puts on the consciousness of the dream world. This mental world contains objects and appearances, thus, an “external” environment for the sensorimotor system where we place our consciousness. In other words, loves construct consciousness through the appearances and objects of the “external” environment.

 

In the mental world these external environments and objects – scenes, landscapes, cities, people, animals, plants, movie theaters, dance halls – are instantiated or rezzed by our loves. In still other words, loves in the affective circulatory system in the material mental body create the external mental environment that “impresses” our sensorimotor system and produces the living experience of consciousness (or conscious awareness).

 

This awesome power of love is truly amazing! We have this power through our loves. It is good and smart to choose our loves well. The loves that create a heavenly environment will bring the experience of peace and thriving, continuing a progression or evolution towards ever further organic human potential. But human beings have the option, maintained in force by God, to adapt the inflow of heavenly mental heat and light from the mental sun (diagram 7). We are able to invert and convert every incoming love into its opposite, thus into a corrupted or negative love, and we can invert every incoming truth into a falsity or absurdity. And in that case we are loading up on negative loves in the affective circulatory system of the material mental body. This is equivalent to breathing in or ingesting poisons that enter into the blood stream of the physical body and corrupt or contaminate every organ and its cells.

 

Heavenly positive loves seek out and come together with thoughts and ideas of truth, creating a rational consciousness and a sensorimotor environment of community, peace, mutual love and respect, mutual enhancement in inventiveness and productivity. The communities of heaven construct an intersubjectivity that is continuously evolving and producing a grander and grander environmental reality for our consciousness. This is called an eternal heaven where we reside forever with our celestial mental body in conjugial love with our soulmate and best friend. This united couple – the conjoined self – is the eternally evolving organic human form, sometimes called “angels.” As celestial being or angels, our consciousness is quasi-omniscient.

 

The opposite is the case with negative loves. They create a sphere or world of “hell” in our consciousness. Every object in hell is injurious, every exchange between people who are mentally co-present in states of hellish loves. What makes a love hellish is its organic opposition to heavenly loves and spontaneous intense aversion for truth and rationality that act together with the heavenly loves. The mental states of hell are point by point correspondential opposites to the mental state of heaven. Heaven loves the neighbor and God. Hell loves self, plots against the neighbor, and hates God. Heaven is a healthy evolution towards better and better. Hell is an insane devolution and corruption towards worse and worse. Organic structures cannot stand still. To live, they must evolve continuously, or else devolve continuously.

 

The awesome mental or “spiritual” battle between heavenly and hellish loves has been in the consciousness of human beings for many generations, as is documented in the world’s written literature for the past few thousand years. The good ruling love battles against the evil ruling love, and the two have an army of supporting loves lined up behind them and below them. The method of “regeneration” is provided by God to every human being, by which God “regenerates” the material mental body and removes from it the evil loves that are encrusted in it from inheritance, and also from a life of materialism unchecked by celestial  rationality (see diagram 7 and surrounding diagrams).

 

This continuous battle between good and evil in the human mind has been discussed in the world literature and in the oral traditions of many cultures, both “primitive” and “advanced.” The protagonists in this battle were the angels and the “fallen angels” who come in different types identified in the Western literature by names such as demons, devils, satans, satyrs, sirens, succubi, warlocks, zombies, vampires, belzebub, dragon, dagon, etc. Angels also have an apparent cast of characters like Gabriel, Uriel, Rafael, etc. These names are representatives or symbolic correspondences to specific varieties or types of mental states that are hellish or heavenly. The societies of the Grand Monster (“hell”) and the Grand Human (“heaven”) (see diagrams) are organized altogether in the overall shape of the human body and its organs and systems. The angelic societies together as a unit appear as a handsome or beautiful human being that has both male and female properties. The infernal societies form a unit which appears as a deformed human being.

 

V. The Digital Body or Avatar

 

for exploring the virtual world. The introduction of computers in our daily lives continues to increase and expand. The social-biological technology known as “virtual world” is quickly drawing in millions of people who spend a portion of their lives inworld, living as a “resident” through their digital avatar. The technology is almost at the stage where people could cross interface platforms with the same avatar, which increasingly brings the realization that there is only one virtual world and everyone has an avatar there, whether they use it or not. Anatomically, people can have many “alts” but only one avatar. Alts are merely surrogates of the one avatar body, allowing it to appear in inventive shapes and forms.

 

The digital avatar body is constructed out of information bits. When the owner logs on with the appropriate software interface the avatar is there waiting on the screen. The conscious material mental body (V) moves the avatar body using appropriate input devices such as a mouse, keyboard, joystick, or other electronic devices wrapped to the physical body and capable of transmitting muscle movements and of receiving sensations from the muscle movements of another owner with whom they are in “contact” by means of the computer interface and communication networks.

 

The conscious material mental body can identify or “put on” the avatar consciousness through a physiological process called absorption. People at their keyboards and workstations become absorbed or intensely involved in the virtual environment and events. This is accomplished by restricting one’s perceptual focus to the visual and motor activity of the digital avatar. In effect, we become the avatar. This has been called by some “the imago effect.”

The issue of identity in relation to our avatar body has been discussed by many. Here is one that is found in Steve Wheeler’s blog, posted February 2, 2009 and entitled The Embodied Self (http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com/search?q=avatar )

(Quoting Miller and Arnold) “Our own research has shown that the psychology of identity and self presentation on the Web is best understood in terms of how people draw on those same signifiers of who and what we are as are used elsewhere: use of photos, claims made of achievements, hobbies, geographical origins, etc. We argue that when people enter into cyberspace they bring with them expectations, challenges, and vulnerabilities from every day life experience and the experience of managing an identity in various circumstances, and here was just another mode (or exciting new theatre) to explore and to play out being oneself” (p 58). [Connected Minds, Emerging Cultures)

 

Miller and Arnold are here arguing that the self we project into cyberspace has all the components of our real life self, but that there is the potential for fantastic or even outlandish new representations of that self, within the affordances of the virtual environment. This of course, implies that all of the outworkings of people's avatars (the gender bending, species swapping, age reassignment, fantasy representations and so on) lay inert within the person's psyche, and are enlivened (or made possible) within say, Second Life as the environment gives them licence and utility. (Steve Wheeler)

And anthropologist Tom Boellstorff writes:

“Without wishing to engage in hyperbole, we may be on the verge of another massive transformation linked to technology, the creation of societies on the Internet: “for the first time, humanity has not one but many worlds in which to live” (Catronova 2005:70). This could involve new forms of culture and selfhood, ones shaped in unpredicatable ways by actual world sociality: “We do not really understand how to live in cyberspace yet” (Sterling 1992:xiii). (…)

I will develop a theory of this virtual worldview as techne, and of the person who engages in techne not just as homo faber (“man the maker”) or homo ludens (“man the player”), but above all as homo cyber. The human online. The virtual human.”  (Coming of Age in Second Life, p.25).

This “virtual human” is the digital avatar body (IV) (see Diagram 8).

There is now the dawning realization in human consciousness that we are each born with a virtual or digital (informational) avatar as part of our mental anatomy, and that there is only one virtual world in which all the avatar bodies exist and can give virtual consciousness to human beings.

 

When we identify with our virtual avatar body we are able to perceive other avatars as real. When we are active and living “inworld” we know in the back of our material mind, which operates the keyboard through the physical avatar’s body that the owner of the avatar that we interact with at the other computer, does not at all look like the digital avatar we are looking at. We know this when we compare how our own digital avatar body looks like, with how our physical body looks like. And yet the imago effect of identifying with our avatar body and its camera perceptions, is so powerful or insistent to our sensorimotor system, that it is difficult for the conscious material mental body (V) to resist the impression that we are actually interacting with the avatar whom we see on the screen.

 

It is similar to the mental state of sleep during which the material mental body puts on the dream body and fully identifies with it. This is why the objects and events in dreams are real to the dream body. When we put on the digital avatar body we are coupled organically to the technology. There is a synergistic fusion between human and machine. Through our digital avatar body we have social interactions in the virtual world. These include such things as meeting other avatars at a prearranged place and time inworld, walking together, shopping together, riding vehicles, dancing, hiking, or doing domestic things in a virtual house located on a virtual real estate for which we pay real money for rent or ownership. I have heard from a number of residents in the virtual world of Second Life, that they have met their soulmate and partner there. Avatar-mediated romance is not unusual, including weddings and marriage.

 

I have heard from a number of residents that they have been “burned” in romantic relationships formed in the virtual world and carried out solely through their digital avatar bodies. Identification with the virtual avatar is so powerful that one feels attraction to the other person’s visible avatar and the conversational style they sustain with each other. Age verification requirements are now in force, but not gender. An owner is allowed to rez inworld an avatar of any appearance, or gender, or whether human, animal, or inert. Nevertheless, in Second Live specifically, the realism is so powerful that the majority of virtual avatars look gorgeous and handsome. The importance of avatar appearance is so valued that the production and sale of avatar body shapes and clothes constitute a growing multi-million dollar industry in Second Life.

 

 

VI. Rational Mental Body or Avatar

 

for exploring the rational zone of the mental world. The mental sun of eternity inundates the mind of every person with mental heat (which is God’s love substance) and mental light (which is God’s truth substance). Truth substance enters our cognitive system through the rational mental body. This gives us the ability to think rationally and to understand celestial ideas (VII). When we are in the consciousness of the material mental body in its higher modality (IIi) we have the ability to rearrange our thinking in accordance with the rational mental body (VI) which is arranged in the order of the celestial mental body (VII). We can reason things out rationally (VI) without having to be bound to material reasoning that is situation based or sense-bound (IIe).

 

The rational mental body has a lower modality that is called material-rational (VIe – “e” for external), and a higher modality that is called celestial-rational (VIi – “i” for interior). Material-rational thinking is fundamentally material and sense-bound, while celestial-rational thinking is fundamentally rational. The material mind differs from the rational mind in critical ways – see the discussion in the Organic Mind: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/mental-psychology-p1.htm .

Or, take another example of rational thinking that is above material thinking. We can think about God’s omnipotence and evil in terms of material-rational consciousness or in terms of rational consciousness. When we try to think rationally with material ideas we only come up with a rational that has been “materialized.” This material-rational thinking tries to apply rational rules using ideas based on the order of the physical world. We look at the existence of evil things around us and in us, such as natural disasters, wars, sicknesses, selfishness, cruelty, brutality, crime, abuse, fraud, suffering, death of innocent children, etc. The material consciousness wonders why these evil things exist if God is omnipotent and could use His infinite power to stop these evil things from happening. Why doesn’t He? Either it is because God cannot stop all evil from existing, or God is both good and evil since He is responsible for everything. This is thinking with material ideas.

 

Or, we can reason rationally without relying on material ideas, that God can prevent evil through omnipotence, but chooses to manage evil by allowing some of it, and not allowing much of it that people would love to do but they do not succeed. God prevents them from succeeding. God decides which evil will be allowed to be done, so that it can occur. In other words, God manages evil through the Divine Laws of Permissions (or Allowances). Only that evil can come into existence which God can turn into good for all concerned. This is a rational idea that explains why there is evil in the world. God uses evil to assist people in regeneration, and thereby makes it possible for people to disconnect themselves from inherited enjoyments of evil. Only that evil is permitted by God to occur that can be turned into occasions for good, for the good of the regeneration of the people involved and affected by the evil. Other evil is not allowed to occur or come into existence. Hence evil is a means towards good in God’s management plan and goal.

 

God allows some evil for the sake and welfare of human beings. To eliminate all evil by omnipotence would prevent many people, perhaps all people, from regenerating, and this would condemn them to a life in hell after the dying/resuscitation process. These ideas are purely rational, and they are relatively meaningless or “purely” abstract to the material mental body.  But to the rational body it is easy to see the reality of God’s management principles. Mental light issues from the mental sun and is captured by the cognitive respiratory organ of the mental body (see Diagram 7 – reminder: use Control-click to open the diagram in an adjacent window).

 

VII. Celestial Mental Body or Avatar

 

for exploring the celestial zone of the mental world. The celestial zone of the mental world is called “heaven” and also the Grand Human (see diagrams). The dying/resuscitation process is called the first death. After about 33 hours we awaken in the consciousness of the material mental body. This is called the resuscitation zone of the mental world. Without the physical body, the material mental body is at last able to be conscious of the surroundings of the mental world. We can now interact with others who are in their material consciousness following their first death.

 

Then follows the second death which is marked by an organic separation of incompatible ruling loves and their sub-loves. If we opt to hold on to our celestial loves in our celestial mental body, then our material mental body enters a non-functioning state. If we opt to hold on to our material loves in our material mental body, then our celestial mental body enters a non-functioning state. The material mental body after the second death is called “hell” or the Grand Monster.

 

Avatars of different owners can interact with each other as long as they are “rezzed” (or put on) in the same modality or world. Avatars cannot interact across modalities or worlds. The behavior of avatars is an outward expression of the owner’s loves in association with the owner’s ideas.

 

Our physical body (I) is related by correspondence to our mental body (II, VI, VII) from birth to first death. At our second death we either enter the Grand Human with our celestial mental body (VII), in which case the unregenerate material mental body (IIe) and the materialized rational mental body (VI) are rendered nonfunctional, or else we enter the Grand Monster with our unregenerate material and corrupted rational mental bodies (V, VI), in which case the celestial mental body (VI) is rendered nonfunctional.

 

For more details on this organic development see: Diagram 6 above and the Diagrams in the chapter on Divine Psychotherapy.

 

Anatomical Components of the Mental Body

 

The mental body has three anatomical systems:

 

The material mental body encompasses the dream body, the fantasy body, and the digital body. Until the dying/resuscitation process, or first death, the material mental body strongly identifies with the physical body. We are not aware of the mental world of eternity that surrounds the mental body because we are so intensely focused on the sensations in the physical body. We actually see our physical body as our very self. We cannot imagine not having the physical body and still having the life of a human being. We imagine that if we lose the physical body we have nothing to live in. This kind of thinking is materialic and does not take into its awareness the reality of dualism and eternity. It is only when we raise our consciousness to the rational mental body that we can understand dualism and the mental world of eternity.

 

Whatever is not material, the material mind cannot see. The material mind can only see material things. Hence all our thoughts and in the material mind are material thoughts. Consequently, every thought we have, every concept we know, is time-bound and place-bound. For instance, try to think of a word or concept that does not include time, place, matter, or history. Suppose you say: house. This concept contains matter, space, and history or location. What about: government. This concept contains history and place. How about: learning theory. This concept refers to an explanation advanced by an author in a book or journal. Keep going and you’ll become convinced that most ideas and words we use in daily life are material ideas. When we reason with material ideas we arrive at conclusions that are time-bound, place-bound, and culture-bound.

 

When we construct abstractions based on material ideas the abstractions will appear rational, and yet they are material within. Hence this kind of material/rational thinking can also be called fake rational to contrast it with pure rational. For example, consider the moral principle of self-defense when killing someone. This is the idea of kill or be killed. It appears to be an abstraction of reality. It appears to be a principle that is universal and true. It is integrated with the “philosophy of selfism” or the principle of the survival of the fittest. But this material/rational idea is not a true rational idea since the principle is based on material ideas and assumptions about what is reality. It ignores dualism and God. It ignores the rational idea that God sets limits on when we can kill, and if we go outside those limits we suffer consequences, both individual or personal, and communal or societal.

 

But when we raise our consciousness to the rational mental body we are able to think and reason with ideas that are free from time, place, and culture. We can think about God’s omnipotence and our afterlife in the mental world of eternity where there is no time, no place, no matter, no history, and no culture. What is left? To the material mind, nothing is left. It is total disappearance and extinction. But the rational consciousness is aware of a different world which our rational avatar can explore.

 

For instance, we can explore the rational world of correspondences. The “Science of Correspondences” was known to the ancient civilizations, and was revived by Swedenborg in the 18th century. Dictionaries of correspondences have been available since then. See these specific works available online full text:  

Dictionary of Correspondences:  http://books.google.com/books?id=FfaO3jELr3oC&pg=PA7&output=html_text

Correspondences in the Bible  ||  Physiological Correspondences  || Science of Correspondences || Correspondences in Swedenborg  ||  Body Mind Correspondences in Symbolism

 

The laws of correspondences insure that the discrete layers of the mental world and the physical world remain connected and acting synergistically as a synchronous unit. An analogy would be to think about an electric circuit, that we all have in our houses and offices. Electricity does not ‘flow’ in the wire when the circuit is not closed. In order for the light bulb to alight and give light in the room, electricity must flow through the circuit to which the bulb or lamp is connected by the wiring. When we turn the light switch “On,” we close the circuit, and the electricity will flow and light the bulb. The moment the circuit is broken again (“Off” position), the electricity stops flowing in that circuit and the bulbs turn dark, along with the room.

 

It is similar with the laws of correspondences that connect all the discrete layers of the universe from top (God through mental sun) to bottom (physical body and world). For an event or object to exist anywhere, all the layers must be connected from top to bottom.

 

Let us recapitulate these anatomical layers and identify the exact connection between the various ways of referring to each layer, depending on the context and focus:

Layers 1, 2, 3:             God, Mental Sun of Eternity, organic souls (unconscious)

Layers 4, 5, 6:             Celestial mental body (VII)

Layer 7                        Rational mental body (VI)

Layers 8, 9, 10:           Material mental body (V) (with II, III, IV)

Layers 11, 12              Physical limbus and body (I)

The layers are explained as anatomical charts in the Organic Mind book (Arabic numbers 1 to 12) and in this Section of the current book (Roman numerals I to VII).

 

Diagram 7 shows the anatomical components of the mental body.

 

Diagram 7 shows a most amazing feature of the mental world of eternity, which is, that loves in the affective organ have two critical organic functions, as marked in the diagram by the two arrows that connect loves to thoughts, and to the mental environment of appearances. Loves have the function of directing and selecting thoughts in the cognitive organ. Loves also instantiate the mental environment around the mental body. These are called “appearances” because they are real mental objects that “make their appearance” around the mental body. In our consciousness we can see them or be aware of them through our sensorimotor system. This is shown in diagram 7 by the arrow linking the mental environment to conscious awareness.

 

We can see from this that loves are the all in all in everything that exists in the mental world of eternity. There is an area where everyone is familiar with the amazing “rezzing” ability of a love, which means to instantiate an environment of appearances around us as if it was real. While we are in the mental state of sleep, our material mental body is unconscious of the physical environment, but conscious of the mental environment. Through our dream body we become conscious of the dream world and its environment. Our dream body can walk around in the dream and can experience intense emotional reactions to the appearances we perceive and the events we participate in through our dream body. The wall feels solid and our dream body can be held imprisoned or chained. We can be with the dream body of a loved one and enjoy embracing each other. We can eat food that tastes real. We can enjoy trips, outings, people, adventures, and we can feel terror and panic. Everything is real to the dream body. When our consciousness is awake in the conscious material mental body (V), the dream body’s dream world (II), seems like it is “just a dream, nothing really.” But to our dream body and its consciousness, the dream environment is real and solid, happy or terrifying.

 

People who appear in your dreams are real people whose dream body has been “summoned” to co-presence with your dream body by your matching loves and intentions. Similar and compatible loves create mental co-presence or intersubjectivity. People who cling to similar loves after the dying/resuscitation process find themselves together or socially co-present in some “corner” or situation of the mental world. Mental societies in the Grand Human and Grand Monster are formed through such love alliances and harmonies, either between heavenly loves or between hellish loves.

 

You can see now that loves can instantiate or project real mental objects in the environment of the mental body, and these can be seen, noticed, and interacted with through the sensorimotor neuro-skeletal system of the mental body. In the dream world, the material mind (V) uses one of its surrogates called the dream body (II). In the virtual world, the material mind (V) uses the surrogate called digital avatar body (IV). In the world of imagination and fantasy, the material mental body (V) uses the imagination body (III). In the rational world, the material mental body (V) uses the surrogate known as the material-rational modality (Ve), but the regenerated person uses the celestial-rational modality (Vi). In the celestial world of heaven and hell, the celestial body uses three surrogates or avatars called the first heaven, the second heaven, and the third heaven, which is the highest and closest to the mental sun of eternity.  The following is a summary of mental bodies and their surrogates:

Diagram 8 – Table Listing the Mental Bodies

Name

Discrete Layer

Description

 

CELESTIAL
MENTAL
BODY

VII

4

Celestial—interior rational

5

Celestial--external-rational

6

Celestial--interior-material

RATIONAL
MENTAL
BODY

VI

7i

Rational—interior or celestial

7e

Rational—external or materialized

MATERIAL
MENTAL
BODY

V, II, II, IV

8

Material--abstract

9

Material--corporeal

10

“Spiritual body”

PHYSICAL BODY

I

11

“Limbus”

12

Physical body

 

Body-Mind Correspondences

 

The reality of body-mind correspondence provides mental psychology with a scientific biological methodology. It makes possible such new scientific developments as theistic psychology, biological theology, embodied cognition, philosophy in the flesh, molecules of emotion, virtual world, avatar consciousness.

 

See also: discussion above on Propositions

See also: What are correspondences: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/correspondences.htm

 

See also this interesting brief article on the human form by Jarvis: http://www.theisticscience.org/biology/humanform.html

 

Readings in Body-Mind Correspondences – Reductionist

 

  1. Theological Ethics and Neuroscience On Morality and the Embodied Mind by Arne Rasmusson and Benoni Edin

http://www8.umu.se/religion/personal/arne.rasmusson/TENS.pdf

  1. Molecules Of Emotion: The Science Behind Mind-Body Medicine (Paperback) by Candace B. Pert
    See also: Your Body is Your Subconscious Mind Audio CD or MP3 download
  2. Johnson, Mark. Body meaning …?
  3. Lakoff, George. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things.
  4. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
  5. Imaging Place as Imaging Thought by Richard Smyth
    http://institute.emerson.edu/vma/faculty/john_craig_freeman/imaging_place/about/research_ensembles/smyth/smyth.pdf
  6. Networks as Mind and Self in Cyberpsychology by John Suler
    http://www.enotalone.com/article/2456.html
  7. Seeking a Foundation for Context-Aware Computing by Paul Dourish
    http://www.dourish.com/embodied/essay.pdf
  8. Embodied Interaction: Exploring the Foundations of a New Approach to HCI by Paul Dourish
    http://www.dourish.com/embodied/embodied99.pdf

 

Readings in Body-Mind Correspondences – Dualist

 

  1. Ian Thompson. Theistic Science. Blog at: http://theisticscience.blogspot.com/
  2. Ian Thompson. zzzz

 

 

 

The Virtual and the Actual

 

The “virtual world” (Second Life) is often contrasted with the “real” world (first life). Residents insist that their activities in Second Life is also real, just not the same way. Boellstorff prefers the contrast “virtual” vs. “actual,” both being real:

In short, “the virtual is opposed not to the real but to the actual. The virtual is fully real in so far as it is virtual . . . the virtual must be defined as strictly a part of the real object” (Deleuze 2004:260; see also Friedberg 2006; Lévy 1998; Massumi 2002; Virilio 1994). As a result, I do not oppose “virtual” and “real”; I refer to places of human culture not realized by computer programs through the Internet as parts of the “actual world.” “Actual” is also imperfect, but I find it the best provisional term and additionally one used fairly often by those in Second Life. As discussed in the final chapter, I could speak of “actual worlds” in the plural, since human experience offline is shaped by cultural specificity, but for simplicity’s sake I will refer to a singular “actual world.” The limitation of “actual” is that synthesis, artifice, and fabrication are constitutive of all human sociality, from language to kinship, from agriculture to desire, from governance to ritual. They are not distinguishing features of virtual worlds but a key point of continuity between them and the actual world. The Oxford English Dictionary notes that “actual” comes etymologically from “act”; as indicated by the term “actor,” it can refer to something “exhibited in deeds.”18 Virtual and actual are both the place of homo faber, the human as maker (Bergson 1911; Tilgher 1930).

Coming of Age, Chapter 1, online at http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s8647.html

Boellstorff argues that the “virtual human” has always existed. That is, the virtual is a normal, actual, and real part of the human mind, every individual mind. He uses virtual as a general term for the capacity to use imagination, with which people have entertained themselves in drama, art, literature, and the fantastical. The mental anatomy of the seven avatar bodies discussed above shows the distinction between the modalities of the material mental body which include the dream body (II), the imagination-fantasy body (III) and the conscious material body (V). The virtual digital body (IV) is associated with the physical body (I) because the virtual world is a physical medium.

 

The resolution lies in understanding that the affective system of loves and the cognitive system of thoughts and images remain constant across the mental avatars at each level. It is the person’s loves and thoughts that activate the dream body, the imagination body, the dream body, and the material mental body. The body is only the neuro-skeletal sensorimotor system.

 

The reductionism of neuroscience, psychology, and medicine is on its way out now that technology has initiated the age of immersion in virtual world. Soon people generally, and experts specifically, will come to the realization that there is only one virtual world, as there is only one mental world. It appears that there are multiple platforms and interfaces of virtual “worlds” but crossing virtual world platforms and interfaces with one avatar is already going on to a limited extent. Soon the social-biological technology will prove to us once and for all that there is only one virtual world. Every human being is in that virtual world through our material mental body, which has several modalities of experiencing sub-worlds of the mental world – namely, the digital avatar body (IV), the dream body (II), the fantasy-imagination body (III), besides our conscious daily awareness which is in the material mental body (V).

 

Consider the difference between the imagination-fantasy body (III) and the digital body in the virtual world. One is real, the other is not. The digital virtual body is real and actual, but the fantasy-body is not real, not actual. You can see the difference when you think about the virtual world in contrast with the fantasy world. Our avatar in the virtual world sees other avatars and interacts with them. Are these real avatars? Yes. Are these real interactions that actually occurred? Yes. But not so for the fantasy world. The characters in a novel are not real but a figment of the imagination, and the events are not actual, but made up. Do you see the difference?

 

What about the dream world? Is it real and are the events actual? Yes. It may surprise you that the characters in your dream are real while the characters in a novel are not. The difference is determined by the anatomy of our mental body. Our conscious material mind or mental body is a living anatomical structure that exists in the mental world of eternity. The mental world appears to be like the physical world, but not really so, once you begin to consider the differences. The physical and mental worlds appear to be alike. Our imagination and our dreams recreate the content of our consciousness through the physical body. Hence we construct our dreams with people, cities, trees, animals, dancing, running, eating, swimming, flying, etc. These are the things are contained in our conscious material mind which has been entirely formed by or filled with sensory input through the physical body.

 

The mental world appears to us as alone, private, dark, empty. Where is everybody when I close my eyes? I only have my own memories, my own thoughts, my own desires and loves. If we work with the hypothesis (or principle) that there is only one mental world, the puzzle is even greater – Where is everybody? Is anybody out there? If people at death wake up in the mental world of eternity called “the afterlife,” then where are all those billions or trillions of people who died since the beginning of the human race?

 

Discovering the Vertical Community

 

Consider again the anatomical features of a human being (see Diagrams). Since the mental world does not have physical space and physical matter or energy, everything that exists in the mental world overlaps with everything else. Things that exists in the mental world cannot have physical structure, and the spaces between the objects cannot be physical spaces. Think of the objects in your dreams, as for example, a horse that your dream body is riding on a beach next to your friend who is also on a horse. Now your friend’s dream body suddenly rides off and disappears in the distance. You are thinking that you can’t talk to her any longer, and you feel disappointment. This is a dream obviously based on the analogy of the physical world. But the actual reality is that your friend riding off is not more distant physically, but only gives you the appearance that there is real distance involved.

 

Meanwhile your physical body remains quasi-inert, and your consciousness is anatomically detached or functionally uninvolved in the sensorimotor input that comes from the physical environment. This is exactly the freedom needed by our material mental mind to alter its consciousness. All day long our material consciousness is totally absorbed by the sensorimotor input of the physical body, a mental state that we call “being awake.” When “fall” asleep, we fall away from the physical world and fall into the mental world of eternity. Our consciousness moves away from the physical world and becomes more involved and attached to the mental world. That’s when we actually “light up” so that suddenly our consciousness is filled with the sensorimotor world of our dream body.

 

Now we CAN see those others who are also in the mental world of eternity, who are no longer tied to and absorbed by the sensorimotor world of the physical body. We see them as our dream body sees them, thus with limited consciousness and understanding of what is actually going on. The other dream bodies we see appear totally real and actual, and they are fully so – to the dream body in a dream world. Those other dream bodies are NOT figments of your fantasy, as when we are in the consciousness of our fantasy mental body while being absorbed in reading a novel we intensely enjoy. The novel’s characters are unreal and the events are not actual, while the dream bodies are real, not fictitious characters, and the events are actual exchanges that took place with real avatar bodies.

 

One of the great discoveries Swedenborg (1668-1772) made while being conscious in both worlds simultaneously, is the fact that dreams are co-constructed by the sleeper’s material mental body and the mental bodies of people in the afterlife who are in the mental vicinity of the sleeper’s dream body. The following is an entry in the daily record book he kept of his “spiritual experiences” for more than two decades. This entry is from the raw notes translated from the Swedish and Latin. Subsequently, Swedenborg wrote two dozen learned volumes filled with treatises and rational explanations of his dual consciousness that lasted 27 years. He had an impeccable reputation as a scientist, high level civil servant, and a devout Christian with high personal integrity.

 

In the following passage Swedenborg takes note of his realization that our mental functioning, namely our thoughts and feelings, are in continuous interdependence with the feelings and thoughts of others to whom we are connected from birth onward. This mental connectivity may be called our vertical community, to distinguish it from the horizontal community in physical space to which we belong through our physical avatar.

 [I add my comments in square brackets]

SD 2951. WITH WHAT DIFFICULTY MAN [=our conscious material mental body] CAN BE PERSUADED THAT HE IS RULED THROUGH SPIRITS [=that we are co-constructing our consciousness with others, not alone] . Before my mind was opened [=suddenly acquired dual consciousness], so that I could speak with spirits, [=interacting with those in the afterlife] and so be persuaded by living experience; for many years previous, such proofs existed with me, that I am now astonished, that yet I did not come into persuasion concerning the Lord's government, through spirits=[only gradually did he realize that the vertical community is God’s management mechanism for networking all of the human race] (…).

 

Afterwards, also, many visions, when my eyes were closed, and light miraculously given; and spirits sensibly (flowed).[=when his physical body was relatively inactive with eyes closed, he could see the environment of his celestial mental body. Thus he had “dual” consciousness in both worlds simultaneously—material mind (V) and celestial mind (VII)] It was as manifest to perception (sensum) [=he perceived the environment of those in the afterlife through the sensorimotor system of his celestial mental body] as the corporeal senses. [=his normal daily consciousness through the sensorimotor system of the material mental body, which identifies with the physical body and its environment]

Many times (occurred) infestations through various modes, by evil spirits, in temptations. [=some of those in his vertical community that he interacted with were hostile. He perceived that this occurred during “temptations”—see regeneration] Then, afterwards, when those things were written to which evil spirits were averse, [=while he was taking notes in his record book, those with him in his celestial mental body were objecting to what he was writing down, as it was reflecting badly over them] so that I was so obsessed as nearly to be overcome with horror.[=they were able to infuse negative emotions that intensely disturbed him] Fiery lights were seen. Speech in morning-time (was heard), besides many other things; until a certain spirit addressed me in a few words. I was greatly astonished that he should perceive my thoughts, and afterwards wondered greatly when [my mind] was opened [=when he was 57 until his passing on at 84] so that I could converse with spirits; [=have dual consciousness] in like manner the spirit (was then surprise)] that I should be astonished.[=they apparently were no longer aware that people in the physical body are ignorant of the vertical community] From these things it may be concluded with what difficulty man can be led to believe that he is ruled by the Lord through spirits, and with what difficulty he recedes from the opinion that he lives his own life from himself, apart from spirits. - 1748, August 27.

 

I formerly perceived, after speaking for some months with spirits, that if I were remitted into my former state, I could have fallen into the opinion that [these things] were phantasies. (SD 2951)

 

CLJ 35. It has pleased the Lord to open for me the eyes of my spirit, and to keep them open now for nineteen years; it has been given me to see the things which are in the spiritual world,[=mental world of eternity and the afterlife world] and also to describe them. I can affirm that they are not visions,[=consciousness in the fantasy body (III)] but things seen in all wakefulness." [=consciousness in the material mental body] (CLJ 35)

[For many additional statements Swedenborg makes about his dual consciousness, see the collection in my Theistic Psychology Index Volume (18)]

In the last two paragraphs, Swedenborg realizes that without dual consciousness one tends to conclude that the vertical community is a fantasy, since there is no material evidence for its existence. The evidence returns however, when consciousness returns to the celestial mental body. This is what he had to say to some “spirits” he was talking to:

SD 3058. ((((At last I spoke with them where they were, in (that) very high (place), representing to me, [=people in the afterlife often communicate with each other by projecting “representations” of their thoughts into visible environmental scenes and objects that correspond to their meaning] that because in the state of the body [=prior to undergoing the dying/resuscitation process] they were such as not to believe in spirits, [=materialic thinking] nor that anyone could speak with spirits; they then thought in a similar manner because they were in that state. [=material consciousness of the material mental body that identifies with the physical body and its world]

I told them that we should believe in (our) senses - for instance, in sight, smell, taste, hearing, touch, and the thousand varieties (of my experiences), lasting now almost three and one-half years, - a thing to be believed, because it is so, (and) that I now write the same in their presence, which no man could do unless he was at the same time with spirits [=being in a state of dual consciousness, aware in both worlds]; for thus to write these things cannot be given by anyone in another manner; at length they for once confessed that it is the case, that I speak with spirits. - 1748, September 5. (SD 3058)

From the last paragraph it is evident that those in the afterlife are unable to communicate consciously with those still connected to the physical body. The vertical community is not available to our awareness or to theirs. In other words, we are connected to each other between the two worlds, but God keeps us unaware of this direct connection and interaction. In his later theological treatises Swedenborg explains that God does not allow conscious communication in the vertical community to prevent “spirits” in the mental world of eternity from obsessing the material mind of those still attached to the physical body. This kind of “spirit obsession” was permitted in pre-scientific societies, as evidenced in ancient literature. Swedenborg’s modern mind and environment (18th century Europe) had to be prepared “since childhood” for his special Divine mission at age 57, otherwise the experience of dual consciousness would have hurt him mentally. (See the distinction between external vs. interior obsessions in my Swedenborg Encyclopedia of Theistic Psychology.)

 

Even without dual consciousness we are able to realize the reality of the vertical community by rational proof. Our rational mental body is able to form its consciousness out of material input below (level 7e) or out of celestial input above (layer 7i) (see Diagrams). The materialized rational thinking sees the idea of a vertical community as abstract or idealized, hence unreal, while the celestial-rational thinking sees it as actual and organic, hence real.

 

In the mental world of eternity there is no physical time nor physical space, nor matter or energy. These are physical things that occur only in the physical world. There are no mental things in the physical world, and there are no physical things in the mental world. But the two are connected and act synchronously through the laws of correspondence. Further, although the two worlds are distinct in structure, they are alike in content. At birth we have our seven avatar bodies as part of our mental and physical anatomy. The material mental body (V) and the physical body (I) are virtually and correspondentially coupled until the dying/resuscitation process separates them forever. Only then is the conscious material mental body freed from this identification process, and for the first time, we “awaken” in consciousness to the environment and people of the mental world of eternity, which sometimes is called the “afterlife” and the “spiritual world.”

 

The expression “our life on earth” is not a literal reference since earth is physical while our life of sensations, thoughts, and feelings is mental. But it appears to us that we are “on earth” because we, through our material mental body (V), identify with our physical body, “seeing and hearing through it” as it were. Hence people have used the expression “the spirit sees through the body” to refer to this identity which our mental body (“spirit”) experiences with our physical body. The anatomy of the mental body allows it to experience consciousness in different modalities through this process of identifying with the avatar body in a different modality.

 

In other words, the material mental body can alternate in consciousness by “rezzing” or instantiating an avatar body with which we can identify, instead of the physical body. For instance when we are “daydreaming” we are identifying with our imagination/fantasy body (III) which operates in fantasy “land.” Every individual has a personal fantasy world or mental zone in which we create imaginary situations, made-up conversations, pretend worlds, in which the characters are not actual or real, and the people and things there are mere “chimera,” mere “visions,” unsubstantial ideas and plans that are “castles in the sky” or “smoke in the eyes.”

 

But it’s different with the other mental bodies. They each operate in distinct worlds that are anatomically shared with all other human beings. There is no way of getting rid of the other bodies that are also there. This is obvious with our digital avatar body in a virtual world (IV). The moment we rez there, others appear, and sometimes intrude. It seems less obvious with our dream body because most of us are told since childhood and through education, that our dreams “aren’t real” and as we grow up we form material and reductionistic ideas about dreams as “just” dreams, not real. So we begin to think of dreams in the same way as we think of fantasies. We thus confuse the distinction between our fantasies and our dreams.

 

What Dreams Are Made Of

 

While the fantasy world is not real, the dream world is real, as real as the rest of the mental world of eternity, namely heaven and hell, and in between. This cannot be understood unless you think about the mental world as unitary, in the same sense that we think of physical space as unitary—it is the same space whether we go out into distant galactic space, or whether we go inside a molecule and watch the particles whirl and collide in that relatively tiny space. There is only one mental world as well, which is the expanse around the mental sun of eternity. There is no physical space there, but there is the appearance of space so that we have the consciousness of walking around there in a body and seeing other people with their avatar bodies, just as we do in Second Life or World of Warcraft. Swedenborg walked around in the mental world for 27 years, even while he was still attached to his physical body. He confirms by thousands of observations and experiences that he can see and interact with anyone who has “passed on” into the world of afterlife through death, even people who preceded him for centuries whom he knew about from the world’s ancient literature.

 

Regarding dreams and visions (not fantasies), Swedenborg makes the following empirical observations and informative comments: [my comments appear in square brackets]

 

AC 1976. There are three types of dreams. The first type comes from the Lord mediately by way of heaven; such were the prophetical dreams spoken of in the Word. The second type comes by way of angelic spirits, especially those who are situated in front and above, over towards the right where the paradise gardens are. This was the source of the dreams that members of the Most Ancient Church had, dreams that were instructive, 1122. The third type comes by way of the spirits who are close to a person when he is asleep. These too carry spiritual meanings. Delusory dreams however come from a different source. (AC 1976)

 

AC 1977. To make me fully aware of the way that dreams flow in I was put to sleep and dreamt of a boat approaching that was laden with delicacies and savories of every kind. These were stowed away in the boat, out of sight. On deck stood two armed guards, as well as a third man who was the captain. The boat was passing by into a kind of arched dock; and with this I woke up and thought about the dream. At that point the angelic spirits in front and above me over to the right addressed me. [=Swedenborg was in his dual consciousness, aware of his dream while his physical body was asleep, and aware of what was surrounding his conscious material mental body. Through this body he could see others around him.]

 

They declared that they were the source of this dream. [=they could not see his physical body, only his mental body] So that I would know for sure that they were the source of it I was brought into a state where I was so to speak both asleep and awake at one and the same time. In a similar way they introduced different things that were pleasing and delightful, for example, an unknown tiny creature which was transformed into an object with blackish and shining rays which shot into my left eye at a fantastic speed. They also presented human beings, and also small children variously adorned, and other things besides whose delightfulness was indescribable. I spoke to those angelic spirits about these things also. This took place not just once but on a number of occasions, and each time they taught me by word of mouth.

 

[2] Those in whom such dreams originate are angelic spirits at the entrance to the paradise gardens. They are commissioned also to keep watch over certain people who are asleep, to prevent them being molested during that time by evil spirits. They perform their task with very great delight, so much so that they vie with one another to be there, and they love to fill man [=material mental body attached to the physical body prior to death] with joys and delights such as they see within his affection and disposition.

 

Those who have become angelic spirits are drawn from those who during their lifetime took delight in and loved in every way to make other people's lives delightful. When a person's hearing has been opened far enough [=this is our interior hearing, or hearing done with the rational mental body] he hears as from afar a sweet rhythmic sound like singing coming from these spirits. They declared that they did not know from where such things as these, and representatives so beautiful and delightful, came to them all in a moment; but they were told that they came from heaven. They belong to the province of the cerebellum, for the cerebellum, as I have learned, remains awake even during periods of sleep when the cerebrum is sleeping. …(AC 1977)

 

AC 1979. I have been allowed very often after dreams such as these to talk to the spirits and angels who had been the source of them. They have told me what they had induced, and I what I had seen. But it would take far too long to report my experience of all these things. (AC 1979)

 

AC 1980. It is worth mentioning that when I have woken up and have related what I had seen in a dream, and this has entailed a length of detail, certain angelic spirits, other than those referred to above, would at that point say that such details were in exact agreement with and identical with the things which they had been talking about, and that absolutely nothing was different. Nevertheless it was not the actual details of their conversation but the representatives of those details into which their ideas were thus converted and changed in the world of spirits, for angels' ideas are transformed in the world of spirits into representatives.

 

Consequently every single thing which they discussed was so represented in the dream. They went on to say that the same discussion could have been transformed into other representations, and indeed with endless variation into either similar or dissimilar ones. The reason they had been transformed into the representations seen in my dream lay in the state of the spirits surrounding me and therefore lay in my own state at the time. In short, very many different dreams may come down and present themselves from the same discussion and so from a single source: The reason for this, as has been stated, is that the things in a person's memory and affection are recipient vessels, in which ideas are varied and are received as representatives according to the variations in form which those ideas take and according to the changes of state which they undergo. (AC 1980)

 

AC 1981. Let one further similar experience be related. I once had quite an ordinary dream, and having woken up I related it all from start to finish. The angels said that it coincided exactly with what they had been discussing; not that the things they were discussing appeared in the dream, but instead things completely different, into which the thoughts in their discussion were transformed, yet in such a way that they were representative and correspondent. Not one detail was missing.

 

 I also spoke to them about influx, about how such things flow in and are varied. There was a person of whom I had the idea that he was governed by natural truth, an idea which I had gained from the things he had done in life. Among the angels a discussion was taking place concerning natural truth, and therefore that person was represented to me. What he told me in my dream, and the things that he did, as well as the order in which these things came, were representative of and corresponded to their higher source, namely the discussion taking place among the angels. Yet what he told me was not anything like or the same as what the angels were discussing. (AC 1981)

 

AC 1983. Evil spirits have a strong and burning desire to molest and attack man when he is asleep, but at that time man is especially protected by the Lord, for love does not sleep. Spirits who molest are punished piteously. I have heard their punishments more often than I can repeat. These involve being torn apart, as described in 829, 957, 959, which is carried out below the heel of the left foot, lasting sometimes for hours on end. Sirens, who inwardly are witches, are those who especially lie in wait in the night, and then try to worm their way into a person's inward thoughts and affections. But as often as they try to do so they are foiled by angels from the Lord and at length are deterred by means of very drastic punishments. 'These sirens have also spoken to others in the night, when they have impersonated me so perfectly and imitated my speaking so accurately that no one could tell the difference, and in so doing have poured in filthy thoughts and suggested ideas that were false.

 

[2] I was once sleeping very soundly, in an altogether sweet repose. When I awoke certain good spirits began to accuse me of having molested them, so violently, they said, that they thought they had been in hell; they put the blame on me. I answered them that I knew nothing whatever about the matter, but that I had been fast asleep and therefore could not possibly have been the one to molest them. At this they were dumbfounded and at length realized that those sirens had been up to their tricks. Something similar was also demonstrated to me after that so that I might know what that band of sirens is like.

 

[3] These sirens are mainly females, who during their lifetime have studied how to attract male companions to themselves by interior devices - by worming their way in through external allurements, by captivating the baser mental instincts in all sorts of ways, by penetrating into each one's affections and delights, but with an evil motive, namely that of manipulating. Their nature is such in the next life therefore that they seem to be able of themselves to do anything. They take in from others and think up for themselves different devices which they absorb with ease like sponges soaking up water, filthy or clean alike. They accordingly soak up and practice what is profane as well as what is holy with the intent, as stated, of manipulating. I have been allowed to perceive how foul they are inwardly, polluted by adultery and hatred. I have also been given to perceive how overpowering their sphere is. These sirens force their own interior thought and feelings into a state of persuasion, so that these may go hand in glove with their exterior thought and feelings towards the things they intend. In this way sirens compel and lead spirits to think as they themselves do.

 

[4] No reasonings are in evidence among them, and yet they employ a whole mass of reasonings that are breathed into people's evil affections by applying themselves to those persons' natural instincts. In this way they gain entry into the baser parts of the minds of others whom they lead on and by persuasion either overwhelm or captivate. There is nothing they study more than how to destroy conscience, and when they have destroyed it gain possession of people interiorly and even obsess them, though the individual is not conscious of it. Nowadays external obsession is not allowed as it once was in former times, but internal possession by spirits such as these does take place.

                                 

People who are devoid of conscience are obsessed in this way. The interior aspects of their thought are insane in a very similar way, but those aspects are concealed by and covered with an outward propriety and presence of honesty displayed for the sake of personal position, wealth, and reputation. This they can even recognize for themselves if they pay any attention to what they think. (AC 1983)

 

Consciousness and Intersubjectivity

 

God’s goal in creating and managing the universe is to evolve a unified intersubjectivity of an ever expanding human race.

 

The method or venue by which God achieves this goal is communication, interaction, and networking involving all individuals.

 

The Grand Human is the name for the conglomeration of communicative networks between all human beings who love and cling to heavenly virtues, values, meanings, and arrangements. Since the beginning of the birth and evolution of the human race on this and other planets, there have been a massive number of human beings that are continuously expanding the societies of the Grand Human. This also true for the Grand Monster, which is the conglomeration of human beings that love and cling to hellish loves, meanings, and arrangements, and these are always the opposite of the heavenly arrangements.

 

Here is an important distinction to figure out and understand clearly:

The ruling love in heavenly consciousness is the love of building community, intersubjectivity, and unity for the sake of promoting the happiness and joy of others. Their happiness and joy are felt in ourselves and becomes our own happiness and joy. We are happy when we see them happy. This heavenly ruling love  is called altruism or goodness.

The ruling love in hellish consciousness is the love of breaking down community, intersubjectivity, and unity for the sake of promoting one’s own happiness and joy. We are happy only when we perceive our own happiness and joy in them. Their own happiness and joy is not felt like our own. When they are happy in their own right, we are not happy for them. We can be happy only if our own happiness is promoted and enhanced by them. This is egotism, selfism, and selfishness.

 

In God infinite good things make a one with infinite rational things to produce the Divine consciousness, also called the Omniproprium. See this article: Our Relationship to the Divine Psychologist at http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/cd.htm

This is the “cosmic” unity known in the world’s literature for millennia. Every love longs to conjoin with its rational “consort” to produce the unity of “marriage.” A love in the affective organ can conjoin, or perform synergistically, only with an idea in the cognitive organ that is compatible with or “agreeable” to the love. The marriage of heavenly loves and affections, often called “virtues,” always involves rational thoughts and principles. Similarly, the marriage of hellish loves and affections, often called “lusts” or “vices,” always involves irrational thoughts and principles. Virtues promote community and altruism, and through that, the happiness and joy of others. Vices promote the breakdown of community and the pursuit of selfish loves, and through that, the unhappiness and suffering of others.

 

The definition of heavenly loves as those that promote community building through rational ideas, is in sharp contrast to the definition of hellish loves as those that promote community breakdown through irrational ideas.

 

The force of community or unity is the central and ruling force in the universe. This comes from the fact that there is a unity of infinite heavenly loves and rational ideas in God, from whom all substance originate through the mental sun of eternity. The outpouring “efflux” of mental heat and light fills the mental expanse with rational ether. This “mental dust” is endless in variety and constitutes the building blocks of all things (see Diagram 4). The central force of unity is imparted to the created universe and its objects through these componential building blocks, in the male and female arrangement. Male building blocks are units of mental light within which there is heat, while female building blocks are units of mental heat within which there is light.

 

The force of unity therefore begins in the elemental building blocks that issue from God through the mental sun of eternity. This first level is called the genetic level of unity. At a more compounded and external level there are formed the male and female mental organs within the threefold mental body system (see Diagram 1). This is the force of unity that fixes and maintains the existence of an immortal individual from birth to endless eternity. It is called the anatomical level of unity. At a still more compounded and external level there are formed conjugial couples through regeneration and the unity model (see Diagrams 2 and 3). This is the conjugial level of unity. At a still more compounded level there are formed individual mental societies within the Grand Human and Grand Monster (see Diagram 6). This is the community level of unity. Finally, there is the universal level of unity that forms all the individual mental societies into just two conglomerates, the Grand Human and its opposite, the Grand Monster.

 

There are accordingly 5 levels of unity in the universe: genetic, anatomical, conjugial, community, and universal. The consciousness that is produced by the universal level of unity is Divine consciousness, thus restricted to God alone. Only to God does the entire human race form a networked unity. This level of unity corresponds to the human body. Hence it is that the Grand Human societies are arranged in the form, structure, and function of the perfect “angelic” or celestial mental body. The whole is an image of the part, and the part is an image of the whole. I call this whole-part relationship synecdoche (see this article and this one). In the literature on the history of ideas we find the idea that a human being is a “microcosm” or an image or form of the universe; and hence the universe was depicted in the form of the human body.

The idea of the unity of the universe is the chief rational concept in mental psychology. Nothing unconnected can have existence (as was argued by Swedenborg). In other words, when something comes into existence it has undergone the process of incorporation or “induction” into the entire whole that already exists. This is discussed in the psychology of learning literature as the primacy effect. This is the chief organizing principle in all organic systems. Whatever comes first, forever influences what comes after. Whatever comes first, is at the center of everything that comes thereafter. For instance, in the history of democratic countries the “Founding Fathers” formulate and adopt the nation’s Constitution, which then governs or limits any laws that future governments can make. Another example is that of a stone, wood, or fabric that an artist or designer might use to fashion some object of art or clothing. The final object will be made out of the original matter, which is the primacy of the artist’s decision at the start of the project. When you examine a human embryo and its growth process (e.g., here or here), you can notice the primacy effect operating through a process of cell differentiation and division out of the one first original “primacy” cell in the fertilized egg.

 

The unity and connectedness of all things in existence are therefore built into existence at each level of construction of reality (genetic, anatomical, conjugial, community, universal).

 

Intersubjectivity is used in mental psychology to refer to the built in unification process in human consciousness. All human beings come into existence at birth with an immortal mental body that matures fully after the temporary physical body is detached through the dying and resuscitation process. Our first experience of intersubjectivity is the consciousness of self in infancy. It has been pointed out in child psychology that an infant first gains the awareness of self by noticing that its hand moves in correspondence with the mental intention we have in voluntary movement. Sensorimotor awareness is our first or primacy form of consciousness. This awareness is established through the synchronous action of the affective organ (feeling of wanting to move, reach, or grasp), conjoined to the idea or thought in the cognitive organ that the sensation of grasping an object means that there is an object separate from self.

 

The infant’s cognitive organ has to supply the idea of “object separate from me” in order for the affective organ to want to grasp or reach. It has been pointed out that this process may initially be unintended, so that the child observes its moving hand “collide” with something. There is also the contrast between colliding with something that is sensed as being one’s own, like touching the face or sucking the thumb, or colliding with an object that is not sensed as one’s own, like the bottle or the mother’s hand.

 

Intersubjectivity is the conscious experience of mental co-presence.

 

When you receive and read an email or text message from a friend, you are “connecting” by “communicating.” The physical act of “staying in touch” corresponds to the mental act of constructing intersubjectivity. Couples who are in love with each other can be seen to touch each other continuously, especially during the dating and honeymoon phases. These physical phases correspond to the mental phases of conjunction or achieving unity – something that takes a long time and develops gradually, as does all organic growth.

 

Dyadic intersubjectivity is the basis for the building of communities and societies. Two workers as a team can accomplish more than one individual can. To become a dyad the two people must be able to communicate or “touch each other” mentally. Typically this involves face to face co-presence of the two physical bodies. But you can also “reach out and touch someone” by calling the person on the phone, or meeting their avatar in a virtual world where they can interact and communicate.

 

Conjugial intersubjectivity is the establishment of eternal unity in the threefold self of a man and woman (see Diagrams). Practices in marriage vary cross-culturally, but in general, all marriages can go through phases of greater intimacy and intersubjectivity. The male dominant phase of marriage creates physical, social, and family connections, but it leaves the husband and wife in separate intersubjective states, not with each other but with others, especially of the same gender. The equity phase creates cognitive intimacy between the couple as they jointly define themselves, their relationship, and their activities. Finally, the unity phase creates affective intimacy as they give up any independence, and become bonded or conjoined to eternity. One cannot feel, think, or do anything without the other’s contribution and co-action. This is true conjugial intersubjectivity. I call it the conjoint self.

 

All unity and conjunction in both worlds comes from the force that strives to unify into a whole or unit at each level of reality and existence. Love takes the lead in the unification process. It is primary, while idea is secondary. Love in the affective system creates the “consorting” idea in the cognitive system, and the two conjoined produce consciousness in our sensorimotor system. Intersubjectivity is this interactive consciousness produced by co-presence or co-action. The arrangement of mental co-presence in the world of eternity is determined by the ruling love that we remain with after resuscitation.

 

The mental societies of the Grand Human and Monster are arranged in the human form according to the correspondence of their ruling love, which becomes the primary love after the second death. No other love can remain that is not compatible with the ruling love. Hence each of us in eternity becomes our ruling love. If this love is heavenly, our mental body appears to others as perfect in form and beautiful in appearance. But if our ruling love is hellish our mental body takes on the appearances of deformity and ugliness. Our outward appearance is a correspondence of our inner ruling love. (See the story of the Picture of Dorian Gray).

 

When we interact through an avatar we are building intersubjectivity through the affordance of the virtual world. The social-biological technology of Second Life is a venue for constructing, enlarging, and maintaining a horizontal intersubjectivity that encompasses anyone from anywhere around the globe. The formation of sub-collectivities in Second Life Groups correspond to the formation of intersubjectivity in mental societies in eternity. Contrast these two lists of Groups from two different avatars in Second Life:

Group Profile of Avatar 1

Group- Profile of Avatar 2

Assault Commanders - AF Training.

Warriors of the afterlife

SL National Police Department, Secret Intelligence Division (SID)

Galactic Alliance Defense

Alpine Executive Center

Damnation Island

Ambassadors of Gor

Black Caste of Laura

Slaves of Laura

Gorean Administration Network

Virtual Builders Alliance

Association of SL Academic Research.

Library: Academic Avatar Librarians

Book Discussion Circle

Miami Nights

SL Skydivers Association

Black Souls Rhythms

Phat Cats Romance Connection

Urban Square Plaza

Red Rock Mesa Arts Cooperative

 

Similar loves create similar interests in particular topics, which create compatible forms of intersubjectivity. A Second Life Group connects people with similar loves so they can form and grow a new group intersubjectivity. This is how they help consummate each other’s loves, hence happiness and joy.

 

There are four basic types of heavenly consciousness:

Monadic: consciousness of self as equal to others.

Dyadic: consciousness of another human being as neighbor, and of God as Father or as the Divine Psychologist.

Community: consciousness of a collection of human beings forming a united group through reciprocal recognition of similarity, through feelings of mutual love, and through a history of personal and meaningful interactions.

 

Hellish consciousness is the reversal or inversion of heavenly consciousness.

Monadic: consciousness of self as superior to others.

Dyadic: consciousness of another human being as one’s victim or slave, and of God as Tyrant or Enemy

Community: consciousness of a band forming a united horde through the reciprocal recognition of the same lust in each other, while at the same time each is plotting to double cross all the others.

 

The community of heaven and the community of hell are polar opposite to each other. When we raise our consciousness to the celestial-rational level (see Diagram 1), our thinking corresponds to celestial correspondences. Our eternal future after the dying-resuscitation process comes to a new immortal beginning at our second death, in which phase we pass into one of the Grand Human societies that constitute the celestial zone of the mental world of eternity. We enter that mental state by forming an organic unit with our conjugial spouse.

 

This is the newborn conjoint self that lives by the Omniproprium. We have the sense, the consciousness, the living experience and awareness, that we are not functioning from our own ego. We do not have the state of conflict or uncertainty of “What shall I do now. What’s next. Let me see.” Etc. There is no ego reaction, no ego defensiveness, nothing to hold up or assert or persuade. No attitude problem. No unfulfilled longing. No vague anxiety. No doubt, conflict, regret, shame. All these ego reactions cannot exist in our celestial consciousness. They are left behind in the material zones.

 

In this conjoint unity phase our community relationship expresses itself through our interactions with neighbors who are likewise conjugial couples, each unique, each making a unique contribution to the society by their mental co-presence. The heavenly community consciousness is closely networked so that one couple’s idea and feeling reverberate across the celestial network to every other couple in the society. This occurs within every society. At the same time the overall reverberations of each society is communicated to all other societies. The Grand Human is a conglomeration of all such societies arranged geographically to represent the shape of the human body.

 

It is convenient therefore to identify the location of a society in the mental world by reference to the anatomical organ of the Grand Human where they are located. If we were able to mentally travel to these societies as in an air ship, we would be able to see the Grand Human from a distance out in rational ether, which has the appearance of space and terrain, as on our physical continents. We might then set our landing target to the right hemisphere of the brain, or to the big toe of the left foot, etc. You can do this virtually now at the Visible Body Web site, which I highly recommend: http://www.visiblebody.com/

 

The mental geography of the Grand Monster is parallel and opposite to that of heavenly intersubjectivity. The circulatory system of the Grand Monster feeds the affective organ of every person whose consciousness clings to egotistical loves. The Grand Monster’s respiratory system supplies the insane thoughts that form an infernal “marriage” with the egotistical loves in each individual’s mental body. The consciousness of hell produces an endlessly grotesque and deformed intersubjectivity, going through phases of an endless devolution towards greater bestiality and lesser humanity.

 

The endless evolution of heavenly virtues and the endless devolution of hellish vices together constitute the consciousness of the human race. God’s omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence allow this bivalent consciousness of good and evil for the sake of humanity itself, which depends on freedom of love. The devolution of hellish mental states is maintained within the human zone so that no society or individual is allowed to devolve below their level of humanity and freedom. All individuals in hell are in that state because of their love. God maintains their freedom of expression in the ruling love they choose to cling to. God provides a human mental environment in the Grand Monster in which they can pursue their loves in freedom. No one is allowed to fulfill loves that deprive others of their freedom to cling to the loves of their choice. There are laws of order that God maintains in the insane hellish mind. Hell has to be managed just as much as heaven. Otherwise both would collapse and the human race would cease to be in freedom, and therefore being human.

 

(to be continued)

See also:
 Intersubjectivity in Virtual World and in Mental World (2008)

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/mental-psychology-p1.htm#_Toc212519322

See also:
The Perizonius Thesis

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/perizonius.html

 

Social Forces and Group Dynamic Theory in the Virtual World

 

(based on an earlier version:  http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/LEONJ/leonpsy/instructor/society/societ3.html )

 

The Classification of Interpersonal Attitudes

 

The attribution of reward value to an attitude object (thing or person) is expressed in a very large number of ways, and it helps to have a system for classifying them. One method consists of pairing particular interaction moves with their effects on others. Leary (1957; reported in Newcomb et. al., 1965) attempted to classify such antecedent-consequents pairs into major subdivisions. For example,

Category
1.
2.
3.

4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

Antecedent Move

leads, advises
gives support, sympathizes
agrees,- acts in a friendly

manner
trusts, seeks help
acts shyly, obediently
rebels, is unconventional
attacks, is unkind
rejects, exploits

Consequent Reaction

invites respect or obedience
invites trust and acceptance
invites help or tenderness

invites advice or help
invites arrogance or leadership
invites punishment or rejection
invites hostility or resistance
invites distrust or inferiority


You may evaluate the generality of this classification scheme by asking your- self two types of questions: (i) Does the functional relation between an antecedent move and the indicated consequence make sense to you, relative to your experience? For example, when you act shyly in a group (category 5), do the others respond by being arrogant or by acting as a leader? (ii) Do the eight categories of antecedent moves cover adequately the various ways you can interact with others? For example, when you disagree with someone, are you giving advice (category 1) or being unconventional (category 6)? And is it followed by obedience (1), rejection (6), hostility (-7), or all of these? What about laughing or making jokes: can they not be taken differently at different times or by different group members?

Another method of approach to classifying functional relations in inter- action processes, is to identify the group conditions that visibly affect attraction among members. Thus, reciprocation is often found as a condition for expressing and feeling attraction; that is, if you ask people in a group to rank each other on attractiveness, you find that the choices tend to be, on the whole, reciprocal. If A feels an attraction towards B, B will be more probable to pick A as one of his attractive choices. Another condition that affects attractiveness of another is perceived attitudinal support. For example, if you perceive similarities of interests and values with person B, it is likely that you feel attracted to that person; you expect support, worthwhile collaboration, and sharing of activities. Reciprocated attraction and perceived attitudinal support are group dynamic conditions that create attraction forces; these forces are calculated as resultants of motivational needs and rewards. That is, in terms of "cognitive dynamics," a person will feel attracted to an attitude object if he attributes to that object (or person) sources of rewards, as in reciprocation of interests and support.

Field theory notation can conveniently be used to chart the course of relationship formation in groups. The simplest group is the dyad, or two- person group. The relationship between A and B in a dyad can be represented by indicating the attraction values Possible in such a situation. thus:


 

Week 1---------------
(a) ++
(b) ++
(c) ++
(d) --
(e) --
(f) --
(9) +-
(h) +-
(i) +-

-->Week 5
++
+-
--
--
+-
++
+-
++
--

In this diagram (based on the notation system presented in Newcomb et al, 1965 we can see the various attraction structures that are possible initially in the formation of a dyad (Week l) and the changes in group structure that may occur over time in the group's life space. The three initial structures that are possible are indicated by ++ (a-c), -- (d-f), and +- (g-i). This means that A and B can both feel positive towards each other (++ type structure); they can both feel negative towards each other (-- type); or A may feel positive towards B, while B feels negative towards A (+- type structure). With time, and continued opportunity for further interactions ("Week 5"), the attraction structure can change as plotted in the above matrix. For example, an initially ++ type structure may change into a +- (b) or -- type (c), or it may remain the same (a) and so on. In terms of field theory predictions, we would expect the ++ type structure to be most stable since A and B both feel advantages to the relationship and are likely to continue to reward each other. With the -- structure, A and B are likely to break up their relationship because of the aversive or negative consequences experienced by both. The +- structure is unstable and is likely to turn into a -- type (i) or a ++ type (h).

When we consider the case of a triad, the attraction structure becomes more complex. In the triadic arrangement, three dyadic pairs exist, thus:

Here you can see that the AB dyad has a ++ type attraction structure; AC have a +- relationship; and BC have a -- relationship. The most stable triadic group structure is that of a fully reciprocated attraction pattern where each of the three pairs relate to each other-through the ++ type structure. Thus, balanced structures are those in which group members reciprocate attraction



and tend to be stable over time. Imbalanced structures on the other hand, are divisive and will tend to break up over time.

Larger groups create more complex relationship structures which can be diagrammed by the technique called sociograms. Let us take an example using a "pentad", i.e. a five-person group:

In this illustration, we can note three sub-groups in terms of their attraction structures. There is a triadic clique composed of A, B, and C; there is a dyadic coalition between B and C; finally, there is a monad, E, who is an isolate and does not enter into a relationship with the other four individuals. Clique structure (or the formation of coalitions), is formed as a result of several identifiable factors ("variables" or "parameters"), the most important of which are, (i) frequency of interaction; (ii) propinquity; (iii) demographic variables; (iv) distribution of members' attitudes; and (v) personal characteristics.

 

Since there are many expressions people use for describing others, it is useful to have techniques for classifying these. One method (described by Leary, 1957) is to classify attitudinal expressions by pairs of antecedent moves and their consequent reactions (e.g. acts shyly--->invites leadership). A second method is to map "attraction structures", i.e. making a graph that shows who is attracted to whom, the attraction clusters found then serve as classification types. As well, attraction structures affect group dynamics since some structures are less stable than others. Clique structure in groups is affected by the on-going cognitive dynamics of its members (e.g. their attitudes and personalities), as well as by the conditions of the members' interactions (e.g. frequency, propinquity).

 

Behavior Influence and Personality

 

The word personality derives from the Greek "persona" meaning "mask'' - i.e. as worn by actors in Greek drama. Thus, implicit in the concept of personality is the idea that a "person" wears a 'social mask' during interactions with others and that this public face is worn or 'put on' for the benefit of others. Sociologist Erving Goffman has written extensively (e.g. Goffman, 1959; 1 963) about this put on and calls it "face work", i.e. the 'work' a person does in interaction with others in "presenting" the self as an entity possessing a "face" and needing protection, respect, and legitimization by others.

 

The psychological conception of personality always implies learning; that is, personality is viewed in terms of its etiology - the issue of how a person comes to develop habits, attitudes, beliefs, style, and so on, which are viewed as its structural components. "Learning" refers to behavioral changes a person exhibits as a result of experience, or interaction with the environment. The psychologist's interest in the study of personality revolves around the idea that behavior is predictable if we know things about the individual's personality. This possibility exists because a person's behavior in one setting or in one set of circumstances is usable to predict his behavior in another set of circumstances. Personality thus serves as a unifying concept for understanding behavior, and hence predicting or controlling it.

 

Neurosemantics

 

(see: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/499s2000/banaag/semantic-satiation.htm )

The behavior of all organisms is based on the same based on the same basic principles, of which the first, is Russian physiologist I.P. Pavlov's "dog reflex paradigm":


 

You see in this famous diagram, the most basic of learning processes called, conditioning. You hold a dog in straps; you place some food in his mouth and you collect the saliva in a tube; you also sound a bell. Now you have to do this in precise time relations so that the clang of the bell, or buzz of the buzzer, sounds off not later, nor earlier-, than approximately half-a- second (we're being very imprecise) after food is squirted (perhaps) in the dog's mouth. At any rate, those who have spent a lifetime doing this have uncovered an amazing set of facts dealing with the conditionability of our organs: salivary glands, eye blink, galvanic skin response, knee jerk, pupflary dilation, eye movement, hand removal jerk, head orienting response, startle response syndrome, muscle tension, heart rate, electroencephalogram (EEG), penile erection, vasilary dilation, to name but a few off the top of our heads.

 

When one realizes that the above short list is intimately involved with our sympathetic, parasympathetic, and voluntary activities, one gets the idea of the full importance of Pavlov's discovery. Indeed, this relatively simple mechanism of contiguity (or timing) is at the very base of our social existence: our movements, our breathing, our bladders and intestines, our blood pressure and muscle tensions, our digestive processes, in short, our well- being in health, body. and therefore mind, is entirely at the mercy of contiguity or contingency!

 

Of course, it works both ways. If noise makes your muscles tense, music (or some thing) will make them relax. If criticism squirts acid in your stomach, praise strums tingles on your nerves. If, today, you buy brand X because your hand automatically reaches towards the conditioned picture from T.V., tomorrow, you reach toward Y, (away from X) because last night's commercial unconditioned you first ("extinction"), then, reconditioned you (still "conditioning"!). Thus it is that we have counter-propaganda to undo what propaganda has wrought, and we have "diet programs" (or clinics) to dishabituate ourselves from earlier habits. The criminal is a recidivist, which means that he recedes or regresses towards his former anti-social habits because the stimuli in his local environment prompt him back to his old ways. Hence the idea of rehabilitating, which means tooling the person up with new and better habits (for the criminals, drug addicts, psychotics, maladjusted, etc.).

 

Here we can see the relationship between the stimulus-response (S-R) paradigm and behaviorism: behavior is a function of the environment, and, manipulating the environment influences behavior.

 

"If the individual responds in a way that produces a stimulus that has reinforcement value, he has provided himself with a reinforcing state of affairs" (*Staats, 1975, p. 60). This idea is called "self-reinforcement" and the stimuli that hang together as "little responses" in the brain are called self-concepts. Thus, if you are asked to give a set of descriptive terms for yourself, you may come up with conditioned labels such as "a nice girl," "a man of integrity," "a lazy student," "a good worker," "devoted mother," "gullible consumer," and so on. These conditioned self-concepts hang together in conditioned clusters called complex processes, which form the basis of your personality structure, Ego-strength, and emotional adjustment.

 

Complex processes of conditioning are still responsive to the same basic laws as the simple salivary reflex of the rat shortly before it enters the goal box where the pellet of food will be found and eaten--whereupon the reinforcement catastrophe precipitates the rat's nervous system into re-hook- ing-connections. The proof: on the next run, the rat runs the maze faster and with less errors. A few more reinforced runs and the animal's score is perfect. The re-hooking of its brain is complete: it now has acquired a fairly-complex skill thanks to the contiguity between the reinforcement and the behavior. Now the rat begins to salivate long before the goal box: these are preparatory or anticipatory goal responses (the term was coined by Clark Hull, famed Yale psychologist, during the 1930's and 1940's).

 

These little "rG's," as they were known when we were in graduate school, became smaller and smaller (with age), until they could no longer be detected by gross instruments. However, when the instruments were improved, they could still be detected. Even if the goal box was removed, these little rG's kept firing in the brain for a long, long time. There was almost no forgetting-- or, as learning theorists would say, resistance to extinction.

 

Charles E. Osgood, one of the world's best known scientific psychologists, and former President of the American Psychological Association, made a valiant attempt to map the action of these little rG's. He contended that thinking is really the firing of rG's in the brain. These rG's are tiny remnants of the original motor and sensory responses that conditioning has established. The sight of an apple gets conditioned to salivary and other goal anticipatory responses including chewing, swallowing, holding, licking, and enjoying yourself all over. As you get older, the mere sound that spells apples in your ear can elicit consummatory responses. As a result, the pleasantness of the experience of eating the apply gets transferred to the word itself, and maybe even to the giver of the apple, and perhaps apple stories. This is called stimulus generalization.

 

When I was in college at McGill University during the 1950's, famed neurophysiologist Donald 0. Hebb taught the introductory course in psychology. How one did in that course determined whether one could go on to major. The competition was keen, the lessons learned well. LAJ made it and went on to write an honor's thesis that traced the hypothetical network of the neurophysiological basis of the mind. He took the matter quite literally and reasoned as follows: if the little rG's are tiny neurophysiological responses associated with reinforcement of overt responses, then those rG's were actually an archaeological record of prior reinforcement history! One could map a person's habits, attitudes, predispositions, meanings by measuring the little rG's the person has firing in the brain (these were called cell assemblies by Hebb who was interested in studying the phase sequences of their firings in the brain). If meanings are little rG's and rG's function in clusters and patterns, then we have a new field in psychology that we may call neurosemantics (see my Ph.D. Dissertation: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/499s2000/banaag/semantic-satiation.htm )

 

But how to measure the little rG's? Some psychologists (e.g. Hebb, Milner, Bindra, Olds--at McGill) went right in there and implanted electrodes into the rat's brain; these were attached to galvanometers and the electrical activity of the area could be measured. Of course this was too gross a technique to be used for the study of human symbolic processes and LAJ was delighted when his research director at McGill, Dr. Wallace E. Lambert, introduced him to Charles Osgood. Dr. Osgood had invented an instrument he called the semantic differential (SD). This marvelous tool was designed to measure the all important little rG's. It was- a simple tool. Have a subject look at an object, person, event, or word (stimulus) and have him respond to it in some agreed-upon manner: reaching, pushing, pulling, tightening, whatever. Give the subject two clear and incompatible choices: either pushing or pulling, lifting up or pressing down, reaching toward or away; then, suddenly show the stimulus. If you arrange things so you can measure and record the speed and strength of the agreed upon response, and you vary stimull systematically, you can then map a person s little rG s!

 

That's because, Osgood argued, the overt responses you can see and measure are caused by the little rG's you can't measure. This one-to-one relation between the inside of the brain and the outside peripheral muscles became known as the neobehavioristic paradigm (see Steinberg and James, 1971).

 

My very first publication (Lambert and James, 1960) was an application of Osgood's semantic differential technique to Hull's contention that little rG's in the brain behaved as gross motor responses. Hull had demonstrated that when a response is repeated its habit strength ("SHR") increases; however, there occurs also a smaller counter-force called reactive inhibition ("IR") which builds with each repetition of the response. Ordinarily, this causes no problems, because in between the responses, IR "dissipates with time." Reactive inhibition was thought of as a negative drive caused by the organism's resistance to repeat motor responses, IR "due to physiological fatigue, or to conditioned fatigue, called boredom or satiation. Lambert and James (1960) argued that if Osgood was right and (I) attitudes, emotions, feelings, and meanings were conditioned little rG's, and if Hull was right and (ii) repeating a response satiated it, then it could be predicted that repeating a word over and over again would satiate the tittle rG's that fired each time the stimulus was repeated. The satiation effect could be measured using Osgood's technique of response speed: if the little rG's decrease in strength, then the motor response should also slow down. In a series of studies prepared for his doctoral dissertation (James, 1962),

 

I proved Osgood's contention, and Hull's. A word repeated loses some or all of its meaning. Furthermore, the effect, which LAJ called semantic satiation, generalizes to other words that are related to it. He also showed that if a number is repeated prior to its use in a timed addition task, it takes relatively longer to add up the answer, presumably because the number's functional value was reduced as a result of the repetition of the little rG's.

 

I also showed that bilinguals repeating a word in one language satiate the meaning of its translation in the other language. LAJ proposed that semantic satiability may be a personality trait; that is, individuals differ in their susceptibility to being satiated. For example, some people avoid reading a book twice, while others like to read it over and over. Ditto with movies. I suggested that children and the elderly appear to like repetition (James, 1967).

 

A test of this hypothesis was made by correlating subjects' scores on a foreign vocabulary learning test ("paired-associates task") and degree of semantic satiation shown on words after their repetition. The correlation was significant, indicating that a common trait of satiability could be responsible. I proposed that repetition could be used as a tool for helping stutterers (James, 1966). If it was true that stuttering behavior was a disruption of articulation of certain words due to their extreme emotional significance, then by repetition, one could satiate the little rG's that are responsible for the extreme emotional response to the threatening word. This hypothesis was later tested by a doctoral student in Speech Communication at the University of Illinois, but I no longer remember the details.

 

However, unbeknownst to me until much later, a South African psychiatrist by the name of Wolpe (1954) had developed Hull's concept of reactive inhibition as a psychotherapeutic technique for the treatment of emotional problems. He used the terms reciprocal inhibition and systematic-desensitization. The subject imagined repeatedly the feared situation until the little rG's that mediated the fear response got satiated, i.e. desensitized. There was skill necessary in the process of discovering stimulit to imagine which would be gradated and not too overwhelming. By starting with "low fear stimuli," the subject could go up a hierarchical list in a systematic manner, until at last, he can imagine just about anything about the feared situation without anxiety. The moment of truth comes when the subject is back in the field, face to face with the elevator, airplane, cockroach, or sex object. The technique has been acclaimed for problems of impotence, acrophobia, claustrophobia, and general free floating anxiety.

 

My work on semantic satiation landed me a job with Osgood at the University of Illinois in 1960. Five years later I assumed the co-directorship of an international project headed by Osgood. The project was known as "the generality of affective meaning systems" and its purpose was to show that the little rG's were basically the same in people all over the world (see results cited in Jakobovits, 1966; Osgood, May, and Miron, 1975).

 

Osgood's life work culminated in the discovery that people everywhere shared the same basic types of little rG's, the three most important by far being, Evaluation, Potency, and Activity (EPA). Osgood viewed these three basic types of responses as deriving from evolution and the necessity for the organism to adjust to environmental changes: is the stimulus dangerous or benign (Evaluation); is it strong or weak (Potency); is it fast or slow (Activity). If an animal or human being adapts to these three dimensions of stimulus variation, survival is assured. Words, labels, symbols, and their more complex derivatives--statements, slogans, ideologies--reflect this basic three- dimensional world of emotional differentiation. The world around us is but a complex expression of "Is it good or bad, strong or weak, fast or slow," and these are but functional complications of sucking the milk, chewing the apple, running from the bear, and caressing the loved one. Osgood's genius lies in inventing new graphic tools that can map cognitive dynamics. The field of neurosemantics, as we'd like to call this search for the little rG's, has a bright future ahead as many science fiction writers have anticipated (see e.g., brainwashing techniques in the Korean War; subliminal advertising; mass hypnosis; memory banks; biofeedback; learning languages in your sleep; lie-detectors; etc., etc.).

 

Personality is a unifying concept used to refer to a person's many social presences; it is an abstraction from the actual ways in which a person behaves in various social circumstances. "Personality" presupposes acquisition of habits, and implies social stimuli acting as triggers for a person's involvement in a situation.

 

"Neurosemantics" refers to the hook-up between social stimuli and physiological and neuronal reactions; the latter are called activation, affect, or emotion. The Hullian-system treats conditioning of physiological states in terms of reflexes; the Hebbian system treats the conditioning of neurons in terms of patterns of firings in the brain. Experiments by Osgood have shown that humans in all cultures investigated have an emotional/affective world made up of three main universal dimensions, thought to be related to people's evolutionary adjustment to survival techniques. These are Evaluation, Potency, and Activity.

 

Conflict: A Field Dynamic Concept

 

We shall now explore some contemporary ideas or-concepts which attempt to deal with and explain human behavior in terms of a field dynamic system. In trying to understand the basic issues involved in such an attempt at accounting for behavior, you should keep in mind the following background notion: an individual is defined as a system in itself surrounded by other systems. This gives rise to inherent factors (inside the individual as a system) and environmental factors (outside the individual as a system). The inherent aspect generates the concept of needs while the environmental factors generate the concept of goals. In simple terms, an individual moves and changes as a result of needs that push it into various directions. The direction that results in need reduction or need satisfaction is called goal-direction. Successful goal-direction (i.e. the attainment of goals that reduce drives or needs) is called adjustment. Today, the field of mental health organizes knowledge about what leads to or facilitates adjustment.

 

Adjustment is a concept closely associated with Darwin's idea of survival of the fittest in that lack of adjustment, is seen as producing pathology, abnormal behavior, and ultimately, reduced capacity to survive. As a result, the field of mental health is practically oriented: how do we teach people to adjust better in the face of lack of success, problems of survival, and resolution of conflicts. The field-dynamic concept-of conflict and conflict resolution is a very general theme we encounter in all discussions of personality and human interrelationships at the level of self, dyad, and society. We will review some of these ideas on conflict starting with the presentation given in *Arkoff (1968).

The following diagram depicts the basic nature of the concept of conflict.


The environmental influences are represented as "the field" within which the individual occupies a position (Person A). The inherent influences are shown as "needs" within the person. By definition, needs are drives to act. We say that needs produce a vector or directed force, called impulse or impulse to act. For example, your foot goes to sleep as you're sitting in class; you are aware of adjusting your position by moving; the need (sensory pain) produces the impulse to move your limb to relieve the stress. Now suppose you're in a situation where you cannot move or don't want to move: you experience frustration.

 

We say that some barrier in the environment blocks or inhibits the act and leads to frustration of the need state. Conflict represents a state of predicament: several needs are aroused simultaneously and you cannot reduce them because they are mutually incompatible or conflicting: to move in one direction reduces one need while at the same time the action produces another need which requires an opposite direction. What happens in such situations and how does the individual resolve the conflict? To answer this question we need to look at the type of conflicts there are and see whether they fall into common patterns. *Arkoff (1968, pp. 95-97) summarizes the various conflictual situations that have been described by psychologists. The following diagram shows some types of conflict and their resolution pattern:




As you can observe, there are three basic types of conflict situations: approach-approach; avoidance-avoidance; and approach-avoidance. The approach- approach conflict situation (1) shows the person (P) caught between the impulse to act toward goal one (left of P) as well as toward goal two (right of P). Since the two goals are in opposite directions, the resolution of the conflict consists of first moving towards one goal, then towards the other. In both cases, the person experiences rewards; the conflict is one of an abundance of riches. In the second type (2), the person is being repelled simultaneously by two different and opposite goals: moving away from one pushes the person closer to the other, and vice versa. Whichever the person does, frustration is the result; the conflict is one of an abundance of problems. Finally, in the approach-avoidance type of conflict situation (3), the person is simultaneously attracted and repelled by the same goal: moving away arouses a conflict which makes the person move away-again. The resolution lies in restructuring of the field whereby the person changes involvement and new impulses begin to operate. In general, a social field is analyzable as a complex composite of multiple combinations of the three types described here.

 

This kind of description presupposes that the amount of conflict experienced in a situation is directly proportional to the distance between the person and the goal: like electromagnetic forces, goals are centers of great energy, attracting and repelling at a distance. For example, you're lying in bed trying to wake up. The approach element operates in two opposite directions simultaneously (approach-approach): goal one, which is positive, attracts you by wanting to stay in bed a little longer; goal two, also positive, attracts you in the opposite direction: you want to get up to finish a project you started the day before. If you get up, you move away from one desired goal (lying around); if you stay in bed, you move away from another desired goal (getting on to your project).

 

At the same time as this approach-approach conflict, there is in the situation an avoidance-avoidance conflict: to stay in bed is not desirable because it reinforces a tendency or habit you'd like to get rid of; but getting up is not favored because it means you will have to clean up your kitchen before you can eat breakfast and get on to your project. Thus, getting up is both desirable and undesirable. Caught in this web of conflicts, pulls, and pushes, your response is to do both at different times: yesterday you lingered in bed, today you jump up, tomorrow, who knows.

 

Psychodynamic theories of conflict make various inventories of them and describe the different responses people exhibit when they are seen as involved in a particular conflictual setting. The accompanying diagram lists some of the terms reported by *Arkoff (1968) that are often discussed in the psycho- logy of adjustment and mental health.

In the next diagram, I summarize some of the results from an experiment by (Geer, 1965, presented in *Arkoff, 1968, p. 113). A group of college men



(N=161) and women (N=109) gave ratings of the degree of fear conflict or anxiety that-different objects and situations evoked when thinking about them.


Several propositions can be made based on the distribution of scores in the graph. Thus, some animals are more "scary" than others, and some situations are more fear producing than others, as imagined by the subjects in this experiment. In general, college men report less fear than women when thinking about animals and situations. In DRA data reported by students in this course (Spring 1978), women more often than men report "cockroaches" as a source of fear. Of course, a distinction ought to be made between reported fears (as a summative assessment of one's tendencies) and measured fears (as actual responses and behaviors recorded by the witness in particular situations). As we all know, early sex role behaviors standardize sex-typed claims about fear responses: boys are taught to inhibit expressions of fear while girls are reinforced for sensitivity and helplessness, i.e. the overt expression of fear.

 

If you ask people to complete sentences such as "What would happen if you (etc.)...", then ask others to answer, you'll find in both cases that people tend to imagine common results to common situations, especially if they're asked to be ''realistic" in their imaginings. I call these standardized imaginings to indicate that they form part of one's necessary social competence skills on the daily round. Standardized imaginings originate in socialization, in education, in the mass media, and in restricted fantasy ("realistic daydreams"). Standardized imaginings mediate common reactions to social stimuli: fears, interests, hobbies, and so on.


Conflict: A Field-Dynamic Concept.

 

Human behavior seen as the outcome of social forces, is a perspective in social psychology, known as "field theory." An individual is a "system", surrounded by systems (other individuals) and embedded in systems (sociocultural environment). "Adjustment" is a Darwinian mental health idea that sees the individual's behavior in terms of the organism's eternal quest for stability, survival, or ascendency. A measure of adjustment success has been the person's management of his own inner (psychic) conflicts. Conflicts are negative "drives" that activate and energize the individual to seek their relief, reduction, or extinction. Need reduction acts to reinforce the behavior, i.e. it becomes habitual (habits, skills, styles). When need reduction is blocked by circumstances ("barriers in psychic space"), frustration ensues. Frustration acts as another negative drive.

 

According to one well-known model, all conflicts are divided into one of three types: approach/approach; avoidance/avoidance, approach/avoidance. The standardization of imaginings in a community (i.e. "What would happen if...") is fostered by socialization, education, and the mass media. This would account for the similarities in people's lists of their fears, interests, hobbies, fantasies, favorite things--i.e. biographic items.

 

The Group as a Social Milieu

 

Lewin was interested in the mechanisms of individual change in behavior, attitudes, habits, and so forth. By knowing this mechanism it would be possible to influence individuals towards change in particular directions. Lewin was thus, first and foremost, a social engineer; he coined the term action research, by which he meant research that involves a direct outcome in community life - industry, freedom, democratic distribution of decision making, education as a means of fostering humanistic values, and the like. Partly as a result of these activities, American social psychologists since the Second World War have been officially involved in what Lewin called "cultural reconstruction" - anti-discrimination investigations such as the effect of ideology on personality, intelligence, and economic opportunity.

 

In all of this work, reviewed throughout this book, the idea of field forces predominate. Lewin's general influence was great in terms of intellectual stimulation; however, the details of his topological methodology were not adopted to the same general extent and, in our opinion, still remains to be applied to its full potential. This book attempts to re-introduce into the mainstream of social psychological work this neglected feature of Kurt Lewin's field theory conceptions (see References for Lewin's work).

 

I have already discussed some of the features of Lewin's diagramming technique of representing a person as a field or region differentiated by layers of personality or sub-regions. Now let us see how this idea leads Lewin to derive group properties from the personality structure of its members. One such derivation concerns the homogeneity (vs. heterogeneity) of a group, that is, the distribution of personality types within the group. In the following diagram, group A is depicted as having a homogeneous composition of members with an "open" personality structure, while group B has members with a "closed" personality structure; in both cases, however, the homogeneity is equivalent:




As can be seen, group A is composed of three individuals whose personality structure is similar in that the outer, peripheral areas are accessible to interaction, whereas in group B, the three individuals share the similarity of being accessible to each other at the most peripheral region only, as shown by the shaded area. Lewin was particularly interested in how the group as a whole becomes itself a region ("group") containing sub-regions ("members"), and how the composition of sub-regions (personality of members) thus forms the character of the group region. For example, how does communication within a group vary as a result of homogeneity, size, and situation? Are there optimal arrangements possible which improve communication and task effectiveness? Manipulating group composition, size, and situation thus become major independent variables for action research.

 

Here is a prediction: individuals who exhibit a more open personality structure are more likely to be affected by a change in situational factors than individuals whose outer personality layers are less accessible. This can be diagrammed as follows:




The diagram depicts a greater movement in A than in B (longer arrow) as a result of a change in the situation (I to II). Lewin argues that A changes more than B because he is more open or accessible to outer influences; where- as B tends to carry within his internal personality characteristics, being more fixed, less influencible by situational changes or interventions.

 

Lewin noted that when a number of individuals get together as a group there emerges as a result of the group status, a new element of force or influence called group values and group standards. These are held together or unified into a system ("group region") through a psychological milieu called belongingness. By accepting belongingness to a group, the individual member at the same time accepts a new system of values, beliefs, and standards (norms of behavior, rules, expectations). This group identification is also referred to as a we-feeling - exploited in many group situations where belongingness becomes a force or pressure acting upon the individual to change in a particular direction (e.g. Alcoholic Anonymous, political conventions, religious revivals, organizational morale, etc.).

 

A prototype experiment based on the above-conceptions is that of R. Lippitt and R. K. White, at the Iowa Child Welfare Research Station, and described by Lewin (1948, p. 73) as an example of "experiments in social space." Two groups of children, aged between ten and eleven, were assigned a task of constructing masks. The independent manipulation was set as the leadership style such that one group had a democratic leader, while the other had an autocratic leader. This meant that the two leaders followed opposite rules of interaction with members: the democratic leader initiated less actions than the autocratic leader, and as well, allowed group members to contribute to the decisions in the execution of the task. The interest of the investigators now focused on the dependent effects or consequences of type of leadership.

 

It was found that the democratic group atmosphere produced less hostile domination, less demands for attention, less hostile criticism, more frequent co-operation, more praise, more constructive suggestions, and more" matter-of-fact submissive behavior of member to member." In the autocratic group, two clearly differentiated levels of status emerged: the leader vs. the rest of the group; greater tension was observed; stronger barriers existed separating the members from the leader; individuality of members was less apparent, as was the we-feeling; little spontaneous sub-grouping occurred; banding together to exclude a particular-individual also occurred.

 

Of central importance in this study is the idea that the group effects that were noted were not attributable so much to individual differences in membership composition (personalities) as to the group atmosphere created by the differing leadership styles. In other words, individual behavior in a group-setting was a function of group milieu. Change the milieu, and you change the character of individual behavior, no matter what the individual personalities may be. Personal style and productivity in planning are thus outcomes of social climate. This sociopsychological view or, cultural anthropology, became Lewin's main theme in his action research: how to affect individual behavior and style of living by manipulating the group.

 

Clique Structure in Groups

 

Frequency of interaction is a "group parameter." Think of several groups you belong to: home, classes, friends, work, T.V. audience, and so on. You can rank order them on the basis of parameters such as size, composition, types of activities, and so on. Frequency of interaction is another: in some groups it is very high (ball games, cocktail parties, etc.), in others it is low (large lecture class, waiting in line, etc.). A general law accepted by social psychologists states that frequency of interaction in a group increases the likelihood of reciprocal attraction ("++" structures). This appears to be a very general principle of field theory and may be viewed as the sociodynamic inverse of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. As you no doubt know, the theory of universal dynamics requires that all isolated systems run down over time; that is, randomness increases and organization breaks down. Thus, it is necessary to import forces outside the system to keep it from running down. The opposite doctrine is posited in sociodynamics: individuals brought together by situational circumstances exhibit maximum disorganization in the initial phases of interaction. As time goes by and the frequency of interactions between them increases and cumulates, they begin to form group structures of the ++ type, thus increasing, not decreasing, degree of organization. In summary, physical systems tend to run down over time while social systems tend to run uphill, as it were.

 

Propinquity is a positional concept and expresses distance among the objects in a region. "Neighborhood" is one such instance of the field concept of propinquity. Whyte (1956, quoted in Newcomb et al, 1965) showed that residential layout in a suburban development is a major determiner of participation in social gatherings. Membership at various social events in a neighborhood--party, bridge, baby shower, gourmet society--tends very strongly to be composed of individuals who live next to each other, relatively speaking. Marriages in large cities tend to occur most frequently between men and women who live close together.

 

Demographic variables influence attraction structures, degree of inter- action, communication, and so on. Age, sex, nationality, ethnic background? neighborhood, schooling, major course of study, religion, family status, occupational prestige--these are some of the many population characteristics that help organize people's associations with each other, the probability or likelihood of interaction, and the type of attraction structure in interpersonal relationships (see Section 1).


The distribution of members' attitudes, interests, and values exerts a definite influence on the coalition structure in larger groups. It is said that birds of a feather flock together, and this sociodynamic doctrine summarizes the overall effect on group structure that can be traced to similarity of attitudinal expressions. "Postacquaintance structuring" can be predicted on the basis of "preacquaintance attitudes" (Newcomb et al, 1965, p. 317).

 

Finally, personal characteristics exert a strong influence on group strucutre and interpersonal relationships, as indeed we already know. Some traits are considered attractive, desirable, or admirable, while others evoke disapproval, rejection, or censure. "Popularity" is a group dynamic concept that expresses an individual's high attractiveness position in a group, and is based on the extent to which the individual possesses personal characteristics that are judged by group standards (norms) as desirable or attractive. Popular individuals tend to be focal points or leaders of cliques and are thus highly influential in group life.

In summary, group structure reflects the character of interpersonal relationships. These in turn determine attraction structures, cliques, and coalitions. These are built up over time as a result of continued interactions These interactions are strengthened and made more stable by frequency, propinquity, demographic overlap, shared attitudinal similarity, and perceived favorableness of personal characteristics.

 

Field Dynamic Theory

 

A central theme that-runs throughout this course of study is the idea- that community creates social organization, and social organization is or acts like a force field. This is the idea that we have tried to capture in giving it the label of sociodynamics. The idea that a-social environment is a field force was not invented by the producers of Star Wars: it is an idea popularized by Kurt Lewin, starting in the 1930's. It has become customary in textbook surveys to elect Lewin to the prestigious position of "founder of group dynamics theory."

 

Also mentioned is a mathematical system Lewin used, called topology, which attempts to deal in detail with the formal characteristics of the social field force. Lewin's writings include influential articles on "conflict resolution", "minority groups", "group morale", "social space", "cultural reconstruction", "acceptance of values", "action research", "conflict in industry." No doubt because Lewin was a refugee Jew fleeing Nazi Germany, his articles on "3ringing up the Jewish Child" (published in 1940) and "The Special ease of Germany" (published in 1943 shortly before his death) focus on the dangers to a society brought on by anti-democratic institutions. a result, much of the work of social psychologists since 1940 has been concerned with the issue of official authority and its manifestations in "blind" obedience, conformity, prejudice, propaganda, and class conflict.

 

Lewin is associated with two schools of thought in social psychology; one is cognitivism, the other gestalt psychology. The German word gestalt is usually rendered in English as configuration. This idea came from work done by German psychologist Max Wertheimer in perception. Wertheimer popularized the idea that we perceive wholistically first, and only later, realize the components as a result of analysis. This idea was considered radical because it went against the prevalent notion that "complex wholes" are built up from "simpler elements" - a position promulgated by the British associationists in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (chiefly Hume and the Mills brothers).

 

Lewin's theories reversed this trend and established through his- personal charisma and writings the wholistic or gestalt view, adopted subsequently by his many followers and admirers - Gordon Allport, Ronald Lippitt, Fritz Heider, Dorwin Cartwright, Stanley Schachter, Kurt Black, Roger Barker, L. K. Frank, John French, Leon Festinger, and many others whose names dot the textbook and professional literature (consult References in any Social Psychology textbook).

 

Lewin's holistic method of analysis carries him to the view that a society is a sociological region, a whole that encloses institutions and settings. Within this region, there are sub-regions marked off by boundaries, and each boundary encloses its own particular state of force or field. Thus, a dynamic tension is created between the sub-regions. This dynamics is understandable only if the overall region is taken into account as a context; the latter was called the "general cultural atmosphere" (nation, ideology, philosophy of life, etc.).

 

By "dynamics", Lewin meant in particular the characteristics of totality (i.e., as a system) and predictability (i.e., what leads to what). In the dynamic system of a community, Lewin sees a space of free movement, by which he meant to indicate the availability to the individual of channels of locomotion in three dimensions: bodily, social, and mental. He isolated two factors which produce dynamic barriers to locomotion across social regions: lack of ability and social prohibition (taboos and rulesl. Barriers or restrictions reduce mobility in space, across social groups, and in mental development. Boundary lines thus segregate individuals and affect their accessibility to available resources in the society.

 

These ideas are quite familiar to us through the social analyses we are exposed to in the mass media. We know, for instance, that the federal government, through its national legislation, is constantly attempting to democratize the boundary lines across social groups, to eliminate restrictions based on race, religion, sex, and age, and thus to make more resources available to more people. We have witnessed, in the experience of the current generation, federal legislation in education which attempts to remedy and compensate for the discrimination in employment against those whose "cultural- ly disadvantaged" environment has "robbed" them of the democratic right to opportunities for developing their skills and "intelligence" (or literacy).

 

I can recognize in these attempts the ideas of Lewin: the dynamic nature of society; nationalism as a general cultural force; the elimination of barriers against locomotion; the importance of cultural background on abilities; and the function of counter-rules (new legislation) to combat and neutralize social prohibitions based on group affiliation. As well, it is easy to notice the interplay of forces ("dynamism") when groups or "political forces" are in opposition against each other. Several cases come to mind from the current "national scene" (region): the anti-abortion movement, the pro-feminist movement, the repeal of legislation giving equal opportunity to practitioners of the "gay lifestyle," the fight against federal restriction on natural health products, and many more. In all of these events, we recognize the dynamic and wholistic social psychology of Kurt Lewin.

 

Topological Features of Group Space

 

Lewin's terminology gives us the possibility of analyzing in schematic form, some of the important (predictive) elements of behavior in social settings. Interpersonal relations, group forces, and personality structures are translatable through Lewin's system into diagrams that schematize the forces acting in a region, whether geographic (country, neighborhood, office), social (member vs. non-member of a group), or "mental" (cognitive dynamics - attitudes, preferences, problem solving style, etc.). We may familiarize ourselves with Lewin's topological system (geometric diagrams) by looking at how he takes the notion of social distance and gives it a strict operational definition in terms of these topological diagrams.

 

"Topological" is a word made up of "top" (= surface, e.g., the surface of the planet) and "-ology" (= study of). Topological psychology uses concepts from geometry and algebra, as does "field theory" in physics, geophysics, and astrophysics. In its non-mathematical version, Einsteinian Relativity Theory has been adapted for use in most sciences. Of close import to social psychology are the field theories of behavior in Lewin, Pike (Young, Becker & Pike, 1970), Barker ("ecological psychology", 1968), Ouspensky (1974), and Thom (1975).

 

The conceptual element that universally characterizes field theory is the relativity of basic forces acting upon physical bodies. This means (i) that physical bodies move as a result of forces, and (ii) that these physical forces are relative to time and space, i.e., sometimes they are felt "ON", sometimes "OFF". This relativity of the forces is therefore also a variability across time and place. Here lies the enormous utility of relativity theory, in that events in time and place as viewed by us, the participant-observers, are analyzable as influences coming from forces outside our region or sphere of perception and operation.

 

These basic forces may be seen to operate at either the-macroscopic level (time zones; eras; regions ) or microscopic (organs; genes; nuclear particles). For example, your mood today may be seen as a consequence of what day it is (calendar = macroscopic level) or, what you've ingested (digestion = microscopic level); the calendrical influence dervies from community life (workday or not) and the ingestive influence comes from planetary life (biology).

 

Both types of influences exert themselves through forces acting: in the field you are surrounded by, externally and internally. The notion that basic and universal field forces vary across regions (time/place "local" systems) and are therefore "relative" contains an apparent contradiction: on the one hand, the forces are universal (basic), on the other, they are also absent in some regions localized by time, place, and internal condition (or speed). We quite naturally wish to say, But if the forces are universal how can they vary with local conditions?? It is this very paradox that gives field theory its pragmatic power or utility because it leads us directly to the following, obviously useful, principle:

Movement and change within a system is influenced by independent outside pressures.

 

Some examples might help in understanding the enormous applicability of this principle.

In time keeping, the relativity principle showed why and how our clocks lost time so that, over the centuries, "leap years" were needed to keep the summer in June (northern hemisphere). Today, some crystal vibrations gives us a steady source of impulses that are "accurate" in millions of a second over centuries! The difference comes from the topological properties of clocks, the sun, and the motion of microstructural elements. In each of these three cases (regions; local conditions), the universal forces have been altered or made relative to the surface properties of the system: what appears to affect the clock and the sun's motion across the sky (gravity; speed; available lines of motion across the surface) does not appear to affect the pulsations of the crystal and its internal workings. The outside, independent, universal forces have been altered by the local conditions.

 

Now take an application in the reverse direction: local conditions have been altered by outside, independent, universal forces. Assume we are dealing with two independent systems, such as a central region, separated by means of a boundary from a peripheral region, thus.



Instances of this arrangement are familiar in everyday life. For example, you put something in a box, now it can no longer-be seen. The central region, or inside the box, is independent of the outside as shown by the fact that you can "hide" something inside the box. Ditto for any covering or boundary separator: skin; balloon; umbrella; etc. To get away from physical barriers, we can think of psychological ones: you bang up the car but you don't tell anyone. Here you are isolating a piece of information, fact, or item of knowledge, by enclosing it within a protected region, one that covers up the information.

 

The cover up is an act that is functionally equivalent to putting a thing in a box. Note that the boundary erected around a region (box; information) functions to alter the previous accessibility of the item. "I won't tell" and "Leave me alone" are psychological boundaries a person erects which function to reduce the person's accessibility. The opposite is true in "I like you" or "Oh, you went to Kailua Hi, too, what year?" where the speaker uncovers a boundary which makes him more accessible to the other person.

 

Lewin's system capitalizes on the topological (= lines of accessibility of "configuration") properties of psychological space as observable in human interactions. The idea that the same principles of dynamics govern the stars, the atoms, and the mind, is both modern and ancient. Many believe that mathematics is the universal language (notation system) that is capable of rendering the facts as they are, whether we deal with functional systems of numbers, particles, or emotions and imaginings.

 

Boundaries in Field Theory

 

The concept of "field" in field theory entails two necessary and sufficient features: boundary and tension. It is easy to see the universal applicability of field theory in our contemporary world. Thus, we conceive the universe around us as a space separated into regions, where each region is defined by a boundary marker or contour. For instance, if we look around us, the surrounds are populated by objects, and each object is separated from its surround by a contour, i.e. each object is self-contained. If we examine photographic preparations made through a microscope device, we see that the surface of objects is actually a composite of separate smaller objects called crystals, cells, molecules, and particles.

 

Each of these micro- structures behaves like an object in that it is self-contained, i.e. separated from the surround by a boundary or contour. Biological organisms are actually composites of smaller bio-chemical units such as cells, genes, and protein clusters. Cells are contained by a surrounding membrane, and objects within a cell are themselves contained by their own boundary membrane (e.g., nucleus, food particles, etc.).

 

There are several ways of demonstrating the field theory principle that a boundary sets up tension, and therefore, creates a field. One simple method is to consider the effect of semipermeable membranes. Cheese cloth and other separator devices provide common instances; if you force a liquid through such a device, the solid particles that are suspended in it (dissolved) separate out, letting some of them through, while keeping others on "the front side." The same principle is used when the fishermen make a net with holes of a particular size: the net sets up a boundary which separates relatively large objects (bigger fish) from small ones by entrapping the former and letting the latter "through." In general, any action of separation sets up a tension, i.e. a differential force which creates grouping, sub-grouping, selection, and interaction.

 

Gestalt psychologists Wertheimer, Kaffka, and Kohler have been influential in drawing attention to field theory concepts in perception. Their work, done during the first two decades of this century, is reported in most elementary textbooks in psychology. As you-may already know, they have explored in detail various phenomena of the perceptual field, such as "the laws of good gestalt": grouping, completion, figure/ground, phi-phenomenon, illusions, and the like. A simple demonstration of grouping is given by arranging dots in various patterns on the page, and observing the phenomenological effects that ensue:



In this diagram, six dots are placed in the box; there ensues a spontaneous perceptual phenomenon whereby we perceive the six dots as falling into two groups of three dots each. Note also that each sub-group organizes itself into a figure, in this case, a triangle. Though there is no actual contour for the triangle, the three points act as if they were joined by lines forming a geometric shape. To illustrate perceptual gestalt field principles, let us look at another illustration:



In this diagram (based on Kanizsa, 1976) you experience what has been called a subjective or virtual contour. Here, the dynamic properties ("tension") are apparently set up by the arrangement of lines: the S-shaped contour is the phenomenal resultant of the tension set up by the lines in the perceptual field. Another example of subjective contour is given by the "pressure" to complete the figure outlined incompletely:





In this diagram (also based on Kanizsa, 1976), you can observe the phenomenon of experiencing a subjective surface, i.e. the white triangle that appears to be superimposed on top of the partially completed triangle.

 

The preceding illustrations demonstrate the powerful effects generated by arrangements of visual shapes. They show that line boundaries set up tensions that create a perceptual field in which surfaces, shapes, and con- tours appear to interact and affect each other through laws of perception.

 

The term social organization refers to an arrangement of social objects. As in the case of visual perceptual fields, particular arrangements occur which set up a tension as evidenced by noticeable consequences in interaction and reciprocal effects ("forces"). We can illustrate these social facts by considering several examples from everyday life. One common example showing the creation of a social field through lines of separation is the phenomenon of erecting a physical barrier in a setting. A ball game setting is created by dividing the field of action into two sides or camps, and further sub- dividing each camp into smaller regions (e.g. goal line, scrimmage line, etc.) By setting up regions ("surfaces") marked off visually by boundary lines, and allocating differential rules within them, the tension of a ball game is created; the interest in any match that plays itself out, lies in the players' adjustments to the forces created by the differential rules that apply to each zone of play.

 

Another common example is the tension of forces set up in a social setting when new boundaries are introduced or old ones removed. For example, you spend half an hour in a doctor's waiting room. At first, you're alone in the room. The surrounding field is empty of other persons. You look around, read, slouch in your chair, scratch, etc. Suddenly the door opens, the boundary line changes, and a new person enters the field, and occupies a spot (chair). You immediately experience a change in tension: new field forces are now impinging on you. You show this in your behavior: you sit up, you smile, you inhibit scratching yourself, you talk. Your involvement has undergone a change as a result of the introduction of a new barrier in the field. Now the-person leaves the waiting room. A barrier is removed and your involvement and your behavior change accordingly.

 

Consider another common instance. Students in a large class are instructed to form teams. They meet in small groups of five in front of the class. The arrangement has now switched from one large audience-group ("the class") to a number of small teams. You are a participant; as you switch your membership status, you alter the social tension you experience. Your perceptions are affected, your feelings, your topic focus. Now the teams are instructed to choose a leader. Good luck, bad luck, or your own maneuverings land you the job; as a result, your status has changed. Your role behaviors are now called into play: your perceptions are switching focus, your interactions take on new patterns.

 

Now you might talk more and initiate more suggestions; as well, others' perceptions of you change as they view you in a more central position. Now your team is instructed to investigate the phenomena of social attitudes by expressing views, exchanging observations about each other, etc. The new task and topic introduce new tension; the forces show themselves in the group's behavior. For instance, individual A talks more and his interventions have an effect on others. Soon you observe a new social organization in the group: individual B openly supports A's actions while the others openly oppose him. Now your team structure has altered considerably: where there were four members and you, the leader, there is now a three-way split: you; coalition one (A & B); and coalition two (C & D). After a while, the teams break up and students resume their customary seats. Again the social field has changed: you either return to previous conditions, or else, you may have permanently altered the field as you've formed new relationships in the audience.

 

Multiple Membership in Groups

 

In actuality, a person belongs to several groups simultaneously. This may be portrayed as follows:



This diagram shows a person (P) holding simultaneous memberships in three groups: family group, professional group, and political group. An example might be "a Republican Doctor, father of two." Now one can derive various predictions: the person's life style will be affected by his simultaneous, multiple membership to the extent that we can note phenomena of role conflict, role strain, and role variation. This means that P's behavior will vary in expected ways across situations: as a family member, i.e. as father, P will exhibit such role behaviors as economic provider and parental disciplinarian; as doctor, he will behave according to the rules and practices of the medical profession; and as a Republican, P will support some candidates and reject others.


Within such a "life-space," P experiences forces and pressures that create tension towards particular goals. This may be represented as follows:



Here you can note P in a life-space (unshaded region) being subjected to various forces (arrows). The shaded areas a, b, c, d are inaccessible regions, thus, P is under tension because his needs are blocked and he is prevented from entering the regions where he would find satisfaction of his needs. The diagram depicts P in a situation where pressure, f, pushes him in the direction of shaded area + G, i.e. his "goal" (see larger arrow, f). Within this field-force, the person's successful adjustment to the situation depends on his ability to gain sufficient freedom of movement so as to satisfy his needs and reduce tension. This adjustment process will depend on the interdependence matrix of the group or groups P is a member of. In a marriage group, for instance, P's movement of freedom will be more constricted than in a political group, say:


Here,-the first diagram depicts two individuals who are very closely interdependent; they share peripheral (p), medial (m), and central (c) regions of intimacy, as in a marriage. The second diagram depicts a looser group of four in which the individuals share only peripheral (p) intimacies, as might be the case-in a political group. As a result, one would predict that tension in situation A, the marriage group, would be greater than in situation B, the political group, on account of the fact that freedom of movement for P is more restricted, hence providing less opportunity for adjustment. By the same token, certain other features of need satisfaction will be more easily met in situation A, precisely those which derive from interdependence, i.e. security, intimacy, affection, acceptance, trust, etc.

 

Field Dynamic Theory

 

Kurt Lewin popularized field dynamic theory in social psychology (1930's and 40's). His system was both "cognitivist" and "gestalt" oriented. Basic to this approach is the idea that social situations are perceptual "fields," and therefore a person's behavior is seen as an outcome of the sociopsychological "forces" acting on the person. Lewin's sociodynamics was three-dimensional, i.e. three kinds of forces act simultaneously on a person--bodily, social, and mental. Thus a person's behavior is defined as a movement or locomotion in these three dimensions. Barriers to locomotion are set up as a result of two causes:- lack of ability and social prohibition. These "barriers" are drawn graphically as boundary lines separating "regions" in space, and indicate restrictions to available resources in a society or group. This leads to the important principle that movement and change within a social system is influenced by independent outside pressures.

 

As well, movement in a region is affected by internal forces called "tension." Thus a boundary acts as a source of tension, i.e. creates a field of local forces. An illustration of perceptual field boundaries is given by the spontaneous organization of dots, lines, and contours ("laws of good gestalt"). Another illustration is the "action" created in a game region (e.g. football) when boundary lines are erected and appropriate rules of conduct are marked off for each sub-region (e.g. goal line). A third illustration is given by social interactions in a setting: as you interact with others, groupings occur; these groupings constitute new boundary lines that affect your subsequent interactions.

 

A person is typically a member of several groups: e.g. father, Republican, profession, etc. This state of "multiple membership"-creates role phenomena of conflict, strain, and variation. Thus, social situations are representable as regions in psychological space in which the sociodynamic forces of group membership and role create "needs" whose fulfillment depends on the resolution of tension and the re-drawing of boundaries.

 

Social Organization

 

Natural impulses seek expression. This is the meaning of "organism". A living organism is animated by bio-chemical reactions inside its skin-boundary called body. These bio-chemical reactions summate (miraculously!) into a "coherent whole" at the next level of existence: emotional life. Though emotional reactions are grounded in bio-chemical processes, their organization is not bio-chemical, as indicated by the fact that bio-chemists do not attempt to predict or control the behavior of organisms, but only the latter's organs. Instead, to predict and understand the emotional conduct of an individual, it is required to take matters up for analysis at the next (discontinuous) level of organization in the world, and that is social organization.

 

Social organization is an arrangement of relationships between members of a group. Among so called "solitary" animal species, social organization appears distant, such as some reptiles and insects whose members meet for restricted time periods (for parenting) but otherwise spend individual lives in solitary adventures. Social animal species, on the other hand, can always be found living together and forming relationships that endure over time. Therefore, social organization is functionally motivated by the existence of regularized relationships among members of a group. In other words, because relationships are formed by individuals, therefore social organization emerges as an environment or ecology.

 

Relationship activity thus gives rise to social organization. Action, reaction, interaction, transaction: these modalities of behavior are implicated in relationship activity. For instance, parenting is a form of relationship activity that produces protective, cooperative, and educative transactions between the members of the family unit. "Family unit" is a component of social organization, and you can see that it emerges out of the relationship activity of parenting.

 

Parenting, mating, playing and other role behaviors thus form the components of social organization. By examining the features of role behaviors in a group one can produce maps of its social organization. Such maps allow prediction of events in the history of the group. For instance, we sometimes find it impossible to recognize the adult individuals in an aviary since they appear to us identical in size, color, and appearance; but if we know some of their role behaviors, identification is instantaneously achieved by observing their transactions. Males mount and feed females among lovebirds and parakeets; mothers hang around the neighborhood. Mapping social organization in a group through identifying role behaviors allows us to predict events and relationship history: parakeet husbands and fathers in our aviary will not protect the nest box against occupation by third parties, while mother parakeets will fight rigorously and persistently when another adult female approaches the nest box area.

 

Male lovebirds, on the other hand, will vigorously attack any adult coming in the vicinity of the home box. Again, if you know that banks are closed on Sunday, i.e., if you have a map of the social organization of your community involving time and schedules, you can predict some behaviors: a customer will not go to his bank on Sunday though you may find him going there on other days; on the other hand, knowing that a robbery took place at the bank on Saturday night, you might predict that the manager will be found there on Sunday morning.

 

Role behaviors are recognizable when observing the behavior of a group on a regular, day-to-day basis. One keeps track of activity in the group over time, from morning to night, and from week to week. For instance, in our aviary, activity can be noticed to vary across several daily time zones as well as places in the birds' habitat. Mid-mornings, noontime, mid-afternoons, and night time are relatively quiet periods in noise levels and general movement. Within an active time zone, say early morning, the public places in the community support a great deal of mixing and interacting, as birds eat, exchange ritualized transactions, explore, fly around, play, chase, build, and so on. As you observe the on-going hustle and bustle, you note that some behaviors, such as fleeing, climbing, foraging for food, are engaged in by all the individuals, whereas some activities are never acted out by some individuals. You begin therefore the process of role differentiation by matching activity type with individual bird.

 

Again, as you enter an unfamiliar milieu, say an airport in a foreign country, your knowledge of social organization allows you to recognize role behaviors and thus, predict behavior: you see people in uniforms and other people; your baggage is lost; so, you approach a uniformed individual because you predict he'll be more likely to respond to your needs.

 

Role Behaviors

 

The concept of role has field dynamic properties that are familiar to all of us who live out our social existence in a community context that assigns to every individual all sorts of duties and responsibilities. Webster's tells us that "role" is either a part an actor plays in a performance or a function (office) assumed by someone. Tradition gives us in the concept of role, the idea that a person "rolls around" on the daily round: "role" comes from Indo-European *roto-, meaning running, rolling, and wheel, according to Webster's. Thus, a fellow who is a big wheel in the community can be expected not only to have big bank rolls stashed away, but as well, to play a central role in decision making.

 

In field dynamic terms, role is a functional feature of settings: role stands to behavior as force stands to movement. Social settings are demarcated regions where sociodynamic forces impart movement and change. The actors, participators, members, individuals form a population pool for fil1inq the positions (statuses): they are office holders in institutions and bureaucracies- the police officer, the teacher, the plumber, the father, the lover, the former president's neighbors' children's pet, and so on. For example, the institution of domestic pets creates positions that many individuals around us appear to fill so cheerfully: the role of neighbor to a pet family (What is your relationship to dog droppings on your lawn?); the role of loving parent to a cute puppy, the role of consumer of pet care services; and so on. Question: How does the social setting help organize appropriate behaviors? Answer: Through role prescriptions.

 

We are all familiar with role prescriptions. We learn them at home by watching parents and T.V. (imitation; modeling). We practice them with dolls, imaginary beings, and real playmates (role interactions). We are taught the rules, procedures appropriate manners, appearance, and decor, i.e., the rituals of the place (locale) when as children, we are taught to "behave": when as adults, we are shown the ropes and are expected to follow suit, i.e., to conform to our role; and when we get criticized for bungling the job by goofing off, doing the wrong things, failing to be efficient, in other words, found wanting in our role behaviors.

 

Social psychologists have examined role behaviors from the point of view of social relationships in groups. A role is a gestalt or whole that organizes many related as well as independent sequences of behaviors, acts, skills, and the like. Through social learning, imitation, modeling, training, conditioning, and other behavior influences, we acquire social competence, knowledge or rules, and habits of perception. From the moment you're awake in the morning to the moment you drift off in sleep, you are enmeshed with your various roles on the daily round. As the minutes of the day tick off, you move across physical regions, from boundary to boundary, and across psycho-social regions, from barrier to barrier, or access ritual to access ritual.

 

Whatever you do is always in a place and connected to some function that you fill by being there. There is no way of being anywhere without filling some role. This evidences the binding nature of social setting (or place): our behaviors, both voluntary and involuntary, conscious and unaware, are never solely centered in our thoughts, emotions, or imaginings--we are literally rooted to the roles prescribed by the position we find ourselves in; and there is never a time when we are free from them, even in our dreams.

 

I use the expression situated behavior or display to indicate that behavior is always setting bound. Field theory is based on the idea that all movement and change in a dynamic region is calculated as being the resultant of general forces set up by tensions produced when boundaries are established. For instance, you walk into class and look for your customary seat. Someone you don't know is already occupying it. You sit in another seat. The human barrier covering your territory has pushed you into another's seat. All of a sudden, you get up, pulled by the sight of the student whom you know is the rightful owner of the territory you're blocking. You look around, you can't stand still because the eyes around you penetrate your life- space causing a storm in your emotions. Finally you're saved: a friendly familiar face waves at you and points to the empty seat beside him. You bolt in that direction, catapulted by the repulsion you feel against standing there with the eyes upon you.

 

All social settings are thus dynamic regions in socio-cultural space. rhe space varies in a number of dimensions; for instance, geographic (your bed vs. the class), sensory (all the private things we sense from our bodies), motor (stone-faced vs. stoned face, for example), interpersonal ("the eyes" vs. being alone), motivational (involved vs. depressed), presentational (authentic vs. fake), and many more. How many and which? That's the question that concerns social psychology: in field theory terms, the dimensionality of social space is indicated by the available lines of movement, i.e., given by the topology of the setting, its surface features, its accessibilities, its access ritual, its role prescriptions, its sanctions, rewards, and contingencies as set up by consensus, agreement, contract, common sense, law and order, tradition, customs, rules, prescriptions, expectations, and all the rest that turns a mere place into a community daily round of roles within relationships.

 

I have discussed the effects that a group setting has upon its members. Thus, irrespective of the particular characteristics of the individuals involved, we note general forces acting upon the "interactants" merely because they are in role positions. Thus, whether A is talkative or quiet, a student or a professor, a mother or a sister, the sociodynamic influences deriving from the group setting will be operative: like attracts like, negatives repulse each other; frequency builds attraction; unconventionality gets rejected; and so on. In field theory terms, we can say that in sociodynamic settings, ethnodynamics becomes a context for psychodynamics. This principle thus allocates a structural arrangement between setting features ("ethnodynamic forces") and the role behaviors that occur in them ("psycho-dynamic forces").

 

Role behaviors can thus be studied independently of psychodynamics. A good instance of this principle is to be found in the work of biologists, in particular, the newer emphases in sociobiology (Wilson, l975). We have a backyard aviary in which a community of two dozen birds live, and share a daily round (see Bird Stories). On many occasions, we've had the opportunity of observing highly differentiated role behaviors on the part of individual birds. For instance, the role behaviors associated with the activity of parenting the young (socialization) give a visible organizing pattern to the conduct of the mother, the father or husband, and the other adults in the community. If you saw a lovebird feeding another lovebird, you can say with certainty that the two are related either in the role of female mate or unweaned child. This is because feeding is a role behavior performed by parent and male mate only: husbands feed mates and children; mothers feed children. One never finds a female mate feeding a male. Similarly, if you see a parakeet vigorously defending its nestbox, you can say with almost certainty that the bird is female, possibly, but not necessarily, a mother as well. This is because the male parakeet, as husband, father, mate, does not defend the nestbox against intruders. And most commonly known, if you see two birds copulating, the one on top is the male.

 

Thus, the ethnodynamic forces acting upon individuals occupying role positions on the daily round are quite visibly influencing their behaviors though we know nothing about their internal psychodynamics. This is equally true whether the ethnodynamic context is that of general species related behavior (as in feeding, parenting, copulating) or that of specific group related behavior. For example, if you note a change in the behavior of A towards B, you can conclude with confidence that there has been a change in the role relationship between them.

 

Thus, if parakeet A regularly feeds parakeet B, a youngster, and then one day, is observed to stop feeding it, you can infer that a change in their relationship has occurred. Indeed, as we have observed in-numerous instances, parakeet youngsters get weaned at one point in time, during which an unstable effect can be noted; that is, the frequency of feeding and approach behavior on the part of both parents gradually decreases; at some point, the likelihood of an approaching youngster being fed equals the likelihood of being pecked and chased away. This unstable pattern is naturally conflictual, but at the same time, instructive; very soon, the youngsters stop approaching their parents and start acting as adult members of the community.

 

Thus, role behaviors can be investigated within the context of a daily round and a pattern of relationships with others. Note that the investigation of role behaviors is possible only within such a context; merely observing the interactions is not sufficient. Their meaning or function can be derived only through the backdrop (setting) of the daily community round.

 

This field dynamic principle is easily noted when you travel or move across boundaries into regions that are unfamiliar to you. As a "foreigner" your position in the setting contrasts with the position occupied by "regulars.''


You can easily observe this effect in reverse when you consider the daily round of a tourist on Oahu: here, the other occupies the position of ''foreigner" and you are the "regular". Similarly, a new employee occupies a contrastive position to your own, as shown by the fact that you have to teach the person the setting rules (starting times, break time, work sequences, and above all, the distinction between what's required, permitted, and forbidden.) Inhuman groups, particularly in bureaucratic settings, this differentiation is mediated through language, oral and written. There are written rules and unwritten ones; there are official rules and unofficial ones. There are rules that apply to everyone-in the organization, and those that apply selectively (depending on status, relationships, seniority, etc.).

 

Status: Role Position and Role Setting

 

To illustrate the relationship between role behavior and role setting, we can contrast the behaviors of the members of a family (triad) at three different times of the day, thus:


This table represents a matrix of structural elements composing the gestalt of "family". Three role positions are evident; that of father, mother, and child. This universal theme plays itself out in contemporary America through unequal status on the daily round. Different role positions entail different role behaviors in the same setting. Here, time of the day is the setting parameter, though others could have been used (e.g., place, activity). Three time zones are sampled, and the activity engaging the three members are indicated. Box A in the table, contrasts roles between the two Parents in that particular household. Box B indicates overlap in type of activity, and box C shows a similarity in one dimension but suggesting differences in many others (i.e., differences in the manner in which they carry out the same activity).

 

Social psychologists use the term status differentiation to refer to the "hierarchical" relations one can observe among role positions in social settings. You no doubt have observed many types of hierarchical structures in settings where you are a regular: job, club, class, public places, and so on. For instance, you're on the phone with airlines reservations and you want a front row seat because your knee cast requires you to hold your leg as straight as possible.

 

The airlines representative informs you that there are no front row seats available. You insist on talking to "the supervisor." He gets on the phone and assures you the seat you want will be held for you. You have witnessed a very common consequence of bureaucratic hierarchies: decision making power varies with status differentiation. "Always get to the top" is a good advice when you want something accomplished which does not fall in the routine category. This is because bureaucratic hierarchies proportion power, or the ability to act, according to status: the higher a person's position in the hierarchy, the greater is his latitude for action ("discretion'').

 

Note however that additional considerations enter into this relationship. Suppose that, in the story of the phone call to the airlines, the Supervisor regretfully informs you that all the front seats are gone. You hang up, and call your friend who knows a sales representative in that airlines and promises you to call him. He phones you back half-an-hour later and tells you the seat is in the bag! You've witnessed the consequences of informal lines of power in a bureaucratic organization.

 

It is clear, then, that social settings are ethnodynamic regions demarcated by lines of relationships. These connections function as access rituals making available or denying rights and privileges in accordance with one's position in a network of interrelationships. You can inventory your connections by making a table as follows:

 

NAME

AGE

SEX

ETHNICITY

OCCUPATION

RELATIONSHIP

Martin J.
Rex J.
Buzz R.

Diane N.

etc.

66
10
+68

+27

M
M
M

F

Caucasian
Caucasian
Caucasian

Caucasian

Store Owner
Child
Handyman &

Contractor
Graduate Student

Assistant

Father
Son
Regular

Repairman
Work &

Personal


Data of this sort map your community connections. By inspecting such data reported by members of a group, many ethnodynamic effects become visible. For instance, data in the DRA contributed by students of this course, clearly shows the effect of demographic parameters on a person's connections. Thus, ethnicity is a primary selection factor for family connections (as you'd expect), for job connections (as you'd expect in many settings here), and for connections reflecting professional services (not as strong a relationship as in the first two cases--again, as you might expect). Age is a primary selector in connections reflecting socializing with (the young associate with the young) as well as for the category people I would ask for a recommendation (in the 50's for the latter vs. in the 20 s for the former, given UH undergraduates). With this category (...recommendations) both age and sex play a primary role: men in their 40's, 5C's, and 60's are most often mentioned (doctors, bosses, etc.). These relationships can be mapped in a matrix of the following type:

 

Category of
Connections

Dependent Parameters

Age

Sex

Ethnicity

Frequency

My Extended Family
People I Socialize With
People Influential on

My Maturity
People I Would Ask for

a Recommendation

etc.

o
++
?

++

o
o
?

++

++
+
o

+

++
++
-

--

 

You can note that the interaction effects between "category of connections" (the independent variable, here) and demographic variables appear in the intersections. A strong positive relation is indicated by "++", a weaker connection by "+" (reverse signs for negative relation). A zero indicates that no relation was observed ("mixed composition"), and the question mark stands for "insufficient data." The dependent variable of "Frequency" refers to the relative strength of the association as given by the Witness' summative assessment (i.e., a rating on "How well I know the person").

 

Communication Networks

 

Connectivity is a field dynamic concept; it measures the lines of accessibility in a region. A door or a bridge connect two geographic points and it is easy to see how it functions as a gate or boundary (barrier) for controlling access. Similarly, relationship connections reflect as well as maintain a person's access rights and privileges in a community or group. The way in which configuration of associations affects behaviors in a group can be made visible by mapping the lines of interactions in a group, i.e., its communication network (who speaks to whom when). For instance, Student Task Groups set up in this course during the Spring l978 semester varied in size and in acquaintance structure. Some task groups were small (N = 5 or 6) while others were more than twice that size; some groups had members who knew each other from outside class, others met only during infrequent meetings. The following diagrams depict three types of groups:

 




Group pattern I shows a network that reminds one of ''a wheel": there is a central position occupied by Person l; all interactions get channeled through this "strong leader" and no interaction takes place between the other four persons. This meant that much of the group's work depended on this one person When this person dropped out of the group, the network disintegrated and each student worked independently, not knowing what the rest of the group members were doing.

 

In pattern II, no one occupies the leadership position, but individual 2 has a slightly more central role in that he communicates with three members. Participant 6 is an isolate, being officially a member, but not attending meetings. Pattern III is more complex as is to be expected in a larger group. Three sub-groups are evident: (1 + 2 + 3), (4 + 5 @ 6 + 7), and (8 + 9), in which members interact only within their own sub-group. You can infer that individual 4 occupies a central leadership role in that he holds the three sub-groups together. Members 10, 11, and 12 are non-participating isolates. This group arrangement reflected the division of labor arrived at through consensus early during the semester. Each sub-group used its own self- designated tasks and allowed one person the role of informing the chairman of the group (4) what had been accomplished.

 

Besides group size and connectivity structure, an important factor that affects group climate is attitudinal distribution. This refers to the systematic variations observable along a convenient index, such as favorableness or unfavorableness towards group goals and events. An example is provided by the distribution of scores obtained on Daily Feedback Forms filled out by students of this course after each class. The following graph illustrates this point:

 




The four patterns displayed by four different students is evident upon inspection: Pl's attitudes are highly favorable through the semester, while P2 is consistently less favorable throughout. P3 begins the semester with highly favorable attitudes but gradually becomes more and more disenchanted; P4 exhibits the opposite pattern. As you would expect, the overall classroom climate will be a resultant of the distributions engendered and the number of students falling in each pattern.

 

Social Organization

 

From the point of view of field theory, systems are self-contained or "local" regions embedded in larger systems (called "surrounds"), which in turn are embedded in still larger, so-called universal (or "general") systems. The relation between systems can be either continuous or discontinuous. For example, at one level of systems, behavior is related to the biochemistry of organs, nerves, muscles; at another level, it is related to emotions. Thus, behavior is related to biochemical activity and to emotional reactivity, but the relation is discontinuous: emotions cannot be predicted on the basis of biochemical principles.

 

On the other hand, the relation between emotional reactivity and the expression of values is continuous: one is predictable on the basis of the other. "Social organization" refers to a system whose components are interrelated in a continuous fashion. These components are out- comes of regularized interactions between individuals sharing a daily round. We can say that relationship activity creates social organization.

 

Relationship exchanges can be classified functionally on the basis of "role behaviors." For example, parenting (a role behavior) creates the unit of "family" (a social organization unit). Knowing role behaviors in a community setting allows us to predict individual behavior; as well, it allows us to identify individuals (e.g. "since A did x, he must be the husband of B"). This matching of activity type (= role behavior) and personal identity is called "role differentiation."

 

Role is a functional feature of social settings, i.e. social settings specify the type of activity (role) that is appropriate for particular individuals (= role prescriptions). These role behaviors are learned in socialization through modeling, imitation, conditioning, and training.

 

The principle that behavior is a function of the setting can be phrased by saying that ethnodynamic forces ("setting rules") generate psychodynamic outcomes (role behaviors). The relation between the setting and the individual is called "role position." Thus during one's daily round, an individual moves from one role position to another as he changes places over time (i.e. as he moves from setting to setting). Role positions are organized in a hierarchical structure. Differences in hierarchical positions in a setting are referred to as "status differentiation." In bureaucratic settings, status differentiation is related to power, decision making, and latitude for action (e.g., duties, responsibilities, rights, and privileges).

 

Status differentiation can be expressed by mapping lines of relationships. For example, by listing all the people you know and interact with--i.e. your "community connections"--you are thereby making a map of status differentiation or role relationship. "Connectivity" maps out the lines of interpersonal accessibility in a social region; these lines of connections are also called "communication networks." The shape of networks in a group indicate the group's interaction structure (who talks to whom, when). Size, connectivity structure, and attitudinal distribution are three major group factors that determine social climate (= status, role).

 

 

Research Methodology in Avatar Psychology

 

Written with the collaboration of Dr. Diane Nahl

Virtual Intersubjectivity

 

Mental co-presence is a state of shared consciousness called intersubjectivity. Prior to the dying/resuscitation process intersubjectivity is co-constructed with others through the physical body and the digital avatar (e.g., computer mediated collaborative work and social networking). The material mind before death always identifies with either one of these two bodies. The physical body is made of chemical elements in solid and liquid form, while the digital avatar (and all its versions and alts) is made of information units in an electronic medium. When our mental body is in a state of sleep it identifies totally with the dream body that is rezzed in that zone of the mental world that supports the life of dream states.

 

When the identification of the material mental body with the dream body is loosened somewhat, it is possible to experience moments of being awake within our dream. In that case we are in a dual state of consciousness, aware of the experiences of the dream body, and aware of the experiences of the physical body. In this case the material mental body identifies partially and simultaneously with the physical body and the dream body. Similarly, when being absorbed with activity with the digital avatar in virtual world, the material mental body can identify partially with the avatar that moves around inworld, and partially with the physical body that is typing at the keyboard and watching the screen. This dual consciousness involves the physical and virtual world synchronously (simultaneously) and has been called the imago effect. It has also been discussed as “double consciousness during play” – see this video trailer of a conference of virtual world game developers: http://2007.sxsw.com/video/movie_window.2007.php?dir=2007_trailers&id=1098 

Here is a powerpoint presentation from that conference titled The Imago Effect: Identity in Games by Harvey Smith: http://www.witchboy.net/articles/the-imago-effect/

See also this blog’s summary notes of that game developers conference: http://hellonline.com/blog/?p=106

Here are some excerpts from those notes:

Games let you express yourself either intentionally or through customization. Players love self-expression. Game avatars facilitate self-expression.

Participatory culture reflects a primal human drive. The future is in more and more customization.

Some players assume a different persona. Some players express an idealized aspect of themselves.

Avatars and Archetypes. Avatars are masks. Looking into your imago (your idealized expression) People tend to gravitate toward repeating patterns – archetypes. Archetypes provide for easily differentiated roles.

The archetype IS the goal. Examples: Sam Fisher vs. Superman. People intuitively get archetypes, they already think along those lines.

What do players identity choices mean? Avatar choice communicates a sense of personal identity or mood state. No objective meaning. Helps the player develop an understanding of self.

Identity is multi-layered. Double-consciousness during play. What’s going on in the player’s mind while they’re playing? The immersive fallacy – the player is the character but they’re also themselves. Leaving a blank slate for the player to project onto.

Game characters allow us to temporarily restructure our view of self. Game experience can be intense and immersive but the avatar is still just a puppet. The player is aware of the avatar being a fictional construct. Many aspects to identity during game play. Player is aware of several things at once (achieving goals, own feelings, avatar’s feelings…)

Identity Absorption. Scott McCloud (Understanding Comics): My car becomes an extension of my body, it absorbs my sense of identity, I become the car. “She hit me! not “her car hit my car!

Identity is constructed. Judith Butler (Gender Trouble): Core aspects of identity are constructed. Coherence of gender categories seems natural. Constructed via repeated stylized acts. Establishes the appearance of coherent gender. Gender/sexuality are performative. Identity is constructed by repeated stylized acts.

 

The relationship that owners have with their avatar is a new kind of joint consciousness that can be called virtual intersubjectivity. People engage in real world social practices through the avatars and the virtual world in which these avatars “are born.” Avatars are real. They exist. People say, “Do you have an alt?” which refers to an alternate avatar. A human being can own or possess any number of alts, or alternate avatars. A human being has only one virtual world avatar and numerous alts.

 

It used to be thought that there were as many virtual worlds as there were games and software platforms and hardware interfaces. Each was a different virtual world, like World of Warcraft, Second Life, There.com, Uni-verse, Protosphere, Multiverse, move online, etc. (see Freitas). Today in 2009 you still need to acquire an avatar for each game platform you are interacting with. Things are beginning to change so that soon we will be able to use one avatar to move across all virtual world platforms. Then people will be conscious of the fact that there is only one virtual world.

 

Once you acquire an avatar you begin your artificial consciousness. Your avatar engages in social interactions with other avatars who exist in the same corner of the virtual world where your avatar is located. Avatars see each other and can inspect each other with powerful zoom cameras. In Second Life, all avatars have a name tag above their head. Clicking the tag or the avatar’s body, calls out a Profile window that contains information put there by the avatar owner. When one avatar is in the visual vicinity of another, the two owners can chat by text or voice.

 

Each owner sees only the other’s avatar. The owners don’t see each other. They can however communicate through chat and through instant messaging.

 

People now see a new consciousness which is synergistically produced through the computer interface. Our real world sensory-motor system is now no longer the origin or input of our consciousness. We are connected to the avatar symbiotically through substituting our real world sensory and motor activity, to the avatar’s world. The avatar is now symbiotically linked to the human being and serves as the new sensory-motor consciousness. This is an artificial or informational intersubjectivity that owners have with their avatar. The real world (RL) social interactions are now carried out through this virtual world information environment called Second Life (SL), which people around the world can access through the new socio-biological technology.

 

The purpose of avatar psychology is to describe this new individual avatar consciousness, and the new community consciousness that is currently beginning with our generation. The next generation in about thirty years will have far more advanced technology, including three dimensional walk through ‘holo-decks’ which will replace the current chat rooms technology. People will have an option of using the mouse-key technique of moving their avatar in-world, as we do now, or, they could don a digital wrap around and get to places by walking or flapping their arms like wings. They could also give a hug to someone who is half way around the world and is wearing a compatible digital suit. These “multi-modal” ways of interacting break the barriers of physical distance and ability limitations. For the first time human beings will have access to a new type of community consciousness that is based on the construction of an intersubjective consciousness that is independent of the physical body and the social identity that are locked in from birth and socialization.

 

Having real social interactions through an avatar is different from having real social interactions in the physical body, or what is called “face to face” interaction. They are both real but different due to the sensorimotor venue. With the physical body the interactions are context-bound, while with the avatar body our interactions are context-free.

 

Context-bound interactions are constrained by the real life setting features that are present in that locale, such as age and gender of the interactants, their relative status, their identity, the physical setting, social practices, legal rules, etc. In contrast context-free interactions are relatively open and exploratory, with built in opportunities to cross all the contextual boundaries of physical encounters. In their Profiles, it is common for avatar owners to write that “I am here to explore, to have fun. IM me if you want to chat.” Or, “I love to dance, to meet new people, to exchange ideas. I’m open to anything, as long as you are sincere.” Evidently it is a common practice for Second Life residents to seek each other out socially and to carry out joint activities.

 

In Second Life the in-world environment consists of individual islands and lands that can be rented or bought from the platform’s owners known as Linden Lab. Once you rent a piece of virtual real estate you can build on it. You can shop around to buy everything you need – houses, furniture, plants and trees, shop exhibits, animals, and media equipment to project your posters, photos, videos, iPods, or other presentations. You can announce the opening date of your shop, yard sale, skating rink, dance hall, or classroom, and other avatars will show up at your place. Residents use a Search engine to find things and a teleport facility to get anywhere listed on the virtual map.

 

This sophisticated virtual environment provides a virtual venue for context-free interactions between anyone to anywhere around the world. It is all free, except the Internet connection service to your computer. Two residents whose physical bodies are separated by thousands of miles can experience the intimacy of dancing together through each watching their avatar dance with the other. Avatars are animated by scripts that you can purchase and make available to any avatar located in a certain place. There is accompanying streaming music that one can turn on or off.

 

There are various ways of exploring this experience. In the first situation two strangers meet through their avatars and carry out an online relationship, which includes dancing together. In the second situation a married couple is separated through travel and they meet and dance in SL through their avatars. In a third situation a married couple in the same room each login with different computers and meet in-world to dance and other activities, meanwhile talking to each other from across the room.

 

The experience of meeting in online chat rooms is more restricted because there is nothing else to do there but to chat. In Second Life people meet in places to engage in activities such as walking together through a grotto, a shopping mall, a museum, or else, attending a class or a wedding party. Joint activities are possible only in the virtual world.

 

The virtual world enhances human opportunity by freeing people from physically inborn limitations to their appearance, and by liberating them from socially imposed limitations to their identity.

 

The removal of the usual physical and social limitations allows the exploration and emergence of interactional activity that is produced by different loves and interests than the ones one ordinarily pursues in the physical world. For instance avatars can simulate sexual activity with each other while the owners are chatting together. There is no risk of sexually transmitted disease. Attempts at rape, abduction, or violence are not effective because avatars can transport out of any place at any time. In this respect, women avatars are as safe in-world as men avatars.

 

Our loves and interests are organic operations in the affective circulatory system of the mental body. There is an endless variety of loves that are potentially active in the affective system of the mental body. This endless affective activity is maintained in operation by the inflow of mental heat dust (or “love substance”) that fills the mental world and in which our mental body is immersed. Similarly, there is a corresponding cognitive activity that is maintained by the inflow of mental light dust (or “truth substance”) from the surrounding mental ether atmosphere.

 

The love substance from the mental sun that we receive through the affective circulatory system supplies the mental “food” that the respiratory sensorimotor systems need to function. Our love or interest (A) energizes particular thoughts (C) that provide us with consciousness of the environment (S). When we desire (A) to establish contact with a friend we pick up the phone and dial (S) the right number (C). The act of dialing is through the neuro-muscular sensorimotor system (S). It is the effect caused by the knowledge of the friend’s number (C), and this knowledge is aroused and maintained by the desire to establish contact (A).

 

The desire or love or motive to establish contact (A) is an organic operation in the affective (A) system that is maintained by mental heat from the mental sun. The cognitive (C) knowledge of how to dial the right number is available through mental light from the mental sun. The consciousness of loves and feelings (A), or motives and intentions (A), is available through mental heat from the mental sun of eternity.

 

The activity of loves in the affective circulatory system is unique to each mental body and individual consciousness. The same mental dust particles of heat and light enter the affective and cognitive systems of each mental body, but there occurs an adaptation process that is unique to each person. Unique personality or self means unique adaptation to the same input. In daily life with the physical body people normally oscillate between undistorted and distorted adaptations to the incoming love and truth substance. We experience this in our material consciousness as mood swings between positive and negative mental states. In positive mental states we are conscious of being confident, happy, content, hopeful, effective, peaceful, altruistic, community spirited, striving to practice the personal virtues of honesty, sincerity, dependability, productivity, usefulness, and a commitment to rational and healthy lifestyles practices. These are the positive healthy “heavenly” character traits that correspond to the celestial order that is built into the mental dust particles of heat and light. Mental heat particles have a built in propensity or striving for conjunction with mental light particles that correspond or are compatible. This built in mutual attraction is constantly active in our mental body, resulting in the affective “circulatory” system to work synergistically with the cognitive “respiratory” system. These two together produce the activity in the sensorimotor “neuro-skeletal” system, which we experience as living consciousness.

 

Every love in the affective “circulatory” system of the mental body remains as unused nourishment in the blood. These are potential loves in endless numbers waiting to be born and live in consciousness. All loves exist and live in our consciousness, and nowhere else. Loves continuously strive to become actualized in consciousness, and some do and some do not, continuing to wait in “potential” form. Those that are realized are called consummated loves. These supply us with all the enjoyments and pleasures of living. Loves that come out into existence in our consciousness are those that we favor and cling to above other loves. It is our subjective attachment to specific loves that ‘make it’ into our consciousness where they are “consummated” in a variety of sensorimotor consciousness forms such as delight, enjoyment, pleasure, contentment, relief, “good feeling”, “being in heaven,” etc.

 

Every person inherits tendencies to favor certain loves and enjoyments. The list is long and different for each person. Think about the foods and tastes you enjoy and prefer. Many of them are inherited and you can observe a similar love with your family members and your larger ethnic community of origin. When you travel you can observe more easily how people who live together and intermarry, share similar loves for food, appearance, clothing, architecture, language pattern, recreation activities like dance, singing, and sports. These shared community activities and lifestyles are produced by their shared loves. There is an overlap in group or community consciousness through these loves and their actualizations in the consciousness of each individual, and in their living and interacting together.

 

Your lifestyle loves are inherited and acquired in your socialization. Some of these loves are “heavenly”  and some are “hellish.” The heavenly loves are undistorted adaptations from the inflow of mental heat particles into the affective circulatory system. The hellish loves are distorted adaptations from the inflow of mental heat particles into the affective circulatory system. People oscillate between these two types of loves, clinging in one moment to an undistorted adaptation to love, and to a distorted one in the next moment. One moment we feel hopeful, positive, and pleasant to others; the next moment we get a phone call, and suddenly we feel distressed, negative, and belligerent to the people around. One moment we are thinking about how somebody likes us, and we feel good, the next moment we think about how much money we owe on our credit card, and we start thinking about the negative consequences and how painful it’s going to be.

 

Undistorted adaptation to mental heat particles in the affective circulatory system leads us to think thoughts that are rational and consistent with positive loves, such as the love of building and benefiting community, the desire to maintain an altruistic orientation, the motivation to cooperate in the development and evolution of the human race towards ever greater perfection.

But distorted mental heat particles in the affective circulatory system leads us to think thoughts that are irrational and consistent with negative loves such as the love of benefiting self instead of building community, the love of egotism instead of altruism, the motivation to sabotage the evolution towards perfection by clinging instead to traits and enjoyments that lead to devolution and retrogression from more human to less human.

 

While we oscillate in daily life between undistorted and distorted loves, we are unable to clearly distinguish between what is heavenly and what is hellish in our own character traits. There is an inherited and powerful tendency for each of us to think of what we enjoy as being “heavenly” and good, and what we dislike or hate as hellish and bad. The only way out of this mental trap is to raise our material consciousness to rational consciousness.

 

Two discrete levels of consciousness are available to us through the sensorimotor “neuro-skeletal” system of our mental body. The lower form is called material consciousness (V), while the higher form is called rational consciousness (VI). After resuscitation a third level of consciousness becomes accessible called celestial consciousness (VII) (see Diagrams).

 

Second Life Affordances for Social Practices by Residents

 

Satisficing Affordances

Visual scenery and auditory sounds surrounding one’s avatar

Name Tag always in place above the avatar’s head

Visual appearance and movement style of avatars in that location (zoom available for inspection)

Ability to see the location of other avatars who may come and go

Seeing avatars who are grouping together, sitting or chatting, while others walk by like strangers

Information Note Cards from owner of an object or place to the visiting

avatar

YAH maps that also show the location of other avatars in that location

Division of Buildings, Malls, Streets, Lands according to Regions specializing in Services, Interests or Content

Profile information for each avatar

Receiving Newsletters, Announcements, and Invitations

Price information of items for sale in shops

Help instructions and Support Wiki

IMessaging text and voice

 

Optimizing Affordances for Normal SL Practices by Residents

 

Downloading the SL application for free and immediately becoming a

Resident, logging in and obtaining an avatar

Moving the avatar and controlling its direction and speed (also Flying)

Dressing the avatar and modifying its appearance, height, shape, etc.

Controls for camera location, zoom, and panning, using mouse and keyboard

commands

Teleporting the avatar to linked, landmarked, or mapped locations

Sending a teleport location for other avatars to appear together in that Location

Creating a Landmark (bookmark) at the location of the avatar

Joining Groups and Inviting Friends

Obtaining the Profile information of an avatar by right clicking on it

Typing or talking in private or public channels with Residents present in one area

Attending Conferences with other avatars by professional Residents such as librarians, designers, fashion consultants, models, motivational speakers, business meetings, etc.

Buying and selling SL currency called Linden Dollars

Buying things for the avatar -- clothes, skins, appearance, gestures,

emotional expressions, AOs, and HUDs which are attachments that provide special abilities, prims that are used to Build in SL objects, buildings, meeting rooms, oceans, fountains, movie theaters, gardens, classrooms, banks, etc.

Search engine by category including Daily Events and Showcases

Building things for avatars, donating them or selling them to other Residents for Linden Dollars (lands, buildings, malls, skating rinks for avatars, grottos, replicating virtual cities people can recognize and explore through the avatar, libraries, schools, credit courses, counseling centers, entertainment, etc.)

Teaching a classroom of avatars whose Residents are scattered at distant locations.

Using private and public IMessaging and voice chat with any Resident online

Project YouTube, other videos, or movies within SL

Show Web pages within SL

Streaming audio sounds, music, and radio broadcasts installed within each built location (shop, park, room)

 

Overall, SL is a technological affordance that makes it possible for real social interactions to take place. It is a multi-user virtual world that allows logged on users to interact with each other through the avatar affordance that each user is given. The visual screen appearance is that avatar interacts with avatar, but in fact it is a real user that is interacting with another real user through moving the avatar or camera movement, and through oral and written chat. These real social interactions in SL are governed by user practices throughout the spectrum of society in first life, which SL is modeling as a virtual environment for avatars controlled by users. Users care about what their avatar looks like and avatar fashion and shopping malls have a strong visible presence. Social identity in SL is expressed through avatar appearance, facial expressions, gestures, movement, grace, skills, and abilities. The motivation to acquire and maintain these avatar properties involves social interactions with other avatar owners. A new type of social interactionism takes place through avatars. I’m interested in research that can keep track and assess this new type of social interactions.

 

In previous research Nahl formulated a social biological perspective on technology. The affective and cognitive systems operate together to manage the sensorimotor system that is symbiotic with the interface. I started using this model to describe how we can better understand the human-computer synergy in the virtual world known as Second Life (SL). In my conceptualization the avatar is a substitute for the sensorimotor system in the physical world. Users in SL (called “Residents”) manage their avatars to transact with each other many types of everyday social activities such as walking in shopping malls and buying things with SL currency (called “Linden dollars”) that can be bought on Web sites or from banks located in SL.

 

The social biological technology seems to be more evident in SL because the avatar in virtual world replaces the sensorimotor system in the physical world. When visually observing what avatars are doing we can have an objective index of both the cognitive and affective procedures being practiced by the users who manage the movement of their avatars. Describing why the avatar is doing something gives an index of the affective procedures of the user. Describing how the avatar is doing something gives an index of the user’s cognitive procedures. For instance, suppose the avatar we are following around is sitting on a chair in a room with other avatars, including one avatar playing the guitar on a stage and singing, (which is a daily event in SL), then we have an affective index of the user who manages that avatar. The user’s cognitive activity is indexed by the details in the description we have when following the avatar, namely, teleporting to a known location with a landmark at a particular local time in SL (which PST), sitting on an empty chair available, turning the local chat and audio on.

 

The virtual world created by users in SL is dedicated towards replicating the socio-biological environment of “first life.” When users enter the world of SL they leave behind their ordinary physical body and social environment, and put on an avatar agent in a digital world. To put on the avatar users have to give up their physical sensorimotor system which ordinarily serves as the interface between the physical on the outside and the cognitive-affective on the inside. In the digital world of SL we need to put on a digital sensorimotor system, which is the avatar. Now we can see, hear, and touch digital objects in a 3D digital environment. Our affective-cognitive system on the inside is now able to operate in a digital world through putting on the digital sensorimotor system in the form of the avatar.

 

In SL users are creating an ever expanding social world in which they can live, be active, and operate through their avatars. Because avatars in SL are lifelike users experience a powerful urge or motivation to identify with the avatar and to reify the social world in which avatars live and relate to each other. One of the social practices of SL users is to personalize one’s avatar. Massive effort is exerted to manage the appearance of one’s avatar. A giant shopping industry exists in SL that caters to the appearance of avatars, including skin tones and shapes, body parts, clothing, fashion, accessories, etc., as well as to the appearance of the environment, trees, flowers, buildings, art, gathering places, entertainment, education, business establishments, etc.

 

Putting on an avatar sensorimotor system is an indication of the increasing symbiosis in the human-computer relationship. The social biological technology is becoming increasingly symbiotic as human life becomes immersed in the metaverse. The affective-cognitive system operating within is entering into a greater synergy with the outward physical technology as we continue to put on more digital sensorimotor systems. Studying how users behave through avatars in SL can give us better understanding of how to manage the growth of the expanding social biological technology.

 

Observing Stages of Acculturation
in Becoming a Resident of Second Life

 

Second Life (SL) is a Web based application that users download for free. It allows them to login and acquire an avatar that can be controlled by the arrow keys and the mouse. The avatar on the screen walks around any place in Second Life that has been developed for public use. Other avatars can be seen on the screen, each carrying a name tag above the head. One can obtain information about any avatar in view by right clicking on it and reading the Profile information that has been provided by the Resident who owns the avatar. Avatars can bump into each other or engage in written or voice chat. They can give each other objects such as a note card with information, items of clothing or furniture, or a HUD which is a device for making the avatar make gestures and move so that one can see avatars, alone or in couples, dancing to music that is broadcast at the place, or skating, sitting on a Flying Carpet that is used for navigating around a place, facility, or one of the many Regions of Second Life. Each Region and place within it has a Teleport location so that avatars can arrive to any place they wish. There is a search engine that provides teleport links, called SLURLS, to the search results. Avatars shop for avatar clothes using Linden Dollars that the Resident Owner can buy online at an exchange rate of 200 Lindens to one U.S. dollar (in September 2008). Avatars also join interest Groups whose members receive email announcements from that group. Random logins throughout August and September 2008 indicated that about 60,000 Residents are online at any one time. A total of 1.2 million Residents login each month.

 

The search engine in Second Life indicates that in September 2008 there were various Libraries active in SL. [add some more details here]. Businesses. Real Estate. Banks. etc. add some brief details]

 

The virtual world in Second Life is an intersubjective consciousness that mirrors the real world or “first life.” People joining in 2008 are pioneers. Informal queries indicate that most people have not heard of, and less have seen it. Thousands of people now sign up for it with almost no idea of what to expect. New user acquire their avatar at the first login and one is introjected suddenly into a new world that is fascinating to explore. The virtual world is so absorbing that users postpone taking tutorials, wanting to get going immediately, like new skates, or a new bike, or a car. For the next few hours of online presence users continue to explore haphazardly the control mechanisms by which they are able not only to move the avatar but to use it as a vehicle for social exchanges such as chatting, shopping, asking for or providing help, attending a conference, making a business sale, skating in a romantic park, etc. These social relations are integrated into the biology of the avatars. All objects such as shops, shoes, jewellery, skins, libraries, learning centers, beach side houses, classrooms, real estate offices, etc. are constructed by users and designers active in Second Life. Constructed objects called Prims can be copied, given, sold, and used for digitally building objects, buildings, shops, or parks, beaches, and lands.

 

The first few hours of becoming a Second Life Resident is a period of acculturation. Users learn by participating in the ongoing practices that create the meaningful and content filled intersubjectivity in this virtual world. Self-witnessing data (Nahl, 19xx) was used to analyze the stages of acculturation during the first few exploratory hours without tutorials.

 

Stage 1: Discovering the Noticing Practices.

 

When avatars arrive to the same location for a group meeting, they plop unto the scene from teleporting. Frequently an oncoming avatar plops on top of another, or in close proximity, either touching or nearly. When avatars “touch” their bodies overlap in various ways. SL social practices in standing and sitting distance, reflect those in the real world with physical bodies. Four categories of avatar distance are practiced by SL Residents:

Public distance:                       Beaches, fields, gardens, malls, streets, shops

Crowded distance:                  Inside smaller buildings or halls         

Together distance                    Group gathering, sitting in a classroom, having a dialog

Close distance             Landing on top of each other, dancing, skating, couple walking

 

Acculturating in SL involves becoming aware of noticing practices. These specific noticing procedures are performed through by owners through the artificial intersubjectivity they each have with their avatar sensorimotor interface. Avatars can see distance from each other and are expected to practice the distance categories in evidence to all. For instance, if an avatar plops on top of another avatar or rezzes too close, the “normal” behavior would be to move away as soon as rezzing is complete, an operation that takes between 4 to 10 seconds. I saw an avatar land on top of the desk in front of an avatar sitting on a chair at a conference meeting. He could be seen standing there for about 60 seconds, which of course was visible to all present. This was satisficed (SCA) by those present in various ways, e.g.:

“Why isn’t he moving away! What’s wrong with him?”

“He is not moving away. How annoying. It must be a newbie.”

“He’s still there. Probably he is reading the chat window, so he’s not aware.”

Newbies are recognized when the social behavior of their avatar is following a different procedure than the group norm in the setting where the interaction takes place. Noticing practices are cognitively complex and affectively urgent and intense for newbies, as well as for oldbies who are involved in a new bio-technical social setting.

 

Noticing practices are interdependent with cognitive and affective procedures, as is shown by the following data segments:

 

Feeling foolish for not seeing the Search button after months of use

Feeling foolish for not seeing the zoom slider on the Map window after months of use

Affective load in exploring Menus

Selective seeing to reduce affective load

Feeling uncertainty, doubt, confusion, frustration at the meaninglessness of explanations or names of buttons or options or tutorials

Motivated to note and process the name of avatars in close presence

Motivated to always notice how the avatar is dressed

Feeling embarrassed when forgetting to notice if Talk is being broadcast in a place

Feeling indignant that someone has declined one’s offer for Friendship

 

What is worth noticing is a satisficing issue whose limits are set by the social practices in any particular setting in avatar land. SL practices are different in public places, gathering places, libraries, or hosted socials. Each place or social occasion has associated with it specific “local” practices, as evidenced by examining discourse exchanges recorded in Local Chat windows. For instance, see this exchange.

 

Individual avatars recognize each other as belonging “together” for some particular event or social occasion. There is formed a self-consciousness of co-constructing a “group event.” This momentary avatar group intersubjectivity is added on top of the permanent individual artificial intersubjectivity each participant maintains with its own avatar. To maintain co-presence each avatar contributes to the developing group intersubjectivity. This requires precisely timed social interventions by moving, sitting, or typing into the common local chat window.

 

Since there is such a magnitude of issues to keep track of in the performance of group co-presence, the noticing practices of Residents in SL are very complex. Affective load is high because the emotional intensity and involvement are speeded up by the fast pace of multiple interactions in multiple windows simultaneously. The ongoing social practices determine the affective load and cognitive overload experienced in any one situation. Overall, the affective and cognitive load of owning an avatar and being a regular Residents, will be balanced out by the love and enthusiasm that Residents have for living part of their lives in Second Life. High positive motivation and reward counterbalance the relatively high affective and cognitive load involved in active participation.

 

Noticing practices in avatar land are operated within limits that are specified by satisficing procedures (A). The values (A) shared by participants for specific occasions and events (S), set evaluational rating limits for what is “enough” to count as ordinary membership by an avatar. This affective satisficing judgment (A) is practiced in common by participants, once they are acculturated Residents. Any avatar behavior or setting information that departs from this commonly held limit, is immediately noticed as abnormal. However variations within this limit are normal. For instance, one avatar may notice that another avatar has a new skin or different hair. Other avatars may not notice this because the personal change is still within the limit of what is ordinary. I once attended a discussion seminar around a table when in plops an avatar sporting large angel wings. He took several minutes trying to sit in a chair around the table. These inept moves were satisficed by the others as strange and somewhat annoying. At last the avatar shed its wings and sat in a chair. Carrying large wings to a meeting is outside the limits of normal behavior for that setting. Similarly, showing up at a dance gathering as a black cat or an egg plant is abnormal avatar behavior. Sanctions include being left alone, not being talked to, being asked to leave, being forcefully “ejected” from an area.

 

Stage 2: Discovering the Appraising Practices

 

How much are Linden dollars worth

When should I accept an offer of becoming Friends

Who is doing the talking to whom

What Region is this in

 

Stage 3: Discovering the Value-Attaching Practices.

 

Which objects are better designs so are worth more

How do others react when my avatar is just standing there

I enjoy the ambiance in this place. People are nice.

Some avatars are rude

Etc.

 

Stage 4: Discovering the Intentionality Practices

 

I need to get emoticons for my avatar

I need to make an outfit box that I can easily put on my avatar

I want to change the lighting to Daytime

I’m going to put voice chat on

I need to buy more Linden dollars

I’m going to join this Group

Etc.

 

Stage 5: Discovering the Planning Practices.

 

I can leave my avatar in this place for next time I log on

I will find out when they have the next tutorial on Building

I’m going to take a Snapshot of my avatar to upload to my Facebook Page

Etc.

 

Stage 6: Discovering the Executing Practices

 

People sometimes reflect on the rapid pace of life in the real world. As soon as they enter the avatar world of artificial intersubjectivity, people experience an increase in pace by a magnitude of 4 or 5. Avatars are much faster than our physical bodies. They run and fly through a street or large building, and they have a camera that owners can manipulate to explore objects from afar, zooming in, and going around corners and inside buildings. Avatars carry invisible HUDs and AOs attached to them by their owners, that offer a menu of choices in animating the movement of the avatar, such as gestures, facial expressions, stances, poses, rate of changing stances and poses, personal radar system that displays the names of and distances of all avatars within a specified range. There are also rules to keep track as each place an avatar teleports to, has local rules regarding behavior of avatars in public places, including displaying weapons, griefing or interfering with the motion of other avatars in range, flying, building, etc.

 

These are only some of the things the avatar owner needs to keep track in the artificial intersubjectivity, so that the rate of information processing with artificial intersubjectivity is more intense both cognitively and affectively. Additional cost in affective and cognitive load is experienced with multiplication factors or intensifiers such as the social demands of the situation in which the avatar is present. For instance, it is a common practice in gatherings or meetings to use the Local Chat window, so that whatever anyone types appears on the screen of everyone in range. This results in a crisscross of dialog, or multilogue, which requires the participants to keep track of several topical development strings simultaneously, and respond appropriately to satisfice the practices of sociality and budding friendships. There are even additional simultaneous dialogs going on in separate chat windows, that are dyadic or personal, being seen only on the screens of the two participants. The separate chat windows are separated by Tabs indicating the other’s avatar name.

 

Participants have to keep track of all these strings of topic exchanges, public and dyadic, and not make mistakes in sending a comment to the wrong window, which can be embarrassing and a social faux pas, perhaps even an offense. Happily, chat windows can be saved so that avatar owners can later go over them at leisure. Some things need to be answered immediately. For example, in a group gathering where avatars have been present for awhile, an offer of friendship to someone present can be answered within two or three seconds. If the answer does not arrive back quickly, or very quickly, there is present a disturbing ambiguity of information, as exemplified in these self-witnessing data fragments:

Cynthia didn’t answer (S) my offer (S)for friendship. I’m wondering (A) why she hasn’t (C)?

Arnold declined (S) my offer (S) of friendship. I wonder (A) what’s (C) wrong?

Shall I (A) offer friendship (S) to her (C)? I don’t know (A). I better (A) wait (CS).

He offered(S) me (S) friendship (C), but (C) I declined (S). Didn’t know enough about him (CA).

Well (A) if (C) she offered (S) me friendship(C), I’d accept (A) right away (S).

 

 

Data Gathering Form Using the Model of Social-Biological Technology

 

The six Stages discussed above can be assessed by this concurrent self report form.

 

Switch between your SL browser and your word processor as you accomplish an intended task inworld, or as you explore places and activities. Answer each question by describing what actually is happening in the event in terms of your perceptions, thoughts, reactions, and intentions. Sometimes you need to reconstruct what happened by redoing it and noticing the same thing as you experience it the second time.

Avatar Psychology Self-Witnessing Report

From: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy29/avatar-psychology-g29.htm

 

Date and SL Time:____________

Episode 1: You are doing something and you notice something.

E.g.: You teleport to a gathering and you land on top of one the avatars standing there.

  1. Noticing:
    Describe what you noticed. How did it come to your attention? Were you looking for it or was it unexpected and new? What were you doing when it came to your attention?

E.g.: The other avatar was just standing in the middle of the landing platform. You’re supposed to move away immediately after you land. My avatar was still ruthing, but I could clearly see the other avatar.

  1. Appraising:
    Explain what you made of it when you first noticed it. What meaning did you make of it? How did you interpret it?

E.g.: I landed on top of the other avatar. It’s an expected event when avatars arrive to the same place at the same time using the identical teleport address.

  1. Value Attaching:
    How did you evaluate it? Give answers to each of the following explaining why: Is it something useful to you or not? Are you surprised or not? Are you pleased or not? Are you grateful or not? Is it something you feel like telling others about it or not? Use  rating scales.

E.g.: On a 1 to 10 scale:
Embarrassing:                                    5
Humiliating:                                        4
Aversiveness:                                       6
Urgency:                                             7
Worried what others would think:       8
Other?:                                               

I felt humiliated and wanted to repair the situation urgently and immediately. I was afraid what other might think about me because of it.

  1. Intending:
    What intention are you forming as a result of evaluating it? Give answers to each of the following explaining why. Do you have the desire to do something about it? Do you intend to behave differently now? Are you motivated to do something with it? Use rating scales.

E.g.:
I need to act instantly.
I need to do something about it now.
Quick, what do I need to do.

 

  1. Planning:
    Do you have a plan to do something about it now or in the future? Do you know a strategy by which to proceed? Will you be seeking more information for this plan?

E.g.:
I need to move away.
I need to hold the arrow key down.
I need to apologize in the chat window.

  1. Executing:
    Describe how you engage the system using its optimizing affordances. What do you do in the interaction with the system – select options, press keys, give commands, search somewhere else?

E.g.:
Press the upper arrow, hold it down till I move out of the way.
Type “So sorry” in the local chat window.

Add additional comments and explanations here:

 

(end)

===========================================

 

Social-Biological Features of Second Life